scholarly journals Probabilistic Flood Forecasting Using Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor with Ensemble Weather Forecasts

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1379-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shasha Han ◽  
Paulin Coulibaly
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Short Range ◽  
Flood Forecasting ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Hydrologic Uncertainty ◽  
Ensemble Weather Forecasts ◽  
Range Forecasts

Recent advances in the field of flood forecasting have shown increased interests in probabilistic forecasting as it provides not only the point forecast but also the assessment of associated uncertainty. Here, an investigation of a hydrologic uncertainty processor (HUP) as a postprocessor of ensemble forecasts to generate probabilistic flood forecasts is presented. The main purpose is to quantify dominant uncertainties and enhance flood forecast reliability. HUP is based on Bayes’s theorem and designed to capture hydrologic uncertainty. Ensemble forecasts are forced by ensemble weather forecasts from the Global Ensemble Prediction System (GEPS) that are inherently uncertain, and the input uncertainty propagates through the model chain and integrates with hydrologic uncertainty in HUP. The bias of GEPS was removed using multivariate bias correction, and several scenarios were developed by different combinations of GEPS with HUP. The performance of different forecast horizons for these scenarios was compared using multifaceted evaluation metrics. Results show that HUP is able to improve the performance for both short- and medium-range forecasts; the improvement is significant for short lead times and becomes less obvious with increasing lead time. Overall, the performances for short-range forecasts when using HUP are promising, and the most satisfactory result for the short range is obtained by applying bias correction to each ensemble member plus applying the HUP postprocessor.

Predictions of 2010’s Tropical Cyclones Using the GFS and Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation Methods

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
pp. 3243-3247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Hamill ◽  
Jeffrey S. Whitaker ◽  
Daryl T. Kleist ◽  
Michael Fiorino ◽  
Stanley G. Benjamin
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Successful Testing ◽  
Gfs Model ◽  
Environmental Prediction ◽  
Statistical Interpolation

Abstract Experimental ensemble predictions of tropical cyclone (TC) tracks from the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) using the Global Forecast System (GFS) model were recently validated for the 2009 Northern Hemisphere hurricane season by Hamill et al. A similar suite of tests is described here for the 2010 season. Two major changes were made this season: 1) a reduction in the resolution of the GFS model, from 2009’s T384L64 (~31 km at 25°N) to 2010’s T254L64 (~47 km at 25°N), and some changes in model physics; and 2) the addition of a limited test of deterministic forecasts initialized from a hybrid three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3D-Var)/EnKF method. The GFS/EnKF ensembles continued to produce reduced track errors relative to operational ensemble forecasts created by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), the Met Office (UKMO), and the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC). The GFS/EnKF was not uniformly as skillful as the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble prediction system. GFS/EnKF track forecasts had slightly higher error than ECMWF at longer leads, especially in the western North Pacific, and exhibited poorer calibration between spread and error than in 2009, perhaps in part because of lower model resolution. Deterministic forecasts from the hybrid were competitive with deterministic EnKF ensemble-mean forecasts and superior in track error to those initialized from the operational variational algorithm, the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI). Pending further successful testing, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) intends to implement the global hybrid system operationally for data assimilation.

scholarly journals Hydrometeorological Short-Range Ensemble Forecasts in Complex Terrain. Part II: Economic Evaluation

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doug McCollor ◽  
Roland Stull
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Utility Function ◽  
Short Range ◽  
Deterministic Model ◽  
Ensemble Average ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Value Assessment ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Hydroelectric Reservoir

Abstract Two economic models are employed to perform a value assessment of short-range ensemble forecasts of 24-h precipitation probabilities for hydroelectric reservoir operation. Using a static cost–loss model, the value of the probability information is compared to the values of a deterministic control high-resolution forecast and of an ensemble-average forecast for forecast days 1 and 2. It is found that the probabilistic ensemble forecast provides value to a much wider range of hydroelectric operators than either the deterministic high-resolution forecast or the ensemble-average forecast, although for a small subset of operators the value of the three forecasts is the same. Forecasts for day-1 precipitation provide measurably higher value than forecasts for day-2 precipitation because of the loss of skill in the longer-range forecasts. A decision theory model provides a continuous-variable weighting of a user-specific utility function. The utility function weights are supplied by the ensemble prediction system, and the outcome is compared with weights calculated from a deterministic model, from the ensemble average, and from climatology. It is found that the methods employing the full ensemble and the ensemble average outperform the single deterministic model and climatology for the hydroelectric reservoir scenario studied.

scholarly journals Simplifying a hydrological ensemble prediction system with a backward greedy selection of members – Part 1: Optimization criteria

