scholarly journals Why Does Aerosol Forcing Control Historical Global-Mean Surface Temperature Change in CMIP5 Models?

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 6608-6625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon D. Rotstayn ◽  
Mark A. Collier ◽  
Drew T. Shindell ◽  
Olivier Boucher
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Dominant Factor ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Enhanced Sensitivity ◽  
Aerosol Forcing ◽  
Global Mean Surface Temperature ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract Linear regression is used to examine the relationship between simulated changes in historical global-mean surface temperature (GMST) and global-mean aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) in 14 climate models from CMIP5. The models have global-mean aerosol ERF that ranges from −0.35 to −1.60 W m−2 for 2000 relative to 1850. It is shown that aerosol ERF is the dominant factor that determines intermodel variations in simulated GMST change: correlations between aerosol ERF and simulated changes in GMST exceed 0.9 for linear trends in GMST over all periods that begin between 1860 and 1950 and end between 1995 and 2005. Comparison of modeled and observed GMST trends for these time periods gives an inferred global-mean aerosol ERF of −0.92 W m−2. On average, transient climate sensitivity is roughly 40% larger with respect to historical forcing from aerosols than well-mixed greenhouse gases. This enhanced sensitivity explains the dominant effect of aerosol forcing on simulated changes in GMST: it is estimated that 85% of the intermodel variance of simulated GMST change is explained by variations in aerosol ERF, but without the enhanced sensitivity less than half would be explained. Physically, the enhanced sensitivity is caused by a combination of 1) the larger concentration of aerosol forcing in the midlatitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, where positive feedbacks are stronger and transient warming is faster than in the Southern Hemisphere, and 2) the time evolution of aerosol forcing, which levels out earlier than forcing from well-mixed greenhouse gases.

scholarly journals Time-Varying Response of ENSO-Induced Tropical Pacific Rainfall to Global Warming in CMIP5 Models. Part II: Intermodel Uncertainty

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Huang
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
El Niño ◽  
El Nino ◽  
Tropical Pacific ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Central Pacific ◽  
Global Mean Surface Temperature ◽  
Global Mean ◽  
Mean State

Anomalous rainfall in the tropical Pacific driven by El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a crucial pathway of ENSO’s global impacts. The changes in ENSO rainfall under global warming vary among the models, even though previous studies have shown that many models project that ENSO rainfall will likely intensify and shift eastward in response to global warming. The present study evaluates the robustness of the changes in ENSO rainfall in 32 CMIP5 models forced under the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenario. The robust increase in mean-state moisture dominates the robust intensification of ENSO rainfall. The uncertain amplitude changes in ENSO-related SST variability are the largest source of the uncertainty in ENSO rainfall changes through influencing the amplitude changes in ENSO-driven circulation variability, whereas the structural changes in ENSO SST and ENSO circulation enhancement in the central Pacific are more robust than the amplitude changes. The spatial pattern of the mean-state SST changes—the departure of local SST changes from the tropical mean—with an El Niño–like pattern is a relatively robust factor, although it also contains pronounced intermodel differences. The intermodel spread of historical ENSO circulation is another noteworthy source of the uncertainty in ENSO rainfall changes. The intermodel standard deviation of ENSO rainfall changes increases along with the increase in global-mean surface temperature. However, the robustness of enhanced ENSO rainfall changes in the central-eastern Pacific is almost unchanged, whereas the eastward shift of ENSO rainfall is increasingly robust along with the increase in global-mean surface temperature.

scholarly journals The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1630-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Andrews ◽  
Jonathan M. Gregory ◽  
Mark J. Webb
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Feedbacks ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Feedback Parameter ◽  
Surface Warming ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract Experiments with CO2 instantaneously quadrupled and then held constant are used to show that the relationship between the global-mean net heat input to the climate system and the global-mean surface air temperature change is nonlinear in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs). The nonlinearity is shown to arise from a change in strength of climate feedbacks driven by an evolving pattern of surface warming. In 23 out of the 27 AOGCMs examined, the climate feedback parameter becomes significantly (95% confidence) less negative (i.e., the effective climate sensitivity increases) as time passes. Cloud feedback parameters show the largest changes. In the AOGCM mean, approximately 60% of the change in feedback parameter comes from the tropics (30°N–30°S). An important region involved is the tropical Pacific, where the surface warming intensifies in the east after a few decades. The dependence of climate feedbacks on an evolving pattern of surface warming is confirmed using the HadGEM2 and HadCM3 atmosphere GCMs (AGCMs). With monthly evolving sea surface temperatures and sea ice prescribed from its AOGCM counterpart, each AGCM reproduces the time-varying feedbacks, but when a fixed pattern of warming is prescribed the radiative response is linear with global temperature change or nearly so. It is also demonstrated that the regression and fixed-SST methods for evaluating effective radiative forcing are in principle different, because rapid SST adjustment when CO2 is changed can produce a pattern of surface temperature change with zero global mean but nonzero change in net radiation at the top of the atmosphere (~−0.5 W m−2 in HadCM3).

