Vasopressor and Inotrope Therapy in Cardiac Critical Care

2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662091763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob C. Jentzer ◽  
Steven M. Hollenberg

Patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) are often in shock and require hemodynamic support. Identifying and addressing the pathophysiology mechanisms operating in an individual patient is crucial to achieving a successful outcome, while initiating circulatory support therapy to restore adequate tissue perfusion. Vasopressors and inotropes are the cornerstone of supportive medical therapy for shock, in addition to fluid resuscitation when indicated. Timely initiation of optimal vasopressor and inotrope therapy is essential for patients with shock, with the ultimate goals of restoring effective tissue perfusion in order to normalize cellular metabolism. Use of vasoactive agents for hemodynamic support of patients with shock should take both arterial pressure and tissue perfusion into account when choosing therapeutic interventions. For most patients with shock, including cardiogenic or septic shock, norepinephrine (NE) is an appropriate choice as a first-line vasopressor titrated to achieve an adequate arterial pressure due to a lower risk of adverse events than other catecholamine vasopressors. If tissue and organ perfusion remain inadequate, an inotrope such as dobutamine may be added to increase cardiac output to a sufficient level that meets tissue demand. Low doses of epinephrine or dopamine may be used for inotropic support, but high doses of these drugs carry an excessive risk of adverse events when used for vasopressor support and should be avoided. When NE alone is inadequate to achieve an adequate arterial pressure, addition of a noncatecholamine vasopressor such as vasopressin or angiotensin-II is reasonable, in addition to rescue therapies that may improve vasopressor responsiveness. In this review, we discuss the pharmacology and evidence-based use of vasopressor and inotrope drugs in critically ill patients, with a focus on the CICU population.

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1559
Author(s):  
Liana Valeanu ◽  
Serban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi ◽  
Carmen Ginghina ◽  
Cosmin Balan

Circulatory failure in sepsis is common and places a considerable burden on healthcare systems. It is associated with an increased likelihood of mortality, and timely recognition is a prerequisite to ensure optimum results. While there is consensus that aggressive source control, adequate antimicrobial therapy and hemodynamic management constitute crucial determinants of outcome, discussion remains about the best way to achieve each of these core principles. Sound cardiovascular support rests on tailored fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy. To this end, an overarching framework to improve cardiovascular dynamics has been a recurring theme in modern critical care. The object of this review is to examine the nature of one such framework that acknowledges the growing importance of adaptive hemodynamic support combining macro- and microhemodynamic variables to produce adequate tissue perfusion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1029.2-1030
Author(s):  
A. Colpo ◽  
P. Marson ◽  
T. Tison ◽  
A. Zambon ◽  
A. La Rosa ◽  
...  

Background:Therapeutic apheresis (TA) represents a therapeutic option in pre-existing conditions or rheumatic diseases that occur during gestation. Although pregnancy is not a contraindication itself, due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines and the alleged risk of maternal and/or fetal adverse events, there is general resistance to its application during pregnancy.Objectives:In this observational study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA in high-risk pregnancies in patients with rheumatic diseases, followed over a decade in a tertiary Center.Methods:Between January 2005 and April 2019, 843 TA procedures were performed during 51 pregnancies in 43 patients: 745 plasma exchange sessions and 98 immunoabsorption sessions. TA was performed in 29 (57%) pregnancies of 21 (48.8%) patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), in 20 (39.2%) pregnancies of 20 (46.5%) patients with congenital heart block (CHB), in 1 (1.9%) pregnancy of 1 (2.3%) patient with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and 1 (1.9%) pregnancy of 1 (2.3%) patient affected by lupic nephritis (SLE).Results:During the period considered, apheresis sessions applied to pregnant women were 7.1% of the total (n = 13.251). The average age at the first treatment was 33 years (range 24-43). The mean management age at the first apheretic treatment was 21 weeks (range 4-32). Twelve (1.4%) apheresis sessions were complicated by adverse events, none required or prolonged hospitalization. There were 44 (86.3%) live births, 3 (5.9%) spontaneous abortions and 2 (3.9%) voluntary terminations of pregnancy, 2 (3.9%) lost to follow-up. The average gestational age at birth was 35 weeks (range 24-37) and cesarean section was performed in 41 (80.4%) cases. TA was added to conventional therapy in 24/29 (82.7%) patients with APS, to the detection of fetal cardiac activity, while in 5/26 (17.3%) it was introduced when the first signs of pregnancy complications such as mild preclampsia, HELLP and IUGR were detected. TA was started within 24 hours of atrioventricular block (AVB) detection; 10/20 (50%) mothers with CHB were diagnosed with 2nd degree AVB, 9/20 (45%) with 3rd degree AVB and one (5%) with sinus bradycardia and endocardial fibroelastosis. The patient with SSc was treated with TA twice a week from the 32nd SG until delivery, which occurred at the 36th SG, due to severe IUGR and oligohydramnios. The patient with SLE complicated by lupic nephritis was treated with TA twice a week, from the 26th SG until the birth, which took place at the 31st SG.Conclusion:Our data have shown that TA in pregnancy is well tolerated. Close collaboration between rheumatologist, obstetrician and specialist in TA is essential to ensure a successful outcome of high-risk pregnancies.Disclosure of Interests: :Anna Colpo: None declared, Piero Marson: None declared, Tiziana Tison: None declared, Alessandra Zambon: None declared, Annalisa La Rosa: None declared, Ermella Zanetti: None declared, Amelia Ruffatti: None declared, Giustina De Silvestro: None declared, Ariela Hoxha Speakers bureau: Celgene, UCB, Novartis, Sanofi, Werfen


