Opioid-Free Thyroid and Parathyroid Operations: Are Patients Satisfied With Pain Control?

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110488
Author(s):  
Preston W. Leader ◽  
Douglas R Oyler ◽  
Tonya M Carter ◽  
Donna S. Damron ◽  
Cortney Y. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Surgical Experience ◽  
Analgesic Regimen ◽  
Thyroid Lobectomy ◽  
Patient Reported

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate pain control and patient satisfaction using an opioid-free analgesic regimen following thyroid and parathyroid operations. Methods Surveys were distributed to all postoperative patients following total thyroidectomy, thyroid lobectomy, and parathyroidectomy between January and April 2020. After surgery, patients were discharged without opioids except in rare cases based on patient needs and surgeon judgment. We measured patient-reported Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores and satisfaction categorically as either satisfied or dissatisfied. Results We received 90 of 198 surveys distributed, for a 45.5% response rate. After excluding neck dissections (n = 6) and preoperative opioid use (n = 4), the final cohort included 80 patients after total thyroidectomy (26.3%), thyroid lobectomy (41.3%), and parathyroidectomy (32.5%).The majority reported satisfaction with pain control (87.5%) and the entire surgical experience (95%). A similar proportion of patients reported satisfaction with pain control after total thyroidectomy (90.9%), thyroid lobectomy (90.5%), and parathyroidectomy (80.8%), indicating the procedure did not significantly impact satisfaction with pain control ( P = .47). Patients who reported dissatisfaction with pain control were more likely to receive opioid prescriptions (30% vs 2.9%, P < .01), but the majority still reported satisfaction with their entire operative experience (70%). Discussion Even with an opioid-free postoperative pain regimen, most patients report satisfaction with pain control after thyroid and parathyroid operations, and those who were dissatisfied with their pain control generally reported satisfaction with their overall surgical experience. Therefore, an opioid-free postoperative pain control regimen is well tolerated and unlikely to decrease overall patient satisfaction.

scholarly journals Stemming the Tide of Opioid Addiction—Dramatic Reductions in Postoperative Opioid Requirements Through Preoperative Education and a Standardized Analgesic Regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 436-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rowan R Sheldon ◽  
Jessica B Weiss ◽  
Woo S Do ◽  
Dominic M Forte ◽  
Preston L Carter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Nonopioid Analgesics

Abstract Introduction Surgery is a known gateway to opioid use that may result in long-term morbidity. Given the paucity of evidence regarding the appropriate amount of postoperative opioid analgesia and variable prescribing education, we investigated prescribing habits before and after institution of a multimodal postoperative pain management protocol. Materials and Methods Laparoscopic appendectomies, laparoscopic cholecystectomies, inguinal hernia repairs, and umbilical hernia repairs performed at a tertiary military medical center from 01 October 2016 until 30 September 2017 were examined. Prescriptions provided at discharge, oral morphine equivalents (OME), repeat prescriptions, and demographic data were obtained. A pain management regimen emphasizing nonopioid analgesics was then formulated and implemented with patient education about expected postoperative outcomes. After implementation, procedures performed from 01 November 2017 until 28 February 2018 were then examined and analyzed. Additionally, a patient satisfaction survey was provided focusing on efficacy of postoperative pain control. Results Preprotocol, 559 patients met inclusion criteria. About 97.5% were provided an opioid prescription, but prescriptions varied widely (256 OME, standard deviation [SD] 109). Acetaminophen was prescribed often (89.5%), but nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescriptions were rare (14.7%). About 6.1% of patients required repeat opioid prescriptions. After implementation, 181 patients met inclusion criteria. Initial opioid prescriptions decreased 69.8% (77 OME, SD 35; P &lt; 0.001), while repeat opioid prescriptions remained statistically unchanged (2.79%; P = 0.122). Acetaminophen prescribing rose to 96.7% (P = 0.002), and NSAID utilization increased to 71.0% (P &lt; 0.001). Postoperative survey data were obtained in 75 patients (41.9%). About 68% stated that they did not use all of the opioids prescribed and 81% endorsed excellent or good pain control throughout their postoperative course. Conclusions Appropriate preoperative counseling and utilization of nonopioid analgesics can dramatically reduce opioid use while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Patient-reported data suggest that even greater reductions may be possible.