scholarly journals Estimating the Impact of Artificially Injected Stratospheric Aerosols on the Global Mean Surface Temperature in the 21th Century

Climate ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei Soldatenko
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Global Temperature ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Solar Radiation Management ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Aerosol Emission ◽  
Global Mean Surface Temperature ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Global Mean

In this paper, we apply the optimal control theory to obtain the analytic solutions of the two-component globally averaged energy balance model in order to estimate the influence of solar radiation management (SRM) operations on the global mean surface temperature in the 21st century. It is assumed that SRM is executed via injection of sulfur aerosols into the stratosphere to limit the global temperature increase in the year 2100 by 1.5 °C and keeping global temperature over the specified period (2020–2100) within 2 °C as required by the Paris climate agreement. The radiative forcing produced by the rise in the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases is defined by the Representative Concentration Pathways and the 1pctCO2 (1% per year CO2 increase) scenario. The goal of SRM is formulated in terms of extremal problem, which entails finding a control function (the albedo of aerosol layer) that minimizes the amount of aerosols injected into the upper atmosphere to satisfy the Paris climate target. For each climate change scenario, the optimal albedo of the aerosol layer and the corresponding global mean surface temperature changes were obtained. In addition, the aerosol emission rates required to create an aerosol cloud with optimal optical properties were calculated.

Effective Radiative Forcing and Adjustments in CMIP6

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Smith ◽  
Ryan Kramer ◽  
Gunnar Myhre ◽  
Kari Alterskjær ◽  
Bill Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Aerosol Forcing ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
Contemporary Climate ◽  
Global Mean

<p>The effective radiative forcing, which includes the instantaneous forcing plus adjustments from the atmsophere and surface, as emerged as the key metric of evaluating human and natural influence on the climate. We evaluate effective radiative forcing and atmospheric adjustments in 13 contemporary climate models that are participating in CMIP6 and have contributed to the Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP). Present-day (2014) global mean anthropogenic forcing relative to pre-industrial (1850) from climate models stands at 1.97 (± 0.26) W m<sup>-2</sup>, comprised of 1.80 (± 0.11) W m<sup>-2</sup> from CO<sub>2</sub>, 1.07 (± 0.21) W m<sup>-2</sup> from other well-mixed greenhouse gases, -1.04 (± 0.23) W m<sup>-2</sup> from aerosols and -0.08 (± 0.14) W m<sup>-2</sup> from land use change. Quoted ranges are one standard deviation across model best estimates, and 90% confidence in the reported forcings, due to internal variability, is typically within 0.1 W m<sup>-2</sup>. The majority of the remaining 0.17 W m<sup>-2</sup> is likely to be from ozone. As determined in previous studies, cancellation of tropospheric and surface adjustments means that the "traditional" stratospherically adjusted radiative forcing is approximately equal to ERF for greenhouse gas forcing, but not for aerosols, and consequentially, not for the anthropogenic total forcing. The spread of present-day aerosol forcing has narrowed compared to CMIP5 models to the range of -0.63 to -1.37 W m<sup>-2</sup>, with a less negative mean. The spread in CO<sub>2</sub> forcing has also narrowed in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5, which may be a consequence of improving radiative transfer parameterisations. We also find that present-day aerosol forcing is uncorrelated with equilibrium climate sensitivity. Therefore, there is no evidence to suggest that the higher climate sensitivity in many CMIP6 models is a consequence of stronger negative present-day aerosol forcing.</p>

Effects of mesoscale ocean flows on multidecadal climate variability

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Jüling ◽  
Anna von der Heydt ◽  
Henk Dijkstra
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Multidecadal Variability ◽  
Global Mean Surface Temperature ◽  
Ocean Flows ◽  
Global Mean

<div> <div>Climate variability on decadal to multidecadal time scales appears to be organized in pronounced patterns with clear expressions in sea surface temperature, such as the Pacific Multidecadal Variability and the Atlantic Multidecadal Variability. These patterns are now well studied both in observations and in global climate models and are important in the attribution of climate change. Results in CMIP5 models have indicated large biases in these patterns with consequences for ocean heat storage variability and eventually the global mean surface temperature.</div> <div>We use two multi-century Community Earth System Model simulations at coarse (1°) and fine (0.1°) ocean model horizontal grid spacing and study the effect of the representation of mesoscale ocean flows on major patterns of multidecadal variability. We find that resolving mesoscale ocean flows both improves the characteristics of the modes of variability with respect to observations and increases the amplitude of the heat content variability in the individual ocean basins. However, the effect on the global mean surface temperature is relatively minor.</div> </div>

