Avoidant attachment and own and perceived partner’s conflict resolution in relationship satisfaction

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 3123-3138
Author(s):  
Ione Bretaña ◽  
Itziar Alonso-Arbiol ◽  
Fernando Molero ◽  
Juan Pardo
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Relationship Satisfaction ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Avoidant Attachment ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽  
Relationship Model ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategy ◽  
Fit Indexes ◽  
Resolution Strategies

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of conflict resolution strategies in the links between the avoidant attachment dimension and relationship satisfaction. The sample comprised 274 participants (ranging from 18 to 73 years old, 58% women). A predictive model of relationship satisfaction was tested, taking into account avoidant attachment and both own and perceived partner’s conflict resolution strategies. Structural equation modeling was used. Fit indexes indicated that the suggested overall relationship model was confirmed. Own withdrawal conflict resolution was associated positively with individuals’ perception of partner demand. Specifically, there was an indirect effect between own withdrawal and relationship satisfaction mediated by demand strategy perceived in the partner. Own withdrawal was negatively associated with perceived partner’s problem solving, and perceived partner’s positive conflict resolution strategy was positively associated with relationship satisfaction. Practical implications for professionals working with couples are discussed.

Parent-adolescent conflict and choice of conflict resolution strategy

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashmi Singh ◽  
J. K. Nayak
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽  
Adolescent Conflict ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategy ◽  
Resolution Strategy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Resolution Strategies

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of family communication patterns (FCPs) on adolescents’ choice of conflict resolution strategies during family holiday planning. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is framed by and builds on the literature on the adolescents’ choice of conflict resolution strategies and the FCP. The sample was collected using a survey among 400 adolescents in India. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling have been used to analyse the data. Findings – The paper provides a significant relationship between FCP and the choice of conflict resolution strategies. The study findings suggested that adolescents’ choice of resolution strategy depends on the type of communication environment in the family. It has been seen that adolescents have more say in concept-oriented families and use different types of resolution strategies compared to socio-oriented families. Practical implications – The present study has considerable implications for the marketers and the academicians. Through FCP, marketers will be able to segment the families and, hence, may introduce efficient and competent marketing strategies and promotional campaigns. Originality/value – The paper offers insights into the choice of conflict resolution strategy by adolescents’ in different FCPs. The study has originality and offers value to marketers as it focuses on adolescents, and explores their perceptions about their influence during the decision process.

Enabling roles of relationship governance mechanisms in the choice of inter-firm conflict resolution strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 957-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khuram Shahzad ◽  
Tahir Ali ◽  
Marko Kohtamäki ◽  
Josu Takala
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Effective Strategies ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽  
Relationship Performance ◽  
Resolution Strategies

Purpose This study aims to present an integrated framework and investigate the enabling roles of governance mechanisms (i.e. contract, interdependence, trust and communication) in the choice of effective conflict resolution strategies (CRS) that in turn facilitate buyer–supplier relationship (BSR) performance. Design/methodology/approach Using Web-survey, data are collected from 170 Finnish small- and medium-sized enterprises that have key relationships with suppliers. This study uses structural equation modeling to test the research framework and hypotheses of the study. Findings The results based on empirical evidence demonstrate how the firms’ choice of CRS depends on the governance mechanisms. The problem solving approach is the most preferable choice, while the legalistic approach remains the last resort influenced by different governance mechanisms. Interdependence and trust between firms drive them to compromise while resolving inter-organizational conflicts. The selected strategies by firms may also either reinforce or deteriorate relationship performance. Practical implications Supply chain managers should recognize the context in which these choices of CRS are made, as it guides them to anticipate their partner’s behavior as well as influences their strategy choice decisions when coping with conflicts. A trustworthy environment supports in providing a certain level of confidence while interdependency drives firms to compromise. The legalistic strategy can hurt the partner’s feelings and diminish relationship performance. Originality/value Conflicts in BSR have become inevitable, but the existing literature is missing evidence on how companies use CRS to enhance relationship performance. Hence, this study differs from those of earlier conflict studies, as it provides a more integrative perspective of buyer–supplier conflict resolution process. This study argues that relationship governance mechanisms can be connected to the choice of effective CRS when tensions arise. Moreover, by assessing the relationship between CRS and relationship performance, this study offers valuable insights to understand that effective strategies enable partners to mutually adapt constructive approaches that facilitate cooperative behavior and accommodate both parties’ interests and needs.

