scholarly journals Subantarctic Mode Water Formation, Destruction, and Export in the Eddy-Permitting Southern Ocean State Estimate

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1485-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Cerovečki ◽  
Lynne D. Talley ◽  
Matthew R. Mazloff ◽  
Guillaume Maze
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Buoyancy Flux ◽  
Differential Heat ◽  
Diapycnal Mixing ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
State Estimate ◽  
Surface Formation ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) is examined using the data-assimilating, eddy-permitting Southern Ocean State Estimate, for 2005 and 2006. Surface formation due to air–sea buoyancy flux is estimated using Walin analysis, and diapycnal mixing is diagnosed as the difference between surface formation and transport across 30°S, accounting for volume change with time. Water in the density range 26.5 < σθ < 27.1 kg m−3 that includes SAMW is exported northward in all three ocean sectors, with a net transport of (18.2, 17.1) Sv (1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1; for years 2005, 2006); air–sea buoyancy fluxes form (13.2, 6.8) Sv, diapycnal mixing removes (−14.5, −12.6) Sv, and there is a volume loss of (−19.3, −22.9) Sv mostly occurring in the strongest SAMW formation locations. The most vigorous SAMW formation is in the Indian Ocean by air–sea buoyancy flux (9.4, 10.9) Sv, where it is partially destroyed by diapycnal mixing (−6.6, −3.1) Sv. There is strong export to the Pacific, where SAMW is destroyed both by air–sea buoyancy flux (−1.1, −4.6) Sv and diapycnal mixing (−5.6, −8.4) Sv. In the South Atlantic, SAMW is formed by air–sea buoyancy flux (5.0, 0.5) Sv and is destroyed by diapycnal mixing (−2.3, −1.1) Sv. Peaks in air–sea flux formation occur at the Southeast Indian and Southeast Pacific SAMWs (SEISAMWs, SEPSAMWs) densities. Formation over the broad SAMW circumpolar outcrop windows is largely from denser water, driven by differential freshwater gain, augmented or decreased by heating or cooling. In the SEISAMW and SEPSAMW source regions, however, formation is from lighter water, driven by differential heat loss.

Strong atmospheric surface pressure anomalies drive a see-saw in Subantarctic Mode Water formation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Cerovecki ◽  
Andrew Meijers
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Western Indian Ocean ◽  
Air Pressure ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Central Pacific ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Argo Data ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Mixed Layers

<p>The dominant Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) formation regions are located in the Indian, and in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. Strong wintertime (Jul-Sep) surface air pressure anomalies with variance maxima at approximately 100°E and 150°W drive a zonal dipole structure in the SAMW formation and thickness, in both the Indian and Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. This has been documented within gridded Argo data for years 2005-2019. A much weaker surface air pressure anomaly variance maxima is located in the Atlantic Ocean centered at approximately 25°W.</p><p>Anomalously strong positive pressure anomalies result in deepening of the wintertime mixed layers and an increase in the SAMW formation in the eastern part of the Pacific and Indian sector; these effects are due to cold southerly winds, strengthened zonal winds and increased surface ocean heat loss. <br>Anomalously strong negative pressure anomalies result in shoaling of the wintertime mixed layers and a decrease in SAMW formation in these regions, while at the same time deepening the wintertime mixed layers and increasing SAMW formation in the western Indian Ocean and in the central Pacific.</p><p>In years with strong El Nino, the interannual variability of the strength of two surface air pressure anomalies does not co-vary in phase with each other. Strong isopycnal heave in SAMW density range emanates from locations where winter surface air pressure anomalies and mixed layers are most strongly coupled.  </p>

The Spatiotemporal Structure of Diabatic Processes Governing the Evolution of Subantarctic Mode Water in the Southern Ocean

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 683-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Cerovečki ◽  
Matthew R. Mazloff
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Formation Rate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Seasonal Migration ◽  
Density Range ◽  
Diapycnal Mixing ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Latitude Range ◽  
Ice Melt ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water

AbstractA coupled ice–ocean eddy-permitting Southern Ocean State Estimate (SOSE) for 2008–10 is used to describe and quantify the processes forming and destroying water in the Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) density range (σθ = 26.7–27.2 kg m−3). All the terms in the temperature and salinity equations have been diagnosed to obtain a three-dimensional and time-varying volume budget for individual isopycnal layers. This study finds that air–sea buoyancy fluxes, diapycnal mixing, advection, and storage are all important to the SAMW volume budget. The formation and destruction of water in the SAMW density range occurs over a large latitude range because of the seasonal migration of the outcrop window. The strongest formation is by wintertime surface ocean heat loss occurring equatorward of the Subantarctic Front. Spring and summertime formation occur in the polar gyres through the freshening of water with σθ > 27.2 kg m−3, with an important contribution from sea ice melt. Further buoyancy gain by heating is accomplished only after these waters have already been transformed into the SAMW density range. The spatially integrated and time-averaged SAMW formation rate in the ocean surface layer is 7.9 Sverdrups (Sv; 1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1) by air–sea buoyancy fluxes and 8.8 Sv by diapycnal mixing, and it is balanced by advective export into the interior ocean. Maps show that these average rates are the result of highly variable processes with strong cancellation in both space and time, revealing the complexity of water mass transformation in the three-dimensional Southern Ocean overturning circulation.

