Immediate and 1-Year Outcomes with a Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array

2020 ◽  
Vol 162 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-736
Author(s):  
Nedim Durakovic ◽  
Dorina Kallogjeri ◽  
Cameron C. Wick ◽  
Jonathan L. McJunkin ◽  
Craig A. Buchman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pure Tone ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Pure Tone Average ◽  
Academic Center

Objective To explore the immediate and 1-year outcomes of patients who underwent implantation with the slim modiolar electrode (SME). Study Design Consecutive case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral academic center. Subject and Methods Between May 2016 and August 2018, a total of 326 cochlear implantations (CIs) were performed. Intraoperative x-rays were performed in all cases to identify tip rollovers. Scalar location was identified for 76 CIs that had postoperative computed tomography reconstructions. Speech outcomes were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months with consonant-nucleus-consonant word and AzBio sentences in quiet and noise (+10-dB signal-to-noise ratio). Preservation of hearing was defined as maintaining a low-frequency pure tone average ≤80 dB at 250 and 500 Hz. Results Among 326 CIs, 23 (7%) had tip rollovers. Postoperative reconstructions revealed 5 of 76 (6.6%) scalar translocations. A subset of 177 cases met criteria for evaluation of speech perception scores. The marginal mean differences between presurgery and 12 months for speech tests were as follows: consonant-nucleus-consonant, 43.7 (95% CI, 39.8-47.6); AzBio in quiet, 49.7 (95% CI, 44.9-54.4); and AzBio in noise, 29.9 (95% CI, 25.2-34.7). Sixty-one patients were identified with preservable hearing (low-frequency pure tone average ≤80 dB), and 12 of 61 (20%) preserved hearing at 1 year. Conclusion CI with SME provides reliable scala tympani insertion in a consistent perimodiolar position. An initially increased tip rollover rate improved with case volume and sheath design improvement. For long-term outcomes, speech performance was comparable to that of other cochlear implants. While hearing preservation for the SME may be better than prior perimodiolar electrodes, consistent outcomes are unlikely.

scholarly journals Impacts of Diabetes, Aging, and Hearing Loss on Speech-on-Speech Masking and Spatial Release in a Large Veteran Cohort

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Theodoroff ◽  
Frederick J. Gallun ◽  
Garnett P. McMillan ◽  
Michelle Molis ◽  
Nirmal Srinivasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
Speech Understanding ◽  
Impaired Hearing ◽  
Pure Tone Average ◽  
Spatial Release

Purpose Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is associated with impaired hearing. However, the evidence is less clear if DM2 can lead to difficulty understanding speech in complex acoustic environments, independently of age and hearing loss effects. The purpose of this study was to estimate the magnitude of DM2-related effects on speech understanding in the presence of competing speech after adjusting for age and hearing. Method A cross-sectional study design was used to investigate the relationship between DM2 and speech understanding in 190 Veterans ( M age = 47 years, range: 25–76). Participants were classified as having no diabetes ( n = 74), prediabetes ( n = 19), or DM2 that was well controlled ( n = 24) or poorly controlled ( n = 73). A test of spatial release from masking (SRM) was presented in a virtual acoustical simulation over insert earphones with multiple talkers using sentences from the coordinate response measure corpus to determine the target-to-masker ratio (TMR) required for 50% correct identification of target speech. A linear mixed model of the TMR results was used to estimate SRM and separate effects of diabetes group, age, and low-frequency pure-tone average (PTA-low) and high-frequency pure-tone average. A separate model estimated the effects of DM2 on PTA-low. Results After adjusting for hearing and age, diabetes-related effects remained among those whose DM2 was well controlled, showing an SRM loss of approximately 0.5 dB. Results also showed effects of hearing loss and age, consistent with the literature on people without DM2. Low-frequency hearing loss was greater among those with DM2. Conclusions In a large cohort of Veterans, low-frequency hearing loss and older age negatively impact speech understanding. Compared with nondiabetics, individuals with controlled DM2 have additional auditory deficits beyond those associated with hearing loss or aging. These results provide a potential explanation for why individuals who have diabetes and/or are older often report difficulty understanding speech in real-world listening environments. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16746475

scholarly journals Comparison of Pure-Tone Average Methods for Estimation of Hearing Loss Caused by Environmental Exposure to Lead and Cadmium: Does the Pure-Tone Average Method Which Uses Low-Frequency Ranges Underestimate the Actual Hearing Loss Caused by Environmental Lead and Cadmium Exposure?