scholarly journals Study of Pain Level Control Targets After Arthroscopic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Xin ◽  
Liu Congying ◽  
Zhang Xiaole ◽  
Wang Hong ◽  
Xu Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Pain Level ◽  
Convenience Sampling ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective: To explore the goal of pain control in patients after arthroscopic surgery.Design: Investigation. Postoperative pain, pain control satisfaction and the effect of pain on daily activities were investigated and evaluated.Setting: Department of Sports Medicine,Peking University 3rd Hospital,Beijing, P.R.ChinaSubjects: 514 patients selected by convenience sampling from patients hospitalized in a level A hospital in Beijing from 2020.06-2020.11. The patient inclusion criteria were an age of at least 18 years, no history of diagnosis of mental illness, the ability to clearly express his or her pain and an agreement to voluntarily cooperate with the investigators. The exclusion criteria were patients who were unable to complete follow-up.Methods: Postoperative pain, pain control satisfaction and the effect of pain on daily activities were investigated and evaluated by administering a homemade questionnaire to 514 patients selected by convenience sampling from patients hospitalized in a level A hospital in Beijing from 2020.06-2020.11. Pain was assessed using a digital pain numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10), and a digital score ranging from 0 to 10 was used for satisfaction with pain control and the impact of pain on aspects of daily living.Results: The pain level was most severe in patients 6-24 hours after arthroscopic surgery, during which pain control satisfaction was at its worst. The pain score was significantly related to the effects of pain on aspects of daily life, and the degree of these effects changed significantly for pain scores greater than 2 points.Conclusion: Pain control 6 to 24 hours after surgery is not satisfactory. It is recommended that a pain score of 2 points is used as the goal for pain control after arthroscopic surgery to guide both doctors and patients to effectively control postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Postoperative Pain Control Following Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Magnusson ◽  
Jo Ann LeQuang ◽  
Joseph V. Pergolizzi
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Acute Postoperative Pain ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Analgesic Regimen ◽  
Short Course

Postoperative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery may not always be adequately treated. The postoperative pain trajectory occurs over several days following the procedure with tenderness and limited arm range of motion lasting for weeks after surgery. Pain control typically commences in the perioperative period while the patient is in the hospital and may continue after discharge; outpatients may be given a prescription and advice for their analgesic regimen. It is not unusual for CIED patients to be discharged a few hours after implantation. While opioids are known as an effective analgesic to manage acute postoperative pain, growing scrutiny on opioid use as well as their side effects and potential risks have limited their use. Opioids may be considered for appropriate patients for a short course of treatment of acute postoperative pain, but other analgesics may likewise be considered.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Score for Poor Postoperative Pain Control Following Elective Spine Surgery

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M H Yang ◽  
Jay Riva-Cambrin ◽  
Jonathan Cunningham ◽  
Nathalie Jette ◽  
Tolulope T Sajobi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control

Abstract INTRODUCTION Approximately, 30% to 64% of people suffer from poorly controlled pain following spine surgery leading to patient dissatisfaction and poor outcomes. The ability to identify these patients before surgery may be useful to facilitate patient education and the development of personalized clinical-care pathways to improve postoperative pain management. METHODS Adult patients were consecutively enrolled through the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry and were included if they underwent inpatient elective cervical or thoracolumbar spine surgery. The outcome was poor postoperative pain control defined as the mean numeric rating scale for pain >4 in the first 24-h after surgery. A split-sample design was used to develop and validate the prediction model. The prediction model was transformed into a risk-based score and simplified to a 3-tier Calgary Postoperative Pain after Spine Surgery (CAPPS) score to maximize clinical utility. RESULTS Of 1300 patients, 57% had poorly controlled pain following spine surgery. Seven significant predictors were associated with poor pain control: younger age, female sex, preoperative daily opioid medication use, higher preoperative neck or back pain intensity, higher PHQ-9 depression score, > = 3 motion segment operation, and fusion surgery. Notably, chronic pain and minimally invasive surgery were not associated with pain control status. The model was discriminative (c-statistics 0.74 [95% CI = 0.71-0.77]) and accurate (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, P = .99) at predicting the outcome. Patients classified to low-, high-, and extreme-risk groups by the CAPPS score had 32%, 63%, and 85% predicted probability of developing poor postoperative pain control, respectively. This closely mirrored the observed probability of 37%, 62%, and 81% in the same risk-groups for poor pain control in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION This internally validated CAPPS score based on 7 easily acquired characteristics accurately predicted the probability of developing poor pain control after spine surgery. This score can be used to develop personalized preoperative and perioperative treatment strategies to improve pain outcomes.

