scholarly journals ‘What Festivals of Atonement, What Sacred Games We have to Invent’ (Friedrich Nietzsche): Modernist Tragedy after the Death of God

2019 ◽  
pp. 176-198
2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (123) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Evaldo Sampaio

Trata-se de examinar a parábola da Morte de Deus enquanto uma crítica do conhecimento. Seguindo-se sua formulação na filosofia de Friedrich Nietzsche, pretende-se identificar a constituição do que se designa por epistemologia divina, sua ascensão e agora declarado declínio. Para tanto, caracteriza-se a singularidade do tipo de abordagem que Nietzsche concede à questão e se discute sua probidade. Entende-se que tal investigação pode fornecer recursos conceituais para debates contemporâneos nos quais, como se sugere, ocultam-se estruturas morais e cognitivas que reforçam aquilo que se propõem a abandonar.Abstract: The article examines the parable of the Death of God as an epistemological issue. In order to achieve this purpose, the work tries to identify in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy the constitution of what could be called divine epistemology, its rise and current decline. To do so, the singularity of Nietzsche’s approach to the issue is characterized and its consistence discussed. It is understood that such investigation can supply conceptual resources for a contemporary debate in which, as suggested, cognitive and moral structures are hidden that reinforce what is to be abandoned.


Author(s):  
Bruce Ledewitz

There has been a breakdown in American public life that no election can fix. Americans cannot even converse about politics. All the usual explanations for our condition have failed to make things better. Bruce Ledewitz shows that America is living with the consequences of the Death of God, which Friedrich Nietzsche knew would be momentous and irreversible. God was this culture’s story of the meaning of our lives. Even atheists had substitutes for God, like inevitable progress. Now we have no story and do not even think about the nature of reality. That is why we are angry and despairing. America’s future requires that we begin a new story by each of us asking a question posed by theologian Bernard Lonergan: Is the universe on our side? When we commit to live honestly and fully by our answer to that question, even if our immediate answer is no, America will begin to heal. Beyond that, pondering the question of the universe will allow us to see that there is more to the universe than blind forces and dead matter. Guided by the naturalism of Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy, and the historical faith of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., we can learn to trust that the universe bends toward justice and our welfare. That conclusion will complete our healing and restore faith in American public life. We can live without God, but not without thinking about holiness in the universe.


2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-151
Author(s):  
Mads Peter Karlsen

This article discusses the question of the influence and potential of Christianity in contemporary secularized culture. I take as my starting point the twofold thesis that ‘God is dead’ and ‘Christianity survived the death of God’. In section 1 and 2 I demonstrate how Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault have elaborated this thesis in a somewhat similar manner by criticising the ideological workings of what in the words of Nietzsche could be called the Christian ‘will to truth’. In section 3 I argue that Slavoj Žižek’s recent engagement with theology allow for another reading of the Christian truth-seeking, which in contrast brings out a potential for a critique of ideology. The difference between these two readings can be summarized as two interpretations of the famous words in The Gospel of John, “you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” Thus, Christianity does not only entail the suppressive danger of an obligation to tell the truth about oneself at any prize, it also offers the liberating prospective in being true to the manifestation of the death of God on the cross.


Author(s):  
Frank Hansel ◽  

Well before Friedrich Nietzsche had Max Stirner with great Gestus shouted (spelled) out the death of God and pulled away the veil of the realm of spirits. Religion critique after Stirner, which follows a clarified Enlightenment, can thereafter for all intents and purposes be only of two sorts: On the one hand, to explain how mankind (has) created its’ Religion and its’ Gods: Gunnar Heinsohn settles this. And on the other hand to point out: Which functional equivalents are themselves found as (religious) beliefs of humankind - freely adapted from Feuerbach: The truth of Religion is the need for it. The free self after Stirner, that knows rationally of the non-existence of God, chooses for itself its’ own respective God, or, it being strong enough, can leave it also as is.


Author(s):  
Marcin Krupa

The paper analyses the concept of nihilism in philosophy of Frederick Nietzsche. Although it is one of the most important problems in late Nietzsche’s philosophy, it is worth pointing out that already in the early theory of tragedy, as presented in The Birth of Tragedy, one can find quite a few similarities to the problem of nihilism. Nihilism itself is defined in the paper as a challenge, as there is a lot of ambivalence in how Nietzsche describes it. On one hand he sees nihilism as a dangerous sign of a disease of some sorts, on the other hand he recognises it as a unique chance to overcome the crisis, in which we find ourselves today, amidst the “death of God” and the failure of old values. Nihilism can be therefore understood as a challenge or even an existential task, because although it is a sign of a crisis of contemporary culture, it is also the only way to overcome this crisis. It is through nihilism that it is possible, according to Nietzsche, to get rid of dangerous, metaphysical thinking still prevalent in our culture. Only through that it is possible to revaluate all the values, and thus create a new way of thinking, in which world and life gain absolute value through themselves, not through some transcendental, metaphysical values. This in turn becomes the lifeblood for an existential attitude of amor fati, which is an attitude of loving one’s own fate and full affirmation of life.


Author(s):  
John Marmysz

This introductory chapter examines the “problem” of nihilism, beginning with its philosophical origins in the ideas of Plato, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. It is argued that film is an inherently nihilistic medium involving the evocation of illusory worlds cut loose from objective reality. This nihilism of film is distinguished from nihilism in film; the nihilistic content also present in some (but not all) movies. Criticisms of media nihilism by authors such as Thomas Hibbs and Darren Ambrose are examined. It is then argued, contrary to such critics, that cinematic nihilism is not necessarily degrading or destructive. Because the nihilism of film encourages audiences to linger in the presence of nihilism in film, cinematic nihilism potentially trains audiences to learn the positive lessons of nihilism while remaining safely detached from the sorts of dangers depicted on screen.


Author(s):  
Vanessa Lemm

Readers of Giorgio Agamben would agree that the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) is not one of his primary interlocutors. As such, Agamben’s engagement with Nietzsche is different from the French reception of Nietzsche’s philosophy in Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Georges Bataille, as well as in his contemporary Italian colleague Roberto Esposito, for whom Nietzsche’s philosophy is a key point of reference in their thinking of politics beyond sovereignty. Agamben’s stance towards the thought of Nietzsche may seem ambiguous to some readers, in particular with regard to his shifting position on Nietzsche’s much-debated vision of the eternal recurrence of the same.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document