The Gender By Us® Toolkit: A Pilot Study of an Intervention to Disrupt Implicit Gender Bias

Affilia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Bates ◽  
Katie Lauve-Moon ◽  
Rebecca McCloskey ◽  
Dawn Anderson-Butcher
Keyword(s):  
Gender Bias ◽  
Gender Discrimination ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Social Dominance Orientation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gender Biases ◽  
Psychometric Instruments ◽  
The Social ◽  
Orientation Scale ◽  
Quantitative Results

Using a mixed methods approach, the current study tested whether an intervention, the Gender By Us® Toolkit, decreased implicit gender bias compared to a generic conversation. Researchers randomly assigned participants in the study to the intervention ( n = 11) or a generic conversation ( n = 12). Participants completed pre-, post-, and 2-week follow-up surveys. Valid psychometric instruments and t tests were used to assess group differences on the following measures: (1) the Social Dominance Orientation Scale, (2) the Neosexism Scale, and (3) the Modern Sexism Scale. Quantitative results showed the intervention group scored significantly higher on the Modern Sexism Scale at posttest than the control group ( p = .00), demonstrating increased acknowledgment of gender discrimination. Both groups also were asked open-ended questions related to the intervention and implicit gender bias. Qualitative results suggested that participants’ overall perception was that the intervention increased their awareness of implicit gender biases within themselves and their ability to identify biases in others, yet a comparatively low number of intervention participants retained the ability to identify an example of implicit gender bias at posttest. Findings may indicate the intervention had a small but positive effect on disrupting implicit gender bias.

scholarly journals Social dominance orientation predicts civil and military intelligence analysts’ utilitarian responses to ethics-of-intelligence dilemmas

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Margoni ◽  
Giangiuseppe Pili
Keyword(s):  
Social Dominance ◽  
Social Dominance Orientation ◽  
Moral Dilemmas ◽  
Ethical Framework ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Military Intelligence ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Social ◽  
Orientation Scale ◽  
Key Aspects

AbstractWhat is the real ethical framework of an intelligence analyst? We addressed this question by presenting a group of civil and military intelligence analysts (N = 41), and a control group of non-professionals (N = 41), with a set of dilemmas depicting intelligence agents facing the decision whether to violate a deontological rule where that would benefit their work (ethics-of-intelligence dilemmas). Participants judged how much violating the rule was acceptable. Next, we measured participants’ individual differences in social dominance orientation (using the Social Dominance Orientation scale which measures the proclivity to endorse intergroup hierarchy and anti-egalitarianism), their deontological and utilitarian response tendencies (using classical moral dilemmas), and how much they value rule conformity, traditions, and safety and stability in the society (using the Value Survey). A multiple regression analysis revealed that, among all the factors, only social dominance significantly helped explain variability in intelligence analysts’ but not non-professionals’ resolutions of the ethics-of-intelligence dilemmas. Specifically, social dominance positively predicted the tendency to judge violating the deontological rule acceptable, possibly suggesting that analysts who show a stronger proclivity to desire their country or company to prevail over others are also more lenient toward deontological violations if these result in a greater good for the state or the company. For the first time in the open literature, we elucidated some key aspects of the real ethics of intelligence.

scholarly journals Ambivalent Speciesism Scale: Development, Validity and Reliability

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (18) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Animal Rights ◽  
Social Dominance ◽  
Animal Ethics ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Social Dominance Orientation ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
The Social ◽  
Orientation Scale ◽  
Animal Use

The aim of this study is to develop a scale compatible with current animal ethics studies to measure the phenomenon of speciesism, that is marginalization of animals and prejudice and discrimination against animals. In order to develop the Ambivalent Speciesism Scale, an item pool was created by examining the animal ethics literature and social psychology studies on human-animal relations, and then the items were edited by taking the opinions of people studying animal rights and experts in measurement and evaluation in psychology. The scale is designed in 7-point Likert type. The trial form was applied to the participants together with the Speciesism Scale, the Social Dominance Orientation Scale and the Basic Empathy Scale. Participants were selected from individuals representing different lifestyles in the context of animal use, using the snowball sampling technique. The study was conducted with 288 participants; 64 men, 217 women and, 7 of whom are not of both genders. While there were 24 items in the trial form of the scale, nine of these items were eliminated as a result of the factor analysis. The final form of the scale with 15 items has a high reliability (.90). The items of the scale are divided into three dimensions: belief in human superiority, protective speciesism, and speciesism in language. It was determined that the scores obtained from the scale were in positive correlation with the scores obtained from the other scale measuring speciesism and the social dominance orientation scale, as expected. The scores obtained from the scale are distributed as expected among the groups that include lifestyles related to animal use. These data were evaluated as findings showing the validity of the scale. Keywords Speciesism, ambivalent speciesism scale, animal rights, discrimination, animal ethics

scholarly journals Experiments in political psychology

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Fischer ◽  
Quentin Atkinson ◽  
Ananish Chaudhuri
Keyword(s):  
Social Dominance ◽  
Political Ideology ◽  
Ultimatum Game ◽  
Social Dominance Orientation ◽  
Right Wing ◽  
Right Wing Authoritarianism ◽  
The Social ◽  
Orientation Scale ◽  
The Right ◽  
Social Conservatism

