Nurses’ perceptions about the dignity of intubated patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 096973302098526
Author(s):  
Nasreen Rafiq ◽  
David Arthur ◽  
Shirin Rahim ◽  
Yasmin Amarsi ◽  
Eunice Ndirangu

Background: The intensive and critical care units are high-dependency areas, with patients requiring complex care. The intubated status of the intensive and critical care patients makes them dependent on healthcare providers not only for acute care, but also for intimate care, imposing a threat to their dignity. Nurses, being the central care providers, become the stakeholders for dignity promotion. The incorporation of dignity in patient care improves the quality of care, and promotes the health and well-being of intubated patients. Objective: The purpose of the study was to explore nurses’ perceptions about the dignity of intubated patients in the intensive and critical care units. Research design: A qualitative descriptive exploratory study design was used to explore the nurses’ perceptions about the dignity of intubated patients. Participants and research context: The intensive and critical care nurses of a tertiary care hospital were recruited using the purposive sampling technique. The data were collected through in-depth individual interviews, using a semi-structured interview guide. The findings were manually analyzed into themes and categories through content analysis. Ethical consideration: The study was conducted after the approval from the Ethical Review Committee of the Aga Khan University. Findings: Four major themes emerged from the data analysis: (1) two sides of the contemporary nursing practice; (2) benefits of dignified nursing care; (3) challenges to the dignity of intubated patients; and (4) strategies for promoting the dignity of intubated patients. Discussion: Dignity incorporates both the science and the art of nursing. The provision of dignified care is the core component of the quality nursing care and patient well-being in the high-dependency units. Conclusion: This is the first exploratory and descriptive study conducted in Pakistan that explored the nurses’ perceptions about the dignity of intubated patients, and also generated contextual understanding about the phenomenon.

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loris A. Thomas ◽  
Carmen S. Rodriguez

Sudden speechlessness (SS) is commonly experienced by patients admitted to critical care units. Although literature findings document challenges associated with periods of SS, the prevalence is unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and characteristics of adult SS patients in four critical care units at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. Data are collected on 9 randomly selected days over a 4-month period. The daily prevalence of SS ranges from 16% to 24% in each unit. Characteristic data collected includes patient age, gender, medical diagnosis related to SS episode, type of speechlessness, days since SS began, and communication strategies in use. Respiratory intubation related to various clinical diagnoses is the main cause for SS. Use of multiple specific strategies to convey needs during SS periods are identified. Follow-up studies to further define the prevalence of SS in settings beyond the critical care environment are recommended.


Author(s):  
Marie-Lys F. A. Deschamps ◽  
Penelope M. Sanderson

Much of the focus related to alarm fatigue has been directed towards reducing the number of alarms associated with vital sign monitoring. However, recent fieldwork conducted in four high dependency and critical care units of an Australian hospital suggests that the most problematic alarms were often unassociated with vital signs, such as IV pumps and mattress alarms. Many nurses indicated that they like alarms, even when false, because they support awareness of their patients’ well-being. Results of the fieldwork are guiding the design of a simulation study investigating clinical monitoring displays.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-149
Author(s):  
Vijeta Bajpai ◽  
Aishwarya Govindaswamy ◽  
Sushma Sagar ◽  
Subodh Kumar ◽  
Pramod Garg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vanajakshamma Velam ◽  
Vyshnavi Kancherla ◽  
Latheef Kasala ◽  
Anusha Kancherla ◽  
Mounica Reddy Pillaram

Abstract Background This study was an attempt to assess and compare the gender-wise lifestyle patterns and well-being status among the employees of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Material and Methods This is a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study conducted at a tertiary care hospital between May and August 2019. A total of 777 employees belonging to both genders (male and female) and working at different professional levels were assessed. All the enrolled employees were subjected to a comprehensive study tool consisting of various dimensions of their health, which included physical, mental, social, spiritual and intellectual health dimensions. Results Among the participants, 327 (42.1%) were male and 450 (57.9%) were female. There was no significant difference in the mean age of male (37.91 ± 7.52) and female (36.85 ± 8.16) employees (p = 0.07). A significantly higher proportion of diabetes and hypertension were seen in male employees (9.8% and 14.4%, respectively) than in female (5.6% and 6.2% respectively). The overall well-being was better in male employees than in females and was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). We found that male employees had statistically significant better well-being in terms of physical, mental and social health whereas female employees had intellectual health. Conclusion The overall well-being in healthcare staff was good at our tertiary care hospital, and the outstanding/good well-being rate was higher in male employees than in female employees. Female employees experienced risks with regard to their physical health.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e000239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Aparanji ◽  
Shreedhar Kulkarni ◽  
Megan Metzke ◽  
Yvonne Schmudde ◽  
Peter White ◽  
...  