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da-An Huh ◽  
Yun-Hee Choi ◽  
Myung Sun Ji ◽  
Kyong Whan Moon ◽  
Seok J. Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Environmental Exposure ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Cadmium Exposure ◽  
Metal Exposure ◽  
Frequency Method ◽  
Pure Tone Average ◽  
Lead And Cadmium

Previous studies have reported that exposure to lead and cadmium can damage the inner ear receptor, which perceives high-frequency sounds. However, few studies have used the pure-tone average (PTA), including high-frequency ranges, for the estimation of hearing loss caused by lead and cadmium exposure. We estimated hearing loss using the PTA test, in low-frequency, speech frequency, and high-frequency ranges and compared the differences in the results using 3 PTA calculation methods. We analyzed the data of 2,387 participants, between the ages of 19 and 85 years, that were obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) of 2010–2012. A dose-response relationship between hearing loss and heavy metal exposure was observed in the high-frequency method after adjustment for confounding factors. When using the high-frequency PTA, it was found that doubling of the levels of lead and cadmium in the blood was associated with a 1.88- (95% CI 1.11–3.17) and 1.89-fold (95% CI 1.02–3.50) increase in the OR for hearing loss. In the case of the low-frequency and speech frequency PTA, however, there were no significant relationships between hearing loss and the concentrations of lead and cadmium in the blood. The outcomes of the present study suggest that the estimation of hearing loss caused by environmental exposure to lead and cadmium is affected by the frequencies used in the PTA calculation.

Significance of Cochlear Dose in the Radiosurgical Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Jacob ◽  
Matthew L. Carlson ◽  
Terry K. Schiefer ◽  
Bruce E. Pollock ◽  
Colin L. Driscoll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Vestibular Schwannoma ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Pure Tone Average

Abstract BACKGROUND: Cochlear dose has been identified as a potentially modifiable contributor to hearing loss after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between computed tomography-based volumetric cochlear dose and loss of serviceable hearing after SRS, to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability when determining modiolar point dose with the use of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, and to discuss the clinical significance of the cochlear dose with regard to radiosurgical planning strategy. METHODS: Patients with serviceable pretreatment hearing who underwent SRS for sporadic VS between the use of Gamma Knife Perfexion were studied. Univariate and multivariate associations with the primary outcome of time to nonserviceable hearing were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent SRS for VS during the study period, and 59 (56%) met study criteria and were analyzed. Twenty-one subjects (36%) developed nonserviceable hearing at a mean of 2.2 years after SRS (SD, 1.0 years; median, 2.1 years; range 0.6-3.8 years). On univariate analysis, pretreatment pure tone average, speech discrimination score, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing class, marginal dose, and mean dose to the cochlear volume were statistically significantly associated with time to nonserviceable hearing. However, after adjustment for baseline differences, only pretreatment pure tone average was statistically significantly associated with time to nonserviceable hearing in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: Cochlear dose is one of many variables associated with hearing preservation after SRS for VS. Until further studies demonstrate durable tumor arrest with reduced dose protocols, routine tumor dose planning should not be modified to limit cochlear dose at the expense of tumor control.

