Decreased Length of Stay After Laparoscopic Diaphragm Repair for Isolated Diaphragm Injury After Penetrating Trauma

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-498
Author(s):  
Haris H. Chaudhry ◽  
Areg Grigorian ◽  
Michael E. Lekawa ◽  
Matthew O. Dolich ◽  
Ninh T. Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Diaphragm Injury ◽  
Diaphragmatic Repair

Background Isolated diaphragm injury (IDI) occurs in up to 30% of penetrating left thoracoabdominal injuries. Laparoscopic abdominal procedures have demonstrated improved outcome including decreased postoperative pain and length of stay (LOS) compared to open surgery. However, there is a paucity of data on this topic for penetrating IDI. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and outcome of laparoscopic diaphragmatic repair versus open diaphragmatic repair (LDR vs ODR) of IDI. Methods The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for patients with IDI who underwent ODR versus LDR. A bivariate analysis using Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney test was performed to determine LOS among the two groups. Results From 2039 diaphragm injuries, 368 patients had IDI; 281 patients (76.4%) underwent ODR and 87 (23.6%) underwent LDR. Compared to LDR, the ODR patients were older (median, 31 vs 25 years, P < .001) and had a higher injury severity score (mean, 11.2 vs 9.6, P = .03) but had similar rates of intensive care unit LOS, unplanned return to the operating room, ventilator days, and complications ( P > .05). Patients undergoing ODR had a longer LOS (5 vs 4 days, P = .01), compared to LDR. There were no deaths in either group. Conclusions Trauma patients presenting with IDI undergoing ODR had a longer hospital LOS compared to patients undergoing LDR with no difference in complications or mortality. Therefore, we recommend when possible an LDR should be employed to decrease hospital LOS. Further research is needed to examine other benefits of laparoscopy such as postoperative pain, incisional hernia, and wound-related complications.

scholarly journals 35. Emergency Medical Services Use of Trauma Triage Criteria to Stratify Patients by Injury Severity and Need for Emergent Intervention

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (S2) ◽  
pp. S32-S32
Author(s):  
Robert E. O'Connor ◽  
Glen H. Tinkoff ◽  
Susan Mascioli ◽  
Ross E. Megargel
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Probability Of Survival ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Serious Injury ◽  
Level I

Purpose: Prehospital triage criteria (PTC) have been used to classify patients according to risk of serious injury. This study was conducted determine whether PTC could be used to identify serious injury, the need for intensive care (ICU), or immediate operative intervention (IOI).Methods: Data for this observational study were gathered prospectively, at a level-I trauma center, from a patient cohort admitted to the trauma service from 01 February to 31 July 1995. Specific triage criteria, based on information given by EMS prior to arrival were used to categorize patients by severity. Patients classified as most serious (codes) had the following: shock, major anatomic injury or proximal penetrating trauma. Patients classified as more serious (alerts) had one of the following: abnormal vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale <13, moderate anatomic injury, high-risk mechanism of injury, or co-morbid factors. Patients not meeting either set of criteria, but were admitted, served as controls (consults). Injury severity scores (ISS) and probability of survival (Probsurvival) were calculated for each patient. The percentage admitted to the ICU, operating room (OR), or requiring IOI, were tabulated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, Mest and chi-square.

scholarly journals 186 Acute Kidney Injury in Skeletal Trauma Admissions to Intensive Care: An Under-Estimated Complication

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Brown ◽  
T Crisp ◽  
M Flatman ◽  
C Hing
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Long Bone ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Skeletal Trauma ◽  
Body Regions ◽  
Intensive Care Stay

