scholarly journals Profiting on Crisis: How Predatory Financial Investors Have Worsened Inequality in the Coronavirus Crisis

2021 ◽  
pp. 000276422110031
Author(s):  
Megan Tobias Neely ◽  
Donna Carmichael

A once-in-a-century pandemic has sparked an unprecedented health and economic crisis. Less examined is how predatory financial investors have shaped the crisis and profited from it. We examine how U.S. shadow banks, such as private equity, venture capital, and hedge fund firms, have affected hardship and inequality during the crisis. First, we identify how these investors helped to hollow out the health care industry and disenfranchise the low-wage service sector, putting frontline workers at risk. We then outline how, as the downturn unfolds, shadow banks are shifting their investments in ways that profit on the misfortunes of frontline workers, vulnerable populations, and distressed industries. After the pandemic subsides and governments withdraw stimulus support, employment will likely remain insecure, many renters will face evictions, and entire economic sectors will need to rebuild. Shadow banks are planning accordingly to profit from the fallout of the crisis. We argue that this case reveals how financial investors accumulate capital through private and speculative investments that exploit vulnerabilities in the economic system during a time of crisis. To conclude, we consider the prospects for change and inequality over time.

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
T D Babu ◽  
G Jayabal

Liberalization, Privatization and Globalisation has brought about worldwide growth of the service sector including health. The Indian health care industry has grown at 17% annual growth rate. This can be attributed to the affherent class and middle class expecting Health Care services of higher quality. This paper analysesthe challenges and opportunities on one hand and presents strategies to overcome the deficiences so as to meet both domestic and global need


2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
Muniraju M ◽  
T.K Srinath

Health has been on the NationalAgenda in most countries. Liberalization has also focused on better health care. National health care has not brought desired results as seen in developed countries where better care is available. This service sector often rests on the quality, satisfaction being reached in accordance with service expectations. Research on providing better service should be oriented at understanding demographic life style of the consumers. Health care industry is moving from a sellers market to buyers market.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omololu Bajulaiye ◽  
Mark Fenwick ◽  
Ivona Skultetyova ◽  
Erik P.M. Vermeulen

Author(s):  
Tommasina Pianese ◽  
Patrizia Belfiore

The application of social networks in the health domain has become increasingly prevalent. They are web-based technologies which bring together a group of people and health-care providers having in common health-related interests, who share text, image, video and audio contents and interact with each other. This explains the increasing amount of attention paid to this topic by researchers who have investigated a variety of issues dealing with the specific applications in the health-care industry. The aim of this study is to systematize this fragmented body of literature, and provide a comprehensive and multi-level overview of the studies that has been carried out to date on social network uses in healthcare, taking into account the great level of diversity that characterizes this industry. To this end, we conduct a scoping review enabling to identify the major research streams, whose aggregate knowledge are discussed according to three levels of analysis that reflect the viewpoints of the major actors using social networks for health-care purposes, i.e., governments, health-care providers (including health-care organizations and professionals) and social networks’ users (including ill patients and general public). We conclude by proposing directions for future research.


1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-348
Author(s):  
Judy B. Chase

AbstractIn National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross of Kansas City, the United States Supreme Court held that there is no blanket exemption from antitrust laws for health planning activities.‘The Court also held that no specific immunity can be granted where the challenged health planning activity is not undertaken pursuant to a federal regulatory scheme. This Comment reviews the Court’s decision and concludes that the Court correctly determined that the challenged activities did not qualify for an exemption. The Comment also examines the implications of the Court's statement that, where Congress has manifested a belief that competition is ineffective in the health care industry, application of the antitrust laws should be modified. The Comment recommends that an intermediate review standard such as the “presumptive, incentive modifying approach” should be used by future courts in deciding whether the ineffectiveness of competition in a given area of health planning activity warrants immunity from antitrust scrutiny.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document