Classification of L2 Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Evidence from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses

RELC Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Changyu Li
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
L2 Vocabulary

scholarly journals THE VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY UUM STUDENTS IN RELATION TO THEIR PROFICIENCY LEVELS

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Noraziah Mohd Amin
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Proficiency Levels ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Universiti Utara Malaysia

AbstrakTulisan ini berfokus pada strategi pembelajaran kosakata yang digunakan oleh Band 1 dan Band 4 mahasiswa sarjana Universitas Utara Malaysia (UUM). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mensurvei penggunaan strategi pembelajaran kosakata yang digunakan oleh responden dan untuk menentukan sejauh mana penggunaan strategi dipengaruhi oleh tingkat kemampuan mereka. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuesioner yang dikembangkan oleh Lachini (2007) berdasarkan klasifikasi Cottrell tentang strategi pembelajaran yang terdiri dari lima kategori strategi belajar kosakata: kreatif, reflektif, efektif, aktif dan motivasi. Respon dari 100 responden dari masing masing kelompok, Band 1 dan Band 4, hasil kuesioner diperiksa pada frekuensi penggunaan strategi pembelajaran kosakata. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam hal frekuensi penggunaan antara Band 1 dan Band 4 peserta sebagai mayoritas kedua kelompok digunakan sebagian besar strategi baik 'sedikit' atau 'sering'. Temuan penelitian mungkin bisa membantu instruktur untuk memfasilitasi pembelajaran kosakata bahasa Inggris oleh mahasiswa UUM dan mahasiswa lain pada umumnya.                        Kata-kata kunci: Strategi pembelajaran kosakata, tingkatan kemampuan berbahasaAbstract This thesis is concerned with the vocabulary learning strategies used by Band 1 and Band 4 undergraduate students of Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM).  The objectives of this descriptive study were to survey the vocabulary learning strategies used by the respondents and to determine to what extent their use of the strategies was influenced by their proficiency level. The instrument employed in the study was a questionnaire developed by Lachini (2007) based on Cottrell’s classification of learning strategies. It consists of five categories of vocabulary learning strategies: creative, reflective, effective, active and motivated. The responses of 100 Band 1 and 100 Band 4 students to the questionnaire were examined on the frequency of their use of the vocabulary learning strategies. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in terms of the frequency of use between Band 1 and Band 4 participants as  the majority of both groups employed most of the strategies either ‘a little’ or ‘often’. The findings of the study perhaps could help instructors to facilitate the learning of English vocabulary by UUM students and other students at large.    Keywords: The vocabulary learning strategies, proficiency levels

scholarly journals Comparing the efficacy of digital flashcards versus paper flashcards to improve receptive and productive L2 vocabulary

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert Dizon ◽  
Daniel Tang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Vocabulary Development ◽  
T Test ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
The Difference ◽  
L2 Vocabulary ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Paired T Test

<p><span>Several researchers have compared the efficacy of digital flashcards (DFs) versus paper flashcards (PFs) to improve L2 vocabulary and have concluded that using DFs is more effective (Azabdaftari &amp; Mozaheb, 2012; Başoğlu &amp; Akdemir, 2010; Kiliçkaya &amp; Krajka, 2010). However, these studies did not utilize vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) as a way to support the vocabulary development of those using PFs. This is significant because DFs often offer a range of features to promote vocabulary development, whereas PFs are much more basic; thus, learners who study via paper materials are at a disadvantage compared with those who use DFs. Given the success that VLSs have had in fostering L2 vocabulary enhancement (e.g., Mizumoto &amp; Takeuchi, 2009), their incorporation could have influenced the previous studies. Therefore, one of the primary aims of this study was to find if there were significant differences in receptive and productive L2 vocabulary improvements between students who used PFs in conjunction with 3 VLSs – dropping, association, and oral rehearsal – and those who used the DF tools Quizlet and Cram. Additionally, the researchers examined the learners’ opinions to see if there was a preference for either study method. A total of 52 EFL students at two Japanese universities participated in the 12-week study. Pre- and post-tests were administered to measure the vocabulary gains in the PF group (n = 26) and the DF group (n = 26). Results from a paired t-test revealed that both groups made significant improvements in receptive and productive vocabulary. However, the difference between the gains was not significant, which contrasts with past comparison studies of DFs and PFs and highlights the importance of VLSs. A 10-item survey with closed and Likert-scale questions was also administered to determine the participants’ opinions towards the study methods. Higher levels of agreement were found in the experimental group, indicating that the students viewed DFs more favorably than PFs.</span></p>

