scholarly journals Double-blind Comparison of Patient Recovery after Induction with Propofol or Thiopentone for Day-case Relaxant General Anaesthesia

1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Chittleborough ◽  
G. A. Osborne ◽  
G. E. Rudkin ◽  
D. Vickers ◽  
P. I. Leppard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Day Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Recovery Times ◽  
Blind Comparison

Postoperative recovery after induction with either propofol or thiopentone has been compared in forty ASA I unpremedicated day surgery patients undergoing surgical extraction of third molar teeth under relaxant general anaesthesia. Mean recovery times in the propofol group, required for patients to sit out of bed (44.8 minutes; SD 18.6) and meet discharge criteria (113.1 minutes; SD 34.5) were significantly (P < 0.05) shorter than those in the thiopentone group (59.7 minutes; SD 21.4 and 133.5 minutes; SD 34.5). Fewer patients in the propofol group were treated in the recovery room for nausea and vomiting and the incidence of mild nausea not requiring treatment was less in the propofol group, but these differences were not statistically significant. Postoperative mental performance, measured by the FAST index, a new test of mental speed, was reduced on average by 1.7% of preoperative levels, during the recovery period tested, with no significant difference between the groups.

Sulphadiazine/Trimethoprim Once Daily in Maxillary Sinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison with Sulphamethoxazole/Trimethoprim B.I.D.

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Federspil ◽  
Peter Bamberg
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Favourable Result ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Cure Rates

In a randomized double-blind study fifty-four patients suffering from acute maxillary sinusitis were treated for 10 days with daily doses of sulphadiazine/trimethopim (1 g) and sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.92 g), respectively. The efficacy was evaluated clinically at two follow-up visits. X-ray investigations were performed at admission and after the therapy. Of thirty-nine patients finally evaluated, thirty-seven showed a favourable result. After 6–8 days of therapy there was significant difference in cure rates in favour of sulphadiazine/trimethoprim (p < 0.05) while the outcome as evaluated after treatment was similar for both drugs.

Blind Comparison of Patient Preference for Flavored Colestid Granules and Questran Light

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 700-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. Jungnickel ◽  
Mark S. Shaefer ◽  
Pierre A. Maloley ◽  
James R. Campbell ◽  
Gregory G. Shawaryn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Preference ◽  
Orange Juice ◽  
Bottled Water ◽  
Sensory Characteristics ◽  
Point Scale ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sensory Characteristic ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Hedonic Scale

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensory and mixability characteristics of Flavored Colestid Granules (a new colestipol formulation) with Questran Light (the most recent cholestyramine formulation). METHODOLOGY: Seventy-two nonsmoking adults between the ages of 25 and 64 years were enrolled in the study. Subjects assessed the sensory and mixability characteristics of each product in chilled bottled water and orange juice after at least a one-hour fast. Products were administered in a double-blind, randomized fashion. The sensory characteristics that were rated included overall rating, aftertaste, appearance, aroma, color, consistency, flavor, sweetness, mouthfeel, and thickness. Each characteristic was rated with a nine-point hedonic scale. Mixability of the products was assessed on a five-point scale. Subjects also were asked to choose which product they preferred as to sensory and mixability characteristics in each vehicle. RESULTS: Fifty-three of the 72 subjects preferred the sensory characteristics of Flavored Colestid Granules in water (p<0.001). Questran Light was preferred by 61 subjects when mixed in orange juice (p<0.001). The sensory characteristic rating scores also supported subject preferences for Flavored Colestid Granules in water and Questran Light in orange juice. Mixability of Flavored Colestid Granules was rated significantly better (p<0.001) than Questran Light in water. There was no significant difference for mixability between the products in orange juice. CONCLUSIONS: Questran Light was significantly preferred on a sensory basis when mixed in orange juice. Flavored Colestid Granules was significantly preferred over Questran Light for both sensory and mixability characteristics with water as the vehicle.

