scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers to Antibiotic Stewardship: A Qualitative Study of Pharmacists’ Perspectives

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley J. Appaneal ◽  
Megan K. Luther ◽  
Tristan T. Timbrook ◽  
Kerry L. LaPlante ◽  
David M. Dosa
Keyword(s):  
New England ◽  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Protected Time ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Core Elements

Background: The Veterans Affairs (VA) is a leader in the implementation and advancement of antibiotic stewardship programs throughout the nation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has also led national antibiotic stewardship efforts and has outlined core elements to improve antibiotic use in hospitals, long-term care, and outpatient settings. Many facilities still face challenges to the implementation and maintenance of successful programs, particularly in nonacute care settings. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to antibiotic stewardship within the VA medical centers through qualitative interviews with pharmacists. Methods: Eight semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with pharmacists from 6 VA medical centers within VA New England Healthcare System. Pharmacist respondents were either pharmacy champions (for medical centers with established programs) or pharmacists with responsibilities in making antibiotic recommendations (locations without established programs). All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. NVivo 8 was used for data coding and analysis. Results: Pharmacists from all 8 medical centers were contacted for interviews and pharmacists from 6 medical centers agreed to interviews (75% VA New England medical center participation). Three main themes regarding antibiotic stewardship were identified from the interviews with pharmacists. Respondents described the importance of (1) a supportive organizational culture, (2) protected time for antibiotic stewardship, and (3) a cohesive organizational structure in the success of antibiotic stewardship programs. Conclusions: Our findings support the CDC core elements for antibiotic stewardship, in particular the importance of leadership commitment in the creation of a culture that supports antibiotic stewardship and in ensuring staff are given sufficient time for antibiotic stewardship efforts. Although a strong supportive culture has been built, strategies focused on fostering increased protected time for antibiotic stewardship and a cohesive organizational structure may be helpful in advancing and sustaining successful antibiotic stewardship programs that improve patient outcomes.

scholarly journals 178. Implementation of the Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship in Nursing Homes – National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), 2016–2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S96-S96
Author(s):  
Katryna A Gouin ◽  
Sarah Kabbani; Angela Anttila ◽  
Josephine Mak ◽  
Elisabeth Mungai ◽  
Ti Tanissha McCray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Long Term Care Facility ◽  
The Core ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Core Elements

Abstract Background Since 2016, nursing homes (NHs) enrolled in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s NHSN Long-term Care Facility (LTCF) Component have reported on their implementation of the core elements of antibiotic stewardship. In 2016, 42% of NHs reported implementing all seven core elements. Recent regulations require antibiotic stewardship programs in NHs. The objectives of this analysis were to track national progress in implementation of the core elements and evaluate how time dedicated to infection prevention and control (IPC) is associated with the implementation of the core elements. Methods We used the NHSN LTCF 2016–2018 Annual Surveys to assess NH characteristics and implementation of the core elements, defined as self-reported implementation of at least one corresponding stewardship activity. We reported absolute differences in percent implementation. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between weekly IPC hours and the implementation of all seven core elements, while controlling for confounding by facility characteristics. Results We included 7,506 surveys from 2016–2018. In 2018, 71% of NHs reported implementation of all seven core elements, a 28% increase from 2016 (Fig. 1). The greatest increases in implementation from 2016–2018 were in Education (+19%), Reporting (+18%) and Drug Expertise (+15%) (Fig. 2). Ninety-eight percent of NHs had an individual responsible for antibiotic stewardship activities (Accountability), with 30% indicating that the role was fulfilled by an infection preventionist. Furthermore, 71% of NHs reported pharmacist involvement in improving antibiotic use, an increase of 27% since 2016. NHs that reported at least 20 hours of IPC activity per week were 14% more likely to implement all seven core elements, when controlling for facility ownership and affiliation, 95% CI: (1.07, 1.20). Conclusion NHs reported substantial progress in antibiotic stewardship implementation from 2016–2018. Improvements in accessing drug expertise, providing education and reporting antibiotic use may reflect increased stewardship awareness and use of resources among NH providers under new regulatory requirements. NHs with at least 20 hours dedicated to IPC per week may have greater capacity to implement all core elements. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Changes in antibiotic use following implementation of a telehealth stewardship pilot program

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 810-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigid M. Wilson ◽  
Richard E. Banks ◽  
Christopher J. Crnich ◽  
Emma Ide ◽  
Roberto A. Viau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

AbstractStarting in 2016, we initiated a pilot tele-antibiotic stewardship program at 2 rural Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs). Antibiotic days of therapy decreased significantly (P < .05) in the acute and long-term care units at both intervention sites, suggesting that tele-stewardship can effectively support antibiotic stewardship practices in rural VAMCs.