Cultural differences in conflict resolution strategies

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Gomez ◽  
Kimberly A Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Social Influence ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
The United States ◽  
Perceptions Of Fairness ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategy ◽  
Resolution Strategy ◽  
Resolution Strategies

Cross-cultural differences in norms, values, and beliefs abound and impact preferred conflict resolution strategies. Potential differences in values and subsequent conflict resolution strategies can exacerbate the underlying conflict unless they are well understood. We study the case of differences in conflict resolution strategies between the United States and Mexico as well as studying the underlying value differences that explain their preferences. In a quasi-experimental study, we found that Mexicans, compared to US participants, appear to have a greater preference for both the use of social influence and negotiating when confronting a conflict. Moreover, it appears that collectivism helps explain these country differences as it mediated the relation between country and the likelihood of using social influence and negotiation. In addition, perceptions of fairness had a stronger influence on the preference that US participants had for negotiation as a conflict resolution strategy. The research helps illuminate the underlying mechanisms through which culture impacts conflict resolution strategy.

Explaining Heterogeneity of Daily Conflict Spillover in the Family: The Role of Dyadic Marital Conflict Patterns

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanos Mastrotheodoros ◽  
Lauren Papp ◽  
Jolien Van der Graaff ◽  
Maja Deković ◽  
Wim H. J. Meeus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Marital Conflict ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Daily Diary Study ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽  
Adolescent Conflict ◽  
Conflict Spillover ◽  
Conflict Intensity

In this multi-informant, longitudinal, and daily-diary study, we investigated whether dyadic patterns of marital conflict resolution could explain the heterogeneity in day-to-day cross-lagged associations between marital conflict intensity and mother-adolescent conflict intensity. The sample consisted of 419 adolescents (44.6% girls, Mage = 13.02, SD = 0.44, at T1; Mage = 17.02, SD = 0.44, at T5), their mothers (N = 419, Mage = 44.48, SD = 4.17, at T1), and their fathers (N = 419, Mage = 46.76, SD = 4.99, at T1). Mothers and fathers reported on their constructive and destructive marital conflict resolution strategies annually across five years. Mother-father daily conflict intensity (mother-reported), and mother-adolescent daily conflict intensity (mother- and adolescent-reported) were assessed for 75 days across five years. Latent Class Growth Analysis revealed four types of families based on dyadic marital conflict resolution: Couple Constructive (n = 132), Mother Constructive-Father Submissive (n = 91), Father Constructive-Mother Average (n = 141), and Couple Destructive (n = 53). Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling was used to investigate the daily levels and daily dynamics of conflict. Most families were characterized by a compartmentalization pattern, where the marital dyad is “insulated” from the mother-adolescent dyad. Yet, spillover and compensatory patterns characterized sizeable proportions of the families. Group differences were found on the levels of daily conflict: mother-father and mother-adolescent daily conflict intensity were the lowest in families where both partners employed primarily constructive marital conflict resolution. However, the dynamic daily associations between mother-father and mother-adolescent conflict (spillover, compensatory, or compartmentalization patterns) did not differ between groups.

scholarly journals Conflict Resolution Strategies and Workplace Frustration and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Emotional Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Aimen Mairaj ◽  
Danish Ahmed Siddiqui
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Organizational Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽  
Moderating Role ◽  
Resolution Strategies

The purpose of this research is to determine the relationship between conflict resolution strategies (accommodating, avoiding, compromising, collaborating, and competing) with workplace frustration and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) with the moderating role of trait emotional intelligence (EI) on their relations. Data was collected through a close-ended questionnaire from 298 employees (male = 197, female =101) working at different private organizations of the manufacturing and service industry within the city of Karachi. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results indicated that accommodating and avoiding strategies don’t seem to have any effect on both frustration and OCB. Accommodating seems positively and significantly affect both. Compromising significantly and positively affect OCB, however, dominating is affecting frustration. Emotional Intelligence also seems to influences both OCB and frustration. EI also complements accommodating and collaboration strategies with workplace frustration. This study is first of its kind in the local context in private sectors and paves the way for further research in the public sector.

scholarly journals Attachment, Conflict Resolution, Marital Satisfaction, and Culture in Women

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ione Bretaña ◽  
Itziar Alonso-Arbiol ◽  
Shiri Lavy ◽  
Fang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Marital Satisfaction ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Romantic Relationship ◽  
Cultural Dimensions ◽  
Avoidant Attachment ◽  
Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽  
Individual Variables ◽  
Attachment Dimensions ◽  
Resolution Strategies

The aim of this study was to compare levels of attachment, conflict resolution strategies and marital satisfaction in women from Israel, United States, Turkey, and Spain (N = 343). A sample of individuals involved in a romantic relationship at ages 18-68 (M = 35.4, SD = 11.83) completed measures of attachment dimensions, conflict resolution strategies, and marital satisfaction. Tucker Phi coefficients revealed the same structure of the scales across all countries. Mean comparisons were used. Differences were observed among women from Israel, Turkey, USA, and Spain in attachment (avoidant and anxiety), as well as in own conflict resolution strategies and in perception of partner’s conflict resolution strategies. In individualistic countries, women reported using conflict withdrawal to a higher extent. Women from collectivistic cultures showed higher levels of avoidant attachment and of use of demand strategy. No cultural differences in women’s marital satisfaction were observed. Results are discussed in light of the combined possible effects of cultural dimensions and individual variables.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document