Implementation Fidelity and the Design of a Fractions Intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindy Crawford ◽  
Barbara Freeman ◽  
Jacqueline Huscroft-D’Angelo ◽  
Sarah Quebec Fuentes ◽  
Kristina N. Higgins
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Implementation Fidelity ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Mathematics Intervention ◽  
Tier Ii ◽  
Higher Order Learning ◽  
And Mathematics

Interventions are implemented with greater fidelity when their core intent is made explicit. The core intent of this intervention was to increase access to higher order learning opportunities for students with learning disabilities or difficulties in mathematics through use of research and practice from the fields of special education and mathematics education. Four steps undertaken in the development of a Tier II fraction-based mathematics intervention designed to improve the conceptual understanding of students with learning disabilities or difficulties are described in this article: (a) articulation of a logic model, (b) delineation of intervention components, (c) analysis of reliability data related to implementation fidelity, and (d) pilot testing to measure implementation fidelity and student outcomes. Results of the pilot study demonstrated no significant effect for the component of technology; however, significant pre–post differences were found in the performance of all groups on their conceptual understanding of fractions as numbers.

A Study of Planning and Mathematics Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1343-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack A. Naglieri ◽  
Suzanne H. Gottling
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Mathematics Scores ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Mathematics Problems ◽  
Cognitive Education ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Computation

The purpose of this study was to extend research in training the use of cognitive strategies or planning to mathematical computation for 4 students with specific learning disabilities. A cognitive education method utilized in previous research was duplicated. It was expected that students would find the instruction differentially effective based upon their initial scores on a measure of planning. Using the Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, Successive model as a base, a cognitive instruction which facilitated planning was provided to two students with low scores on planning, obtained using an experimental version of the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System, and two students with average planning scores. All students completed three sessions of baseline and seven sessions of cognitive instruction in addition and multiplication. During the cognitive instruction phase, 5-min. sessions of self-reflection and verbalization of strategies about the mathematics problems were conducted after each initial 10-min. session of mathematics. Scores on addition problems showed that all students improved. On multiplication, however, 2 students with low planning scores improved considerably but not 2 with higher planning scores. Implications are provided.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of the Science Experimental Guidebook on the Conceptual Understanding of Students with Learning Disabilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-243
Author(s):  
Tülay Şenel Çoruhlu ◽  
Murat Pehlevan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Electrical Circuit ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Living Things ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Learning Domains ◽  
The Universe

This study aimed to develop a science experiments guidebook (based on discussion method and enriched worksheet) for fourth grade mainstreamed students with learning disabilities and to investigate its effect on their conceptual understanding of the "Matter and its Nature", "Living Things and Life", "Physical Events" and "Earth and The Universe" learning domains. Furthermore, mixtures, sieving, filtration, magnetism (Matter and its Nature), recycling (Living Things and Life), simple electrical circuit (Physical Events), and fossil (Earth and The Universe) concepts/issues were determined. Since the aim is to investigate the conceptual understanding of five 4th grade students with learning disabilities, the case study method was used. Conceptual understanding tests, drawing tests, and semi-structured interviews were used as data collection tools. The science experiments guidebook was presented to the students in worksheet format. Besides, worksheets were enriched with avatar images, mobile applications (QR codes), hands-on experiments, and active learning techniques (brainstorming, buzz 22, aquarium, and snowball). As a result of the research, it can be said that the science experiments guidebook had a positive effect on the conceptual understanding of students with learning disabilities.

Current Knowledge and Future Directions: Proportional Reasoning Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities and Mathematics Difficulties

2020 ◽  
pp. 073194872093285
Author(s):  
Gena Nelson ◽  
Jessica H. Hunt ◽  
Kristi Martin ◽  
Blain Patterson ◽  
Andy Khounmeuang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Proportional Reasoning ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Mathematics Difficulties ◽  
Students With Ld ◽  
And Mathematics

The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of proportional reasoning interventions for students with learning disabilities (LD) or mathematics difficulty (MD). We evaluated fifth to ninth grade interventions on proportional reasoning content, instructional features, and disability and difficulty identification. The nine studies met inclusion criteria yielded intervention effects ranging from g = −0.10 to 1.87 and from Tau- U = 0.88 to 1.00. Two of the nine studies were deemed high quality and very few studies included participants with LD. Although most studies identified the concepts addressed in the interventions, authors rarely provided in-depth descriptions of how the concept was taught. The results suggest that proportional reasoning interventions for students with LD and MD is under investigated. We posit that intervention research in proportional reasoning can and should be expanded upon and offer suggestions in terms of how researchers can continue to develop the knowledge base.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research on Word-Problem Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities

2020 ◽  
pp. 074193252096491
Author(s):  
Mikyung Shin ◽  
Diane P. Bryant ◽  
Sarah R. Powell ◽  
Pyung-Gang Jung ◽  
Min Wook Ok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Word Problem ◽  
Variance Estimation ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Implementation Fidelity ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities

In this meta-analysis of single-case designs, the researchers investigated the effects of word-problem instruction for students with learning disabilities in Grades 1 through 12, as reported in 20 peer-reviewed articles published between 1975 and 2020. A two-level multilevel model with a robust variance estimation method was implemented to calculate the effect sizes. A significant overall effect of word-problem instruction for students with learning disabilities was found, and the results indicate that studies meeting all three quality indicators of implementation fidelity (i.e., adherence, dosage, and regularity) showed greater effects. The average weighted effect sizes of word-problem instruction varied depending on the content and practice standards of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Limitations and future research directions are also discussed.

The Effects of Computer-Based Attribution Retraining on the Attributions, Persistence, and Mathematics Computation of Students with Learning Disabilities

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia M. Okolo
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Urban Schools ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Attribution Retraining ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Attributional Patterns ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of the present study was to examine the impact of attribution retraining, embedded within a mathematics computer-assisted instructional (CAI) program, on students' attributions, persistence, and mathematics computation. Twenty-nine school-identified students with learning disabilities from five urban schools participated in the study. The sample's mean age was 13.3 years. After blocking on initial attributional patterns, students were randomly assigned to a mathematics CAI program that provided either attribution retraining or neutral feedback. Students used their assigned program for eight 30-minute sessions. Results did not support the contention that attribution retraining would have a significant impact on students' attributions. However, students who participated in the attribution retraining condition completed significantly more levels of the program than their counterparts who received neutral feedback. Attribution retraining students also obtained significantly higher scores on a test of problems practiced during the CAI program. These results suggest that attribution retraining may be a desirable addition to the type of feedback typically provided by CAI programs. However, they also highlight the need for further research that examines the conditions under which specific attributions are most advantageous.

Mathematical Interventions for Secondary Students With Learning Disabilities and Mathematics Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha K. Jitendra ◽  
Amy E. Lein ◽  
Soo-hyun Im ◽  
Ahmed A. Alghamdi ◽  
Scott B. Hefte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Mathematics Difficulties ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Mathematics

This meta-analysis is the first to provide a quantitative synthesis of empirical evaluations of mathematical intervention programs implemented in secondary schools for students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties. Included studies used a treatment-control group design. A total of 19 experimental and quasi-experimental studies containing 20 independent samples met study inclusion criteria. Results of a random effects model analysis indicated that mathematical interventions influence mathematics outcomes ( g = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [0.18, 0.56]) for students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties. In addition, instructional time moderated the relation between mathematics interventions and student learning. Limitations of the study, future directions for research, and implications for practice are discussed.

scholarly journals Does Applied STEM Course Taking Link to STEM Outcomes for High School Students With Learning Disabilities?

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Gottfried ◽  
Cameron Sublett
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
High School Students ◽  
General Population ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
School Students ◽  
Diverse Learning ◽  
Math And Science ◽  
And Mathematics

Over the most recent two decades, federal policy has urged high schools to embed applied science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses into the curriculum to reinforce concepts learned in traditional math and science classes as well as to motivate students’ interests and long-term pursuits in STEM areas. While prior research has examined whether these courses link to STEM persistence for the general student population, no work has examined the role of these courses for students with learning disabilities (LDs). This is a critical lapse, as these courses have been supported as being one path by which STEM material can become more accessible for students with diverse learning needs. Hence, this descriptive study examines the landscape of applied STEM course taking for students with LDs. The findings suggest students with LDs are less likely to take applied STEM courses in high school compared to the general population. Additionally, while the general population does benefit from taking these courses, there is a unique association between applied STEM course taking and advanced math and science course taking or math achievement for students with LDs. Hence, there is no evidence that applied STEM course taking is related to any closure of the STEM achievement gap for students with LDs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document