The Lady Knows the Recipe

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-38
Author(s):  
Alice Guilluy
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Small Group ◽  
Feminist Research ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Feminist Methodology ◽  
Romantic Comedy ◽  
National Differences ◽  
Phd Thesis

This article outlines the methodology of my PhD thesis, which examined the reception of contemporary Hollywood romantic comedy in Britain, France and Germany. I underline the significant epistemological and methodological shift which took place over the course of four years, as my research went from a positivist mixed-methods study aiming to describe national differences in reception, to a constructivist and qualitative interrogation of the specific pleasures of romantic comedy viewing as manifested by a small group of participants. I conclude that whilst there is no single perfect feminist methodology, doing feminist research must include a degree of self-introspection at all stages of the research, from recruitment to data collection to analysis.

How does small group continuing medical education (CME) impact on practice for rural GPs and their patients, a mixed-methods study

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-161
Author(s):  
Stephanie Dowling ◽  
J Last ◽  
H Finnegan ◽  
John Bourke ◽  
Pat Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Small Group ◽  
Continuing Medical Education ◽  
Mixed Methods Study

scholarly journals Deaf Adults’ Health Literacy and Access to Health Information: Protocol for a Multicenter Mixed Methods Study

10.2196/14889 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e14889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M McKee ◽  
Peter C Hauser ◽  
Sara Champlin ◽  
Michael Paasche-Orlow ◽  
Kelley Wyse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Literacy Interventions ◽  
Limited Health Literacy ◽  
Limited Health

Background Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users often struggle with limited health literacy compared with their hearing peers. However, the mechanisms driving limited health literacy and how this may impact access to and understanding of health information for Deaf individuals have not been determined. Deaf individuals are more likely than hearing individuals to use the internet, yet they continue to report significant barriers to health information. This study presents an opportunity to identify key targets that impact information access for a largely marginalized population. Objective This study aims to elucidate the role of information marginalization on health literacy in Deaf ASL users and to better understand the mechanisms of health literacy in this population for the purpose of identifying viable targets for future health literacy interventions. Methods This is an exploratory mixed methods study to identify predictors and moderators of health literacy in the Deaf population. These predictors of health literacy will be used to inform the second step that qualitatively explains the findings, including how Deaf individuals access and understand Web-based health information. Multiple interviewer- and computer-based instruments underwent translation and adaptation, from English to ASL, to make them accessible for the Deaf participants in our study. A planned sample of 450 Deaf ASL users and 450 hearing native English speakers, aged 18 to 70 years, will be recruited from 3 partnering sites: Rochester, NY; Flint, MI; and Chicago, IL. These individuals will participate in a single data collection visit. A subset of participants (approximately 30) with key characteristics of interest will be invited for a second data collection visit to observe and inquire more about their ability to directly access, navigate, and comprehend Web-based health information. The study will help assess how the ways health literacy and information are visualized may differ between Deaf individuals and hearing individuals. The study will also survey participants’ ownership and use of computer and mobile devices and their level of Web-based information use, including health information. Results Adaptation and translation of protocols and instruments have been completed and are now in use for the study. Recruitment is underway and will continue until late 2020. Results from this study will be used to provide a guide on how to structure Web-based health information in a way that maximizes accessibility and improves health literacy for Deaf individuals. Conclusions The results from this mixed methods proposal will advance what is known about health literacy and health information accessibility for Deaf individuals. This innovative study will generate rich data on how to formulate health information and health literacy interventions more accurately to take advantage of visual learning skills. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/14889

Students’ General Knowledge of the Learning Process: A Mixed Methods Study Illustrating Integrated Data Collection and Data Consolidation

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joke H. van Velzen
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
General Knowledge ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Data Consolidation ◽  
New Research

There were two purposes for this mixed methods study: to investigate (a) the realistic meaning of awareness and understanding as the underlying constructs of general knowledge of the learning process and (b) a procedure for data consolidation. The participants were 11th-grade high school and first-year university students. Integrated data collection and data transformation provided for positive but small correlations between awareness and understanding. A comparison of the created combined and integrated new data sets showed that the integrated data set provided for an expected statistically significant outcome, which was in line with the participants’ developmental difference. This study can contribute to the mixed methods research because it proposes a procedure for data consolidation and a new research design.

scholarly journals Involving High-Grade Glioma Patients and Their Carers in Qualitative Research to Promote Structured Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 160940692098213
Author(s):  
Ishrat Islam ◽  
Silvia Goss ◽  
Annmarie Nelson ◽  
Anthony Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Ethics ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Ethics Committee ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Ethical Approval

