scholarly journals Periarticular Injection with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varah Yuenyongviwat ◽  
Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong ◽  
Thitima Chinachoti ◽  
Keerati Chareancholvanich
Keyword(s):  
Pain Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Local periarticular injection with bupivacaine alone in TKA has not been studied. Thus, we aimed to examine the effectiveness of local periarticular injection with bupivacaine for post-operative pain control in TKA.Method. Sixty patients undergoing TKA by a single surgeon were randomly assigned into two groups in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In the injection group, patients received periarticular injections with 0.25% bupivacaine before wound closure; in the control group, patients received a 0.9% normal saline injection. Both groups received the same anesthetic procedure, post-operative pain control, and rehabilitation protocol.Results. There was a significant reduction in post-operative morphine consumption in the first six hours after the operation (mean 0.9 mg and 2.43 mg,P=0.01), but there was no significant difference in post-operative morphine consumption between six hours and ninety-six hours after the operation, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, morphine side effects during the first 96 hours, length of hospital stay, or complications from morphine consumption.Conclusion. Local periarticular injection with bupivacaine alone before wound closer was shown to be an effective method to improve pain control after TKA with a few complications and ease of use.

scholarly journals Intrauterine levobupivacaine for pain control during intrauterine device insertion

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1117
Author(s):  
Nilufer Akgun ◽  
Esra Keskin ◽  
Muberra Namlı Kalem ◽  
Batuhan Bakirarar
Keyword(s):  
Pain Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intrauterine Device ◽  
Saline Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vas Scores

Background: Safe, effective, long term and a reversible contraception method is offered by intrauterine devices (IUDs).  The objective was to determine the potency of intrauterine administration of 5 cc levobupivacain for pain relief with IUD insertion, when compared with saline placebo.Methods: This was a prospective randomized, double blind placebo-controlled trial undergoing İUD insertion. The trial medication was intrauterine anesthesia, either 5 mL 0.9% saline (control group), or 5 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine. Our primary outcome was self-reported pain scores on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) immediately following IUD insertion.Results: 95 women were enrolled, and data for 88 women were analyzed. In IUD insertion procedure, no difference was observed between groups during teneculum placement and solution administration, in the course of VAS scores (p=0.349, p=0.396). There was a significant difference in the VAS scores measuring pain suffering during and after IUD procedure (p=0.001).Conclusions: Intrauterine instillation of 5 cc of levobupivacaine along with saline solution reduces pain with IUD insertion when compared to intrauterine saline placebo. Broad deviation in pain scores and persistent pain after IUD insertion recommends that patient would benefit from more functioning method of pain control than before at IUD insertion and during the post interval.

scholarly journals Is Infusion of Subhypnotic Propofol as Effective as Dexamethasone in Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Related to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Randomized Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mine Celik ◽  
Aysenur Dostbil ◽  
Mehmet Aksoy ◽  
Ilker Ince ◽  
Ali Ahiskalioglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group D

Background. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of common complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of subhypnotic (1 mg/kg/h) infusion of propofol with dexamethasone on PONV in patients undergoing LC.Methods. A total of 120 patients were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups; patients of group dexamethasone (group D) were administrated 8 mg dexamethasone before induction of anesthesia, patients of group propofol (group P) were infused to subhypnotic (1 mg/kg/h) propofol during operation and patients of group control (group C) were applied infusion of 10% intralipid. The incidence of PONV and needs for rescue analgesic and antiemetic were recorded in the first 24 h postoperatively.Results. In the 0–24 h, the incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the group D and group P compared with the group C (37.5%, 40%, and 72.5%, resp.). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV and use of antiemetics and analgesic between group D and group P.Conclusion. We concluded that infusion of propofol 1 mg/kg/h is as effective as dexamethasone for the prevention of PONV during the first 24 hours after anesthesia in patients undergoing LC.

scholarly journals Comparison of lidocaine, huffing maneuver and combination of both in prevention fentanyl induced cough before induction of anesthesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laleh Dehghanpisheh ◽  
Mohammadhossein Eghbal ◽  
Fatemeh Bagheri Baravati ◽  
Pooya Vatankhah
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Cough Reflex ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl has been frequently reported to be associated with cough reflex during patient anesthesia. However, the search for the most effective protocol continues. This study aimed to compare the effect of reducing cough reflex after injection of fentanyl in a fusion protocol by combining the injections of lidocaine and Huffing maneuver and comparing with a placebo control group, before anesthesia induction. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial study was performed on 400 patients who were divided into four groups of combined protocol (group 1), lidocaine group (group 2), Huffing maneuver group (group 3), and the control receiving normal saline (group 4). Then patients were injected with 2. 5 μg /kg fentanyl and monitored for 2 min regarding their cough reflex, as well as the severity. Results In group one, 9 patients (9%), in group two, 45 patients (45%), 22 patients (22%) in group three, and in group four, 75 patients (75%), developed cough reflex following fentanyl injection. Also, 13 patients (13%) developed moderate and 4 (4%) developed severe coughs in the control group reported, while no reports of severe or moderate cough were among the intervention groups. There was a significant difference between the intervention group and the control group both in terms of the rate and severity of the fentanyl-induced cough. Conclusion By using a combination of lidocaine injection along and Huffing maneuver, better results can be obtained in reducing the frequency, and also the severity of cough followed by fentanyl injection. Trial registration The trial was registered with IRCT.IR (09/03/2018-No. IRCT20141009019470N74).

Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade for analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled trial

Perfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff G. Lockwood ◽  
Leilani Cabreros ◽  
Dorota Banach ◽  
Prakash P. Punjabi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Subcutaneous Infusion ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade has been used for analgesia after cardiac surgery, but its efficacy has never been formally tested. Method: Fifty adult patients were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, controlled study of continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral infusion of 0.5% lidocaine (1 mg.kg-1.hr-1) for analgesia after coronary surgery. Control patients received a subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine at the same rate through catheters inserted at the same locations as the study group. The primary outcome was morphine consumption at 48 hours using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Secondary outcomes included pain, respiratory function, nausea and vomiting. Serum lidocaine concentrations were measured on the first two post-operative days. Results: There was no difference in morphine consumption or in any other outcome measure between the groups. Serum lidocaine concentrations increased during the study, with a maximum of 5.9 mg.l-1. There were no adverse events as a consequence of the study. Conclusion: Bilateral paravertebral infusion of lidocaine confers no advantage over systemic lidocaine infusion after cardiac surgery. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN13424423 ( https://www.isrctn.com )

Controlled Study of the Use of Local Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger and Thumb

1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. LAMBERT ◽  
R. J. MORTON ◽  
J. P. SLOAN
Keyword(s):  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Methylprednisolone Acetate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Local Steroid Injection ◽  
Control Injection

A controlled double-blind prospective study of injection of methylprednisolone acetate plus local anaesthetic against a control injection of a local anaesthetic in the treatment of trigger finger and thumb has shown a 60% success rate for the steroid injection against 16% for the control group (p < 0.05). This is the first controlled trial of local steroid therapy in this condition.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Preoperative Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on Pain After Lower Posterior Teeth Removal: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 112-119
Author(s):  
Abbas Haghighat ◽  
Shaqayeq Ramezanzade
Keyword(s):  
Control Group ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Mouth Rinse ◽  
Pain Level ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pain is one of the most common complications after tooth extraction and pain control is a crucial part of the procedure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of 0.2% (w/v) chlorhexidine (CHX) gluconate mouth rinse on the severity of post-extraction pain. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted among 170 subjects. Subjects were instructed to rinse with 15 mL of CHX mouth rinse (study group) or placebo (control group) 0.5 to 1 hour before extraction. Post-operative pain was evaluated considering the number of taken rescue analgesics and using a visual analog scale (VAS) that each case completed 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the surgery. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed in this regard. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding demographic variables (P>0.05). The preoperative use of CHX mouth rinse showed a better performance in mitigating the perceived pain. A significant difference in the pain level (P=0.001) was found only at the 6th hour postoperatively although there was no significant difference in the pain level between the two groups (P>0.05) at all other times (12th, 24th, 48th hours). The total number of analgesics that were taken by the study group was significantly lower compared to the control group (P=0.042). Conclusions: The preoperative CHX mouth rinse could be a beneficial choice for reducing pain after simple tooth extractions.

scholarly journals Faecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: results from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 2107-2115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Ingdam Halkjær ◽  
Alice Højer Christensen ◽  
Bobby Zhao Sheng Lo ◽  
Patrick Denis Browne ◽  
Stig Günther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Faecal Microbiota ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Faecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Faecal Samples ◽  
Significant Difference

ObjectiveIBS is associated with an intestinal dysbiosis and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been hypothesised to have a positive effect in patients with IBS. We performed a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate if FMT resulted in an altered gut microbiota and improvement in clinical outcome in patients with IBS.DesignWe performed this study in 52 adult patients with moderate-to-severe IBS. At the screening visit, clinical history and symptoms were assessed and faecal samples were collected. Patients were randomised to FMT or placebo capsules for 12 days and followed for 6 months. Study visits were performed at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months, where patients were asked to register their symptoms using the IBS-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) and IBS-specific quality of life (IBS-QoL). Prior to each visit, faecal samples were collected.ResultsA significant difference in improvement in IBS-SSS score was observed 3 months after treatment (p=0.012) favouring placebo. This was similar for IBS-QoL data after 3 months (p=0.003) favouring placebo. Patients receiving FMT capsules had an increase in faecal microbial biodiversity while placebos did not.ConclusionIn this randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study, we found that FMT changed gut microbiota in patients with IBS. But patients in the placebo group experienced greater symptom relief compared with the FMT group after 3 months. Altering the gut microbiota is not enough to obtain clinical improvement in IBS. However, different study designs and larger studies are required to examine the role of FMT in IBS.Trial registration numberNCT02788071.

