scholarly journals From CMIP3 to CMIP6: Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Blocking Simulation in Present and Future Climate

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (23) ◽  
pp. 10021-10038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Davini ◽  
Fabio D’Andrea
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Atmospheric Blocking ◽  
The Urals ◽  
Climate Simulations ◽  
European Sector ◽  
Global Mean

AbstractA comprehensive analysis of the representation of winter and summer Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking in global climate simulations in both present and future climate is presented. Three generations of climate models are considered: CMIP3 (2007), CMIP5 (2012), and CMIP6 (2019). All models show common and extended underestimation of blocking frequencies, but a reduction of the negative biases in successive model generations is observed. However, in some specific regions and seasons such as the winter European sector, even CMIP6 models are not yet able to achieve the observed blocking frequency. For future decades the vast majority of models simulate a decrease of blocking frequency in both winter and summer, with the exception of summer blocking over the Urals and winter blocking over western North America. Winter predicted decreases may be even larger than currently estimated considering that models with larger blocking frequencies, and hence generally smaller errors, show larger reduction. Nonetheless, trends computed over the historical period are weak and often contrast with observations: this is particularly worrisome for summer Greenland blocking where models and observations significantly disagree. Finally, the intensity of global warming is related to blocking changes: wintertime European and North Pacific blocking are expected to decrease following larger global mean temperatures, while Ural summer blocking is expected to increase.

Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking simulation in present and future climate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio D'Andrea ◽  
Paolo Davini
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Western North America ◽  
Atmospheric Blocking ◽  
The Urals ◽  
Climate Simulations ◽  
European Sector ◽  
Global Mean

<p>We present a comprehensive analysis of the representation of winter and summer Northern Hempishere atmospheric blocking in global climate simulations in both present and future climate. Three generations of climate models are considered: CMIP-3 (2007), CMIP-5 (2012) and CMIP-6 (2019).<br>All models show common and extended underestimation of blocking frequencies, but a reduction of the negative biases in successive model generations is observed. However, in some specific regions and seasons as the winter European sector, even CMIP-6 models are not yet able to achieve the observed blocking frequency. For future decades the vast majority of models simulates a decrease of blocking frequency in both winter and summer, with the exception of summer blocking over the Urals and winter blocking over Western North America. Winter predicted decreases may be even larger than currently estimated considering that models with larger blocking frequencies  hence generally smaller errors - show larger reduction. Nonetheless trends computed over the historical period are weak and often contrasts with observations: this is particularly worrisome for summer Greenland blocking where models and observation significantly disagree. Finally, the intensity of global warming is related to blocking changes: wintertime European blocking is expected to decrease following larger global mean temperatures, while Western Russia summer blocking is expected to increase.</p>

Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Blocking Representation in Global Climate Models: Twenty Years of Improvements?

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (24) ◽  
pp. 8823-8840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Davini ◽  
Fabio D’Andrea
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Atmospheric Blocking ◽  
Atlantic Sector

Abstract The correct simulation of midlatitude atmospheric blocking has always been a main concern since the earliest days of numerical modeling of Earth’s atmosphere. To this day blocking represents a considerable source of error for general circulation models from both a numerical weather prediction and a climate perspective. In the present work, 20 years of global climate model (GCM) developments are analyzed from the special point of view of Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking simulation. Making use of a series of equivalent metrics, three generations of GCMs are compared. This encompasses a total of 95 climate models, many of which are different—successive—versions of the same model. Results from model intercomparison projects AMIP1 (1992), CMIP3 (2007), and CMIP5 (2012) are taken into consideration. Although large improvements are seen over the Pacific Ocean, only minor advancements have been achieved over the Euro-Atlantic sector. Some of the most recent GCMs still exhibit the same negative bias as 20 years ago in this region, associated with large geopotential height systematic errors. Some individual models, nevertheless, have improved and do show good performances in both sectors. Negligible differences emerge among ocean-coupled or atmosphere-only simulations, suggesting weak relevance of sea surface temperature biases. Conversely, increased horizontal resolution seems to be able to alleviate the Euro-Atlantic blocking bias.