This chapter provides an overview of studies that use incentivised experiments to study political ideology. We look first at studies that conceptualise political ideology along a unidimensional liberal-conservative spectrum and explore whether there are behavioural differences between liberals and conservatives. While recent studies find that liberals display more pro-sociality, many other studies find that liberals and conservatives display similar levels of pro-social, ingroup-biased, normative, and punitive behaviour. We then turn to experiments that study two-dimensional political ideology as embodied in the concepts of economic conservatism/progressivism (often measured with the Social Dominance Orientation scale) and social conservatism/progressivism (usually measured with the Right-Wing Authoritarianism scale). In such experiments, economic conservatives display lower levels of pro-sociality and universalism and greater tolerance of inequality and tendencies to harm outgroups. Social conservatives tend to display “groupishness”, including distrusting anonymous strangers, cooperating with ingroup members, following rules, punishing in the ultimatum game, and sometimes harming outgroups.

scholarly journals Peningkatan Kemampuan Ketrampilan Sosial Pasien Gangguan Jiwa di Masyarakat dengan Terapi Hortikultura

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82
Author(s):  
Widyo Subagyo ◽  
Dyah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Mukhadiono Mukhadiono
Keyword(s):  
Social Skills ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Horticultural Therapy ◽  
The Social ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Significant Difference

This study aimed to determine the effect of the development of horticultural therapy to improve the social skills of mental disorders patients in the community. This research's method is quantitative research with a pre-posttest queasy experimental research design with a control group. The study results the social skills score before and after treatment in the intervention group given horticultural therapy was marked with a p-value of 0.01 (<0.05). In conclusion, there is a significant difference in the mean difference in social skills scores between the intervention and control groups.   Keywords: Mental Disorders, Social Skills, Horticultural Therapy

Enhancing Empathy through a Creative Writing Program in Elementary School

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
Sofia Tsatsou-Nikolouli ◽  
Stavroula Mavrogeni
Keyword(s):  
Creative Writing ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Social And Emotional ◽  
Social And Emotional Skills ◽  
The Social ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Very High

Education is not only about the transferring of knowledge, but also about the cultivation of strong social and emotional skills, which are necessary for the strengthening of the social competence of students, their positive self-perception and their success in school. Empathy, which refers to the ability to recognize another person‟s emotional state is one of the basic skills of the 21st century, which helps all students grow up to become active and critically aware citizens. The research/intervention program "Creative Writing and Social Learning Skills", implemented by students of the 5th and 6th grade of elementary schools in Thessaloniki, Greece, explores the enhancement of empathy, through the use of creative writing as an educational tool. Activities used were based on literary texts from Balkan countries and countries of Eastern and Southeastern Europe. The research sample consisted of 573 students, who were divided into the Intervention Group, that implemented the program, and the Control Group, that attended its regular curriculum. The analysis of the level of skills in children, and especially the level of empathy, which is of concern to us in the present study, was carried out using a structured improvised questionnaire, the alpha Cronbach coefficients where of range at very high levels. Study results showed that the Intervention Group exhibited statistically greater improvement in the assessment of empathy compared to the Control Group.

scholarly journals A Pilot Randomised Control Trial of Digitally-Mediated Social Stories for Children on the Autism Spectrum

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 4243-4257 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hanrahan ◽  
E. Smith ◽  
H. Johnson ◽  
A. Constantin ◽  
M. Brosnan
Keyword(s):  
Attentional Control ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Social Stories ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Educational Context ◽  
The Social ◽  
Meta Analyses

AbstractSocial stories is a widely used intervention for children on the autism spectrum, particularly within an educational context. To date, systematic reviews and meta analyses of the research evaluating social stories has produced mixed results, often due to a lack of methodological rigour and variability in the development and delivery of the social stories. To address the gap in methodological rigour, a pilot Randomised Control Trial (RCT) was conducted, incorporating a social stories intervention group (n = 9 children on the autism spectrum) and an attentional control group who received a poem (n = 6 children on the autism spectrum) using a digital platform to address variability. Digitally-mediated social stories were found to be effective in producing beneficial changes in behaviour outcomes, which were sustained at a six-week follow up.

scholarly journals Effect of Time Management Workshops in Reducing the Social Procrastination among Emergency Medicine Residents

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Hamid Reza Morteza Bagi ◽  
Rouzbeh Rajaei Ghafouri ◽  
Seyedhossein Ojaghihaghighi ◽  
Hoorolnesa Ameli
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Medical Errors ◽  
Time Management ◽  
Management Education ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Management Skills ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
The Social ◽  
Before And After