Delirium is a key quality metric identified by The Society of Critical Care Medicine for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. If not recognised early, delirium can lead to increased length of stay, hospital and societal costs, ventilator days and risk of mortality. Clinical practice guidelines recommend ICU patients be assessed for delirium at least once per shift. An initial audit at our urban tertiary care hospital in Illinois, USA determined that delirium assessments were only being performed 31% of the time. Nurses completed simulation based education and were trained using delirium screening videos. After the educational sessions, delirium documentation increased from 40% (12/30) to 69% (41/59) (two-proportion test, p<0.01) for dayshift nurses and from 27% (8/30) to 61% (36/59) (two-proportion test, p<0.01) during the nightshift. To further increase the frequency of delirium assessments, the delirium screening tool was standardised and a critical care progress note was implemented that included a section on delirium status, management strategy and discussion on rounds. After the documentation changes were implemented, delirium screening during dayshift increased to 93% (75/81) (two-proportion test, p<0.01). Prior to this project, physicians were not required to document delirium screening. After the standardised critical care note was implemented, documentation by physicians was 95% (106/111). Standardising delirium documentation, communication of delirium status on rounds, in addition to education, improved delirium screening compliance for ICU patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muneera A. Rasheed ◽  
Waliyah Mughis ◽  
Kinza N Elahi ◽  
Babar S. Hasan

Abstract Background: The purpose of the study was to design and test the feasibility of a recent guideline of family-centered psychosocial support as an approach to developmental monitoring in a pediatric outpatient setting.Methods: The patient experience team at a private tertiary care hospital leveraged an on-going patient and family-centric initiative in the service to implement the intervention. The intervention delivery model was designed using the theory of change model and entailed the following i) the service providers: paediatricians but with support from psychology trainee volunteers to address time constraints; ii) monitoring form: Survey of Well-Being of Young Children (SWYC) being feasible and designed for regular developmental monitoring as parent report; iii) family support intervention: the Care for Child Development module to enhance parent-child interactions given team’s successful experience with inpatient children; iv) timing: utilize wait time to also enhance families’ experience and v) reinforcement: reinforced by the paediatrician in the consultation visit to capitalize on the established rapport and relationship with families. All families with children under 5 years 5 months of age in selected clinics (acute care, complex care, developmental issues) were eligible. The study was evaluated for acceptability and implementation feasibility. Families were interviewed about their experience; trainees provided a written narrative while physicians provided feedback on email. These were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach.Results: A total 182 families were administered the SWYC with 54% children detected for further review on cognitive milestones and 76% on social-emotional milestones. Forty-eight families were interviewed regarding their experience with the intervention. They reported the monitoring process to be useful and important for them as parents indicating acceptability. Paediatricians and trainees found the intervention to be important for parents and children’s health also requesting further understanding about child’s functioning. The trainees further expressed the experience to be significant for their own learning.Conclusion: The authors conclude that the intervention model for a family-centric approach to monitoring was acceptable to the families and the service providers. The intervention when implemented using a robust behaviour change framework can enhance feasibility.


Author(s):  
Anjali Singh ◽  
Sruthi Bhaskaran ◽  
Anshuja Singla

Background: Due to unrestricted free availability of abortion pills, despite of national policies, guidelines and medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) act, unsafe abortions by self-administration of these drugs for termination of unwanted pregnancies without prescription are becoming common in our country, leading to associated morbidity and mortality.Methods: A prospective Observational study was done at Guru Teg Bahadur hospital, university college of medical sciences, New Delhi, from November 2019 to April 2020, in the department of gynecology and obstetrics, on women visiting the outpatient department and casualty department with the history of self-administration of medical termination pills without prescription. This study was done to study the outcome and complications occurring due to self-administration of over-the-counter abortion pills that are freely available in the market. 95 women were included in study and data was collected regarding age, education level, parity, presenting complaints, complications and their management. Descriptive analysis of the collected data was done.Results: In this study 95 women were included 71.6% took pills before 8 weeks of gestation, 1% took in second trimester. 46.3% landed up in incomplete abortion and 33.68% needed surgical evacuation, 8.42% had ectopic out, 2.1% had scar site pregnancy and 7.36% needed laparotomy, 1.05% had rupture uterus followed by abortion pill intake while 1.05% suffered from acute kidney injury (AKI). There was no ICU admission nor any mortality.Conclusions: There is urgent need of strict legislation to curtail this bad practice and free availability of over-the-counter abortion pills which leads to unexpected morbidity and mortality, such drugs should be given only by health care providers under supervision, there is need of community level awareness so as to impart knowledge regarding this problem. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document