4. Modelling future climate

2014 ◽  
pp. 46-67
Author(s):  
Mark Maslin
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Emissions ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
Climate System ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

‘Modelling future climate’ is about understanding the fundamental physical processes of the climate system. Modelling future climate considers the carbon cycle, cooling effects, carbon emissions, and the complex three-dimensional general circulation models that examine and further our understanding of the global climate system and which are used to predict future global climate. Over 40 climate models were used in developing the IPCC projections for the 2013 report. The three main realistic carbon emissions pathways suggest the global mean surface temperature could rise by between 2.8°C and 5.4°C by 2100 and predict an increase in global mean sea level of between 52 cm and 98 cm in this timeframe.

scholarly journals Effects of a Warming Climate on Daily Snowfall Events in the Northern Hemisphere

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 6295-6318 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Danco ◽  
Anthony M. DeAngelis ◽  
Bryan K. Raney ◽  
Anthony J. Broccoli
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Northern Siberia ◽  
Northern Canada ◽  
Event Frequency ◽  
Snowfall Event ◽  
Frequency Changes

Abstract Using simulations performed with 24 coupled atmosphere–ocean global climate models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), projections of Northern Hemisphere daily snowfall events under the RCP8.5 emissions scenario are analyzed for the periods of 2021–50 and 2071–2100 and compared to the historical period of 1971–2000. The overall frequency of daily snowfall events is simulated to decrease across much of the Northern Hemisphere, except at the highest latitudes such as northern Canada, northern Siberia, and Greenland. Seasonal redistributions of daily snowfall event frequency and average daily snowfall are also projected to occur in some regions. For example, large portions of the Northern Hemisphere, including much of Canada, Tibet, northern Scandinavia, northern Siberia, and Greenland, are projected to experience increases in average daily snowfall and event frequency in midwinter. But in warmer months, the regions with increased snowfall become fewer in number and are limited to northern Canada, northern Siberia, and Greenland. These simulations also show changes in the frequency distribution of daily snowfall event intensity, including an increase in heavier snowfall events even in some regions where the overall snowfall decreases. The projected changes in daily snowfall event frequency exhibit some dependence on the temperature biases of the individual models in certain regions and times of the year, with colder models typically toward the positive end of the distribution of event frequency changes and warmer models toward the negative end, particularly in regions near the transition zone between increasing and decreasing snowfall.

scholarly journals Future Australian Severe Thunderstorm Environments. Part II: The Influence of a Strongly Warming Climate on Convective Environments

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3848-3868 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Allen ◽  
David J. Karoly ◽  
Kevin J. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Vertical Wind Shear ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Severe Thunderstorm ◽  
Warming Climate ◽  
Eastern Australia

Abstract The influence of a warming climate on the occurrence of severe thunderstorm environments in Australia was explored using two global climate models: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Mark, version 3.6 (CSIRO Mk3.6), and the Cubic-Conformal Atmospheric Model (CCAM). These models have previously been evaluated and found to be capable of reproducing a useful climatology for the twentieth-century period (1980–2000). Analyzing the changes between the historical period and high warming climate scenarios for the period 2079–99 has allowed estimation of the potential convective future for the continent. Based on these simulations, significant increases to the frequency of severe thunderstorm environments will likely occur for northern and eastern Australia in a warmed climate. This change is a response to increasing convective available potential energy from higher continental moisture, particularly in proximity to warm sea surface temperatures. Despite decreases to the frequency of environments with high vertical wind shear, it appears unlikely that this will offset increases to thermodynamic energy. The change is most pronounced during the peak of the convective season, increasing its length and the frequency of severe thunderstorm environments therein, particularly over the eastern parts of the continent. The implications of this potential increase are significant, with the overall frequency of potential severe thunderstorm days per year likely to rise over the major population centers of the east coast by 14% for Brisbane, 22% for Melbourne, and 30% for Sydney. The limitations of this approach are then discussed in the context of ways to increase the confidence of predictions of future severe convection.

scholarly journals Mean precipitation change from a deepening troposphere

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (45) ◽  
pp. 11465-11470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadir Jeevanjee ◽  
David M. Romps
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Precipitation Change ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Simple Theory ◽  
Radiative Cooling ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Global Mean

Global climate models robustly predict that global mean precipitation should increase at roughly 2–3%K−1, but the origin of these values is not well understood. Here we develop a simple theory to help explain these values. This theory combines the well-known radiative constraint on precipitation, which says that condensation heating from precipitation is balanced by the net radiative cooling of the free troposphere, with an invariance of radiative cooling profiles when expressed in temperature coordinates. These two constraints yield a picture in which mean precipitation is controlled primarily by the depth of the troposphere, when measured in temperature coordinates. We develop this theory in idealized simulations of radiative–convective equilibrium and also demonstrate its applicability to global climate models.

scholarly journals Mediterranean Precipitation Response to Greenhouse Gases and Aerosols

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Tang ◽  
Drew Shindell ◽  
Bjørn H. Samset ◽  
Oliviér Boucher ◽  
Piers M. Forster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Local Heating ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Radiative Balance ◽  
Precipitation Decrease ◽  
The Mediterranean

