Reproducibility and Detection Threshold of Peri-Implant Diagnostics

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Van Steenberghe ◽  
M. Quirynen
Keyword(s):  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Oral Implants ◽  
Damping Characteristics ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Attachment Level ◽  
Individual Implant

There is an increasing awareness that, for clinical monitoring of oral implants, there is a need for reliable diagnostics and possibly prognostic parameters. Indeed, reports have too often limited results to an inventory of failures, while no mention was made of progressive marginal bone loss or other symptoms of a future failure. Several parameters, such as marginal bone level assessment and/or probing attachment level, give a precision of up to 0.5 mm. Both measurements also seem related. The damping characteristics of the individual implant/bone unit also offer a highly reproducible diagnostic tool. The Periotest® allows for detection of subclinical mobilities, and 95% of repeated measurements fall within a range of one unit on the arbitrary scale. So far, these three parameters offer no prognostic value.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Success Criteria for Zirconia Dental Implants: A Four-Year Clinical and Radiological Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Enrico Borgonovo ◽  
Rachele Censi ◽  
Virna Vavassori ◽  
Marcello Dolci ◽  
Josè Luis Calvo-Guirado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
First Year ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Bone Preservation ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Zirconia Implants

Objectives. The aim was to evaluate survival and success rates, soft tissue health, and radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL) of zirconia implants placed in the esthetic and posterior areas of the jaws and in association with multiple or single implant restorations after at least 6 months of definitive restoration.Material and Methods. 35 one-piece zirconium implants were utilized for single or partially edentulous ridges rehabilitation. All implants received immediate temporary restorations and six months after surgery were definitively restored. Every 6 months after implant placement, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed. For each radiograph, the measurements of MBL were calculated.Results. The results showed that the mean MBL at 48-month followup was 1.631 mm. The mean MBL during the first year of loading was not more significant for implants placed in the first molar regions than for those positioned in other areas. Moreover, no differences in marginal bone level changes were revealed for multiple and single implants, whereas MBL in the first year was observed to be slightly greater for implants placed in the maxilla than for those placed in the mandible.Conclusion. Zirconia showed a good marginal bone preservation that could be correlated with one-piece morphology and characteristics of zirconia implants.

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Internal Friction Connection and Micro-Threads in Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki-Won Jeong ◽  
Jeong Chan Kim ◽  
In-Sung Luke Yeo ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Load Transfer ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Tissue Response ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Load Transfer Mechanism ◽  
Implant Abutment ◽  
Conical Connection ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

A connection structure using both a screw and friction is advantageous to secure an abutment to an implant. Understanding the biomechanics of the implant-abutment connection is necessary for the long-term clinical survival of a dental implant with decreased complications. The internal conical friction connection structure and micro-threads have shown favorable biological hard tissue response with exceptional structural features. The internal conical connection structure maintains the soft tissue seal and the marginal bone level around the implant. The durability of the implant wall thickness at the top is balanced via micro-threads with the load-transfer mechanism, resulting in proper peri-implant bone strain. These two structural devices are designed to achieve implant-abutment connection stability by redistributing an external load and by minimizing screw loosening events that cause implant component fractures and marginal bone loss.

scholarly journals Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 10715
Author(s):  
Odontuya Dorj ◽  
Hsi-Kuei Lin ◽  
Eisner Salamanca ◽  
Yu-Hwa Pan ◽  
Yi-Fan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants.

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Periodontal Status between Hookah and Cigarette Smokers

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Seyed Ali Banihashem Rad ◽  
Mohammad Bagheri Iraj ◽  
Majid Sanat Khani ◽  
Zahra Saeedi ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Banihashem Rad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Molar Tooth ◽  
Pocket Depth ◽  
Cigarette Smokers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hookah Smoking ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Attachment Level