The Value of Iron Therapy in Pica

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-562
Author(s):  
ROBERT MCDONALD ◽  
SHEILA R. MARSHALL
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hemoglobin Level ◽  
Iron Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intramuscular Injections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Permanent Cure

As doubt had been cast upon the reputed efficacy of iron in the treatment of pica, a double blind controlled trial was carried out in an endeavor to establish a firmer conclusion in the matter. One group of children received intramuscular iron and a control group of equal mean age were given intramuscular injections of normal saline. Three to 4 months later nearly all of those given iron had lost their pica, but it was still present in three-quarters of the controls. After 5 to 6 months there was no significant difference between the two groups and this failure of maintenance of cure may have been related to a fall in mean hemoglobin level which occurred. Five children who initially received saline and in whom pica was still present were given iron at 6 months and all lost their pica. Our experience is that pica can be cured by iron in nearly all cases, but that permanent cure may be dependent upon the maintenance of adequate hemoglobin levels.

scholarly journals 2838. Safety and Immunogenicity of a gp120-CD4 Chimeric Subunit Vaccine: A Phase 1a Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S65-S66
Author(s):  
Joel V Chua ◽  
Charles Davis ◽  
Amy Nelson ◽  
Ka Wing J Lam ◽  
Lydiah Mutumbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subunit Vaccine ◽  
Vaccine Development ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Chain ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Humoral Responses ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Background A primary challenge for HIV vaccine development is to raise antiviral antibodies capable of recognizing highly variable viral antigens. The full-length single chain (FLSC) gp120-CD4 chimeric protein was designed to present a highly conserved CD4-induced HIV-1 envelope structure that evokes cross-reactive humoral responses (Figure 1). IHV01 is an FLSC subunit vaccine formulated in alum adjuvant. The safety and immunogenicity of IHV01 was evaluated in this first-in-human phase 1a trial. Methods This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study involved three dose-escalating cohorts (75 µg, 150 µg, and 300 µg doses). Eligible participants were HIV-1 uninfected healthy volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. Participants in each cohort were block randomized in groups of four in a 3:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo. Intramuscular injections were given on weeks 0, 4, 8, and 24. Participants were followed for an additional 24 weeks after the last immunization. Crossreactive antibody binding titers against diverse HIV envelopes and antigens and specific CD4i epitopes on gp120 were assessed. Results Sixty-five volunteers were enrolled—49 vaccine and 16 placebo. Majority (81%) of vaccinations with IHV01 produced no localized or systemic reactions; no different from the control group. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was not significantly different between groups. Majority (89%) of vaccine-related AEs were mild in severity. The most common vaccine-related AEs were injection site pain (31%), pruritus (10%), and headache (10%). There were no vaccine-related serious AE, discontinuation due to AE, or intercurrent HIV infection. By the final vaccination, all subjects in all cohorts had developed antibodies against IHV01; all placebo recipients were negative. The antibodies induced by IHV01 reacted with envelope antigens from diverse HIV-1 strains (Figure 2). Conclusion IHV01 vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in all doses tested. The vaccine raised broadly reactive humoral responses against multiple gp120 domains, transition state structures, and CD4i epitopes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals Acupuncture and Postoperative Vomiting in Day-Stay Paediatric Patients

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Schwager ◽  
D. B. Baines ◽  
R. J. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Adult Population ◽  
Acupuncture Point ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Postoperative Vomiting ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Paediatric Patients ◽  
Transcutaneous Stimulation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stimulation Of

The stimulation of the acupuncture point P6 has been used to prevent nausea and vomiting in the adult population. It has, however, been subject to limited comparative evaluation in children. We proposed that stimulation of P6 and the analgesic point Li4 would reduce the incidence of postoperative vomiting. Eighty-four unpremedicated paediatric patients having day-stay surgery (circumcision or herniotomy/orchidopexy) were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of transcutaneous stimulation of P6 and Li4 or no stimulation. The incidence of vomiting was recorded for 24 hours postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in total postoperative vomiting in those patients who were stimulated, compared with the control group (P=0.909), or between any group for postoperative vomiting in the recovery ward, day-stay ward or at home. For all groups, vomiting was more common within the first four hours and more likely to occur in the day-stay ward.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document