Abstract. Atmospheric aerosols and greenhouse gases affect cloud properties, radiative balance and thus, the hydrological cycle. Observations show that precipitation has decreased in the Mediterranean since the 20th century, and many studies have investigated possible mechanisms. So far, however, the effects of aerosol forcing on Mediterranean precipitation remain largely unknown. Here we compare Mediterranean precipitation responses to individual forcing agents in a set of state-of-the-art global climate models (GCMs). Our analyses show that both greenhouse gases and aerosols can cause drying in the Mediterranean, and that precipitation is more sensitive to black carbon (BC) forcing than to well-mixed greenhouse gases (WMGHGs) or sulfate aerosol. In addition to local heating, BC appears to reduce precipitation by causing an enhanced positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)/Arctic Oscillation (AO)-like sea level pressure (SLP) pattern, characterized by higher SLP at mid-latitudes and lower SLP at high-latitudes. WMGHGs cause a similar SLP change, and both are associated with a northward diversion of the jet stream and storm tracks, reducing precipitation in the Mediterranean while increasing precipitation in Northern Europe. Though the applied forcings were much larger, if forcings are scaled to those of the historical period of 1901–2010, roughly one-third (31 ± 17 %) of the precipitation decrease would be attributable to global BC forcing with the remainder largely attributable to WMGHGs whereas global scattering sulfate aerosols have negligible impacts. The results from this study suggest that future BC emissions may significantly affect regional water resources, agricultural practices, ecosystems, and the economy in the Mediterranean region.

scholarly journals Amplified warming of seasonal cold extremes relative to the mean in the Northern Hemisphere extratropics

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-111
Author(s):  
Mia H. Gross ◽  
Markus G. Donat ◽  
Lisa V. Alexander ◽  
Steven C. Sherwood
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Northern Eurasia ◽  
Health Tourism ◽  
Cold Temperatures ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Late 21St Century ◽  
Cold Extremes

Abstract. Cold extremes are anticipated to warm at a faster rate than both hot extremes and average temperatures for much of the Northern Hemisphere. Anomalously warm cold extremes can affect numerous sectors, including human health, tourism and various ecosystems that are sensitive to cold temperatures. Using a selection of global climate models, this paper explores the accelerated warming of seasonal cold extremes relative to seasonal mean temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere extratropics. The potential driving physical mechanisms are investigated by assessing conditions on or prior to the day when the cold extreme occurs to understand how the different environmental fields are related. During winter, North America, Europe and much of Eurasia show amplified warming of cold extremes projected for the late 21st century, compared to the mid-20th century. This is shown to be largely driven by reductions in cold air temperature advection, suggested as a likely consequence of Arctic amplification. In spring and autumn, cold extremes are expected to warm faster than average temperatures for most of the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes to high latitudes, particularly Alaska, northern Canada and northern Eurasia. In the shoulder seasons, projected decreases in snow cover and associated reductions in surface albedo are suggested as the largest contributor affecting the accelerated rates of warming in cold extremes. The key findings of this study improve our understanding of the environmental conditions that contribute to the accelerated warming of cold extremes relative to mean temperatures.

scholarly journals CMIP5 model selection for ISMIP6 ice sheet model forcing: Greenland and Antarctica

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 855-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Barthel ◽  
Cécile Agosta ◽  
Christopher M. Little ◽  
Tore Hattermann ◽  
Nicolas C. Jourdain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Selection ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Modeling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Subsurface Ocean ◽  
Spatial Domains

Abstract. The ice sheet model intercomparison project for CMIP6 (ISMIP6) effort brings together the ice sheet and climate modeling communities to gain understanding of the ice sheet contribution to sea level rise. ISMIP6 conducts stand-alone ice sheet experiments that use space- and time-varying forcing derived from atmosphere–ocean coupled global climate models (AOGCMs) to reflect plausible trajectories for climate projections. The goal of this study is to recommend a subset of CMIP5 AOGCMs (three core and three targeted) to produce forcing for ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet simulations, based on (i) their representation of current climate near Antarctica and Greenland relative to observations and (ii) their ability to sample a diversity of projected atmosphere and ocean changes over the 21st century. The selection is performed separately for Greenland and Antarctica. Model evaluation over the historical period focuses on variables used to generate ice sheet forcing. For stage (i), we combine metrics of atmosphere and surface ocean state (annual- and seasonal-mean variables over large spatial domains) with metrics of time-mean subsurface ocean temperature biases averaged over sectors of the continental shelf. For stage (ii), we maximize the diversity of climate projections among the best-performing models. Model selection is also constrained by technical limitations, such as availability of required data from RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 projections. The selected top three CMIP5 climate models are CCSM4, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, and NorESM1-M for Antarctica and HadGEM2-ES, MIROC5, and NorESM1-M for Greenland. This model selection was designed specifically for ISMIP6 but can be adapted for other applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document