Teacher Perceptions of the Behavioral Adjustment of Primary Grade Level Handicapped Pupils Within Regular and Special Education Settings

1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 34-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted R. Fabre ◽  
Hill M. Walker
1964 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 478-482
Author(s):  
Thomas Glbney

The group of elementary mathematics teachers who have never used a number line as a teaching device is becoming smaller each year. During the past three years many articles have been written and many guides prepared to help a teacher use the number line in introducing mathematical concepts to students at the primary grade level.


1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Cleborne D. Maddux ◽  
Steve Arvig

A questionnaire was mailed to a special education teacher in each of the 127 high schools in the state of Arizona. The questionnaire included demographic information and five questions related to career and vocational education for mildly handicapped students. Most high schools report administering vocational interest inventories, but less than 60% actually use the results when placing students into vocational programs. Analysis of the data after categorizing schools as rural, urban, and suburban indicates significantly different responses on three of the five questions, with fewer rural schools administering interest inventories, using the results of such inventories for placement, and placing mildly handicapped students in special vocational programs.


1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Carlson ◽  
Lucian Parshall

Each year 7% of Michigan's special education students return to full-time general education programs through declassification. In a preliminary investigation of declassification from special education, the authors analyzed data collected by the Michigan Department of Education over the past 5 years. Respondents suggested that, as a group, students declassified from special education are academically, socially, and behaviorally well adjusted; but teachers or counselors of 11% of the declassified students felt that these students continued to require special education services. Within 3 years, 4% of declassified students had returned to special education. Particularly noteworthy were the relatively poor results for declassified students with emotional impairments.


1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna J. Sands ◽  
Lois Adams ◽  
Donna M. Stout

This study reports the results of a statewide survey of the beliefs and practices, regarding curriculum, of 341 elementary and secondary special education teachers serving students with a variety of disabilities. Findings indicate that (a) teacher training in curriculum development occurs mostly on the job; (b) teachers want training in teaching compensatory skills and life skills; (c) teachers believe that the IEP constitutes the curriculum for students with disabilities; (d) teacher judgment primarily guides the content of classroom instruction; (e) teachers focus principally on academic remediation versus life-skill or other instruction; (f) curriculum focus varies little across service-delivery models, but does vary by grade level; and (g) minimal articulation of curriculum exists across grade levels.


2020 ◽  
pp. 073194872095814
Author(s):  
Ae-Hwa Kim ◽  
Ui Jung Kim ◽  
Jae Chul Kim ◽  
Sharon Vaughn

The purpose of this study was to classify Korean readers into subgroups based on their reading achievement and to examine the relationships between these subgroups and a set of cognitive-linguistic variables. The reading achievement and cognitive-linguistic skills of 394 elementary school students were measured and the data were analyzed by disaggregating into primary grade level (i.e., Grades 1–3) and intermediate grade level (i.e., Grades 4–6). The main results are summarized as follows. First, three subgroups of readers were found based on the reading achievement for the primary grade level: “very poor word readers and poor comprehenders,” “poor readers,” and “average readers.” Second, four subgroups of readers were found based on the reading achievement for the intermediate grade level: “very significantly poor readers,” “very poor readers,” “average word readers but poor comprehenders,” and “average readers.” Third, vocabulary, rapid naming, phonological memory, and phonological awareness were cognitive-linguistic variables that significantly differentiated “very poor readers” and “poor readers” from “average readers” for the primary grade level. Fourth, phonological memory, rapid naming, sentence repetition, and listening comprehension were cognitive-linguistic variables that significantly differentiated “very poor readers” and “poor readers” from “average readers” for the intermediate grade level. This article also discusses the limits of this research and the implications in practice. Finally, this article touches upon the direction of future studies.


