Examining the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Six-Spot Step Test in older adults with self-reported balance problems

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552110102
Author(s):  
John Brincks ◽  
Jacob Callesen
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Step Test ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Dynamic Gait Index ◽  
Dynamic Gait ◽  
Balance Problems

Objective: To evaluate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Six-Spot Step Test in older adults. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Outpatient clinics. Subjects: Sixty-six adults aged ⩾65 years with self-reported balance problems. Main measure: The Six-Spot Step Test was completed twice on day 1. Three days later, the Six-Spot Step Test, the Timed “Up and Go” test, Dynamic Gait Index, the Mini-BESTest, and standing balance test were conducted. Reliability and validity were estimated using Bland-Altman statistics, minimal detectable change, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Results: Participants had a mean (SD) age of 75.5 (6.6) years, a median ( Q1– Q3) Montreal Cognitive Assessment test score of 26 (24–27), and a median ( Q1– Q3) Falls Efficacy Scale International score of 22 (20–26). The study found within-day and between-day limits of agreements of ±15.7% and ±18.1%, respectively. The minimal detectable changes at the 95% level of confidence for within-day and between-day were 17.5% and 21.6%, and the ICCs were 0.96 (CI: 0.92–0.98) and 0.94 (CI: 0.86–0.97), respectively. A learning effect was observed between the first and second Six-Spot Step Test. Moderate to strong correlations were found between the Six-Spot Step Test and Mini-BESTest (ρ = −0.62), Dynamic Gait Index (ρ = −0.55), and the Timed “Up and Go” test (ρ = 0.79). Weak correlations were identified between the Six-Spot Step Test and static standing balance test (ρ < 0.38). Conclusion: The Six-Spot Step Test shows excellent relative consistency and moderate to high construct validity in older adults. A change of 21.6% is a true change in outcome.

Task-oriented training and exer-gaming for improving mobility after stroke: a randomized trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Arshad Nawaz Malik ◽  
Tahir Masood
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Virtual Reality Training ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dynamic Gait Index ◽  
Task Oriented ◽  
Dynamic Gait

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of task-oriented training and to compare it with virtual reality training on the mobility, physical performance and balance in stroke patients. Method: The randomised controlled trial was conducted from January 2016 to March 2017 at the Physical Rehabilitation Department of Pakistan Railways General Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and comprised patients 40-70 years with stroke history of at least 3 months who had the ability to stand unaided. The subjects were randomised into virtual reality training group A and task-oriented training group B. Task oriented training was provided for 3 days per week over 8 weeks to both groups with each session lasting 40-45 minutes, while additional 15-20 minutes of exer-gaming was provided only to group A. Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity, Berg Balance Test, Timed Up and Go Test and Dynamic Gait Index were used for assessment which was done at baseline, and at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks of training. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. Results: Of the 52 subjects, there were 26(50%) in each of the two groups. The overall sample had 36(69.2%) males and 16(30.7%) females. Group A showed significant difference in Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity and Berg Balance Test scores at 04 weeks of training compared to group B (p<0.05). Timed Up and Go Test significantly improved in group A at 6 weeks (p<0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in Dynamic Gait Index after 8 weeks of training (p>0.05). Continuous....

Urdu Translation and Validation of Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3505-3508
Author(s):  
Noor Ul Ain Fatima ◽  
Qurat-Ul- Ain ◽  
Fareeha Kausar ◽  
Mian Ali Raza ◽  
Misbah Waris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
A Value ◽  
Abc Scale ◽  
Translation And Validation

Objective: To translate and validate the ABC-Scale in Urdu language to predict risk of fall in older population. Study design: Cross-cultural Translation and validation Place and Duration: Study was conducted in older adult community of Sialkot from March 2020 to December 2020. Methodology: Translation of ABC in Urdu was conducted by using Beaton et al guidelines. Two bilingual translators translated the original version into Urdu language step wise, correction process was followed. Then two backward translations were done by language expert. After all this process, the translated version was reviewed by the professionals and the final version was applied on 15 individuals. Its reliability and validity was tested on 60 older adults. Results: For test re test reliability, intra class correlation coefficient ICC was measured with a value of 0.984 Which shows good test re-test reliability. The internal consistency and reliability of ABC was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha for total score with a value of 0.985. Content validity was good with values of CVI ranging from 0.767 to 0.955. To test the discriminative validity, independent t test was used to show the difference between the healthy and unhealthy adults. Factor analysis of UABC showed total variance 81.277 and cumulative variance was also 81.277. To calculate construct validity of U-ABC Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used and measured as 0.558. Conclusion: It was concluded that Urdu version of UABC is a valid assessment tool for older adults with fear of fall. It has good content validity, construct validity and reliability. Keywords: activities specific balance scale, validation, Urdu translation, reliability, tool translation

scholarly journals Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the English Lequesne Algofunctional index in to Bengali

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Mahmood ◽  
Minhaj Rahim Choudhury ◽  
Md Nazrul Islam ◽  
Syed Atiqul Haq ◽  
Md Abu Shahin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Divergent Validity ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background This study was focused on translation and cultural adaptation of the English Lequesne Algofunctional index (LAI) into Bengali for patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (OA) and testing reliability and validity of the Bengali version of the LAI. Methods This study was carried out in the Department of Rheumatology, BSM Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Using the forward–backward method the English LAI was translated into Bengali including cultural adaptation. For pretesting, A sample of 40 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were screened using the Bengali version of LAI. Following the pretest, 130 consecutive patients with symptomatic knee OA completed the interviewer administered Bengali LAI, the validated Bengali version of SF-36, Visual Analogue Scale for Pain, Distance Walked and Activities of Daily Living. For the retest 60 randomly selected patients from the cohort were administered the Bengali LAI 7 days later. An item by item analysis was performed. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha, test–retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa coefficient, construct validity was measured using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results It took 3.25 ± 0.71 min to complete the Bengali LAI and the mean score was 9.23 ± 4.58. For the Bengali LAI Cronbach’s alpha score was 0.88, test–retest reliability assessed by ICC was 0.97. For construct validity, excellent convergent validity was achieved (ρ = 0.93) but the divergent validity was moderate (ρ = 0.43). Conclusions The Bengali LAI showed excellent convergent validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability, only the divergent validity was moderate. So, the Bengali LAI can be applied as a HRQoL assessment tool for primary knee OA patients.