Implementation of core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes—National Healthcare Safety Network, 2016–2018

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Katryna A. Gouin ◽  
Sarah Kabbani ◽  
Angela Anttila ◽  
Josephine Mak ◽  
Elisabeth Mungai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
The Core ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Core Elements

Abstract Objective: To assess the national uptake of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes from 2016 to 2018 and the effect of infection prevention and control (IPC) hours on the implementation of the core elements. Design: Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis. Setting: US nursing homes. Methods: We used the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Long-Term Care Facility Component annual surveys from 2016 to 2018 to assess nursing home characteristics and percent implementation of the core elements. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between weekly IPC hours and the implementation of all 7 core elements while controlling for confounding by facility characteristics. Results: We included 7,506 surveys from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported implementation of all 7 core elements, a 28% increase from 2016. The greatest increases in implementation from 2016 to 2018 were in education (19%), reporting (18%), and drug expertise (15%). In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported pharmacist involvement in improving antibiotic use, an increase of 27% since 2016. Nursing homes that reported at least 20 hours of IPC activity per week were 14% (95% confidence interval, 7%–20%) more likely to implement all 7 core elements when controlling for facility ownership and affiliation. Conclusions: Nursing homes reported substantial progress in antibiotic stewardship implementation from 2016 to 2018. Improvements in access to drug expertise, education, and reporting antibiotic use may reflect increased stewardship awareness and resource use among nursing home providers under new regulatory requirements. Nursing home stewardship programs may benefit from increased IPC staff hours.

scholarly journals 1838. Digging Deeper: A Closer Look at Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Long-Term Care Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S524-S524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan Tahir Lodhi ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
Philip Chung ◽  
Mark E Rupp ◽  
Trevor Vanschooneveld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Core Elements

scholarly journals 857. A Tele-Antibiotic Stewardship Program Influences Antibiotic Use at 2 Rural Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S19-S19
Author(s):  
Brigid Wilson ◽  
Richard Banks ◽  
Christopher Crnich ◽  
Emma Ide ◽  
Roberto Viau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Limited Access ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Length Of Therapy

Abstract Background Telehealth offers the possibility of supporting antibiotic stewardship in settings with limited access to people with infectious diseases (ID) expertise. Previously, we described preliminary results from a pilot project that used the Veterans Affairs (VA) telehealth system to facilitate a Videoconference Antimicrobial Stewardship Team (VAST) which connected a multidisciplinary team from a rural VA medical center (VAMC) with ID physicians at a remote site to support antibiotic stewardship. Here, we present 3 distinct metrics to assess the influence of the VAST on antibiotic use at 2 intervention sites. Methods Outcomes assessed antibiotic use in the hospital and long-term care units of 2 rural VAMCs in the year before and after VAST implementation, allowing for a 1-month wash-in period in the first month of the VAST. Using VA databases, we determined 3 metrics: the rate of antibiotic use (days of therapy per 1,000 bed days of care); the mean length of therapy (days); and the mean patient antibiotic spectrum index (ASI), a measure of antibiotic spectrum increasing from narrow to broad. Using segmented regression on monthly measures of each metric with a knot at the wash-in month (gray square), we calculated predicted values (solid lines), and confidence intervals (dashed lines) to examine trends before (black squares) and after (white squares) implementing the VAST. Results The rate of antibiotic use, mean length of therapy, and ASI decreased at Site A. As indicated in the figure, the effect was more pronounced in long-term care compared with the hospital, where the VAST sustained but did not accelerate downward trends. At Site B, the most notable influence of the VAST was on the ASI for the hospital and long-term care units. Conclusion The VAST is a feasible, sustainable program that is effective at inducing change in antibiotic use at 2 VAMCs. The influence of the VAST differed between the 2 sites and, at Site A had a more pronounced effect on the long-term care compared with hospital units. These distinct metrics capture changes in overall antibiotic use, length of therapy, and agent selection. Tele-antibiotic stewardship programs hold potential to improve antibiotic use at facilities with limited access to people with antibiotic stewardship expertise. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Impact of Training Consultant Pharmacists on Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Long-Term Care Facilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s446-s448
Author(s):  
Muhammad Salman Ashraf ◽  
Philip Chung ◽  
Alex Neukirch ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
R. Jennifer Cavalieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Core Elements

