Enhancing of Nurse Interpersonal Skill Boosts Cancer Patient Satisfaction

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 326-329
Author(s):  
Ng Kim-Soon ◽  
Fadia Abdalla Musbah ◽  
Abd Rahman Ahmad
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. A19
Author(s):  
D Sat-Muñoz ◽  
L Balderas-Peña ◽  
U Palomares-Chacon ◽  
C Salas-Barragán ◽  
B Martinez-Herrera

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ignacio Arraras ◽  
Johannes Giesinger ◽  
Omar Shamieh ◽  
Iqbal Bahar ◽  
Michael Koller ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1195-S1196
Author(s):  
A. hadhri ◽  
S. Yahyaoui ◽  
S. zarraa ◽  
N. Ghaiet El Fida ◽  
M. khalil ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Dwi Susanti ◽  
Christantie Effendy ◽  
Sri Setiyarini

Background: Patient satisfaction in palliative care is an important dimension that can describe a patient’s experience acceptable of care. Patient satisfaction is used to evaluate performance and improve the quality of palliative care. Objective: This study aimed to know the description of patient satisfaction of palliative cancer against palliative care which has been given in IRNA I RSUP Dr.Sardjito Yogyakarta based on a ranking that includes 5 subscales of satisfaction in palliative care. Method: Type of research was mixed methods with sequential explanatory design, collecting data began from collecting quantitative data and followed by collecting qualitative data. Subject of study involved cancer patient in Central Hospital of Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta during September and October 2016 number of respondent was 48 patients and 8 participants. Sampling technique in quantitative research used purposive sampling, while the qualitative research used the techniques sampling criterion. Instrument used FAMCARE-P to measure satisfaction and the interview based on interview guideline. Quantitative data analysis used descriptive analysis and analysis of qualitative data used the content analysis. Integration of the results of quantitative research and qualitative used the joint displays. Results: Cancer patients have a high satisfaction on the subscale of support in decision-making with a mean (4,60±0,49), followed by a subscale of symptom management (3,96±0,42), communication and information (3,93±0,35), coordination and consistency (3,8±0,38) and accessibility (3,7±0,44). Qualitative research gained eight categories. Conclusion: Cancer patient satisfaction on palliative care was high with score on every subscales above mean score. Keyword: Satisfaction, Cancer Patient, Mixed Method, Palliative Care


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1540
Author(s):  
Umbarkar Prakash ◽  
Kannan Venkatesan ◽  
Deshpande Sudesh ◽  
Elenjickal Nikhil ◽  
Naidu Suresh ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 358-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wessels ◽  
A. de Graeff ◽  
G. Groenewegen ◽  
K. Wynia ◽  
M. de Heus ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1579-1579
Author(s):  
Divya Natesan ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Taofik Oyekunle ◽  
Aviva Emmons ◽  
Yousuf Zafar ◽  
...  

1579 Background: Telehealth (TH) utilization for patients at our cancer institute increased in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, however oncology-specific TH patient satisfaction is unknown. Methods: Monthly TH utilization at a single large NCI-designated institute from 3/1/2020-11/30/2020 was reviewed. Utilization was calculated as chargeable TH visits (new video, established video, phone) as a proportion of all consult/follow up visits. Patient satisfaction surveys for oncology TH visits for MD/PA/NP providers were reviewed from 4/1/2020-11/30/2020. Surveys were sent after every TH visit, unless the patient had a prior visit in the past 3 months. Percent (%) top box score (TBS) was defined as proportion of responses in the highest possible response category (i.e. very good). % TBS was reported for 14 survey items in 4 domains: technology, access, care provider (CP), and overall assessment. Satisfaction was assessed over time and according to patient factors: generation, gender, insurance type, employment status, and clinic site. The Cochrane-Armitage trend test was used to compare proportions of TBS responses across monthly time points. Results: TH comprised 21% (22,055/103,461) of all encounters in the study period. TH use increased from 9% in 3/2020 to a peak of 47% in 4/2020. In 11/2020, TH use was 18%. 28.0% (2,286/8,173) of TH patient surveys were returned. Multiple patient satisfaction metrics were improved over time (Table). Patients had higher satisfaction with phone compared to video visits with regards to technology (86% vs 76%) and access (80% vs 72%). Millennials (born 1981-1995) had higher satisfaction with access to TH (87%) compared to Gen X (1965-1980) (77%), Baby Boomer (1946-1964) (74%), and Silent Generation (1928-1945) (72%), however all generations had similar levels of satisfaction with technology (range 77-80%). Disabled patients had higher overall satisfaction of TH (82%) versus those working full time or retired (71%). Patients with commercial insurance had worse overall satisfaction of TH compared to other insurance types (65% vs 72%). Patients with encounters in genitourinary, thoracic, and endocrine oncology clinics had the highest levels of overall satisfaction (75%) compared to other clinics (69%). There were no observed differences in TH satisfaction according to gender. Conclusions: TH cancer patient satisfaction is high and has improved over time, however satisfaction differs by patient demographics. Further data are needed to best select patients appropriate for TH.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document