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2739-2782 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Brochero ◽  
F. Anctil ◽  
C. Gagné
Keyword(s):  
Computational Time ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Criterion Score ◽  
Prediction Systems ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract. Hydrological Ensemble Prediction System (HEPS), obtained by forcing rainfall-runoff models with Meteorological Ensemble Prediction Systems (MEPS), have been recognized as useful approaches to quantify uncertainties of hydrological forecasting systems. This task is complex both in terms of the coupling of information and computational time, which may create an operational barrier. The main objective of the current work is to assess the degree of simplification (reduction of members) of a HEPS configured with 16 lumped hydrological models driven by the 50 weather ensemble forecasts from the European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Here, the selection of the most relevant members is proposed using a Backward greedy technique with k-fold cross-validation, allowing an optimal use of the information. The methodology draws from a multi-criterion score that represents the combination of resolution, reliability, consistency, and diversity. Results show that the degree of reduction of members can be established in terms of maximum number of members required (complexity of the HEPS) or the maximization of the relationship between the different scores (performance).

scholarly journals Test of a Poor Man’s Ensemble Prediction System for Short-Range Probability Forecasting

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (7) ◽  
pp. 1825-1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Arribas ◽  
K. B. Robertson ◽  
K. R. Mylne
Keyword(s):  
Short Range ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Sea Level Pressure ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
To Come ◽  
Prediction Systems

Abstract Current operational ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) are designed specifically for medium-range forecasting, but there is also considerable interest in predictability in the short range, particularly for potential severe-weather developments. A possible option is to use a poor man’s ensemble prediction system (PEPS) comprising output from different numerical weather prediction (NWP) centers. By making use of a range of different models and independent analyses, a PEPS provides essentially a random sampling of both the initial condition and model evolution errors. In this paper the authors investigate the ability of a PEPS using up to 14 models from nine operational NWP centers. The ensemble forecasts are verified for a 101-day period and five variables: mean sea level pressure, 500-hPa geopotential height, temperature at 850 hPa, 2-m temperature, and 10-m wind speed. Results are compared with the operational ECMWF EPS, using the ECMWF analysis as the verifying “truth.” It is shown that, despite its smaller size, PEPS is an efficient way of producing ensemble forecasts and can provide competitive performance in the short range. The best relative performance is found to come from hybrid configurations combining output from a small subset of the ECMWF EPS with other different NWP models.

scholarly journals On the Impact of Short-Range Meteorological Forecasts for Ensemble Streamflow Predictions

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1301-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Thirel ◽  
Fabienne Rousset-Regimbeau ◽  
Eric Martin ◽  
Florence Habets
Keyword(s):  
Short Range ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Prediction Systems ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Ensemble streamflow prediction systems are emerging in the international scientific community in order to better assess hydrologic threats. Two ensemble streamflow prediction systems (ESPSs) were set up at Météo-France using ensemble forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Ensemble Prediction System for the first one, and from the Prévision d’Ensemble Action de Recherche Petite Echelle Grande Echelle (PEARP) ensemble prediction system of Météo-France for the second. This paper presents the evaluation of their capacities to better anticipate severe hydrological events and more generally to estimate the quality of both ESPSs on their globality. The two ensemble predictions were used as input for the same hydrometeorological model. The skills of both ensemble streamflow prediction systems were evaluated over all of France for the precipitation input and streamflow prediction during a 569-day period and for a 2-day short-range scale. The ensemble streamflow prediction system based on the PEARP data was the best for floods and small basins, and the ensemble streamflow prediction system based on the ECMWF data seemed the best adapted for low flows and large basins.

A Comparison between Raw Ensemble Output, (Modified) Bayesian Model Averaging, and Extended Logistic Regression Using ECMWF Ensemble Precipitation Reforecasts

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (11) ◽  
pp. 4199-4211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice J. Schmeits ◽  
Kees J. Kok
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Bayesian Model ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Model Averaging ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Model Output Statistics

Abstract Using a 20-yr ECMWF ensemble reforecast dataset of total precipitation and a 20-yr dataset of a dense precipitation observation network in the Netherlands, a comparison is made between the raw ensemble output, Bayesian model averaging (BMA), and extended logistic regression (LR). A previous study indicated that BMA and conventional LR are successful in calibrating multimodel ensemble forecasts of precipitation for a single forecast projection. However, a more elaborate comparison between these methods has not yet been made. This study compares the raw ensemble output, BMA, and extended LR for single-model ensemble reforecasts of precipitation; namely, from the ECMWF ensemble prediction system (EPS). The raw EPS output turns out to be generally well calibrated up to 6 forecast days, if compared to the area-mean 24-h precipitation sum. Surprisingly, BMA is less skillful than the raw EPS output from forecast day 3 onward. This is due to the bias correction in BMA, which applies model output statistics to individual ensemble members. As a result, the spread of the bias-corrected ensemble members is decreased, especially for the longer forecast projections. Here, an additive bias correction is applied instead and the equation for the probability of precipitation in BMA is also changed. These modifications to BMA are referred to as “modified BMA” and lead to a significant improvement in the skill of BMA for the longer projections. If the area-maximum 24-h precipitation sum is used as a predictand, both modified BMA and extended LR improve the raw EPS output significantly for the first 5 forecast days. However, the difference in skill between modified BMA and extended LR does not seem to be statistically significant. Yet, extended LR might be preferred, because incorporating predictors that are different from the predictand is straightforward, in contrast to BMA.