scholarly journals Review and Discussion of Learning Strategies of Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Bachiri Housseine ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
University Students ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
School System ◽  
Vocabulary Learning ◽  
Vocabulary Knowledge ◽  
Vocabulary Learning Strategies ◽  
Vocabulary Growth ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
L2 Vocabulary

Learning second language (L2) vocabulary can be a challenge for L2 students. As researchers and TEFL practitioners, we perpetually strive to seek ways to help our students with necessary linguistic tools to be ultimately both productive and resourceful. Moroccan EFL students in L2 are able to use learning strategies, which are valued in the school system, in order to, among other things, expand their vocabulary knowledge for the purpose of being able to communicate verbally and non-verbally. It is complex, however, to determine to what extent these strategies are used. In fact, very few studies have emphasized vocabulary learning strategies. Therefore, this study is of interest to Moroccan university students so as to determine which strategies to use, how often, and whether their use has an impact on students’ vocabulary growth.

Development of the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ)

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold A. Riemer ◽  
Packianathan Chelladurai
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Team Leadership ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Satisfaction Questionnaire ◽  
Reliability Estimates ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Athlete Satisfaction ◽  
University Athletes

The development of the l5-dimension, 56-item Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ) was based on Chelladurai and Riemer’s (1997) classification of facets of athlete satisfaction. Qualitative procedures included item generation, expert judgment, and independent placement of items in relevant facets. Quantitative procedures, item-to-total correlations, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, involving 172 undergraduate students and 614 Canadian university athletes, confirmed the construct validity of the scale. Correlations between the ASQ’s subscales and scales of commitment and negative affectivity provided evidence of criterion-related validity. Reliability estimates (Cronbach’s alpha) ranged from .78 to .95. The 15 facets of ASQ encompassed salient aspects of athletic participation, performance (both individual and team), leadership, the team, the organization, and the athlete.

scholarly journals Psychometric Studies of the Learning Strategies Scale for University Students

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (60) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evely Boruchovitch ◽  
Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Social Regulation ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Psychometric Studies ◽  
Cognitive And Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Variance Explained

The aim of this article is to examine the psychometric properties of a learning strategies scale for university students. The scale was composed of 49 Likert scale items related to cognitive and metacognitive strategies. It was applied in a sample of 1,490 university students. The factor analysis revealed that 35 items had acceptable loadings and identified a three factor structure: Factor 1 - Cognitive and Metacognitive Self-regulation, Factor 2 - Internal Resource and Context regulation, and Factor 3 - Social regulation. Its internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha and was .87 for the total scale, .86 for Factor 1, .71 for Factor 2 and .65 for Factor 3. The total variance explained was 26.6%. Further studies are suggested based on confirmatory factor analyses, so that the scale can be better utilized in psychoeducational evaluation.

scholarly journals Construct Validation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire in a Singapore High School Sample

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiu Wai Chow ◽  
Elaine Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
School Sample ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Motivation And Learning

In this study, the construct validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was assessed. Participants were 441 Year 11 students in Singapore. Three separate confirmatory factor analyses were conducted for each section of the MSLQ (motivation and learning strategies). Results indicated that the original factor structures proposed by the instrument developers produced the best model fit. Cronbach α coefficients were also acceptable for all but one of the individual scales. Correlations with the Revised Learning Process Questionnaire—Two Factor and physics achievement scores also aligned with the theoretical basis of the MSLQ. These results confirmed the potential utility of this instrument for assessing the motivation and learning strategies of secondary students in Singapore.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document