Why Women Veterans Do Not Use VA-Provided Health and Social Services: Implications for Health Care Design and Delivery

2019 ◽  
pp. 002216781984732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Evans ◽  
Dawn L. Tennenbaum ◽  
Donna L. Washington ◽  
Alison B. Hamilton
1985 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 889-890
Author(s):  
Chris Phillipson ◽  
Patricia Strang

In the present study a sentence completion list was administered to a range of community carers in the health and social services. Analysis of information from 334 respondents indicated statistically significant differences regarding perceptions about older people. The responses of the different groups indicated attitudinal support for developing a range of preventive strategies in the field of social and health care. There was some evidence, however, that workers held stereotyped views about the lives of older people.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruta Valaitis ◽  
Laura Cleghorn ◽  
Ivaylo Vassilev ◽  
Anne Rogers ◽  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Primary care providers have been tasked with fostering self-management through managing referrals and linking patients to community-based health and social services. This study evaluated a web-based tool –GENIE (Generating Engagement in Network InvolvEment)– as a component of the Health TAPESTRY program to support self-management of older adults who are high health care system users. GENIE aims to empower patients to leverage their personal social networks to access community services towards reaching their health goals. GENIE maps client’s personal networks, elicits preferences, and filters local health and social resources from a community service directory based on results of a questionnaire that explores client’s interests. In the Health TAPESTRY program, volunteers conducted home visits to gather health information on tablets and implemented the GENIE tool. A report was generated for the primary care team for follow up. OBJECTIVE This study examined the usability, feasibility, and perceived outcomes of the implementation of GENIE with older adults who were enrolled in Ontario’s Health Links Program, which coordinates care for the highest users of the health care system. METHODS This study involved two primary care clinician focus groups, one clinician interview, a volunteer focus group, client telephone interviews, field observations, and GENIE utilization statistics. RESULTS Eight patients, three volunteers, and 16 primary care clinicians participated. Patients were most interested in services that were health-related (exercise and socialization). Overall, participants perceived GENIE to be useful and easy to use, despite challenges related to email set up, disease terminology, instructions for personal network mapping, and clarity of questionnaire items. Volunteer facilitation was critical to support implementation of Genie. Tool completion averaged 39 minutes. Almost all patients identified a community program or activity of interest using GENIE. Half followed up on health and social services and added new members to their network over 6 months, while one participant lost a member. Clinicians had concerns about accuracy, suitability, and quantity of suggested programs and services generated from the tool and believed that they could better tailor choices for their patients highlighting the inherent tension between user-centred preferences focused on capabilities and bio-medical definitions of need shaping professional judgement. However, clinicians did note that GENIE strengthened their understanding of patients’ personal social networks. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated GENIE’s potential, facilitated by volunteers, to expand patients’ social networks and link them to relevant health and social services to support self-management. Volunteers require training to effectively implement GENIE for self-management support and can help overcome time limitations that primary care clinicians face. Refining the filtering capability of GENIE to allow for better tailoring of results to address the complex needs of those who are high system users may help to improve primary care provider’s confidence in such tools. CLINICALTRIAL Not applicable


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 442-452
Author(s):  
Patrycja Kabiesz ◽  
Joanna Bartnicka

Abstract The health care system should offer and provide a variety of services without undue delay. Due to numerous technical, financial and human resource constraints, not all services can be offered both without restrictions and in equal measure in places of different sizes of residence. As a result of qualitative and quantitative research, a map of accessibility to social and health services was drawn up, taking into consideration the division of the country into voivodeships with different population. Spatial analysis showed great diversity in terms of service availability. Voivodships with the highest accessibility of health and social services are Dolnośląskie, Opolskie and Świętokrzyskie, while the worst situation is in Wielkopolskie. Moreover, the article identifies the main problems that people with limited functionality encounter when using health and social services.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. e3488
Author(s):  
Rosana Onocko-Campos ◽  
Larry Davidson ◽  
Manuel Desviat

The care of people with mental health problems requires health system and service reforms to build up proper mental health care. The challenges of the present moment continue to be immense. The viral pandemic that we are experiencing has exposed the fragility of our health and social services and certified the inequality and precariousness of the living conditions of many people. The collection of articles published in the journal Salud Colectiva as part of the open call for papers “Mental health and human rights: challenges for health services and communities,” includes articles from Spain, Brazil, Mexico, and Chile. These papers present conceptual experiences and reflections on community action plans and programs, contributing toward better knowledge and development of mental health in the region.