Introduction: Structured physical activity may improve physical, cognitive, and social functionality, as well as overall quality of life of people with high-grade glioma. Yet, engaging them in such activities remains highly challenging due to their unique disease burden and perceived “loss of control.” A greater understanding of patients’ interests, preferences, behavioral motivations, and perceived barriers around physical activity is needed to design tailored and patient-led physical activity interventions. This protocol describes the method and ethical considerations of a cross-sectional mixed-methods study that has been developed to collect such information from glioma patients and their carers. Methods and analysis: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ 7, short form) and semi-structured interviews will be used for data collection. IPAQ scoring protocol will be followed to examine objective data and Clarke and Braun’s thematic approach will be used to analyze the interview transcripts. Ethics: Ethical approval was obtained from Cardiff University’s Research Ethics Committee and from the regional NHS Research Ethics Committee. The main ethical concerns are to maintain patients’ safety and comfort and ensure that their consent remains informed and valid throughout the recruitment, data collection, management, and dissemination stage. Risks associated with their physical condition, emotional distress, and time commitment should be continuously assessed and necessary actions should be taken accordingly. Conclusion: The protocol will work as a step by step guide for future researchers for developing similar qualitative research and obtaining ethical approval when involving vulnerable individuals like high-grade glioma patients in studies.

scholarly journals Mobility and Participation of People With Disabilities Using Mobility Assistive Technologies: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Routhier ◽  
W Ben Mortenson ◽  
Louise Demers ◽  
Atiya Mahmood ◽  
Habib Chaudhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Ethics ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Assistive Technologies ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Quebec City ◽  
Environmental Features ◽  
Research Ethics Board

BACKGROUND Many community-dwelling individuals living with a disability use mobility assistive technologies (MATs). MAT devices are generally beneficial for individuals with mobility impairments. However, less is known about the specific factors that may foster or deter mobility and community participation. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this protocol is to describe the methodology for a study including three main objectives: (1) to understand the places people using MAT go and the things they do, (2) to identify perceived barriers and facilitators as well as users’ desired environmental modifications, and (3) to understand subjective and objective issues related to environmental accessibility. METHODS A mixed-methods study was conducted in Vancouver and in Quebec City. Qualitative interviews were conducted to address all three objectives. In addition, Objective 1 was achieved through collection of global positioning system (GPS) data and activity diaries with 36 participants per site who represented six types of MAT users (ie, cane, walker, crutches, manual wheelchair, power wheelchair, and scooter). All participants were invited to take part in all aspects of data collection. PhotoVoice was used to address Objectives 2 and 3. Two environmental audits were used to address Objective 2. The Stakeholders’ Walkability/Wheelability Audit in Neighbourhood (SWAN) measured perceptions related to a variety of community environmental features associated with mobility and participation. A total of 24 participants were recruited to each study site for SWAN data collection. The Measure of Environmental Accessibility (MEA) was also used to objectively measure access to exterior and interior environments selected earlier in the project by the participants that could benefit from improvements. RESULTS Funding for this study was obtained from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board and the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale Research Ethics Board. Regarding the MEA evaluations, 19 locations (ie, buildings and exterior spaces) where obstacles have been identified by the participants of the PhotoVoice focus groups have been evaluated in Quebec City and 20 locations have been identified in the Vancouver region by the participants of the community forums. Data collection for this project was completed in December 2018. Analysis and writing of manuscripts are underway. CONCLUSIONS The use of a variety of methods to gather data on participation and mobility will allow a more holistic consideration of factors influencing mobility with a MAT device. This study will provide objective information about the mobility of participants and identify barriers and facilitators that impact their mobility and community participation. Through the mixed-methods approach employed in this study, we will gain a subjective evaluation of the participants’ neighborhoods, including personally meaningful information on environmental features that influence participants' everyday mobility and participation. We will also gain an objective evaluation of particular obstacles that community users of MAT identify as significant barriers to their ability to access public environments. We anticipate that these findings will help to identify a broad spectrum of solutions to improve the mobility and community participation of MAT users. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR DERR1-10.2196/12089

scholarly journals Sociodemographic data collection for health equity measurement: a mixed methods study examining public opinions