Impact of Electric Stimulation on Residual Hearing

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (08) ◽  
pp. 732-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret T. Dillon ◽  
Andrea L. Bucker ◽  
Marcia C. Adunka ◽  
English R. King ◽  
Oliver F. Adunka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
First Year ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Listening Experience

Background: Candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation are expanding to include patients with substantial low-to-mid frequency hearing sensitivity. Postoperative hearing preservation has been achieved in cochlear implant recipients, though with variable outcomes. Previous investigations on postoperative hearing preservation outcomes have evaluated intraoperative procedures. There has been limited review as to whether electric stimulation influences hearing preservation. Purpose: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate whether charge levels associated with electric stimulation influence postoperative hearing preservation within the first year of listening experience. Research Design: Retrospective analysis of unaided residual hearing and charge levels. Study Sample: Twenty-eight cochlear implant recipients with postoperative residual hearing in the operative ear and at least 12 mo of listening experience with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). Data Collection and Analysis: Assessment intervals included initial cochlear implant activation, initial EAS activation, and 3-, 6-, and 12-mo postinitial EAS activation. A masked low-frequency bone-conduction (BC) pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated for all participants at each assessment interval. Charge levels for each electrode were determined using the most comfortable loudness level and pulse width values. Charge levels associated with different regions of the electrode array were compared to the change in the low-frequency BC PTA between two consecutive intervals. Results: Charge levels had little to no association with the postoperative change in low-frequency BC PTA within the first year of listening experience. Conclusions: Electric charge levels do not appear to be reliably related to the subsequent loss of residual low-frequency hearing in the implanted ear within the first year of EAS listening experience.

Hearing preservation in surgery for large vestibular schwannomas

2009 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 845-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Wanibuchi ◽  
Takanori Fukushima ◽  
John T. McElveen ◽  
Allan H. Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Pure Tone ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Discrimination Score ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Pure Tone Average ◽  
Speech Discrimination Score ◽  
Class A ◽  
Abducent Nerve Palsy ◽  
Hearing Preservation Surgery

Object Hearing preservation remains a challenging problem in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. The ability to preserve hearing in patients with large tumors is subject to particular difficulty. In this study, the authors focus on hearing preservation in patients harboring large VSs. Methods A total of 344 consecutive patients underwent surgical removal of VSs over the past 9 years. Of these 344 cases, 195 VSs were > 20 mm in maximum cisternal diameter. Of the 195 cases, hearing preservation surgery was attempted for 54 patients who had a Class A, B, C, or D preoperative hearing level; that is, a pure tone average ≤ 60 dB and speech discrimination score ≥ 50% according to the Sanna/Fukushima classification. The tumors were classified as moderately large (21–30 mm based on the largest extrameatal diameter), large (31–40 mm), and giant (≥ 41 mm) according to the international criteria. The authors categorized patients with Class A, B, C, D, or E hearing (pure tone average ≤ 80 dB and speech discrimination score ≥ 40%) as having preserved hearing postoperatively. Results Forty-one tumors (75.9%) were totally removed and 13 (24.1%) had near-total removal. Of the 54 patients, 29 maintained their hearing postoperatively; the overall hearing preservation rate was 53.7%. Analysis based on the preoperative hearing level showed that hearing was preserved in 14 (77.8%) of 18 cases for Class A; in 8 (47.1%) of 17 cases for Class B; in 4 (57.1%) of 7 cases for Class C; and in 3 (25.0%) of 12 cases for Class D. In addition, according to the analysis based on the tumor size, 20 (52.6%) of 38 patients with moderately large tumors retained their hearing, as did 5 (50.0%) of 10 patients with large tumors and 4 (66.7%) of 6 patients with giant tumors. Complications included 2 cases of bacterial meningitis that were cured by intravenous injection of antibiotics, 3 cases of subcutaneous CSF leakage that resolved without any surgical repair, and 1 case of temporary abducent nerve palsy. There were no deaths in this series. Conclusions The results indicate that successful hearing preservation surgery in large VSs is possible with meticulous technique and attention to adhesions between the tumor and the cochlear nerves.

scholarly journals Longitudinal Tracking of Sound Exposure and Hearing Aid Usage through Objective Data Logs

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-116
Author(s):  
John B. Doyle ◽  
Rohit R. Raghunathan ◽  
Ilana Cellum ◽  
Gen Li ◽  
Justin S. Golub
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Data Logging ◽  
Sound Exposure ◽  
Pure Tone Average

