scholarly journals Assimilating Surface Weather Observations from Complex Terrain into a High-Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Model

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 1037-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxiu Deng ◽  
Roland Stull

Abstract An anisotropic surface analysis method based on the mother–daughter (MD) approach has been developed to spread valley station observations to grid points in circuitous steep valleys. In this paper, the MD approach is further refined to allow spreading the mountain-top observations to grid points near neighboring high ridges across valleys. Starting with a 3D first guess from a high-resolution mesoscale model forecast, surface weather observations are assimilated into the boundary layer, and pseudo-upper-air data (interpolated from the coarser-resolution analyses from major operational centers) are assimilated into the free atmosphere. Incremental analysis updating is then used to incorporate the final analysis increments (the difference between the final analysis and the first guess) into a high-resolution numerical weather prediction model. The MD approaches (including one with shoreline refinement) are compared with other objective analysis methods using case examples and daily mesoscale real-time forecast runs during November and December 2004. This study further confirms that the MD approaches outperform the other methods, and that the shoreline refinement achieves better analysis quality than the basic MD approach. The improvement of mountain-top refinement over the basic MD approach increases with the percentage of mountain-top stations, which is usually low. Higher skill in predicting near-surface potential temperature is found when surface information is spread upward throughout the boundary layer instead of at only the bottom model level. The results show improved near-surface forecasts of temperature and humidity that are directly assimilated into the model, but poorer forecasts of near-surface winds and precipitation, which are not assimilated into the model.

2015 ◽  
Vol 142 (694) ◽  
pp. 211-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Thurston ◽  
Robert J. B. Fawcett ◽  
Kevin J. Tory ◽  
Jeffrey D. Kepert

Author(s):  
Matthew T. Bray ◽  
David D. Turner ◽  
Gijs de Boer

AbstractDespite a need for accurate weather forecasts for societal and economic interests in the U.S. Arctic, thorough evaluations of operational numerical weather prediction in the region have been limited. In particular, the Rapid Refresh Model (RAP), which plays a key role in short-term forecasting and decision making, has seen very limited assessment in northern Alaska, with most evaluation efforts focused on lower latitudes. In the present study, we verify forecasts from version 4 of the RAP against radiosonde, surface meteorological, and radiative flux observations from two Arctic sites on the northern Alaskan coastline, with a focus on boundary-layer thermodynamic and dynamic biases, model representation of surface inversions, and cloud characteristics. We find persistent seasonal thermodynamic biases near the surface that vary with wind direction, and may be related to the RAP’s handling of sea ice and ocean interactions. These biases seem to have diminished in the latest version of the RAP (version 5), which includes refined handling of sea ice, among other improvements. In addition, we find that despite capturing boundary-layer temperature profiles well overall, the RAP struggles to consistently represent strong, shallow surface inversions. Further, while the RAP seems to forecast the presence of clouds accurately in most cases, there are errors in the simulated characteristics of these clouds, which we hypothesize may be related to the RAP’s treatment of mixed-phase clouds.


Author(s):  
Hayk Grigoryan ◽  
Rita Abrahamyan

The Lesser Caucasus Mountains are crossing through the territory of Armenia, creating vast differences in altitude, terrain, temperature and precipitation in provinces and towns. Even Armenia’s lowlands are 500 to 1500m above sea level. Armenias highlands extend up to Aragats mountain at 4090m where, 75% of the territory is above 1000m, 50% is above 2000m, and 3.4% is above 3000m. This paper presents a cloud service with interactive visualization and analytical capabilities for weather data in Armenia by integrating the two existing infrastructures for observational data and numerical weather prediction. The weather data used in the platform consist of near-surface atmospheric elements including air temperature, relative humidity, pressure, wind and precipitation. The visualization and analitycs have been implemented for 2m air temperature. Cloud service provides the Armenian State Hydrometeorological and Monitoring Service with analytical capabilities to make a comparative analysis between the observation data and the results of a numerical weather prediction model for per station and region for a given period.


2008 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Brown ◽  
R. J. Beare ◽  
J. M. Edwards ◽  
A. P. Lock ◽  
S. J. Keogh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 2255-2278
Author(s):  
Robert G. Fovell ◽  
Alex Gallagher

AbstractWhile numerical weather prediction models have made considerable progress regarding forecast skill, less attention has been paid to the planetary boundary layer. This study leverages High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) forecasts on native levels, 1-s radiosonde data, and (primarily airport) surface observations across the conterminous United States. We construct temporally and spatially averaged composites of wind speed and potential temperature in the lowest 1 km for selected months to identify systematic errors in both forecasts and observations in this critical layer. We find near-surface temperature and wind speed predictions to be skillful, although wind biases were negatively correlated with observed speed and temperature biases revealed a robust relationship with station elevation. Above ≈250 m above ground level, below which radiosonde wind data were apparently contaminated by processing, biases were small for wind speed and potential temperature at the analysis time (which incorporates sonde data) but became substantial by the 24-h forecast. Wind biases were positive through the layer for both 0000 and 1200 UTC, and morning potential temperature profiles were marked by excessively steep lapse rates that persisted across seasons and (again) exaggerated at higher elevation sites. While the source or cause of these systematic errors are not fully understood, this analysis highlights areas for potential model improvement and the need for a continued and accessible archive of the data that make analyses like this possible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document