scholarly journals Decomposition of a New Proper Score for Verification of Ensemble Forecasts

2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 1517-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Christensen
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Ensemble Forecast ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Atmospheric Flow ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Medium Range

Abstract A new proper score, the error-spread score (ES), has recently been proposed for evaluation of ensemble forecasts of continuous variables. The ES is formulated with respect to the moments of the ensemble forecast. It is particularly sensitive to evaluating how well an ensemble forecast represents uncertainty: is the probabilistic forecast well calibrated? In this paper, it is shown that the ES can be decomposed into its reliability, resolution, and uncertainty components in a similar way to the Brier score. The first term evaluates the reliability of the forecast standard deviation and skewness, rewarding systems where the forecast moments reliably indicate the properties of the verification. The second term evaluates the resolution of the forecast standard deviation and skewness, and rewards systems where the forecast moments vary from the climatological moments according to the predictability of the atmospheric flow. The uncertainty term depends only on the observed error distribution and is independent of the forecast standard deviation or skewness. The decomposition was demonstrated using forecasts made with the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ensemble prediction system, and was able to identify the source of the skill in the forecasts at different latitudes.

A Comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP Global Ensemble Prediction Systems

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (5) ◽  
pp. 1076-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Buizza ◽  
P. L. Houtekamer ◽  
Gerald Pellerin ◽  
Zoltan Toth ◽  
Yuejian Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ensemble Forecasting ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Forecast Errors ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Prediction Systems ◽  
Environmental Prediction ◽  
Global Systems

Abstract The present paper summarizes the methodologies used at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC), and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) to simulate the effect of initial and model uncertainties in ensemble forecasting. The characteristics of the three systems are compared for a 3-month period between May and July 2002. The main conclusions of the study are the following:the performance of ensemble prediction systems strongly depends on the quality of the data assimilation system used to create the unperturbed (best) initial condition and the numerical model used to generate the forecasts;a successful ensemble prediction system should simulate the effect of both initial and model-related uncertainties on forecast errors; andfor all three global systems, the spread of ensemble forecasts is insufficient to systematically capture reality, suggesting that none of them is able to simulate all sources of forecast uncertainty.The relative strengths and weaknesses of the three systems identified in this study can offer guidelines for the future development of ensemble forecasting techniques.

scholarly journals Simplifying a hydrological ensemble prediction system with a backward greedy selection of members – Part 1: Optimization criteria

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3307-3325 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Brochero ◽  
F. Anctil ◽  
C. Gagné
Keyword(s):  
Computational Time ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Prediction Systems ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract. Hydrological Ensemble Prediction Systems (HEPS), obtained by forcing rainfall-runoff models with Meteorological Ensemble Prediction Systems (MEPS), have been recognized as useful approaches to quantify uncertainties of hydrological forecasting systems. This task is complex both in terms of the coupling of information and computational time, which may create an operational barrier. The main objective of the current work is to assess the degree of simplification (reduction of the number of hydrological members) that can be achieved with a HEPS configured using 16 lumped hydrological models driven by the 50 weather ensemble forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Here, Backward Greedy Selection (BGS) is proposed to assess the weight that each model must represent within a subset that offers similar or better performance than a reference set of 800 hydrological members. These hydrological models' weights represent the participation of each hydrological model within a simplified HEPS which would issue real-time forecasts in a relatively short computational time. The methodology uses a variation of the k-fold cross-validation, allowing an optimal use of the information, and employs a multi-criterion framework that represents the combination of resolution, reliability, consistency, and diversity. Results show that the degree of reduction of members can be established in terms of maximum number of members required (complexity of the HEPS) or the maximization of the relationship between the different scores (performance).

scholarly journals Constrained Quantile Regression Splines for Ensemble Postprocessing

2019 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 1769-1780 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Bjørnar Bremnes
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Quantile Regression ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Strong Wind ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Lognormal Distributions ◽  
Ensemble Mean ◽  
Quantile Regression Method

Abstract Statistical postprocessing of ensemble forecasts is widely applied to make reliable probabilistic weather forecasts. Motivated by the fact that nature imposes few restrictions on the shape of forecast distributions, a flexible quantile regression method based on constrained spline functions (CQRS) is proposed and tested on ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System (ENS) wind speed forecasting data at 125 stations in Norway. First, it is demonstrated that constraining quantile functions to be monotone and bounded is preferable. Second, combining an ensemble quantile with the ensemble mean proved to be a good covariate for the respective quantile. Third, CQRS only needs to be applied to about 10 equidistant quantiles, while those between can be obtained by interpolation. A comparison of CQRS versus a mixture model of truncated and lognormal distributions showed slight overall improvements in quantile score (less than 1%), reliability, and to some extent also sharpness. For strong wind speed forecasts the quantile score was improved by up to 4.5% depending on lead time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document