A Comparison of Southern Ocean Air–Sea Buoyancy Flux from an Ocean State Estimate with Five Other Products

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 6283-6306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Cerovečki ◽  
Lynne D. Talley ◽  
Matthew R. Mazloff
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Buoyancy Flux ◽  
Western Boundary ◽  
Turbulent Heat ◽  
Radiative Fluxes ◽  
State Estimate

Abstract The authors have intercompared the following six surface buoyancy flux estimates, averaged over the years 2005–07: two reanalyses [the recent ECMWF reanalysis (ERA-Interim; hereafter ERA), and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)–NCAR reanalysis 1 (hereafter NCEP1)], two recent flux products developed as an improvement of NCEP1 [the flux product by Large and Yeager and the Southern Ocean State Estimate (SOSE)], and two ad hoc air–sea flux estimates that are obtained by combining the NCEP1 or ERA net radiative fluxes with turbulent flux estimates using the Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (COARE) 3.0 bulk formulas with NCEP1 or ERA input variables. The accuracy of SOSE adjustments of NCEP1 atmospheric fields (which SOSE uses as an initial guess and a constraint) was assessed by verification that SOSE reduces the biases in the NCEP1 fluxes as diagnosed by the Working Group on Air–Sea Fluxes (Taylor), suggesting that oceanic observations may be a valuable constraint to improve atmospheric variables. Compared with NCEP1, both SOSE and Large and Yeager increase the net ocean heat loss in high latitudes, decrease ocean heat loss in the subtropical Indian Ocean, decrease net evaporation in the subtropics, and decrease net precipitation in polar latitudes. The large-scale pattern of SOSE and Large and Yeager turbulent heat flux adjustment is similar, but the magnitude of SOSE adjustments is significantly larger. Their radiative heat flux adjustments patterns differ. Turbulent heat fluxes determined by combining COARE bulk formulas with NCEP1 or ERA should not be combined with unmodified NCEP1 or ERA radiative fluxes as the net ocean heat gain poleward of 25°S becomes unrealistically large. The other surface flux products (i.e., NCEP1, ERA, Large and Yeager, and SOSE) balance more closely. Overall, the statistical estimates of the differences between the various air–sea heat flux products tend to be largest in regions with strong ocean mesoscale activity such as the Antarctic Circumpolar Current and the western boundary currents.

scholarly journals The Role of Southern Ocean Surface Forcings and Mixing in the Global Conveyor

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1377-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Iudicone ◽  
Gurvan Madec ◽  
Bruno Blanke ◽  
Sabrina Speich
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Thermohaline Circulation ◽  
North Atlantic Deep Water ◽  
Surface Fluxes ◽  
Weddell Sea ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Circumpolar Deep Water ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water

Abstract Despite the renewed interest in the Southern Ocean, there are yet many unknowns because of the scarcity of measurements and the complexity of the thermohaline circulation. Hence the authors present here the analysis of the thermohaline circulation of the Southern Ocean of a steady-state simulation of a coupled ice–ocean model. The study aims to clarify the roles of surface fluxes and internal mixing, with focus on the mechanisms of the upper branch of the overturning. A quantitative dynamical analysis of the water-mass transformation has been performed using a new method. Surface fluxes, including the effect of the penetrative solar radiation, produce almost 40 Sv (1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1) of Subantarctic Mode Water while about 5 Sv of the densest water masses (γ > 28.2) are formed by brine rejection on the shelves of Antarctica and in the Weddell Sea. Mixing transforms one-half of the Subantarctic Mode Water into intermediate water and Upper Circumpolar Deep Water while bottom water is produced by Lower Circumpolar Deep Water and North Atlantic Deep Water mixing with shelf water. The upwelling of part of the North Atlantic Deep Water inflow is due to internal processes, mainly downward propagation of the surface freshwater excess via vertical mixing at the base of the mixed layer. A complementary Lagrangian analysis of the thermohaline circulation will be presented in a companion paper.