Critical Care ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P154
Author(s):  
E Tishkov ◽  
O Bukaev

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. S127
Author(s):  
Iosif Taleb ◽  
Antigone Koliopoulou ◽  
Anwar Tandar ◽  
Stephen McKellar ◽  
Jose Nativi-Nicolau ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin Kheterpal ◽  
Michael O’Reilly ◽  
Michael J. Englesbe ◽  
Andrew L. Rosenberg ◽  
Amy M. Shanks ◽  
...  

Background The authors sought to determine the incidence and risk factors for perioperative cardiac adverse events (CAEs) after noncardiac surgery using detailed preoperative and intraoperative hemodynamic data. Methods The authors conducted a prospective observational study at a single university hospital from 2002 to 2006. All American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients undergoing general, vascular, and urological surgery were included. The CAE outcome definition included cardiac arrest, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and new clinically significant cardiac dysrhythmia within the first 30 postoperative days. Results Four years of data demonstrated that of 7,740 noncardiac operations, 83 patients (1.1%) experienced a CAE within 30 days. Nine independent predictors were identified (P < or = 0.05): age > or = 68, body mass index > or = 30, emergent surgery, previous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery, active congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, operative duration > or = 3.8 h, and the administration of 1 or more units of packed red blood cells intraoperatively. The c-statistic of this model was 0.81 +/- 0.02. Univariate analysis demonstrated that high-risk patients experiencing a CAE were more likely to experience an episode of mean arterial pressure < 50 mmHg (6% vs. 24%, P = 0.02), experience an episode of 40% decrease in mean arterial pressure (26% vs. 53%, P = 0.01), and an episode of heart rate > 100 (22% vs. 34%, P = 0.05). Conclusions In comparison with current risk stratification indices, the inclusion of intraoperative elements improves the ability to predict a perioperative CAE after noncardiac surgery.


Author(s):  
Priya Rewatkar ◽  
Manoj Patil

Introduction: Wilms's tumour was named after Carl Max Wilhelm Wilms, a 19th century German surgeon. Wilm’s tumor is derived from primitive metanephric blastema and is a form of childhood carcinoma that begins in the kidneys (also called nephroblastoma). In infants, it is the most common form of kidney carcinoma. 9 out of 10 kidney cancers in kids is Wilms Tumor. Carcinoma can spread to other parts of the body. The incidence is around seven new cases per million children in the United States, with a peak incidence between the ages of 2 and 3 years. Main symptoms and important clinical findings: A 11 yrs. old female child was admitted in Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Wardha on 08/02/2021 with chief complaint of breathing difficulty, shortness of breath, blood in the urine, nausea and vomiting. After physical examination and investigations, doctors diagnosed it as a case of Wilm’s tumor. The main diagnoses, therapeutic interventions and outcomes: After physical examination and investigations like MRI, doctor diagnosed it as a case Wilm’s tumour. Tab. Actinomycin D (Dactinomycin), tab. Vincristine (chemotherapy) were started and calcium and multivitamin supplements were given for 7 days to enhance immune function. Tab. Septran 160 mg OD and tab. Acenet 400 mg OD, tab. Bactrim 5mg OD was also prescribed. Patient took all treatment and outcome was good. Her signs and symptoms improved. Conclusion: Accurate diagnosis and timely initiation of treatment speeded up recovery.


ABSTRACT:Objective:In many countries, neurosurgical care is concentrated in regional centres, which often necessitates the inter-hospital transfer of patients with head injury for optimal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of teleradiology in the management of head-injured patients when referred from a district general hospital to a tertiary neurosurgical centre.Methods:Prospective data were collected over a fifteen month period from March '95 to May '96. Head-injured patients referred without the facility of teleradiology (Group 1), were compared to similar patients referred with teleradiologie images (Group 2), with particular regard to therapeutic intervention before transfer and adverse events during transfer.Results:There were 28 patients in Group 1 and 35 in Group 2, of which 31 were transferred. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, and intracranial pathology. For patients transferred with teleradiology consultation (Group 2), therapeutic interventions were more (32.1% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.06), adverse events during transfer were significantly lower (6.4% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.01), and transfer time was reduced (72 vs. 80 minutes, p = 0.38). Four patients in Group 2 were treated by a mobile neurosurgical team at the referring hospital because of rapid clinical deterioration.Conclusion:Our findings indicate that teleradiology has an important role in improving inter-hospital management of head-injured patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document