Background and Aims: Medical errors are important in all fields of medicine and have larger consequences in risky and stressful fields like emergency medicine. Social carelessness can cause these errors. On the other hand better understanding of time perception can lead to increased power of management and better decision making. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of time management education on social procrastination among emergency medicine residents.Material and Methods: In this interventional study, 25 residents in intervention group had a time management workshops for two weeks and we evaluated them for social procrastination before and after intervention. 25 residents were studied and compared as control group. Results: Both groups were matched according to baseline findings. Married residents compared to single ones had significantly lower procrastination score (p=0.02). The serial changes in procrastination score after the workshop in intervention group was significantly higher that control group (p=0.006). Conclusion: Education time management skills workshops could be effective in reducing social procrastination among emergency medicine residents. Married residents possibly due to responsiveness in their marriage and management skills have low procrastination.

scholarly journals More than Just Soup: Use of a Student-Led COVID-19 Social Pediatrics Initiative to Propose the Integration of Social Medicine Electives in Undergraduate Medical Education

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 238212052097321
Author(s):  
Jennifer Daccache ◽  
Michel Khoury ◽  
Charlene Habibi ◽  
Susan Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Education ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Social Medicine ◽  
Learning Objectives ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Social Pediatrics ◽  
The Social ◽  
Innovative Solution ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The need to educate medical students on the social forces shaping disease and health patterns is paramount in preparing incoming physicians with the aptitudes to address health inequities. Despite its well-documented merit as a model of practice, social medicine remains underrepresented at the undergraduate medical education level. We hypothesize that the success of this student-led COVID-19 initiative proposes a tangible and innovative solution to address the lack of social medicine exposure in undergraduate medical education. Methodology: We sought to evaluate the impact of sustaining clinical learning during the pandemic using the social pediatrics model as a didactic vector for clerkship students. We extracted learning objectives relevant to the teaching of social medicine from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada’s CanMEDS framework and developed a survey aimed at evaluating the attainability of each of those objectives. The survey was distributed to students enrolled in the social pediatrics COVID-19 initiative after 6 weeks (April-May), as well as a control group. Results: Completing the survey were 19 students from the University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, 7 in the intervention group and 12 in the control group. Students that participated in the social pediatrics initiative yielded significantly higher values for the achievement of 6 out of 9 social medicine learning objectives when compared to the control group. Although the values followed a similar trend for the remaining 3 objectives, favoring the intervention group, they were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The positive results from this study and the COVID-19 student-led initiative template can serve as a catalyst for curricular change so as to ensure graduates are adequately trained to contend with the realities of the social landscape in which they will practice. Future plans include the incorporation of interactive social medicine experiences throughout all 4 years of medical school.

scholarly journals Effects of a multi-level intervention on hookah smoking frequency and duration among Iranian adults: An application of Socio-ecological Model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Bakhtari ◽  
Nader Alizadeh ◽  
Haidar Nadrian ◽  
Christoph Augner ◽  
Asghar Mohammadpoorasl
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Program ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Ecological Model ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Social Ecological Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Social Ecological ◽  
The Social ◽  
Hookah Smoking ◽  
Multi Level

Abstract Background The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of a multi-level intervention based on the social ecological model on the frequency and duration of hookah smoking among a sample of Iranian adults. Methods In this study, two comparable cities in Iran were selected to participate in an intervention program based on a social ecological model (SEM). In each city, 133 hookah smokers in coffee houses were selected. Environmental changes in coffee houses such as serving light foods and games were conducted. A virtual group named "no hookah" was established on the Telegram application to train participants in the intervention group. Messages, pictures and short videos were sent to the participants through that virtual network. The frequency and duration of hookah consumption were assessed in both groups at baseline and after the intervention. Results The frequency of hookah consumption decreased in 72.6% of participants in the intervention group (vs. 6.3% in the control group); and the duration of hookah consumption per session decreased in 39.5% of participants in the intervention group (vs. 5.5% in the control group). Conclusions Using multi-level interventions through a social ecological model can reduce hookah consumption in young people.

scholarly journals Effects of a School-Based Relaxation Intervention on Recovery in Young Elite Athletes in High School

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 199-224
Author(s):  
Johan Michael Wikman ◽  
Knud Ryom ◽  
Reinhard Stelter ◽  
Anne-Marie Elbe
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Theoretical Foundation ◽  
Elite Athletes ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Based ◽  
Relaxation Intervention ◽  
Danish Version ◽  
Quantitative Results

Abstract This study reports the effects of a recovery intervention in young elite athletes in high school. The scissors model (Kellmann & Kallus, 2001) was used as a theoretical foundation for the intervention. An intervention group (n = 40) participated in 12 weekly intervention sessions, while the control group (n = 58) did not. A Danish version of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes measured recovery levels in the participants, at baseline and at the end of intervention. Qualitative interviews were conducted with four of the participants. Quantitative results did not show an improvement in recovery and stress levels. Qualitative results showed that the intervention had an effect on the participants, and also revealed areas, in which the intervention could be improved. Suggestions for future interventions are given.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document