Albumin Utilization in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002199700
Author(s):  
Alex M. Ebied ◽  
Thakul Rattanasuwan ◽  
Yiqing Chen ◽  
Adonice P. Khoury
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis ◽  
Total Bilirubin ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Dosing Regimen ◽  
Bacterial Peritonitis ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Order Set

Background: Albumin has been shown to decrease the incidence of mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Albumin administration in SBP is recommended within 6 hours of diagnosis and for reserved use in high-risk patients with the following baseline laboratory tests: serum creatinine >1 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen >30 mg/dL or total bilirubin >4 mg/dL. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of an albumin order set restricted to high-risk SBP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between Jan 1, 2013 to Feb 28, 2018. The albumin order set was implemented on Sep 20, 2016. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with SBP and had an ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear count ≥ 250 cells/mm3. Results: Out of a total of 137 patients reviewed, 88 met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of AKI in the pre-order set and post-order set were 63.93% and 33.33% (p = 0.01), respectively. The incidence of mortality in the pre-order set and post-order set were 36.07% and 7.41% (p = 0.005), respectively. The percentage of patients administered albumin within 6 hours were 24.59% to 40.74% (p = 0.14) in the pre-order set and post-order set, respectively. The percentage of patients who received the recommended albumin dosing regimen ordered was 42.62% vs 96.30% (p < 0.001), in the pre-order set and post-order set, respectively. Conclusion: The albumin order set restricted to high-risk SBP patients significantly reduced the incidence of AKI and mortality, and improved the appropriateness of albumin regimen ordered.

scholarly journals Sinonasal Risk Factors for the Development of Invasive Fungal Sinusitis in Hematological Patients: Are they Important?

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. ar.2011.2.0009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio J. Fernandez ◽  
Marta Stanzani ◽  
Giulia Tolomelli ◽  
Ernesto Pasquini ◽  
Nicola Vianelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fungal Sinusitis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Invasive Fungal Sinusitis ◽  
Radiological Images ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ct Finding

Invasive fungal sinusitis (IFS) is a highly aggressive infection that can affect hematologic patients. The classically described general risk factors, however, do not fully explain the development of IFS in a small percentage of cases. This study examined the impact of anatomic sinonasal factors and environmental factors on the development of IFS in high-risk patients. Medical records and computed tomography (CT) scans of patients admitted to our institution who were at high risk of developing IFS were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-seven patients of 797 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients affected by IFS were compared with patients not affected to identify possible sinonasal and environmental risk factors of IFS. Seven patients were excluded because of the lack of adequate radiological images. Six of the 20 eligible patients were assigned to the study group of patients affected by IFS and the remaining 14 patients were assigned to the control group. All but one case developed the infection during the summer with a significantly higher mean environmental temperature (p = 0.002). Anatomic nasal alterations were found in all patients affected by IFS and were significantly more frequent than in the control group (p = 0.014). It would be advisable to have patients with hematologic risk factors of IFS, especially during the summer period, undergo endoscopic nasal assessment. Furthermore, a CT finding of anatomic nasal alterations, such as anterior nasal septum deviation causing nasal obstruction, should increase the suspicion of IFS in case of the occurrence of nasal symptoms.

A Critical Analysis of the Specific Pharmacist Interventions and Risk Assessments During the 12-Month TRANSAFE Rx Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110447
Author(s):  
Haley M. Gonzales ◽  
James N. Fleming ◽  
Mulugeta Gebregziabher ◽  
Maria Aurora Posadas Salas ◽  
John W. McGillicuddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Therapy Monitoring ◽  
Pharmacist Intervention ◽  
Risk Levels ◽  
Medication Therapy ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Medication Changes

Background Medication safety issues have detrimental implications on long-term outcomes in the high-risk kidney transplant (KTX) population. Medication errors, adverse drug events, and medication nonadherence are important and modifiable mechanisms of graft loss. Objective To describe the frequency and types of interventions made during a pharmacist-led, mobile health–based intervention in KTX recipients and the impact on patient risk levels. Methods This was a secondary analysis of data collected during a 12-month, parallel-arm, 1:1 randomized clinical controlled trial including 136 KTX recipients. Participants were randomized to receive either usual care or supplemental, pharmacist-driven medication therapy monitoring and management using a smartphone-enabled app integrated with telemonitoring of blood pressure and glucose (when applicable) and risk-based televisits. The primary outcome was pharmacist intervention type. Secondary outcomes included frequency of interventions and changes in risk levels. Results A total of 68 patients were randomized to the intervention and included in this analysis. The mean age at baseline was 50.2 years; 51.5% of participants were male, and 58.8% were black. Primary pharmacist intervention types were medication reconciliation and patient education, followed by medication changes. Medication reconciliation remained high throughout the study period, whereas education and medication changes trended downward. From baseline to month 12, we observed an approximately 15% decrease in high-risk patients and a corresponding 15% increase in medium- or low-risk patients. Conclusion and Relevance A pharmacist-led mHealth intervention may enhance opportunities for pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions and mitigate risk levels in KTX recipients.

