Analysis of Caloric Test Responses in Sudden Hearing Loss

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Ping Shih ◽  
Yu-Ching Chou ◽  
Hsin-Chien Chen ◽  
Jih-Chin Lee ◽  
Yueng-Hsiang Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Caloric Testing ◽  
Hearing Recovery ◽  
Caloric Response

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is characterized by a rapid-onset hearing loss that develops within 3 days. Vertigo may also be present. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate whether the severity of a loss of caloric function is associated with the initial hearing loss and with hearing recovery. Our study population was made up of 135 patients—67 men and 68 women, aged 25 to 71 years (mean: 50.9)—with sudden sensorineural hearing loss who had undergone bithermal caloric testing. We compared various patient factors according to patients’ hearing level and their response to caloric testing. We also analyzed the canal paresis (CP) value in patients with an abnormal caloric response according to three factors: disease severity, vertigo, and hearing recovery, and we evaluated the correlation between the loss of caloric function and hearing outcomes. We found that an abnormal caloric response was significantly associated with a profound hearing loss at presentation, the presence of vertigo, and poor hearing recovery. Among patients with an abnormal caloric response, the CP value was significantly correlated with hearing recovery (r = 0.503, p = 0.001). Poor hearing recovery was seen in 80% of patients with a CP value of ≥40% but in only 25% of patients with a value of <40%; in addition, the degree of hearing recovery was worse in the patients with a CP value of ≥40% (p = 0.002). We conclude that a CP value of ≥40% is a significant prognostic factor for an unfavorable treatment outcome.

The impact of vestibular symptoms and electronystagmography results on recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaelle Vofo ◽  
Marrigje Aagje de Jong ◽  
Michal Kaufman ◽  
Julia Meyler ◽  
Ron Eliashar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Routine Identification ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Caloric Tests

Abstract Objectives Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) represents a frequently encountered otological entity, of various types and severity, with an array of associated symptoms including vertigo. This is a devastating life-changing condition with a blurry prognosis. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical association of vestibular impairment by electronystagmography (ENG) and caloric tests, and their ability to predict prognosis. Methods An observational, crossectional study was carried out amongst patients admitted with SSNHL. Each consenting patient had an audiometry test performed on admission as well as ENG and caloric tests. Treatment included oral steroids and carbogen with intratympanic steroids used only as salvage treatment. Follow-up was completed after 6 months when hearing gains were evaluated. Finally, an association was sought between the rate of recovery and ENG and caloric test results. Results Of 35 patients included, marked recovery was seen in patients without vertigo when compared to those with vertigo (p=0.003). A statistically significant association was found between the presence of vertigo and hearing deterioration (p=0.008). More so, normal electronystagmography results were associated with marked recovery (p=0.04). Conclusions The vestibular end organs are both subjectively and objectively affected in SSNHL as demonstrated by the abnormal ENG and caloric tests in our study despite the small sample size. Concomitant vestibular involvement carries poorer prognosis and routine identification may help foresee the recovery of patients with SSNHL and as such, aid in patient counseling. ENG and caloric tests are easily available and may be recommended for all patients with SSNHL.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Various Treatments for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss—A Retrospective Study

Life ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Magdalena B. Skarżyńska ◽  
Aleksandra Kołodziejak ◽  
Elżbieta Gos ◽  
Milaine Dominici Sanfis ◽  
Piotr H. Skarżyński
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Complete Recovery ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
Hearing Recovery

(1) Background: A retrospective clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different pharmacological and non-pharmacological regimens for treating sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). (2) Methods: Adult patients (n = 130) diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and hospitalized between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled in this study. Depending on the treatment regimen applied, patients were divided into five groups. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) hearing loss of sudden onset; (ii) hearing loss of at least 30 dB at three consecutive frequencies; (iii) unilateral hearing loss; (iv) age above 18 years. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) no follow-up audiogram; (ii) bilateral hearing loss; (iii) recognized alternative diagnosis such as tumor, disorder of inner ear fluids, infection or inflammation, autoimmune disease, malformation, hematological disease, dialysis-dependent renal failure, postdural puncture syndrome, gene-related syndrome, mitochondrial disease; and (iv) age below 18 years. (3) Results: Complete recovery was found in 14% of patients (18/130) and marked improvement was found in 6% (8/130), giving an overall success rate of 20%. The best results were obtained in the second group (i.e., patients given intratympanic glucocorticoid + prolonged orally administered glucocorticoid) where the success rate was 28%. In general, the older the patient, the smaller the improvement in hearing, a correlation that was statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: In treating SSNHL, the highest rate of hearing recovery—28%—was in the group of patients given intratympanic corticoid plus prolonged treatment with orally administered glucocorticoid.