Objective To use data-logging technology to objectively track and identify predictors of hearing aid (HA) usage and aided sound exposure. Study Design Case series with planned data collection. Setting Tertiary academic medical center. Subjects and Methods Individuals with HAs between 2007 and 2016 were included (N = 431; mean, 74.6 years; 95% CI, 73.1-76.0). Data-logging technology intrinsic to new-generation HAs was enabled to track usage and sound exposure. With multivariable linear regression, age, sex, number of audiology visits, duration of audiologic follow-up, pure tone average, and HA side were assessed as predictors of usage (hours/day) and aided sound exposure (dB-hours/day; ie, “dose” of sound per day). Results Mean follow-up was 319 days (95% CI, 277-360). Mean HA usage was 8.4 hours/day (95% CI, 8.0-8.8; N = 431). Mean aided sound exposure was 440 dB-hours/day (95% CI, 385-493; n = 110). HA use (β < 0.001, P = .45) and aided sound exposure (β = −0.006, P = .87) were both stable over time. HA usage was associated only with hearing loss level (pure tone average; β = 0.030, P = .04). Aided sound exposure was associated only with duration of audiologic follow-up (β = 0.100, P = .02). Conclusion While measurement of HA use has traditionally relied on subjective reporting, data logging offers an objective tool to longitudinally track HA use and sound exposure. We demonstrate the feasibility of using this potentially powerful research tool. Usage and sound exposure were stable among patients throughout the study period. Use was greater among subjects with greater hearing loss. Maximizing aided sound exposure might be possible through continued audiology follow-up visits.

scholarly journals Hearing subclassification may predict long-term auditory outcomes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma patients with good hearing

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 845-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed H. Mousavi ◽  
Ajay Niranjan ◽  
Berkcan Akpinar ◽  
Marshall Huang ◽  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Vestibular Schwannoma ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Pure Tone Average

OBJECTIVE In the era of MRI, vestibular schwannomas are often recognized when patients still have excellent hearing. Besides success in tumor control rate, hearing preservation is a main goal in any procedure for management of this population. The authors evaluated whether modified auditory subclassification prior to radiosurgery could predict long-term hearing outcome in this population. METHODS The authors reviewed a quality assessment registry that included the records of 1134 vestibular schwannoma patients who had undergone stereotactic radiosurgery during a 15-year period (1997–2011). The authors identified 166 patients who had Gardner-Robertson Class I hearing prior to stereotactic radiosurgery. Fifty-three patients were classified as having Class I-A (no subjective hearing loss) and 113 patients as Class I-B (subjective hearing loss). Class I-B patients were further stratified into Class I-B1 (pure tone average ≤ 10 dB in comparison with the contralateral ear; 56 patients), and I-B2 (> 10 dB compared with the normal ear; 57 patients). At a median follow-up of 65 months, the authors evaluated patients' hearing outcomes and tumor control. RESULTS The median pure tone average elevations after stereotactic radiosurgery were 5 dB, 13.5 dB, and 28 dB in Classes I-A, I-B1, and I-B2, respectively. The median declines in speech discrimination scores after stereotactic radiosurgery were 0% for Class I-A (p = 0.33), 8% for Class I-B1 (p < 0.0001), and 40% for Class I-B2 (p < 0.0001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates were 98%, 73%, and 33% for Classes I-A, I-B1, and I-B2, respectively. Gardner-Robertson Class I hearing was preserved in 87%, 43%, and 5% of patients in Classes I-A, I-B1, and I-B2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Long-term hearing preservation was significantly better if radiosurgery was performed prior to subjective hearing loss. In patients with subjective hearing loss, the difference in pure tone average between the affected ear and the unaffected ear was an important factor in long-term hearing preservation.