Randomized double-blind comparison of tiaprofenic acid and diclophenac sodium after third molar surgery

1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. van der Westhuijzen ◽  
J.A. Roelofse ◽  
F.W. Grotepass ◽  
P.J. Becker
Keyword(s):  
Tiaprofenic Acid ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Comparison

Double-Blind Comparison of Maternal Analgesia and Neonatal Neurobehaviour following Intravenous Butorphanol and Meperidine

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hodgkinson ◽  
Robert W Huff ◽  
Robert H Hayashi ◽  
Farkhanda J Husain
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Foetal Heart Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cervical Dilation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison

Butorphanol (1 mg and 2 mg) and meperidine (40 mg and 80 mg), given intravenously, were evaluated for analgesic efficacy and safety in a double-blind randomized study employing 200 consenting pre-partum patients in moderate to severe pain during the late first stage of labour. Both drugs provided adequate relief of pain to the mothers. There was no significant difference in the rate of cervical dilation, the foetal heart rate, the Apgar score, pain relief or neonatal neurobehavioural scores between those receiving butorphanol and those receiving meperidine. Twenty-two mothers who received butorphanol and eleven who received meperidine nursed their infants with no adverse effects observed. Side-effects were generally infrequent in this study; however, more side-effects were reported by the patients and observed by the investigator in the meperidine-treated cases (13%) than in the cases treated with butorphanol (2%).

scholarly journals Epidural Pethidine or Fentanyl during Caesarean Section: A Double-Blind Comparison

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Paech
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Epidural Fentanyl ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Bolus Dose ◽  
Clinical Advantage ◽  
Blind Comparison

The onset, quality and duration of analgesia and side-effects of a single bolus dose of either epidural pethidine 50 mg or fentanyl 100 mcg, administered immediately post-delivery, were compared in a randomised, double-blind study of fifty-five women undergoing epidural caesarean section. The onset of effect was more rapid with fentanyl, a significantly larger number of women achieving complete pain relief fifteen minutes post-administration (P<0.05). The quality of analgesia was good in both groups and the quality and duration of effective analgesia not significantly different. The incidence and severity of side-effects were low, with no significant difference between groups. One patient in the pethidine group experienced early onset respiratory depression; however, she did not require active treatment. Epidural fentanyl 100 mcg appears to offer a small clinical advantage over pethidine 50 mg for intraoperative use during caesarean section.

Prevention of Opioid-Induced Nausea and Vomiting During Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing CL-108 (Hydrocodone 7.5 mg/Acetaminophen 325 mg/Rapid-Release, Low-Dose Promethazine 12.5 mg) with Conventional Hydrocodone 7.5 mg/Acetaminophen 325 mg

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2528-2538
Author(s):  
John R Zuniga ◽  
Athena S Papas ◽  
Stephen E Daniels ◽  
Kyle Patrick ◽  
Derek D Muse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rapid Release ◽  
Surgical Extraction

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the prevention of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) and the relief of moderate to severe acute pain by CL-108, a novel drug combining a low-dose antiemetic (rapid-release promethazine 12.5 mg) with hydrocodone 7.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg (HC/APAP) was used. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled multidose study. After surgical extraction of two or more impacted third molar teeth (including at least one mandibular impaction), 466 patients with moderate to severe pain (measured on a categorical pain intensity scale [PI-CAT]) were randomized to CL-108, HC/APAP, or placebo. Over the next 24 hours, patients used the PI-CAT to assess pain at regular intervals whereas nausea, vomiting, and other opioid-related side effects were also assessed prospectively. Study medications were taken every four to six hours as needed; supplemental rescue analgesic and antiemetic medications were permitted. Co-primary end points were the incidence of OINV and the time-weighted sum of pain intensity differences over 24 hours (SPID24). Results Relative to HC/APAP treatment alone, CL-108 treatment reduced OINV by 64% (P &lt; 0.001). Treatment with CL-108 significantly reduced pain intensity compared with placebo (SPID24 = 16.2 vs 3.5, P &lt; 0.001). There were no unexpected or serious adverse events. Conclusions CL-108 is a safe and effective combination analgesic/antiemetic for the prevention of OINV during treatment of moderate to severe acute pain.

scholarly journals Efficiency of gaseous ozone in reducing the development of dry socket following surgical third molar extraction

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 381-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jehona Ahmedi ◽  
Enis Ahmedi ◽  
Osman Sejfija ◽  
Zana Agani ◽  
Vjosa Hamiti
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Period ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Dry Socket ◽  
Third Molar Extraction ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Prophylactic Use ◽  
Experimental Group