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maritt Kirst ◽  
Ketan Shankardass ◽  
Sivan Bomze ◽  
Aisha Lofters ◽  
Carlos Quiñonez
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Public Opinions ◽  
Sociodemographic Data

scholarly journals An analytic perspective of a mixed methods study during humanitarian crises in South Sudan: translating facility- and community-based newborn guidelines into practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samira Sami ◽  
Ribka Amsalu ◽  
Alexander Dimiti ◽  
Debra Jackson ◽  
Kemish Kenneth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Public Health Practice ◽  
South Sudan ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Public Health Action ◽  
Study Team

Abstract Background: The civil war in 2016 led to mass displacement in Juba that rapidly spread to other regions of the country. Access to health care was limited because of attacks against health facilities and workers and pregnant women and newborns were among the most vulnerable. Translation of newborn guidelines into public health practice, particularly during periods of on-going violence, are not well studied during humanitarian emergencies. During 2016 to 2017, we assessed the feasibility of delivering a package of community- and facility-based newborn health interventions in displaced person camps to understand implementation outcomes. This case study describes the methodology for conducting a mixed methods study during periods of sudden violence.Discussion: Challenges unique to conducting research in South Sudan included violent attacks against humanitarian aid workers that required research partners to modify study plans on an ongoing basis to ensure staff and patient safety. South Sudan faced devastating cholera and measles outbreaks that shifted programmatic priorities. Costs associated with traveling study staff and transporting equipment kept rising due to hyperinflation and, after the July 2016 violence, the study team was unable to convene in Juba for some months to conduct refresher trainings or monitor data collection. Strategies used to address these challenges were: collaborating with non-research partners to identify operational solutions; maintaining a locally-based study team; maintaining flexible budgets and timelines; using mobile data collection to conduct timely data entry and remote quality checks; and utilizing a cascade approach for training field staff. Conclusions: The study provides lessons that are applicable to other humanitarian settings including the need for flexible research methods, budgets and timelines; innovative training and supervision; and a local team from the study sites with careful consideration of sociopolitical factors that impact their access and safety. Engagement of national and local stakeholders can ensure health services and data collection continue and findings translate to public health action, even in contexts facing severe and unpredictable insecurity. Word count: 314/350

scholarly journals Deaf Adults’ Health Literacy and Access to Health Information: Protocol for a Multicenter Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M McKee ◽  
Peter C Hauser ◽  
Sara Champlin ◽  
Michael Paasche-Orlow ◽  
Kelley Wyse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Literacy Interventions ◽  
Limited Health Literacy ◽  
Limited Health

BACKGROUND Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users often struggle with limited health literacy compared with their hearing peers. However, the mechanisms driving limited health literacy and how this may impact access to and understanding of health information for Deaf individuals have not been determined. Deaf individuals are more likely than hearing individuals to use the internet, yet they continue to report significant barriers to health information. This study presents an opportunity to identify key targets that impact information access for a largely marginalized population. OBJECTIVE This study aims to elucidate the role of information marginalization on health literacy in Deaf ASL users and to better understand the mechanisms of health literacy in this population for the purpose of identifying viable targets for future health literacy interventions. METHODS This is an exploratory mixed methods study to identify predictors and moderators of health literacy in the Deaf population. These predictors of health literacy will be used to inform the second step that qualitatively explains the findings, including how Deaf individuals access and understand Web-based health information. Multiple interviewer- and computer-based instruments underwent translation and adaptation, from English to ASL, to make them accessible for the Deaf participants in our study. A planned sample of 450 Deaf ASL users and 450 hearing native English speakers, aged 18 to 70 years, will be recruited from 3 partnering sites: Rochester, NY; Flint, MI; and Chicago, IL. These individuals will participate in a single data collection visit. A subset of participants (approximately 30) with key characteristics of interest will be invited for a second data collection visit to observe and inquire more about their ability to directly access, navigate, and comprehend Web-based health information. The study will help assess how the ways health literacy and information are visualized may differ between Deaf individuals and hearing individuals. The study will also survey participants’ ownership and use of computer and mobile devices and their level of Web-based information use, including health information. RESULTS Adaptation and translation of protocols and instruments have been completed and are now in use for the study. Recruitment is underway and will continue until late 2020. Results from this study will be used to provide a guide on how to structure Web-based health information in a way that maximizes accessibility and improves health literacy for Deaf individuals. CONCLUSIONS The results from this mixed methods proposal will advance what is known about health literacy and health information accessibility for Deaf individuals. This innovative study will generate rich data on how to formulate health information and health literacy interventions more accurately to take advantage of visual learning skills. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/14889

scholarly journals Identification of Factors That Motivate People With Multiple Sclerosis to Participate in Digital Data Collection in Research: Sequential Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Karnoe ◽  
Lars Kayser ◽  
Lasse Skovgaard
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Data Collection Tool ◽  
Sequential Mixed Methods