Background: The CDC recommends that consultant pharmacists support antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). We studied CDC-recommended ASP core elements implementation and antibiotic use in LTCFs before and after training consultant pharmacists. Methods: Between August 2017 and October 2017, consultant pharmacists from a regional long-term care pharmacy attended 5 didactic sessions preparing them to assist LTCFs in implementation of CDC-recommended ASP core elements. Training also included creating a process for evaluating appropriateness of all systemic antibiotics and providing prescriber feedback during their monthly mandatory drug-regimen reviews. Once monthly “meet-the-expert” sessions were held with consultant pharmacists throughout the project (November 2017 to December 2018). LTCF enrollment began in November 2017 and >90% of facilities joined by January 2018. After enrollment, consultant pharmacists initiated ASP interventions including antibiotic reviews and feedback using standard templates. They also held regular meetings with infection preventionists to discuss Core Elements implementation and provided various ASP resources to LTCFs (eg, antibiotic policy template, guidance documents and standard assessment and communication tools). Data collection included ASP Core Elements, antibiotic starts, days of therapy (DOT), and resident days (RD). The McNemar test, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, generalized estimating equation model, and the classic repeated measures approach were used to compare the presence of all 7 core elements and antibiotic use during the baseline (2017) and intervention (2018) year.Results: In total, 9 trained consultant pharmacists assisted 32 LTCFs with ASP implementation. When evaluating 27 LTCFs that provided complete data, a significant increase in presence of all 7 Core Elements after the intervention was noted compared to baseline (67% vs 0; median Core Elements, 7 vs 2; range, 6–7 vs 1–6; P < .001). Median monthly antibiotic starts per 1,000 RD and DOT per 1,000 RD decreased in 2018 compared to 2017: 8.93 versus 9.91 (P < .01) and 106.47 versus 141.59 (P < .001), respectively. However, variations in antibiotic use were detected among facilities (Table 1). When comparing trends, antibiotic starts and DOT were already trending downward during 2017 (Fig. 1A and 1B). On average, antibiotic starts decreased by 0.27 per 1,000 RD (P < .001) and DOT by 1.92 per 1,000 RD (P < .001) each month during 2017. Although antibiotic starts remained mostly stable in 2018, DOT continued to decline further (average monthly decline, 2.60 per 1,000 RD; P < .001). When analyzing aggregated mean, antibiotic use across all sites per month by year, DOT were consistently lower throughout 2018 and antibiotic starts were lower for the first 9 months (Fig. 1C and 1D). Conclusions: Consultant pharmacists can play an important role in strengthening ASPs and in decreasing antibiotic use in LTCFs. Educational programs should be developed nationally to train long-term care consultant pharmacists in ASP implementation.Funding: Merck & Co., Inc, provided funding for this study.Disclosures: Muhammad Salman Ashraf and Scott Bergman report receipt of a research grant from Merck.

scholarly journals Assessment of Adherence to the Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs: A Survey of the Tertiary Care Hospitals in Punjab, Pakistan

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 906
Author(s):  
Naeem Mubarak ◽  
Asma Sarwar Khan ◽  
Taheer Zahid ◽  
Umm e Barirah Ijaz ◽  
Muhammad Majid Aziz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Current Response ◽  
The Core ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals

Background: To restrain antibiotic resistance, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United States of America, urges all hospital settings to implement the Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (CEHASP). However, the concept of hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs is relatively new in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Aim: To appraise the adherence of the tertiary care hospitals to seven CEHASPs. Design and Setting: A cross-sectional study in the tertiary care hospitals in Punjab, Pakistan. Method: CEHASP assessment tool, (a checklist) was used to collect data from the eligible hospitals based on purposive sampling. The check list had 19 statements to cover seven CEHASPs: Hospital Leadership Commitment, Accountability, Pharmacy Expertise, Action (Implement Interventions to Improve Antibiotic Use), Tracking Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, Reporting Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, and Education. For each statement, a response of “YES”, “NO” or “Under Process” constituted a score of 2, 0 and 1, respectively, where the higher the scores the better the adherence. Categorical variables were described through descriptive statistics, while independent t-test computed group differences. Result: A total of 68 hospitals (n = 33 public, n = 35 private) participated with a response rate of 79.1%. No hospital demonstrated “Perfect” adherence. Roughly half private (48.6%) and more than half public (54.5%) sector hospitals were “Poor“ in adherence. Based on the mean score, there was no significant difference between the private and the public hospitals in terms of comparison of individual core elements. The two most neglected core elements emerged as top priority area were: Reporting Antibiotic Use and Outcomes and Tracking Antibiotic Use and Outcomes.Conclusion: The current response of Pakistan to implement hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs is inadequate. This study points out significant gaps of practice both in public and private tertiary care hospitals. A majority of the core elements of antibiotic stewardship are either absent or ”Under Process”. The deficiency/priority areas mentioned require immediate attention of the concerned stakeholders in Pakistan.