Antarctic Intermediate Water and Subantarctic Mode Water Formation in the Southeast Pacific: The Role of Turbulent Mixing

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1558-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette M. Sloyan ◽  
Lynne D. Talley ◽  
Teresa K. Chereskin ◽  
Rana Fine ◽  
James Holte
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Austral Summer ◽  
Buoyancy Flux ◽  
Intermediate Water ◽  
Austral Winter ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water ◽  
Southeast Pacific ◽  
Water Formation ◽  
Summer Survey

Abstract During the 2005 austral winter (late August–early October) and 2006 austral summer (February–mid-March) two intensive hydrographic surveys of the southeast Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean were completed. In this study the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate ε, diapycnal diffusivity κ, and buoyancy flux Jb are estimated from the CTD/O2 and XCTD profiles for each survey. Enhanced κ of O(10−3 to 10−4 m2 s−1) is found near the Subantarctic Front (SAF) during both surveys. During the winter survey, enhanced κ was also observed north of the “subduction front,” the northern boundary of the winter deep mixed layer north of the SAF. In contrast, the summer survey found enhanced κ across the entire region north of the SAF below the shallow seasonal mixed layer. The enhanced κ below the mixed layer decays rapidly with depth. A number of ocean processes are considered that may provide the energy flux necessary to support the observed diffusivity. The observed buoyancy flux (4.0 × 10−8 m2 s−3) surrounding the SAF during the summer survey is comparable to the mean buoyancy flux (0.57 × 10−8 m2 s−3) associated with the change in the interior stratification between austral summer and autumn, determined from Argo profiles. The authors suggest that reduced ocean stratification during austral summer and autumn, by interior mixing, preconditions the water column for the rapid development of deep mixed layers and efficient Antarctic Intermediate Water and Subantarctic Mode Water formation during austral winter and early spring.

New insights into concurrent air-sea heat flux forcing of Subantarctic Mode Water formation from mooring observations in the Southeast Indian and Southeast Pacific sectors of the Southern Ocean

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Josey ◽  
Veronica Tamsitt ◽  
Ivana Cerovecki ◽  
Sarah Gille ◽  
Eric Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Indirect Pathway ◽  
The South ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water ◽  
Southeast Pacific ◽  
Indian Sector

<p>Wintertime surface ocean heat loss is the key driver of Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) formation. However, until now there have been very few direct observations of fluxes, particularly during winter. Here, we present results from the first concurrent (2015-17 with gaps), air-sea flux mooring deployments in two key SAMW formation regions: the Southern Ocean Flux Site (SOFS) in the Southeast Indian sector and the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) mooring in the Southeast Pacific sector. Gridded Argo and ERA5 reanalysis provide temporal and spatial context for the mooring observations. Turbulent ocean heat loss is found to be on average 1.5 times larger at the Southeast Indian than Southeast Pacific sites with stronger extreme heat flux events in the Southeast Indian leading to larger cumulative winter heat loss. For the first time, we show that turbulent heat loss events in the Southeast Indian sector occur in two atmospheric regimes (a direct cold air pathway from the south and an indirect pathway circulating dry Antarctic air via the north). In contrast, heat loss events in the Southeast Pacific sector occur in a single atmospheric regime (cold air from the south). On interannual timescales, wintertime anomalies in net heat flux and mixed layer depth (MLD) are often correlated at the two sites, particularly when wintertime MLDs are anomalously deep. Using ERA5, we show that this is part of a larger zonal dipole in heat flux and MLD anomalies present in both the Indian and Pacific SAMW formation regions, associated with anomalous meridional atmospheric circulation. These recent results will be placed in the context of multidecadal variability in the SAMW formation region dominant heat flux patterns over the past 40 years over all 3 sectors of the Southern Ocean (Pacific, Indian and Atlantic).</p>

scholarly journals Mooring Observations of Air–Sea Heat Fluxes in Two Subantarctic Mode Water Formation Regions

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 2757-2777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Tamsitt ◽  
Ivana Cerovečki ◽  
Simon A. Josey ◽  
Sarah T. Gille ◽  
Eric Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
The South ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Southeast Pacific

AbstractWintertime surface ocean heat loss is the key process driving the formation of Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW), but there are few direct observations of heat fluxes, particularly during winter. The Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Southern Ocean mooring in the southeast Pacific Ocean and the Southern Ocean Flux Station (SOFS) in the southeast Indian Ocean provide the first concurrent, multiyear time series of air–sea fluxes in the Southern Ocean from two key SAMW formation regions. In this work we compare drivers of wintertime heat loss and SAMW formation by comparing air–sea fluxes and mixed layers at these two mooring locations. A gridded Argo product and the ERA5 reanalysis product provide temporal and spatial context for the mooring observations. Turbulent ocean heat loss is on average 1.5 times larger in the southeast Indian (SOFS) than in the southeast Pacific (OOI), with stronger extreme heat flux events in the southeast Indian leading to larger cumulative winter ocean heat loss. Turbulent heat loss events in the southeast Indian (SOFS) occur in two atmospheric regimes (cold air from the south or dry air circulating via the north), while heat loss events in the southeast Pacific (OOI) occur in a single atmospheric regime (cold air from the south). On interannual time scales, wintertime anomalies in net heat flux and mixed layer depth (MLD) are often correlated at the two sites, particularly when wintertime MLDs are anomalously deep. This relationship is part of a larger basin-scale zonal dipole in heat flux and MLD anomalies present in both the Indian and Pacific basins, associated with anomalous meridional atmospheric circulation.