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with prolonged admission and 3.5 times increased mortality for trauma patients requiring intensive care (ICU) treatment. Blunt trauma confers greater risk of AKI than penetrating trauma, potentially related to long bone fracture. The relationship between skeletal trauma and AKI in ICU has not previously been investigated. Method Retrospective data was analysed from 202 consecutive adult patients admitted to ICU with skeletal trauma from 01/06/2018 to 01/06/2019. AKI was defined by creatinine rise &gt;1.5 times baseline. Results AKI was found in 70/202 (34.65%) patients aged 16-99 years, 138 males and 64 females. Mean limb Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was significantly higher in AKI (AIS= 2.57 (SD 0.53) versus non-AKI AIS=2.38 (SD 0.61), p = 0.027). Other body regions and total Injury Severity Score (ISS) were non-significant. AKI was associated with a significantly worse Glasgow Outcome Score (AKI 3.28 (SD 1.52) versus 4.02 (SD 1.08) p &lt; 0.001), increased intensive care stay (AKI 7.03 (SD 8.30) days versus non-AKI 3.8 (SD 4.1) days p &lt; 0.001) and increased 30-day mortality (AKI 18/70 (25.71%) versus non-AKI 10/132 (7.58%) p &lt; 0.001) Conclusions Skeletal trauma patients have a high incidence of AKI, which was significantly correlated with severity of skeletal limb trauma but not overall ISS.

A Tale of Two Cities: What’s Driving the Firearm Mortality Difference in Two Large Urban Centers?

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482094525
Author(s):  
Jessica K. Friedman ◽  
Elizabeth Mytty ◽  
Scott Ninokawa ◽  
Tara Reza ◽  
Elinore Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Urban Centers ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Police Data ◽  
Lower Blood ◽  
Mortality Difference

Introduction Per police data, the case fatality rate (CFR) of firearm assault in New Orleans (NO) over the last several years ranged between 27% and 35%, compared with 18%-22% in Philadelphia. The reasons for this disparity are unknown, and potentially reflect important system differences with broader implications for the reduction of firearm mortality. Methods A retrospective analysis of police and city-specific trauma databases between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Victims of firearm assaults within city limits were included. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square for categorical and t-test for continuous variables. Bivariate analysis was conducted using logistic regression. Results Per police data, the CFR of firearm assault was 31% in NO and 20% in Philadelphia. However, per trauma registry data, the CFR of firearm assault was 14% in NO and 25% in Philadelphia. Patients in Philadelphia were older, had higher injury severity score, and lower blood pressure. Patients in NO had higher rates of head injury. 51% of patients in Philadelphia arrived via police compared to <1% in NO. There was no mortality difference between police and emergency medical service (EMS) transport. Longer EMS prehospital times were associated with increased mortality in NO but not Philadelphia. A much larger percentage of patients died on-scene in NO than Philadelphia. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the major driver of increased mortality following firearm assault in NO compared with Philadelphia is death prior to the arrival of first responders. Interventions that shorten prehospital time will likely have the greatest impact on mortality in NO. This should include the consideration of police transport.

scholarly journals A retrospective cohort study of 27,049 polytraumatized patients age 60 and above: identifying changes over 16 years

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kalbas ◽  
M. Lempert ◽  
F. Ziegenhain ◽  
J. Scherer ◽  
V. Neuhaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Purpose The number of severely injured patients exceeding the age of 60 has shown a steep increase within the last decades. These patients present with numerous co-morbidities, polypharmacy, and increased frailty requiring an adjusted treatment approach. In this study, we establish an overview of changes we observed in demographics of older severe trauma patients from 2002 to 2017. Methods A descriptive analysis of the data from the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) was performed. Patients admitted to a level one trauma center in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between 2002 and 2017, aged 60 years or older and with an injury severity score (ISS) over 15 were included. Patients were stratified into subgroups based on the admission: 2002–2005 (1), 2006–2009 (2), 2010–2013 (3) and 2014–2017 (4). Trauma and patient characteristics, diagnostics, treatment and outcome were compared. Results In total 27,049 patients with an average age of 73.9 years met the inclusion criteria. The majority were males (64%), and the mean ISS was 27.4. The proportion of patients 60 years or older [(23% (1) to 40% (4)] rose considerably over time. Trauma mechanisms changed over time and more specifically low falls (< 3 m) rose from 17.6% (1) to 40.1% (4). Altered injury patterns were also identified. Length-of-stay decreased from 28.9 (1) to 19.5 days (4) and the length-of-stay on ICU decreased from 17.1 (1) to 12.7 days (4). Mortality decreased from 40.5% (1) to 31.8% (4). Conclusion Length of stay and mortality decreased despite an increase in patient age. We ascribe this observation mainly to increased use of diagnostic tools, improved treatment algorithms, and the implementation of specialized trauma centers for older patients allowing interdisciplinary care.

