scholarly journals Responsiveness Beyond Policy Satisfaction: Does It Matter to Citizens?

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Esaiasson ◽  
Mikael Gilljam ◽  
Mikael Persson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real World ◽  
Policy Decision ◽  
Willingness To Communicate ◽  
Perceptual Bias ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Survey Experiment ◽  
Majority Opinion ◽  
Real World Setting

Can politicians facilitate citizen acceptance of unwelcome policy decisions by acting responsively during the decision-making process? We suggest a framework to analyze the responsiveness–acceptance connection and report findings from two studies designed for that purpose. First, we ran a survey experiment to examine how exogenously induced responsiveness actions affect reactions to a policy decision. Second, we conducted a case study to see how results hold up in a real-world setting. We find that responsiveness actions are rewarded provided that citizens are convinced that politicians have paid attention to their wishes and views. Responsiveness actions that signal willingness to communicate (“to listen” and “to explain”) are more effective than the action to follow majority opinion (“to adapt”). However, the responsiveness–acceptance connection is sensitive to perceptual bias; policy losers are hard pressed to accept that politicians have indeed acted responsively.

scholarly journals Feminist Judging in the 'Real World'

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1275-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Hunter
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Real World ◽  
Interview Data ◽  
Feminist Perspective ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
The Real ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Tools And Techniques

The various feminist judgment projects (FJPs) have explored through the imagined rewriting of judgments a range of ways in which a feminist perspective may be applied to the practice of judging. But how do these imagined judgments compare to what actual feminist judges do? This article presents the results of the author’s empirical research to date on ‘real world’ feminist judging. Drawing on case study and interview data it explores the how, when and where of feminist judging, that is, the feminist resources, tools and techniques judges have drawn upon, the stages in the hearing and decision-making process at which these resources, tools and techniques have been deployed, and the areas of law in which they have been applied. The article goes on to consider observed and potential limits on feminist judicial practice, before drawing conclusions about the comparison between ‘real world’ feminist judging and the practices of FJPs. Los proyectos de sentencias feministas, a través de la reelaboración imaginaria de sentencias judiciales, han explorado multitud de vías en las que las perspectivas feministas se podrían aplicar a la práctica judicial. Pero ¿qué resulta de la comparación entre dichas sentencias y la práctica real de las juezas feministas? Este artículo presenta los resultados de la investigación empírica de la autora. Se analiza el cómo, el cuándo y el dónde de la labor judicial feminista, es decir, los recursos, herramientas y técnicas feministas que las juezas han utilizado, las fases de audiencia y toma de decisión en las que se han utilizado y las áreas del derecho en que se han aplicado. Además, se toman en consideración los límites observados y potenciales de la práctica judicial feminista, y se extraen conclusiones sobre la comparación entre la labor judicial feminista en el “mundo real” y la práctica de los proyectos de tribunales feministas.

Implementation of Decision Tree for Maintenance Policy Decision Making - A Case Study in Semiconductor Industry

2012 ◽  
Vol 591-593 ◽  
pp. 704-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siew Hong Ding ◽  
Teing Tien Goh ◽  
Pei Sze Tan ◽  
Siew Ching Wee ◽  
Shahrul Kamaruddin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Failure Mechanism ◽  
Semiconductor Industry ◽  
Policy Decision ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Maintenance Policy ◽  
Machine Performance ◽  
Policy Decision Making

Suitable maintenance policy implemented in particular machine able to improve the machine performance as well as the product quality. However, selecting a suitable maintenance policy is a vital and hard work because it has to be decided from analysis of various criteria including failure mechanism and resources limitation. Thus, decision tree is suggested in this paper to provide assistance for maintenance crew in conducting a systematic and efficient decision making process in determining the suitable maintenance policy. In the end of the paper, a case study in semiconductor industry is conducted to illustrate the practicability of developed decision tree.

Simulating the Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process in the Undergraduate Classroom

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Loggins
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Real World ◽  
Policy Decision ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
Political Events ◽  
Policy Decision Making ◽  
Concrete World

A simulation of the foreign policy decision-making process, as described in this article, can assist an instructor in linking students' abstract understanding of complex political events, circumstances, and decision making to the real-world interplay of the multiple factors involved in decision making. It is this type of active learning that helps bring a student's abstract understanding into the concrete world. Instead of being passive learners relying on an instructor's knowledge, students are active participants in the learning process.

Key Issues and the Requirements for an Effective Enterprise Decision-Making Using an Ontology-Based GOAL-Framework for Evaluation of the Organizational Goals Achievement

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-42
Author(s):  
Tengku Adil Tengku Izhar ◽  
Torab Torabi ◽  
M. Ishaq Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real World ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Organizational Goals ◽  
Domain Experts ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Real World Situation

This article proposes the GOAL-Framework for the evaluation of organizational goals based on an ontology. The aim is to capture and analyze relevant data for the organization goals because determining relevant data is a key to delivering value from massive amounts of data for better decision-making in relation to the organizational goals achievement. The framework will allow the domain experts and entrepreneurs to evaluate relevant organizational data to assist the decision-making process with respect to the organizational goals. Hence, they will be able to identify to what extent certain organizational goals could be achieved. In order to test the flexibility and applicability of the GOAL-Framework, a case study is presented to explain how the framework is implemented and applied to a real world situation. The outcome of the case study demonstrates that the framework can be applied for analysis and decision-making based on the metrics using the dashboard to evaluate the extent to which the organizational goals could be achieved.

Did Groupthink or Polythink Derail the 2016 Raqqa Offensive?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasey Barr ◽  
Alex Mintz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Dynamics ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Islamic State ◽  
Study Analysis ◽  
Strategic Decisions ◽  
Case Study Analysis ◽  
The Us ◽  
Tactical Decisions

This chapter examines the effect of group dynamics on the 2016 decision within the administration of President Barack Obama to lead the international coalition in a mission to liberate Raqqa, Syria, from the Islamic State. The authors show that whereas the groupthink syndrome characterized the decision-making process of the US-led coalition’s decision to attack Raqqa, it was polythink that characterized the decision-making dynamics both in the US-led coalition and within the inner circle of Obama’s own foreign policy advisors. Through case-study analysis, the authors illustrate that groupthink is more likely in strategic decisions, whereas polythink is more likely in tactical decisions.

scholarly journals Postlaunch evidence-generation studies for medical devices in Spain: the RedETS approach to integrate real-world evidence into decision making

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Serrano-Aguilar ◽  
Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea ◽  
Pilar Díaz ◽  
Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia ◽  
Jesús González-Enríquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Real World ◽  
Policy Decision ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Political Commitment ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Health Policy Decision ◽  
Regional Health Authorities

Abstract The Monitoring Studies (MS) program, the approach developed by RedETS to generate postlaunch real-world evidence (RWE), is intended to complement and enhance the conventional health technology assessment process to support health policy decision making in Spain, besides informing other interested stakeholders, including clinicians and patients. The MS program is focused on specific uncertainties about the real effect, safety, costs, and routine use of new and insufficiently assessed relevant medical devices carefully selected to ensure the value of the additional research needed, by means of structured, controlled, participative, and transparent procedures. However, despite a clear political commitment and economic support from national and regional health authorities, several difficulties were identified along the development and implementation of the first wave of MS, delaying its execution and final reporting. Resolution of these difficulties at the regional and national levels and a greater collaborative impulse in the European Union, given the availability of an appropriate methodological framework already provided by EUnetHTA, might provide a faster and more efficient comparative RWE of improved quality and reliability at the national and international levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document