Author(s):  
Tricia Crosby-Cooper ◽  
Dina Pacis

Pre-service teachers in a K-12 setting, encounter students in need of academic and behavioral supports. One method of providing supports to struggling students in the general education and special education setting is through the problem-solving process of pre-referral intervention, hence forth referred to as Student Support Teams (SST) within Response-to-Intervention. During the SST process, student's academic and/or behavioral difficulties are considered through a multidisciplinary approach. Research demonstrates the use of a multi-tiered problem solving approach as a means to provide supports for students prior to special education eligibility and placement. Additionally, there are concerns regarding implementation and teacher perceptions (Powers, 2001) on the effectiveness of the intervention and collaboration between general education and special education teachers (Graden, 1989). This chapter discusses historical aspects, purpose and process, best practices, and challenges of SSTs, while presenting strategies for teachers and educators to effectively implement the SST process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
North Cooc

Background/Context The overrepresentation of some minority groups in special education in the United States raises concerns about racial inequality and stratification within schools. While many actors and mechanisms within the school system may contribute to racial disparities in special education, the role of teachers is particularly important given that teachers are often the first ones to refer students for services. Previous studies examining biases in teacher perception of student disability have used simulations and vignettes that lack information on how teachers may perceive their own students. Purpose of the Study This study examined whether teachers disproportionately perceive minority students as having a disability based on survey information from teachers about their students. The study provides additional insight into teacher perception of student disability by accounting for student background, teacher traits, and school characteristics. Research Design The study used data on a nationally representative sample of high school sophomores from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002. The dataset included surveys that asked teachers about their students, including whether they perceived them to have a disability. Logistic regression models were used to model the relationship between teacher perception of student disability and student race, controlling for background factors relevant to identification for a disability. Results The findings show that while teachers were more likely to perceive Black, Hispanic, and Native American students as having a disability compared to White students, controlling for individual background characteristics and school contextual factors often resulted in underidentification. The exception is Asian Americans, who were consistently less likely to be perceived to have a disability. Conclusions/Recommendations Since teachers were less likely to perceive certain racial minority students as having a disability when accounting for student background characteristics, the finding provides a different perspective on how teachers may contribute to disproportionality in special education. The results also raise concerns about whether racial minority students are appropriately identified for services, especially Asian Americans who were consistently less likely to be perceived to have a disability, even when their achievement and behavior were similar to those of other students. Policies and practices should focus on using culturally and linguistically appropriate methods to identify students who may have disabilities.


Author(s):  
Tricia Crosby-Cooper ◽  
Dina Pacis

Pre-service teachers in a K-12 setting, encounter students in need of academic and behavioral supports. One method of providing supports to struggling students in the general education and special education setting is through the problem-solving process of pre-referral intervention, hence forth referred to as Student Support Teams (SST) within Response-to-Intervention. During the SST process, student's academic and/or behavioral difficulties are considered through a multidisciplinary approach. Research demonstrates the use of a multi-tiered problem solving approach as a means to provide supports for students prior to special education eligibility and placement. Additionally, there are concerns regarding implementation and teacher perceptions (Powers, 2001) on the effectiveness of the intervention and collaboration between general education and special education teachers (Graden, 1989). This chapter discusses historical aspects, purpose and process, best practices, and challenges of SSTs, while presenting strategies for teachers and educators to effectively implement the SST process.


1980 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Prawat

A content analysis was performed on a sample of written descriptions of classroom events provided by 84 elementary school teachers in which they focused on the affective or noncognitive behavior of students. The analysis indicated that (a) students’ interpersonal adjustment is of greater concern to teachers than their intrapersonal adjustment; (b) the individual is not necessarily the preferred unit in teachers’ descriptions of student affect; (c) groups and individuals are talked about differently; and (d) teacher perceptions of student affect are related to background factors such as grade level taught.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise K. Frazier ◽  
Anastasia M. Trekles

This mixed-method case study followed K-5 elementary teachers through their first year of 1:1 iPad adoption in one elementary school. All teachers in the school were surveyed in September and December 2015 and May 2016. Focus groups consisting of two teachers from each grade level were held during these same months. Teacher perceptions were gathered in regard to iPads in curriculum, management, differentiation, collaboration, assessment, and inquiry learning. Struggles during the first year included lack of professional development, rushed decisions made by administration, technical problems, and poor planning. Success was found in differentiation and improvement throughout the year.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document