Predictors of blunt diaphragm injury in Australia

Trauma ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 146040862110418
Author(s):  
Annelise M Cocco ◽  
Vignesh Ratnaraj ◽  
Benjamin PT Loveday ◽  
Kellie Gumm ◽  
Phillip Antippa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Rib Fractures ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Missed Injury ◽  
Diaphragm Injury ◽  
Trauma Service

Introduction Blunt diaphragm injury (BDI) is an uncommon, potentially fatal consequence of blunt torso injury. While associations between BDI and other factors such as mechanism of injury or other injuries have been described elsewhere, little recent research has been done in Australia into BDI. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence rate of BDI in our centre, identify how it was diagnosed, determine rates of missed injury and identify predictive factors for BDI. The hypothesis was that patients with BDI would significantly differ to those without BDI. Methods All major trauma patients with blunt torso injuries at our Level 1 major trauma service from 2010 to 2018 were included. Data for patient demographics, other injuries, diagnosis and treatment of BDI were extracted. Patients with BDI were compared with patients without BDI in order to identify differences that could be used to predict BDI in future patients. Results Of 5190 patients with a blunt torso injury, 51 (0.98%) had a BDI at a mean age of 53 ± 19.6 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 27(IQR 21–38.5) compared with 5139 patients with a mean age of 48.2 ± 20.7 years and median ISS of 21.9(IQR 14–26) who did not have a BDI. The diagnosis of BDI was made at CT ( n = 35), surgery ( n = 14) or autopsy ( n = 2). Blunt diaphragm injury was missed on index imaging for 11 of 43 patients (25.6%). On multivariate analysis, each point increase in ISS (OR 1.03, p = 0.02); rib fractures (OR 4.65, p = 0.004); splenic injury (OR 2.60, p = 0.004); and liver injury (OR 2.78, p = 0.003) were independently associated with BDI. Conclusion Injury Severity Score, rib fractures and solid abdominal organ injury increase the likelihood of BDI. In patients with these injuries, BDI should be considered even in the presence of normal CT findings.

scholarly journals Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Powers Kinney ◽  
Kamal Gursahani ◽  
Eric Armbrecht ◽  
Preeti Dalawari
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

scholarly journals CORRELATION OF FACIAL INJURY SEVERITY SCALE (FISS) WITH LENGTH OF STAY, THE NEED FOR SURGERY AND THE INVOLVEMENT OF OTHER SPECIALISTS IN MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA PATIENTS AT H. ADAM MALIK GENERAL HOSPITAL MEDAN

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Darwin Firmansyah Siregar ◽  
Frank Bietra Buchari ◽  
Utama Abdi Tarigan ◽  
Aznan Lelo
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
The Body ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Facial Injury ◽  
Single Operator ◽  
Surgery Department

Background: Facial Injury Severity Severity Score (FISS) has been used to assess the severity of facial injuries. However, FISS scores as a useful predictor of length of stay and changes between FISS scores and injuries to other parts of the body have not evaluated. In this study, we want to know the relationship between FISS score as the clinical assessment of maxillofacial trauma with the length of stay, the need for surgery, and the involvement of other specialist elds. Method: This research was conducted using analytical research through a retrospective approach by looking at the medical records of patients who suffered maxillofacial trauma at H. Adam Malik General Hospital Medan from June to August 2019. Result : From a total of 43 patients included in the study, there were 22 mandibular fractures, with mandibular angulus (29.0%), parasymphysis (22.4%), and mandibular corpus (21.5%). Thirty subjects (69.8%) needed surgery, and xation of the fracture and subjects without intervention were 13 (30.2%). Patients who needed surgical intervention, the average time needed for hospitalization was 10.98 + 7.72 days (p = 0.007). The most collaboration found with neurosurgeons specialists, 39.53% of subjects who performed the surgery. A total of 55.8% of surgeries performed by a single operator from the plastic surgery department. Relationship between the length of stay with FISS, obtained for FISS> 3 (OR 14.37) (p = 0.01), meaning that patients with FISS> 3 are likely to stay longer for 14 times. Subsequent results related to the need for surgery obtained signicant results (OR = 8.26, p = 0.026). signicant (p = 0.059). Conclusion: A FISS score signicantly affects the length of stay for a maxillofacial trauma patient. FISS score also affects the involvement of other specialists in maxillofacial trauma patients but not statistically signicant.