scholarly journals Efeitos da prática mental associada à fisioterapia motora sobre a marcha e o risco de quedas na doença de Parkinson: estudo piloto

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliane Pereira da Silva ◽  
Matheus Pereira de Souza Duarte ◽  
Caroline de Cássia Batista de Souza ◽  
Carla Cabral dos Santos Accioly Lins ◽  
Maria das Graças Wanderley de Sales Coriolano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Dynamic Gait Index ◽  
Dynamic Gait ◽  
Gait Index

RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo piloto, realizado em um hospital universitário de referência em Pernambuco, foi avaliar os efeitos da prática mental associada à fisioterapia motora sobre a marcha e o risco de queda em pessoas com doença de Parkinson. A amostra da pesquisa foi composta por 18 sujeitos, de ambos os sexos, com doença de Parkinson idiopática, divididos em grupo experimental (8 indivíduos) e controle (10 indivíduos). Ambos os grupos realizaram 15 sessões de 40 minutos de fisioterapia motora, duas vezes por semana. No grupo de intervenção, a fisioterapia foi associada a prática mental (15 minutos). Em relação às variáveis de desfecho primário, o tempo de execução do timed up and go e do teste de caminhada de 10 metros reduziu, mas a diferença não foi significativa. Em relação à velocidade, cadência e escore do dynamic gait index, houve aumento após a intervenção no grupo experimental, com diferença significativa (p=0,02). O número de passos foi mantido em ambos os grupos. Os resultados sugerem que a prática mental associada à fisioterapia motora reduz o risco de quedas em comparação com a fisioterapia motora aplicada isoladamente.

scholarly journals The Modified Gait Efficacy Scale: Establishing the Psychometric Properties in Older Adults

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaina M. Newell ◽  
Jessie M. VanSwearingen ◽  
Elizabeth Hile ◽  
Jennifer S. Brach
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Community Dwelling Older Adults

BackgroundPerceived ability or confidence plays an important role in determining function and behavior. The modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) is a 10-item self-report measure used to assess walking confidence under challenging everyday circumstances.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the mGES as a measure of gait in older adults.DesignThis was a cross-sectional study.MethodsParticipants were 102 community-dwelling older adults (mean [±SD] age=78.6±6.1 years) who were independent in ambulation with or without an assistive device. Participants were assessed using the mGES and measures of confidence and fear, measures of function and disability, and performance-based measures of mobility. In a subsample (n=26), the mGES was administered twice within a 1-month period to establish test-retest reliability through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]). The standard error of measure (SEM) was determined from the ICC and standard deviation. The Cronbach α value was calculated to determine internal consistency. To establish the validity of the mGES, the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient was used to examine the association with measures of confidence, fear, gait, and physical function and disability.ResultsThe mGES demonstrated test-retest reliability within the 1-month period (ICC=.93, 95% confidence interval=.85, .97). The SEM of the mGES was 5.23. The mGES was internally consistent across the 10 items (Cronbach α=.94). The mGES was related to measures of confidence and fear (r=.54–.88), function and disability (Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, r=.32–.88), and performance-based mobility (r=.38–.64).LimitationsThis study examined only community-dwelling older adults. The results, therefore, should not be generalized to other patient populations.ConclusionThe mGES is a reliable and valid measure of confidence in walking among community-dwelling older adults.

scholarly journals A influência das demandas atencionais no controle postural de hemiparéticos

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
Viviane dos Santos Araújo ◽  
Erika Pedreira da Fonseca
Keyword(s):  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Contrôle Postural ◽  
Dynamic Gait Index ◽  
Dynamic Gait ◽  
Gait Index

Objetivo. Investigar os efeitos da dupla tarefa com demanda cogni­tiva sobre o controle postural de indivíduos hemiparéticos após Aci­dente Vascular Cerebral (AVC). Método. Participaram 18 indivíduos (52,28±13,8 anos) hemiparéticos crônicos, capazes de deambular com ou sem dispositivo para o auxilio da marcha. Foram utilizados os testes Timed Up and Go (TUG), foi solicitado que o individuo se levantasse de uma cadeira, caminhasse três metros, retornasse para a cadeira e sentasse, e o Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) onde os indivíduos realizaram oito tarefas que envolviam a marcha em diferentes contextos senso­riais, com e sem associação de demanda cognitiva, para avaliar o equi­líbrio. Resultados. Verificou-se que a demanda cognitiva influenciou nos resultados dos testes, no DGI apresentou uma redução na pontu­ação (-3,05) e no TUG um tempo maior (2,60) para a realização de ambos com uma demanda cognitiva. Porém não houve diferença na redução da pontuação no DGI ou no aumento do tempo do TUG, na dupla tarefa, quando comparado com gênero (p=0,860 e p=0,069), escolaridade (p=0,973 e p=0,571), tipo de AVC (p=0,408 e p=0,408), e hemisfério acometido (p=0,798 e p=0,101). Conclusão. A realiza­ção da dupla tarefa com inserção de uma demanda cognitiva influen­cia no controle postural de indivíduos hemiparéticos após AVC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document