scholarly journals Impact of Different Modules of 21-Gene Assay in Early Breast Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengdi Chen ◽  
Deyue Liu ◽  
Weilin Chen ◽  
Weiguo Chen ◽  
Kunwei Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Gene Assay ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Gene Modules ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe 21-gene assay recurrence score (RS) provides additional information on recurrence risk of breast cancer patients and prediction of chemotherapy benefit. Previous studies that examined the contribution of the individual genes and gene modules of RS were conducted mostly in postmenopausal patients. We aimed to evaluate the gene modules of RS in patients of different ages.MethodsA total of 1,078 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer patients diagnosed between January 2009 and March 2017 from Shanghai Jiao Tong University Breast Cancer Data Base were included. All patients were divided into three subgroups: Group A, ≤40 years and premenopausal (n = 97); Group B, &gt;40 years and premenopausal (n = 284); Group C, postmenopausal (n = 697). The estrogen, proliferation, invasion, and HER2 module scores from RS were used to characterize the respective molecular features. Spearman correlation and analysis of the variance tests were conducted for RS and its constituent modules.ResultsIn patients &gt;40 years, RS had a strong negative correlation with its estrogen module (ρ = −0.76 and −0.79 in Groups B and C) and a weak positive correlation with its invasion module (ρ = 0.29 and 0.25 in Groups B and C). The proliferation module mostly contributed to the variance in young patients (37.3%) while the ER module contributed most in old patients (54.1% and 53.4% in Groups B and C). In the genetic high-risk (RS &gt;25) group, the proliferation module was the leading driver in all patients (ρ = 0.38, 0.53, and 0.52 in Groups A, B, and C) while the estrogen module had a weaker correlation with RS. The impact of ER module on RS was stronger in clinical low-risk patients while the effect of the proliferation module was stronger in clinical high-risk patients. The association between the RS and estrogen module was weaker among younger patients, especially in genetic low-risk patients.ConclusionsRS was primarily driven by the estrogen module regardless of age, but the proliferation module had a stronger impact on RS in younger patients. The impact of modules varied in patients with different genetic and clinical risks.

scholarly journals Preventing acute kidney injury in high-risk patients by temporarily discontinuing medication – an observational study in general practice

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne J Faber ◽  
Nynke Scherpbier ◽  
Hans Peters ◽  
Annemarie Uijen
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Fluid Loss ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Raas Inhibitors

Abstract Background Elderly, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and patients with heart failure who continue using renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) inhibitors, diuretics, or non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during times of fluid loss have a high risk of developing complications like acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of this study was to assess how often advice to discontinue high-risk medication was offered to high-risk patients consulting the general practitioner (GP) with increased fluid loss. Furthermore, we assessed the number and nature of the complications that occurred after GP consultation. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study with patients from seven Dutch general practices participating in the Family Medicine Network between 1-6-2013 and 1-7-2018. We included patients who used RAAS-inhibitors, diuretics, or NSAIDs, and had at least one of the following risk factors: age ≥70 years, CKD, or heart failure. From this population, we selected patients with a ‘dehydration-risk’ episode (vomiting, diarrhoea, fever, chills, or gastrointestinal infection). We manually checked their electronic patient files and assessed the percentage of episodes in which advice to discontinue the high-risk medication was offered and whether a complication occurred in three months after the ‘dehydration-risk’ episode. Results We included 3607 high-risk patients from a total of 44.675 patients (8.1%). We found that patients were advised to discontinue the high-risk medication in 38 (4.6%) of 816 ‘dehydration-risk’ episodes. In 59 of 816 episodes (7.1%) complications (mainly AKI) occurred. Conclusions Dutch GPs do not frequently advise high-risk patients to discontinue high-risk medication during ‘dehydration-risk’ episodes. Complications occur frequently. Timely discontinuation of high-risk medication needs attention.

scholarly journals What nephrologist should know about COVID-19 outbreak?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar maoujoud
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
High Mortality ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Multiorgan Failure ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Acute Kidney injury is relatively uncommon in COVID-19 patients yet carries a high mortality. It occurs in patients complicated with ARDS or multiorgan failure, but further investigation about inflammatory and apopotic mechanisms during renal impairment are needed. Since the development of AKI is an important negative prognostic indicator for survival with CoV as reported in previous SAR-CoV and MERS-CoV outbreaks, adequate medical management of high risk patients with AKI may improve the results of previous outbreaks related to CoV.

scholarly journals The impact of the incorporation of a feasible postoperative mortality model at the Post-Anaesthestic Care Unit (PACU) on postoperative clinical deterioration: A pragmatic trial with 5,353 patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0257941
Author(s):  
Claudia de Souza Gutierrez ◽  
Katia Bottega ◽  
Stela Maris de Jezus Castro ◽  
Gabriela Leal Gravina ◽  
Eduardo Kohls Toralles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Deterioration ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Postoperative Death ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Death Probability ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background Practical use of risk predictive tools and the assessment of their impact on outcome reduction is still a challenge. This pragmatic study of quality improvement (QI) describes the preoperative adoption of a customised postoperative death probability model (SAMPE model) and the evaluation of the impact of a Postoperative Anaesthetic Care Unit (PACU) pathway on the clinical deterioration of high-risk surgical patients. Methods A prospective cohort of 2,533 surgical patients compared with 2,820 historical controls after the adoption of a quality improvement (QI) intervention. We carried out quick postoperative high-risk pathways at PACU when the probability of postoperative death exceeded 5%. As outcome measures, we used the number of rapid response team (RRT) calls within 7 and 30 postoperative days, in-hospital mortality, and non-planned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Results Not only did the QI succeed in the implementation of a customised risk stratification model, but it also diminished the postoperative deterioration evaluated by RRT calls on very high-risk patients within 30 postoperative days (from 23% before to 14% after the intervention, p = 0.05). We achieved no survival benefits or reduction of non-planned ICU. The small group of high-risk patients (13% of the total) accounted for the highest proportion of RRT calls and postoperative death. Conclusion Employing a risk predictive tool to guide immediate postoperative care may influence postoperative deterioration. It encouraged the design of pragmatic trials focused on feasible, low-technology, and long-term interventions that can be adapted to diverse health systems, especially those that demand more accurate decision making and ask for full engagement in the control of postoperative morbi-mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document