The Roles Played by Blood Inflammatory Parameters in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132096035
Author(s):  
Yan Guo ◽  
Jisheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Inflammatory Parameters

Objective: The etiology of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) remains unknown; inflammation may be one cause. We retrospectively studied SSHNL cases in terms of the inflammatory parameters involved. Methods: We reviewed 169 SSNHL cases. The control group contained 132 patients with vocal cord polyps. The C-reactive protein (CRP) level, CRP/serum albumin (Alb) ratio, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were compared between the 2 groups. The relationships between these parameters and the time to treatment after SSHNL onset, hearing level, and therapeutic effects were also analyzed. Results: The CRP level, CRP/Alb ratio, and NLR were higher in SSNHL patients than in controls, but only the NLR differed significantly between the 2 groups. We found no significant differences between patients with different hearing levels, those evaluated at various times after SSNHL onset, and those with different outcomes. Conclusion: The NLR is a reliable SSNHL diagnostic marker. The CRP level and CRP/Alb ratio are not useful indicators.

scholarly journals High Fibrinogen in Peripheral Blood Correlates with Poorer Hearing Recovery in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e104680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Kanzaki ◽  
Masafumi Sakagami ◽  
Hiroshi Hosoi ◽  
Shingo Murakami ◽  
Kaoru Ogawa
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Hearing Recovery

scholarly journals Early Posttreatment Audiometry Underestimates Hearing Recovery after Intratympanic Steroid Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Wycherly ◽  
Jared J. Thompkins ◽  
H. Jeffrey Kim
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Hearing Recovery ◽  
History Of

Objective. To review our experience with intratympanic steroids (ITSs) for the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), emphasizing the ideal time to perform follow-up audiograms.Methods. Retrospective case review of patients diagnosed with ISSNHL treated with intratympanic methylprednisolone. Injections were repeated weekly with a total of 3 injections. Improvement was defined as an improved pure-tone average ≥20 dB or speech-discrimination score ≥20%.Results. Forty patients met the inclusion criteria with a recovery rate of 45% (18/40). A significantly increased response rate was found in patients having an audiogram >5 weeks after the first dose of ITS (9/13) over those tested ≤5 weeks after the first dose of ITS (9/27) ().Conclusions. Recovery from ISSNHL after ITS injections occurs more frequently >5 weeks after initiating ITS. This may be due to the natural history of sudden hearing loss or the prolonged effect of steroid in the inner ear.

Intratympanic dexamethasone for profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 902-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Battista
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Partial Recovery ◽  
Hearing Recovery ◽  
Intratympanic Dexamethasone

OBJECTIVES: To determine hearing recovery by using intratympanic dexamethasone for profound, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, clinical study was performed of 25 consecutive patients seen with profound ISSNHL. Patients received 4 intratympanic treatments of dexamethasone over the course of 2 weeks. Complete hearing recovery was defined as the final pure-tone average (PTA) within 10 dB of baseline. Partial recovery was defined as a final PTA with >50% hearing. The hearing in the contralateral ear was used as baseline. RESULTS: The average time to treatment was 28 days. Two patients had significant hearing recovery, and 1 additional patient had partial recovery. The 2 patients with significant hearing recovery were treated within 9 days of onset of hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: By using the treatment protocol and definition of hearing recovery of this study, intratympanic dexamethasone does not result in significant hearing improvement for patients with profound ISSNHL. There is a possible trend for improved hearing results if intratympanic treatment is performed within 11 days of onset of hearing loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document