scholarly journals Electroacupuncture to alleviate postoperative pain after a laparoscopic appendectomy: study protocol for a three-arm, randomised, controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e015286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Dongwoo Nam ◽  
Minsoo Kwon ◽  
Won Seo Park ◽  
Sun Jin Park
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Acupuncture Treatment ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Acupuncture Points ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for postoperative pain after laparoscopic appendectomy compared with sham electroacupuncture (SEA) and no acupuncture treatment.Methods and analysisThis study is a protocol for a three-arm, randomised, patient-assessor-blinded (to the type of acupuncture treatment), controlled, parallel trial. 138 participants diagnosed with appendicitis and scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy will be randomly assigned to the EA group (n=46), SEA group (n=46) or control group (n=46). The EA group will receive acupuncture treatment at both regional and distal acupuncture points with electrostimulation. The SEA group will receive sham acupuncture treatment with mock electrostimulation. Both EA and SEA groups will receive a total of four treatments 1 hour preoperative, 1 hour postoperative and during the morning and afternoon the day after surgery with the same routine postoperative pain control. The control group will receive only routine postoperative pain control. The primary outcome is the 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) at 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes are the PI-NRS, analgesic consumption, opioid-related side effects, time to first passing flatus, quality of life and adverse events evaluated 6, 12, 24 and 36 hours and 7 days after surgery.Ethics and disseminationThe study was planned in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the Korean Good Clinical Practice Guidelines to protect the participants and was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KMC IRB-1427–02). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.Trial registration numberClinical Research Information Service (KCT0001328).

scholarly journals Safety and Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 247301142110578
Author(s):  
Shahin Kayum ◽  
Sahil Kooner ◽  
Ryan M. Khan ◽  
Mansur Halai ◽  
Adam Awoke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Numeric Scale

Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a surgical procedure commonly reserved for patients suffering from symptomatic end-stage ankle arthritis. As the number of TAAs increases, so does the associated economic burden. Given these economic constraints, there has been interest in the feasibility of outpatient TAA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and satisfaction of patients undergoing outpatient TAA. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients who underwent outpatient TAA from July 2018 to June 2019. Inclusion criteria included any patient undergoing a primary TAA in the outpatient setting. This was defined as discharge on the same day of surgery or within 12 hours of surgery. All surgeries were completed by a single experienced surgeon through an anterior approach using the Cadence Total Ankle System. Prior to surgery, all patients received a popliteal nerve block. Patients were then discharged home with oral analgesic and a popliteal nerve catheter, which they removed after 48 hours. The primary outcome of interest was postoperative pain control, which was measured using a numeric scale. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, readmission rate, and patient satisfaction. A review of the current literature was then completed to supplement our results. Results: In total, 41 patients were included in our analysis. In terms of the primary outcome, the average numeric scale score was 1.98, indicating excellent pain control. Additionally, nearly all 41 patients stated they were very satisfied with their postoperative pain control regimen. In terms of secondary outcomes, the majority of patients stated they were satisfied with discharge on the same day as surgery. There were no readmissions or major complications in our outpatient TAA cohort. When asked if they would recommend the care they experienced to a friend with the same condition, 95% of patients said that they would recommend this care pathway. Our literature review included 5 original studies, which were all retrospective level IV studies. These studies uniformly demonstrated the safety and efficacy of outpatient TAA. Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrate the outpatient TAA is associated with excellent pain control using a multidisciplinary pain approach. The use of standardized outpatient postoperative pathways was effective in preventing readmissions and complications, while still resulting in high patient satisfaction scores. A review of the literature complemented our results, as there are largely no significant differences between outpatient and inpatient TAA. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals An Interactive Pain Application (MServ) Improves Postoperative Pain Management

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Richard Gordon-Williams ◽  
Andreia Trigo ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
Amanda Williams ◽  
Stephen Cone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Patient Reported