Totally implantable active middle-ear implants: a large, single-surgeon cohort

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
E McCarty Walsh ◽  
D R Morrison ◽  
W J McFeely
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Recognition Score ◽  
Hearing Level ◽  
Pure Tone Average ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Middle Ear Implants

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate hearing outcomes and device safety in a large, single-surgeon experience with the totally implantable active middle-ear implants. Methods This was a retrospective case series review of 116 patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss undergoing implantation of active middle-ear implants. Results Mean baseline unaided pure tone average improved from 57.6 dB before surgery to 34.1 dB post-operatively, signifying a mean gain in pure tone average of 23.5 dB (p = 0.0002). Phonetically balanced maximum word recognition score improved slightly from 70.5 per cent to 75.8 per cent (p = 0.416), and word recognition score at a hearing level of 50 dB values increased substantially from 14.4 per cent to 70.4 per cent (p < 0.0001). Both revision and explant rates were low and dropped with increasing surgeon experience over time. Conclusion This study showed excellent post-operative hearing results with active middle-ear implants with regard to pure tone average and word recognition score at a hearing level of 50 db. Complication rates in this case series were significantly lower with increasing experience of the surgeon. Active middle-ear implants should be considered in appropriate patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss who have struggled with conventional amplification and are good surgical candidates.

scholarly journals One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 5604
Author(s):  
Nicolas Guevara ◽  
Cécile Parietti-Winkler ◽  
Benoit Godey ◽  
Valerie Franco-Vidal ◽  
Dan Gnansia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Full Range ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
One Year ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal ◽  
Time Point

Background: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study was conducted to assess the one-year postsurgical hearing preservation profile of the EVOTM electrode array. Methods: Fifteen adults presenting indications of electro-acoustic stimulation (pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds ≤70 dB below 750 Hz) were implanted with the EVO™ electrode array. Hearing thresholds were collected at five time-points from CI activation to twelve months (12M) after activation. Hearing thresholds and hearing preservation profiles (HEARRING group classification) were assessed. Results: All subjects had measurable hearing thresholds at follow-up. No case of complete loss of hearing or minimal hearing preservation was reported at any time point. At activation (Nact = 15), five participants had complete hearing preservation, and ten participants had partial hearing preservation. At the 12M time point (N12m = 6), three participants had complete hearing preservation, and three participants had partial hearing preservation. Mean hearing loss at activation was 11 dB for full range PTA and 25 dB for PTAs low-frequency (125–500 Hz). Conclusions: This study provides the first longitudinal follow-up on associated hearing profiles to the EVO™ electrode array, which are comparable to the literature. However, other studies on larger populations should be performed.

scholarly journals Low-Frequency Hearing Preservation With Long Electrode Arrays: Inclusion of Unaided Hearing Threshold Assessment in the Postoperative Test Battery

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret T. Dillon ◽  
Emily Buss ◽  
Brendan P. O'Connell ◽  
Meredith A. Rooth ◽  
English R. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Electrode Arrays ◽  
Hearing Sensitivity ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Initial Activation

Purpose The goal of this work was to evaluate the low-frequency hearing preservation of long electrode array cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Method Twenty-five participants presented with an unaided hearing threshold of ≤ 80 dB HL at 125 Hz pre-operatively in the ear to be implanted. Participants were implanted with a long (31.5-mm) electrode array. The unaided hearing threshold at 125 Hz was compared between the preoperative and postoperative intervals (i.e., initial CI activation, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after activation). Results Eight participants maintained an unaided hearing threshold of ≤ 80 dB HL at 125 Hz postoperatively. The majority ( n = 5) demonstrated aidable low-frequency hearing at initial activation, whereas 3 other participants experienced an improvement in unaided low-frequency hearing thresholds at subsequent intervals. Conclusions CI recipients can retain residual hearing sensitivity with fully inserted long electrode arrays, and low-frequency hearing thresholds may improve during the postoperative period. Therefore, unaided hearing thresholds obtained within the initial weeks after surgery may not reflect later hearing sensitivity. Routine measurement of postoperative unaided hearing thresholds—even for patients who did not demonstrate aidable hearing thresholds initially after cochlear implantation—will identify CI recipients who may benefit from electric–acoustic stimulation. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11356637

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document