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of ozone gas (O3) on the reduction of dry socket (DS) occurrence following surgical extraction of lower jaw third molars, influence of the indication for the extraction, and the difficulty of extraction on the incidence of DS. Materials and Methods: This study included thirty patients with bilaterally impacted third molars of mandible requiring surgical procedure for extraction. Following extraction, in the control group, saline solution was used for irrigation of extraction sockets and in the experimental group, intra-alveolar O3 was applied for 12 s (Prozone, W and H, UK, Ltd.). The surgeries were performed by the same oral surgeon. The follow-up visits were performed at 48 h and on day seven, postsurgery where the symptoms of DS were evaluated and intensity of pain has been recorded using visual analog scale 0–100. Results: In this pilot study, DS was present in 16.67% and 3.33% of cases in the control and experimental groups, respectively (P = 0.20). Conclusion: The application of O3 may reduce the incidence of DS and accelerates the recovery period after the surgery. Prophylactic use of O3 may be suggested in all patients, especially in the patients at a risk of development of DS.

scholarly journals An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Bupivacaine Applied to the Abdominal Wall and Fallopian Tubes in Reducing Pain after Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation

1986 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. T. Cook ◽  
T. F. Lambert
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Tubal Ligation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Fallopian Tubes ◽  
Moderate Pain ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Low Incidence

Sixty women having laparoscopic sterilisation performed under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Intraoperatively, one group had bupivacaine applied topically to the fallopian tubes and injected into the skin wounds, while the other group received no local anaesthetic. A double-blind investigation utilising a visual analogue scale failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups. In both groups there was a significant reduction in mean pain scores between ½ and 7 hours, but there was no further reduction between 7 hours and 17 hours. At 7 hours, only 10% of patients scored their pain as 3 or greater (out of a possible 10). It is concluded that the use of bupivacaine as described is not a useful adjuvant to general anaesthesia and that the low incidence of even moderate pain at 7 hours confirms the view that these patients are suitable for management in the day-stay unit.

scholarly journals Patient Evaluation and Comparison of the Recovery Profile between Propofol and Thiopentone as Induction Agents in Day Surgery

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kern ◽  
A. Weber ◽  
C. Aurilio ◽  
A. Forster
Keyword(s):  
Demographic Data ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Day Surgery ◽  
Induction Agent ◽  
Subjective Perception ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induction Agents

The patient's subjective perception of the quality of his/her recovery after day case anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone as induction agents is still controversial. The authors investigated the perception and quality of awakening after anaesthesia during the recovery period and at 24 hours and 72 hours, in outpatients undergoing anaesthesia induced either with propofol or thiopentone and maintained with a volatile anaesthetic. In a double-blind study in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy in a day surgery unit, propofol and thiopentone were compared as induction agents in 60 randomized outpatients. A Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold test (CFFT), verbal test for anxiety, visual analog scale for anxiety and pain, and questionnaires were used to assess objectively and subjectively the quality of anaesthesia and awakening during the postoperative period. Demographic data and mean duration of anaesthesia were similar. In the propofol group, patients awoke more rapidly (9.2±5.8 vs 12.3±5.8 min) (P<0.05); however, the CFFT measurements did not show any significant difference between the groups, except at time=0 min, when 17 patients in the propofol group were able to perform the test versus only 10 patients in the thiopentone group (P<0.05). At 4, 24, and 72 hours postoperatively, the authors were unable to detect any difference between the two groups. Except for early recovery, there were no differences between the intermediate and late recovery profiles, when propofol or thiopentone was used as the anaesthetic induction agent in day surgery.

Double-Blind Comparison of An Acetaminophen 400 mg-Codeine 25 mg Combination Versus Aspirin 1000 mg and Placebo in Acute Migraine Attack

Cephalalgia ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Boureau ◽  
JM Joubert ◽  
V Lasserre ◽  
B Prum ◽  
G Delecoeuillerie
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Migraine Attack ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Complete Disappearance ◽  
Acute Migraine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Acute Migraine Attack

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a single dose of the acetaminophen 400 mg-codeine 25 mg combination (ACC) aspirin 1000 mg (A) and a placebo (P) for the treatment of acute migraine attack. The study design was randomized, multicentre, double-blind and double dummy with cross-over on three periods. Of the 198 patients who had three attacks 29.8%, 52.3% and 49.7% had recorded the complete or almost complete disappearance of the pain at 2 h after P, A and ACC respectively. When compared with the placebo, the difference was significant for the A and ACC. When complete disappearance of pain at 2 h was used as a criterion, no significant difference was observed. These results enabled the sensitivity of the evaluation criteria suggested for clinical trials of migraine attack to be discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document