Background. Most patients have moderate or severe pain after surgery. Opioids are the cornerstone of treating severe pain after surgery but cause problems when continued long after discharge. We investigated the efficacy of multifunction pain management software (MServ) in improving postoperative pain control and reducing opioid prescription at discharge. Methods. We recruited 234 patients to a prospective cohort study into sequential groups in a nonrandomised manner, one day after major thoracic or urological surgery. Group 1 received standard care (SC, n = 102), group 2 were given a multifunctional device that fed back to the nursing staff alone (DN, n = 66), and group 3 were given the same device that fed back to both the nursing staff and the acute pain team (DNPT, n = 66). Patient-reported pain scores at 24 and 48 hours and patient-reported time in severe pain, medications, and satisfaction were recorded on trial discharge. Findings. Odds of having poor pain control (>1 on 0–4 pain scale) were calculated between standard care (SC) and device groups (DN and DNPT). Patients with a device were significantly less likely to have poor pain control at 24 hours (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25, 0.81) and to report time in severe pain at 48 hours (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.80). Patients with a device were three times less likely to be prescribed strong opioids on discharge (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.95). Interpretation. Using an mHealth device designed for pain management, rather than standard care, reduced the incidence of poor pain control in the postoperative period and reduced opioid prescription on discharge from hospital.

scholarly journals Aesthetics Assessment and Patient Reported Outcome of Nasolabial Aesthetics in 18-Year-Old Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1058-1064
Author(s):  
Frans J. Mulder ◽  
David G. M. Mosmuller ◽  
Riekie H. C. W. de Vet ◽  
J. P. W. Don Griot
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Facial Trauma ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Satisfaction Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Aesthetics Assessment

Objective: To determine if there is a correlation between objective nasolabial aesthetics assessment using the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale (CARS) and patient satisfaction. Design: Retrospective analysis of a generic satisfaction questionnaire and independent assessment by three cleft surgeons of the nasolabial area of these patients on 2D frontal photographs, using the CARS. Setting: The Vrije Universiteit Medical Center and The Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam. Patients: Thirty-nine 18-year old patients with a repaired complete or incomplete unilateral cleft lip, with or without a cleft palate, and a completed satisfaction questionnaire. Exclusion criteria were an incomplete questionnaire; a history of facial trauma; and congenital syndromes affecting facial appearance. Main Outcome Measures: The correlation between surgeon evaluation (on a 5-point Likert scale) and patient satisfaction (not, moderately or very satisfied) on nasolabial appearance was assessed using Spearman rho (ρ). Results: There was a negligible correlation between surgeon evaluation and patient satisfaction on nose assessment (ρ = 0.20) and a moderate correlation on lip assessment (ρ = 0.32). Conclusions: Most literature supports this discrepancy between different objective aesthetics evaluation methods and subjective patient-reported outcome measures, suggesting there are factors playing a role in patient satisfaction that are impossible to objectify with assessment methods. Therefore, a strong emphasis should remain on clear communication between the physician and patient regarding their expectations, perception, and satisfaction of surgery results.

scholarly journals Use of Air Arthrograms to Aid in Joint Distraction During Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Decreases Postoperative Pain and Opioid Requirements

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596711983738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Hodax ◽  
Sergio E. Flores ◽  
Edward C. Cheung ◽  
Alan L. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Postanesthesia Care Unit ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Joint Distraction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Pacu Stay

Background: Positive-pressure air arthrography and venting of the hip capsule are techniques used to decrease the traction forces needed for joint distraction during hip arthroscopic surgery. Little is known about the effects that these techniques have on postoperative pain. Hypothesis: Positive-pressure air arthrography and venting during hip arthroscopic surgery will decrease patient-reported pain and narcotic requirements in the acute postoperative setting. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted to analyze 35 patients who underwent positive-pressure air arthrography and venting to aid joint distraction during hip arthroscopic surgery versus a group with similar demographics, pathologies, and treatments who did not undergo air arthrography. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) scores and medication administration including narcotic and nonnarcotic analgesia in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were tracked and compared. Results: The maximum (7.17 vs 4.97, respectively), minimum (2.43 vs 1.09, respectively), and mean (5.15 vs 3.11, respectively) NPRS scores were all higher in the control group compared with the air arthrogram group ( P < .001, P = .007, and P < .001, respectively). The administration of oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during the PACU stay was significantly lower in the air arthrogram group, with a mean of 36.75 ± 11.37 OMEs, compared with 44.53 ± 16.06 OMEs in the control group ( P = .023). There was no difference in postoperative nonopioid medications, such as ketorolac or acetaminophen, given between groups. Conclusion: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery with air arthrography and venting used to aid distraction had significantly less postoperative pain and required a lower total dosage of opioids during their PACU stay when compared with patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery without air arthrography.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document