1976 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Macgregor Wood

SUMMARYThis article casts some light on a neglected area of the health and social services in Britain, namely provision for homeless, single men. It is shown that the services available are grossly inadequate to meet their needs. The paper uses results from a study of Camberwell reception centre which demonstrate that the absolute number of men having either a physical or mental illness who use the centre in any one year is much higher than had previously been calculated. The reception centre is unable to meet their needs which are principally for low-rent accommodation for single people and appropriate health care and social support.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam J. Laugesen ◽  
George France

AbstractIntegration in health care is a key goal of health reform in United States and England. Yet past efforts in the 1990s to better integrate the delivery system were of limited success. Building on work by Bevan and Janus on delivery integration, this article explores integration through the lens of economic theories of integration. Firms generally integrate to increase efficiency through economies of scale, to improve their market power, and resolve the transaction costs involved with multiple external suppliers. Using the United States and England as laboratories, we apply concepts of economic integration to understand why integration does or does not occur in health care, and whether expectations of integrating different kinds of providers (hospital, primary care) and health and social services are realistic. Current enthusiasm for a more integrated health care system expands the scope of integration to include social services in England, but retains the focus on health care in the United States. We find mixed applicability of economic theories of integration. Economies of scale have not played a significant role in stimulating integration in both countries. Managerial incentives for monopoly or oligopoly may be more compelling in the United States, since hospitals seek higher prices and more leverage over payers. In both countries the concept of transaction costs could explain the success of new payment and budgeting methods, since health care integration ultimately requires resolving transaction costs across different delivery organizations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Justus Amukugo ◽  
Julia Paul Nangombe

This article focuses on the paradigmatic perspective facilitate the development of a quality improvement training programme for health professionals in the ministry of health and social services in Namibia. The study of this nature requires a paradigmatic perspective; this is a collection of logically linked concepts and propositions that provide a theoretical perspective or orientation that tends to guide the research approach to a specific. Assumptions are useful in directing research decisions during the research process.The study adopted a constructivism and interpretivism approach, since it involved understand the current situation of quality health care/service delivery at health care facilities, and explore and describe the of the health professionals; experiences at the health care facilities. The study was based on the specific information that was accepted as true, as obtained from those lived the experiences of challenges and constraints of providing quality health care at the health care facilities.The paradigm perspectives in this study include Meta – theoretical assumption which consisted ontological, epistemological, axiological, methodological and rhetorical assumptions. Theoretical basis of the study includes Dickoff (1968), Practice Oriented Theory; Programme development by Meyer and Van Niekerk; Kolb’s Theory of experiential learning; Demining’s model of quality improvement, Quality improvement policy of the Ministry of Health and Social Services (MoHSS) and Centre for Diseases control (CDC) framework for programme education.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Rudkjøbing ◽  
Martin Strandberg-Larsen ◽  
Karsten Vrangbæk ◽  
John Sahl Andersen ◽  
Allan Krasnik

Author(s):  
Mandeep Flora ◽  
Sujitha Ratnasingham ◽  
Aki Tefera ◽  
J. Charles Victor ◽  
Michael Schull

IntroductionIntegrating health and social services data is critical to understanding social determinants of health and responding to public expectations for evidence-based policies amidst changing demographics and fiscal constraint. While academia has long understood the importance of social determinants of health, real and perceived obstacles have slowed their evaluation in Ontario. Objectives and ApproachThis report describes how the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) and the Ministry and Community and Social Services (MCSS) have partnered to bring social services data and health data together to better understand the Ontario population and better support decision makers across various sectors. We present how ICES and MCSS tackled barriers to data access and cultural challenges to data sharing in the Ontario context, provide an overview of their unique data and research partnership - including the new collaboration research and data access platforms created, highlight research findings to date, and identify key topics of interest moving forward. ResultsOver the last decade, ICES and MCSS have led the way in Ontario linking health administrative and social services data. An initial single year linkage enabled the success of the Health Care Access Research and Developmental Disabilities project. This cross-sectoral initiative provided a clearer sense of how people with developmental disabilities experienced health care in Ontario. Building on this work, ICES and MCSS recently expanded their partnership bringing together 15 years of social services and health data through a broader data sharing agreement. This agreement allows greater data access to researchers. In addition, ICES and MCSS have been successful in creating a new integrated research platform that will increase the depth and quality of health and social services research and policy evaluation in Ontario. Conclusion/ImplicationsA broader collaborative research community will now be able to answer questions of interest, do self-directed integrated data analytics and leverage respective program data expertise to tackle joint research projects. Importantly, MCSS analytics teams will now also have access to linked data on this platform to conduct their own research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document