Simulation and Projection of Global Mean Surface Temperature Using the Empirical Model of Global Climate and Comparison to CMIP6 GCMs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura McBride ◽  
Austin Hope ◽  
Timothy Canty ◽  
Walter Tribett ◽  
Brian Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Empirical Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Climate Record ◽  
Global Mean Surface Temperature ◽  
Global Mean ◽  
Human Component

<p>The Empirical Model of Global Climate (EM-GC) (Canty et al., ACP, 2013, McBride et al., ESDD, 2020) is a multiple linear regression, energy balance model that accounts for the natural influences on global mean surface temperature due to ENSO, the 11-year solar cycle, major volcanic eruptions, as well as the anthropogenic influence of greenhouse gases and aerosols and the efficiency of ocean heat uptake. First, we will analyze the human contribution of global warming from 1975-2014 based on the climate record, also known as the attributable anthropogenic warming rate (AAWR). We will compare the values of AAWR found using the EM-GC with values of AAWR from the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble. Preliminary analysis indicates that over the past three decades, the human component of global warming inferred from the CMIP6 GCMs is larger than the human component of warming from the climate record. Second, we will compare values of equilibrium climate sensitivity inferred from the historical climate record to those determined from CMIP6 GCMs using the Gregory et al., GRL, 2004 method. Third, we will use the future abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols provided by the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) to project future global mean surface temperature change. We will compare the projections of future temperature anomalies from CMIP6 GCMs to those determined by the EM-GC. We will conclude by assessing the probability of the CMIP6 and EM-GC projections of achieving the Paris Agreement target (1.5°C) and upper limit (2.0°C) for several of the SSP scenarios.</p>

scholarly journals The magnitudes and timescales of global mean surface temperature feedbacks in climate models

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jarvis
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Deep Ocean ◽  
Ocean Heat Uptake ◽  
Positive Feedbacks ◽  
Heat Uptake ◽  
Global Mean Surface Temperature ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. Because of the fundamental role feedbacks play in determining the response of surface temperature to perturbations in radiative forcing, it is important we understand the dynamic characteristics of these feedbacks. Rather than attribute the aggregate surface temperature feedback to particular physical processes, this paper adopts a linear systems approach to investigate the partitioning with respect to the timescale of the feedbacks regulating global mean surface temperature in climate models. The analysis reveals that there is a dominant net negative feedback realised on an annual timescale and that this is partially attenuated by a spectrum of positive feedbacks with characteristic timescales in the range 10 to 1000 yr. This attenuation was composed of two discrete phases which are attributed to the equilibration of "diffusive – mixed layer" and "circulatory – deep ocean" ocean heat uptake. The diffusive equilibration was associated with time constants on the decadal timescale and accounted for approximately 75 to 80 percent of the overall ocean heat feedback, whilst the circulatory equilibration operated on a centennial timescale and accounted for the remaining 20 to 25 percent of the response. This suggests that the dynamics of the transient ocean heat uptake feedback first discussed by Baker and Roe (2009) tends to be dominated by loss of diffusive heat uptake in climate models, rather than circulatory deep ocean heat equilibration.

scholarly journals Estimating the Effect of Radiative Feedback Uncertainties on Climate Response to Changes in the Concentration of Stratospheric Aerosols

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 654
Author(s):  
Sergei Soldatenko
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Deep Ocean ◽  
Climate System ◽  
Ocean Heat Uptake ◽  
Heat Uptake ◽  
Global Mean Surface Temperature ◽  
Radiative Feedbacks ◽  
Global Mean ◽  
System Inertia

Using the two-box energy balance model (EBM), we explore the climate system response to radiative forcing generated by variations in the concentrations of stratospheric aerosols and estimate the effect of uncertainties in radiative feedbacks on changes in global mean surface temperature anomaly used as an indicator of the response of the climate system to external radiative perturbations. Radiative forcing generated by stratospheric sulfate aerosols from the second-largest volcanic eruption in the 20th century, the Mount Pinatubo eruption in June 1991, was chosen for this research. The global mean surface temperature response to a specified change in radiative forcing is estimated as a convolution of the derived impulse response function corresponding to EBM with a function that describes the temporal change in radiative forcing. The influence of radiative feedback uncertainties on changes in the global mean surface temperature is estimated using several “versions” of the EBM. The parameters for different “versions” were identified by applying a specific procedure for calibrating the two-box EBM parameters using the results of climate change simulations conducted with coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5). Changes in the global mean surface temperature caused by stratospheric aerosol forcing are found to be highly sensitive not only to radiative feedbacks but also to climate system inertia defined by the effective heat capacity of the atmosphere–land–ocean mixed layer system, as well as to deep-ocean heat uptake. The results obtained have direct implications for a better understanding of how uncertainties in climate feedbacks, climate system inertia and deep-ocean heat uptake affect climate change modelling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document