Equatorial Pacific bulk 𝛿15N supports a secular increase in subantarctic zone nitrate utilization after the mid-Pleistocene Transition

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Lambert ◽  
Kelly Gibson ◽  
Braddock Linsley ◽  
Samantha Bova ◽  
Yair Rosenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Guinea ◽  
Isotopic Signature ◽  
Polar Front ◽  
Nitrogen Dynamics ◽  
Equatorial Pacific ◽  
Glacial Cycles ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Basin Scale

<p>Pacific-wide measurements of nitrate and its isotopic composition have furthered our understanding of modern subsurface circulation and have revealed basin-scale connections between oceanographic and nitrogen cycle processes. From the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP), the isotopic signature of denitrification is spread zonally and meridionally via subsurface currents. From the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean, Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) penetrates to the low latitudes, delivering nitrate (and likely its isotopic signature) to equatorial surface waters via upwelling. These two regional processes combine to inform much of the thermocline nitrogen dynamics of the Pacific. Here, we compare a new 1.4-Myr bulk sediment 𝛿<sup>15</sup>N record from the New Guinea margin (IODP Site U1486) to other Pacific 𝛿<sup>15</sup>N records to track Pleistocene changes in denitrification and SAMW properties. Our results highlight a dramatic increasing 𝛿<sup>15</sup>N trend after the mid-Pleistocene Transition (MPT) at equatorial sites that is not observed at the New Guinea and California margin sites. Strong 41-ky forcing at equatorial sites and little detectable influence from denitrification (counter to larger denitrification signals at margin sites) suggests increasing 𝛿<sup>15</sup>N within upwelled SAMW. Because the New Guinea and California margin sites are not below equatorial upwelling, thermocline nitrate is less influenced by SAMW, but rather tracks denitrification in the ETP.</p><p>As equatorial Pacific nitrate utilization has not dramatically increased in the late Pleistocene, an increase in subantarctic zone nitrate utilization is proposed. Initiation of increased nitrate utilization appears to commence near the end of the MPT and accelerate near the Mid-Brunhes Event (~430 ka). The observed southward shift of the polar front at this time (associated with increased sea surface temperature), combined with elevated dust/iron flux, may have contributed to greater nitrate utilization and a more efficient biological pump in the subantarctic zone. Through the production (via denitrification) and sequestration (via nitrate utilization) of greenhouse gases, these biogeochemical processes potentially participated in feedbacks associated with both the MPT and the Mid-Brunhes Event. Until reconstructions of subantarctic zone nitrate are extended beyond the last two glacial cycles, this reconstruction of SAMW properties via equatorial Pacific bulk 𝛿<sup>15</sup>N may provide the best record of long-term changes in nitrogen dynamics in the subantarctic zone.</p>

scholarly journals Strong quasi-stationary wintertime atmospheric surface pressure anomalies drive a dipole pattern in the Subantarctic ModeWater formation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-44
Author(s):  
Ivana Cerovečki ◽  
Andrew J.S. Meijers
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Mode Water ◽  
Sea Level Pressure ◽  
Surface Ocean ◽  
Subantarctic Mode Water ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Meridional Winds ◽  
Dipole Pattern ◽  
Mixed Layers

AbstractThe deepest wintertime (Jul-Sep) mixed layers associated with Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) formation develop in the Indian and Pacific sectors of the Southern Ocean. In these two sectors the dominant interannual variability of both deep wintertime mixed layers and SAMW volume is a east-west dipole pattern in each basin. The variability of these dipoles are strongly correlated with the interannual variability of overlying winter quasi-stationary mean sea level pressure (MSLP) anomalies. Anomalously strong positive MSLP anomalies are found to result in the deepening of the wintertime mixed layers and an increase in the SAMW formation in the eastern parts of the dipoles in the Pacific and Indian sectors. These effects are due to enhanced cold southerly meridional winds, strengthened zonal winds and increased surface ocean heat loss. The opposite occurs in the western parts of the dipoles in these sectors. Conversely, strong negative MSLP anomalies result in shoaling (deepening) of the wintertime mixed layers and a decrease (increase) in SAMW formation in the eastern (western) regions. The MSLP variability of the Pacific and Indian basin anomalies are not always in phase, especially in years with a strong El Niño, resulting in different patterns of SAMW formation in the western vs. eastern parts of the Indian and Pacific sectors. Strong isopycnal depth and thickness anomalies develop in the SAMW density range in years with strong MSLP anomalies. When advected eastward, they act to precondition downstream SAMW formation in the subsequent winter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document