scholarly journals 112. Prescriber Perceptions on Utilization of the Antibiotic Self-Stewardship Time Out Program (SSTOP) at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMC): A Strategy for Improved Antibiotic Use

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S171-S171
Author(s):  
Cassie Goedken ◽  
Joshua Judd ◽  
Jorie M Butler ◽  
Nui G Brown ◽  
Michael Rubin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Practice Change ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Service Information ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Data Feedback ◽  
Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

Abstract Background Evidence is lacking on how to implement effective and sustainable antibiotic stewardship strategies. The Antibiotic Self-Stewardship Time Out Program (SSTOP) evaluated the implementation at VAMCs of an “Antibiotic Timeout” 3 days after the initiation of antibiotics to encourage providers to review continued use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Methods Sites launched the SSTOP note templates in a rolling fashion from June 2019-March 2020. Clinical pharmacists largely drove the implementation. The vancomycin note template was implemented at 6 of 8 sites and the antipseudomonal note template across 4 of 8 sites. Two sites were unable to launch the note templates due to lack of resources, however they utilized SSTOP principles/guided tools. From Sept 2019-Nov 2020 we conducted post-launch qualitative interviews with Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) champions involved in implementation across the 8 VAMCs. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for thematic content. Results Feedback from ASP providers suggests prescribers had mixed reviews on the note template, but overall liked the process and deemed it to be straightforward. Many valued the algorithm, indicating it was helpful in both thinking about antibiotics prior to initiation, and identification of appropriate antibiotics. Barriers included staffing (e.g., rotating residents/turnover), surgery service, information technology (IT) support, COVID-19, and the need to remind providers to use the template. Facilitators consisted of strong stewardship, local champions (e.g., ID Fellow), medicine service, and SSTOP data feedback reports. Recommendations largely centered on improvements to the note template usability and to SSTOP feedback reports (e.g., inclusion of patient/provider-level data). Conclusion Overall, the SSTOP note templates were considered acceptable and straightforward. By guiding providers to prescribe more appropriate antibiotics, they act as influencers for practice change, and may strengthen provider/ASP relations. Plans for continued utilization of the note templates after the project concludes suggest SSTOP may serve as a way to achieve sustainable promotion of antibiotic use improvements. Disclosures Matthew B. Goetz, MD, Nothing to disclose

A Veterans’ Healthcare Administration (VHA) antibiotic stewardship intervention to improve outpatient antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections: A cost-effectiveness analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Minkyoung Yoo ◽  
Karl Madaras-Kelly ◽  
McKenna Nevers ◽  
Katherine E. Fleming-Dutra ◽  
Adam L. Hersh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Intervention Cost ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Objectives: The Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship provides a framework to improve antibiotic use, but cost-effectiveness data on implementation of outpatient antibiotic stewardship interventions are limited. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of Core Element implementation in the outpatient setting. Methods: An economic simulation model from the health-system perspective was developed for patients presenting to outpatient settings with uncomplicated acute respiratory tract infections (ARI). Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost and utility parameters for antibiotic treatment, adverse drug events (ADEs), and healthcare utilization were obtained from the literature. Probabilities for antibiotic treatment and appropriateness, ADEs, hospitalization, and return ARI visits were estimated from 16,712 and 51,275 patient visits in intervention and control sites during the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. Data for materials and labor to perform the stewardship activities were used to estimate intervention cost. We performed a one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) using 1,000,000 second-order Monte Carlo simulations on input parameters. Results: The proportion of ARI patient-visits with antibiotics prescribed in intervention sites was lower (62% vs 74%) and appropriate treatment higher (51% vs 41%) after implementation, compared to control sites. The estimated intervention cost over a 2-year period was $133,604 (2018 US dollars). The intervention had lower mean costs ($528 vs $565) and similar mean QALYs (0.869 vs 0.868) per patient compared to usual care. In the PSA, the intervention was dominant in 63% of iterations. Conclusions: Implementation of the CDC Core Elements in the outpatient setting was a cost-effective strategy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document