Background and Objective: Inhalation of chemicals and toxins in cigarette and hookah smoke results in loss of integrity of oral cavity tissues. The objective of this study was to compare the periodontal health of hookah and cigarette smokers. Materials and Methods: In this study, 73 men at the age group of 20-35 years who smoked hookah for more than 5 years and 73 men at the same age who smoked cigarette for more than 5 years and 73 healthy men referred to the periodontal department of Mashhad dentistry school were selected and studied. Periodontal indices including pocket depth, GI, BOP, CAL were assessed in two groups. Also, using parallel periapical radiography, mesial and distal marginal bone level around the first molar tooth was measured. Finally, the data were assessed and compared using appropriate statistical analysis. Results: Pocket depth was 24.27% and 23.62%, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers, and it was 0.96% in healthy subjects, clinical attachment level was 4.48 and 4.41 mm, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers, and it was 0.77 mm in healthy subjects. Gingival index (GI) was 1.40 and 1.42, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 0.52 in healthy subjects, BOP value ​​was 6.52 and 6.52%, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 10.86% in healthy subjects. Mesial marginal bone level of first lower molar tooth was 2.27 and 2.32 mm, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 1.74 mm in healthy subjects and distal marginal bone level of lower first molar tooth was 2.38 and 2.35 mm, respectively, in cigarette smokers and hookah smokers and it was 1.75 mm in healthy subjects. Comparison of results between the two groups of cigarette smokers and hookah smokers did not show any significant relationship in any of the variables, but there was a significant relationship between the two groups and the healthy group (P &lt;0.001). Conclusion: Periodontal parameters in healthy individuals are significantly better than those of smokers. Also, although there is a relationship between cigarette smoking and hookah smoking and periodontal parameters, these two groups do not show a significant difference in terms of periodontal parameters.

scholarly journals Marginal Bone Loss around Implants with Internal Hexagonal and Internal Conical Connections: A 12-Month Randomized Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5427
Author(s):  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno ◽  
Ada Concha-Jeronimo ◽  
Lucia Lopez-Chaichio ◽  
Roque Rodriguez-Alvarez ◽  
Elena Sanchez-Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Radiographic Measurements ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Main Outcome Variable ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Implant Prosthesis

The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in terms of the marginal bone level (MBL) around implants with either an internal conical or an internal hexagonal implant–prosthesis connection. A randomized clinical trial included patients in need of a single implant-supported restoration. The implant–prosthesis connection was either internal conical or internal hexagonal while maintaining the same type of implant macro- and microarchitecture. Clinical and radiographical variables were registered up to 12 months of follow-up, including MBL. A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The main outcome variable, MBL 12 months after prosthesis delivery, was statistically different in both groups: −0.25 (0.12) vs. −0.70 (0.43) (conical vs. hexagonal; p = 0.033). Differences were also observed at the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits as well as for the MBL change from prosthesis delivery to the 12-month follow-up (−0.15 (0.13) vs. −0.56 (0.44); conical vs. hexagonal; p = 0.023). Correlations between MBL around the implants and radiographic measurements on the adjacent teeth, buccal bone to implant, tissue thickness or keratinized tissue were not significant neither globally nor when analyzed independently by group. In view of such results, it can be concluded that single-unit restorations with internal hexagonal-connection implants induce higher marginal bone loss after 12 months of follow-up from prosthesis delivery than internal conical-connection implants.

Influence of Inflammatory Reactions Vs. Occlusal Loading On Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Level

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Van Steenberghe ◽  
I. Naert ◽  
R. Jacobs ◽  
M. Quirynen
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Edentulous Patient ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Inflammatory Reactions ◽  
Oral Implants ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Plasma Sprayed

Plaque accumulation on abutments or implant surfaces induces an inflammatory reaction in the gingiva/alveolar mucosa just as around teeth. The longevity of oral implants can be jeopardized by either peri-implantitis and/or an occlusal overload. In the partially edentulous patient in whom pockets around teeth act as a reservoir for the colonization of the pockets around implants, the risk for inflammatory reactions of the peri-implant soft tissues seems especially more plausible than in the fully edentulous patient. This is especially true for implants with a very rough surface (e.g., plasma-sprayed), because of the positive relationship between surface roughness and supra- as well as subgingival plaque formation. Several medium-term (from 5 to 10 years) clinical studies support this hypothesis, through the observation of ongoing bone loss and subsequent decreasing success/survival percentages. Occlusal overload increases the risk for microfractures at the implant-bone interface in two-stage implants, which can result in significant marginal bone loss and even failure. There is ample evidence that occlusal factors are related to marginal angular defects around two-stage implants.

Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting Fixed Restorations

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 549-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Mumcu ◽  
Hakan Bilhan ◽  
Ali Cekici
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Size ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Implant Length

A key criterion of success following dental implants is the marginal bone level. Long-term clinical and radiographic evaluation is necessary to test the results of in vitro studies investigating how cantilevering of restorations or implant size affect bone level changes around implants. There is no consensus on the effect of several variables such as age, gender, implant size, and cantilever prostheses on marginal bone levels around fixed dentures supported by dental implants. Patients who received cemented, fixed restorations supported by implants and who were examined in routine recall sessions 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after loading were included in the study group. Comparative bone level measurements were obtained from images of radiographs at ×20 magnification using the CorelDraw 11.0 software program. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and 1-way analysis of variance. In the 36-month observation period, there were no incidences of implant failure, excessive bone loss around implants, or peri-implant inflammation. One hundred twenty-six implants in 36 patients were evaluated, and the effect of several factors on marginal bone loss (MBL) during the 36 months after loading was analyzed statistically. There was no significant relationship between MBL and implant length or diameter, whereas age, gender, and cantilevers affected bone loss rates. MBL was elevated in older and female patients as well as in patients who received cantilevers. In cases of limiting anatomic conditions, short and/or narrow implants should be preferred over cantilever extensions.

scholarly journals Effect of laser-microtexturing on bone and soft tissue attachments to dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-296
Author(s):  
Roodabeh Koodaryan ◽  
Ali Hafezeqoran
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Surface Characterization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Osseointegrated Implant ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Mean Differences

Background. It is critical to understand laser-microtextured implant collars’ influence on peri-implant pocket depths and marginal bone levels, especially in crucial areas. The present review investigated the peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) and pocket depths and failure rates of dental implants with laser-microtextured collars. Methods. An electronic search was run in the PubMed and Embase databases until September 15, 2019. Randomized and prospective clinical studies comparing peri-implant MBL and pocket depths and failure rates between implants with laser-microtextured and machined collar surfaces were included. Five studies (two cohort studies and three RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis after the inclusion and exclusion criteria and qualitative assessments were applied. The risk ratio of osseointegrated implant failure and mean differences in peri-implant MBL and pocket depths were calculated using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Results. Implants with laser-microtextured collars exhibited significantly better marginal bone level scores (P<0.001; MD: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.489‒0.592) and a significant reduction in peri-implant probing depths than implants with machined collars (P<0.001; MD: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90‒1.13). The assessed studies showed that 17 out of 516 implants failed (3.29%), comprising nine implants with machined (3.62%) and eight implants with laser-microtextured collars (2.98%). However, no significant differences were detected in the implant neck surface characterization (P=0.695; RR: 1.205; 95% CI: 0.472‒3.076). Conclusion. This study suggests that laser-microtexturing of implant collar significantly affected the peri-implant MBL and probing depths. Although no significant differences were noted in implant failure rates between implants with laser-microtextured and machined collar surfaces, the peri-implant MBL and probing depths with laser-microtextured collars were significantly lower than the machined collars.

scholarly journals Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single- Tooth Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine N Berberi ◽  
Ziad N Noujeim ◽  
Wasfi H Kanj ◽  
Rita J Mearawi ◽  
Ziad A Salameh
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

ABSTRACT Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate marginal bone level around single-tooth implants placed in anterior maxilla and immediately restored. Materials and Methods Twenty implants were placed in 20 patients (8 men and 12 women) that were selected for this study. Following atraumatic non-surgical extraction of tooth, all patients immediately received implants and the definitive prefabricated abutment was placed. Implant position was transferred to the scanning unit of the CAD/CAM system using prefabricated surgical guide. Temporary crowns were immediately fabricated and cemented. Eight weeks later final crowns were luted. Outcome assessment as implant survival and level of marginal bone radiographic evaluations were performed at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period after loading. Results All implants placed osseointegrated successfully after 3 years of functional loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.16 mm (SD, 0.167 mm), 0.275 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) and 0.265 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period respectively. Four out of the 20 implants showed no bone loss. Conclusion Immediate loading technique using the final abutment directly eliminated the need for a second stage surgery and prevented interruption of soft and hard tissue at implant neck, which resulted in better soft tissue response and reduced marginal bone loss. Clinical significance Immediately loaded implants, in fresh extraction sockets by insertion of a provisional restoration on the titanium abutment without any later manipulation, helped to protect the initially forming blood clot and presented a template for soft tissue contouring that resulted in significant reduction of marginal bone resorption and maintenance of soft tissue architecture. How to cite this article Berberi AN, Noujeim ZN, Kanj WH, Mearawi RJ, Salameh ZA. Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single-Tooth Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(2): 202-208.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document