Intraabdominal Injury is Common in Blunt Trauma Patients who Sustain Spinal Cord Injury

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 1035-1038
Author(s):  
Ali Salim ◽  
Marcus Ottochian ◽  
Ryan J. Gertz ◽  
Carlos Brown ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Intraabdominal Injury

The evaluation of the abdomen in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging for obvious reasons. There are very little data on the incidence and complications of patients who sustain SCI with concomitant intraabdominal injury (IAI). To determine the incidence and outcomes of IAI in blunt trauma patients with SCI, a trauma registry and record review was performed between January 1998 and December 2005. Baseline demographic data, Injury Severity Score, and associated IAI were collected. Two groups were established and outcomes were analyzed based on the presence or absence of IAI. Intraabdominal and hollow viscus injures were found in 15 per cent and 6 per cent, respectively, of 292 patients with blunt SCI. The presence of intraabdominal injury varied according to the level of the SCI: 10 per cent of cervical, 23 per cent of thoracic, and 18 per cent of lumbar SCI. The overall mortality was 16 per cent. The presence of intraabdominal injury was associated with longer intensive care unit length of stay (13 versus 6 days, P < 0.01), hospital length of stay (23 versus 18 days, P < 0.05), higher complication rate (46% versus 33%, P = 0.09), and higher mortality (44% versus 11%, P < 0.01) when compared with patients with SCI without IAI. Intraabdominal injuries are common in blunt SCI. Liberal evaluation with computed tomography is necessary to identify injuries early.

Placement of Surgical Feeding Tubes Among Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Requiring Exploratory Abdominal Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-642
Author(s):  
Peter I. Cha ◽  
Ronald M. Jou ◽  
David A. Spain ◽  
Joseph D. Forrester
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement

Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify trauma patients who would benefit from surgical placement of an enteral feeding tube during their index abdominal trauma operation. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to 2 level I trauma centers between January 2013 and February 2018 requiring urgent exploratory abdominal surgery. Results Six-hundred and one patients required exploratory abdominal surgery within 24 hours of admission after trauma activation. Nineteen (3% of total) patients underwent placement of a feeding tube after their initial exploratory surgery. On multivariate analysis, an intracranial Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥4 (odds ratio [OR] = 9.24, 95% CI 1.09-78.26, P = .04) and a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 (OR = 4.39, 95% CI 1.38-13.95, P = .01) were associated with increased odds of requiring a feeding tube. All patients who required a feeding tube had an Injury Severity Score ≥15. While not statistically significant, patients with an open surgical feeding tube compared with interventional radiology/percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement had lower median intensive care unit length of stay, fewer ventilator days, and shorter median total hospital length of stay. Conclusions Trauma patients with severe intracranial injury already requiring urgent exploratory abdominal surgery may benefit from early, concomitant placement of a feeding tube during the index abdominal operation, or at fascial closure.

An Objective Study of the Impact of the Electronic Medical Record on Outcomes in Trauma Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1249-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Schenarts ◽  
Claudia E. Goettler ◽  
Michael A. White ◽  
Brett H. Waibel
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Delay In Diagnosis ◽  
The Impact

It is commonly believed that the electronic medical record (EMR) will improve patient outcomes. However, there is scant published literature to support this claim and no studies in any surgical population. Our hypothesis was that the EMR would not improve objective outcome measures in patients with traumatic injury. Prospectively collected data from our university-based Level I trauma center was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, injury severity as well as outcomes and complications data were compared for all patients admitted over a 20-month period before introduction of the EMR and a 20-month period after full, hospital-wide use of the EMR. Implementation of the EMR was associated with a decreased hospital length of stay, P = 0.02; intensive care unit length of stay, P = 0.001; ventilator days, P = 0.002; acute respiratory distress syndrome, P = 0.006, pneumonia, P = 0.008; myocardial infarction, P = 0.001; line infection, P = 0.03; septicemia, P = 0.000; renal failure, P = 0.000; drug complication, P = 0.001; and delay in diagnosis, P = 0.04. There was no difference in mortality, unexpected cardiac arrest, missed injury, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, or late urinary tract infection. This is the first study to investigate the impact of the EMR in surgical patients. Although there was an improvement in some complications, the overall impact was inconsistent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document