BACKGROUND Digital data collection has the potential to reduce participant burden in research projects that require extensive registrations from participants. To achieve this, a digital data collection tool needs to address potential barriers and motivations for participation. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify factors that may affect motivation for participation and adoption of a digital data collection tool in a research project on nutrition and multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS The study was designed as a sequential mixed methods study with 3 phases. In phase 1, 15 semistructured interviews were conducted in a Danish population of individuals with MS. Interview guide frameworks were based on dimensions from the electronic health literacy framework and the Health Education Impact Questionnaire. Data from phase 1 were analyzed in a content analysis, and findings were used to inform the survey design in phase 2 that validates the results from the content analysis in a larger population. The survey consisted of 14 items, and it was sent to 1000 individuals with MS (response rate 42.5%). In phase 3, participants in 3 focus group interviews discussed how findings from phases 1 and 2 might affect motivation for participation and adoption of the digital tool. RESULTS The following 3 categories related to barriers and incentives for participation were identified in the content analysis of the 15 individual interviews: (1) life with MS, (2) use of technology, and (3) participation and incentives. Phase 1 findings were tested in phase 2’s survey in a larger population (n=1000). The majority of participants were comfortable using smartphone technologies and participated actively on social media platforms. MS symptoms did cause limitations in the use of Web pages and apps when the given pages had screen clutter, too many colors, or too small buttons. Life with MS meant that most participants had to ration their energy levels. Support from family and friends was important to participants, but support could also come in the form of physical aids (walking aids and similar) and digital aids (reminders, calendar functions, and medication management). Factors that could discourage participation were particularly related to the time it would take every day. The biggest motivations for participation were to contribute to research in MS, to learn more about one’s own MS and what affects it, and to be able to exchange experiences with other people with MS. CONCLUSIONS MS causes limitations that put demands on tools developed for digital data collection. A digital data collection tool can increase chances of high adoption rates, but it needs to be supplemented with a clear and simple project design and continuous communication with participants. Motivational factors should be considered in both study design and the development of a digital data collection tool for research.

scholarly journals Improving hospital safety for patients with chronic kidney disease: a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia New ◽  
Donna Goodridge ◽  
Joanne Kappel ◽  
Joshua Lawson ◽  
Roy Dobson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Interpersonal Interactions ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Hospital Safety

Abstract Background People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) require complex medical management and may be frequently hospitalized. Patient safety incidents during hospitalization can result in serious complications which may negatively affect health outcomes. There has been limited examination of how these patients perceive their own safety. Objectives This study compared the safety perceptions of patients hospitalized with CKD using two approaches: (a) the Patient Measure of Safety (PMOS) questionnaire and (b) qualitative interviews. The study objectives were to: (1) assess concordance between qualitative and quantitative data on safety perceptions and (2) better understand safety as perceived by study participants. Methods A cross-sectional convergent mixed methods design was used. Integration at the reporting level occurred by weaving together patient narratives and survey domains through the use of a joint display. Interview data were merged with results of the PMOS on a case-by-case basis for analysis to assess for concordance or discordance between these approaches to safety data collection. Results Of the 30 inpatients with CKD, almost one quarter (23.3 %) of participants reported low levels of perceived safety in hospitals. Four major themes emerged from the interviews: receiving safe care; expecting to be taken care of; expecting to be cared for; and reporting safety concerns. Suboptimal communication, delays in care and concerns about technical aspects of care were common to both forms of data collection. Concordance was noted between qualitative and quantitative data with respect to communication/teamwork, respect and dignity, staff roles, and ward type/lay-out. While interviews allowed for participants to share specific concerns related to safety about quality of interpersonal interactions, use of the questionnaire alone did not capture this concern. Conclusions Safety issues are a concern for in-patients with CKD. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches provided important and complementary insights into these issues. Narratives were mostly concordant with questionnaire scores. Findings from this mixed methods study suggest that communication, interpersonal interactions, and delays in care were more concerning for participants than technical aspects of care. Eliciting the concerns of people with CKD in a systematic fashion, either through interviews or a survey, ensures that hospital safety improvement efforts focus on issues important to patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document