Oral Agents in the Management of Urticaria: Patient Perception of Effectiveness and Level of Satisfaction with Treatment

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 730-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Pontasch ◽  
Lynn J. White ◽  
John C. Bradford

OBJECTIVE: Orally administered diphenhydramine, famotidine, and cromolyn sodium were compared for their abilities to alleviate symptoms of acute urticaria. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective, randomized, blind study, implemented in the emergency departments (EDs) of two teaching hospitals, each with an annual average of 40000 ED patient visits. Patient perception of the effectiveness of treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale. PATIENTS: 33 adult patients presenting to the EDs were entered into the study over a one-year period. Of these, 8 were lost to follow-up and 5 were noncompliant with medications and not included in data analysis. Twenty adult patients, aged 19–78 years, completed the five-day study: 7 received diphenhydramine, 6 received famotidine, and 7 received cromolyn sodium. RESULTS: Patients receiving diphenhydramine reported the greatest satisfaction with treatment: 86 percent (6/7) indicated they would use the medication again. Fifty percent (3/6) in the famotidine group and 43 percent (3/7) in the cromolyn sodium group rated the treatment as worth using again. Patients receiving famotidine reported the greatest occurrence of adverse effects (50 percent, 3/6); the lowest incidence of such effects was seen in the cromolyn sodium group (14 percent, 1/7). Patients receiving diphenhydramine reported adverse effects at a rate of 43 percent (3/7). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients receiving diphenhydramine are more satisfied with their treatment than are patients receiving famotidine or cromolyn sodium.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e043363
Author(s):  
Jimmy de Oliveira Araújo ◽  
Cristiane de Cássia Bergamaschi ◽  
Luciane Cruz Lopes ◽  
Caio Chaves Guimarães ◽  
Natalia Karol de Andrade ◽  
...  

ObjectivesIt can be challenging to manage patients who are anxious during dental procedures. There is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adults. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in patients undergoing dental procedures.DesignSystematic review.MethodsRandomised clinical trials (RCTs) compared the oral use of benzodiazepines and other medications with a placebo or other oral agents in adult patients. A search of the Cochrane (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via Ovid) databases was conducted, without any restrictions on language or date of publication. The primary outcomes included the adverse effects and anxiety level. The secondary outcomes included sedation, satisfaction with the treatment, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Reviewers, independently and in pairs, assessed each citation for eligibility, performed the data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis of the data was provided.ResultsA number of RCTs (n=327 patients) assessed the use of benzodiazepines (n=9) and herbal medicines (n=3). We found good satisfaction with treatment after the use of midazolam 7.5 mg or clonidine 150 µg and reduced anxiety with alprazolam (0.5 and 0.75 mg). Midazolam 15 mg promoted greater anxiety reduction than Passiflora incarnata L. 260 mg, while Valeriana officinalis 100 mg and Erythrina mulungu 500 mg were more effective than a placebo. More patients reported adverse effects with midazolam 15 mg. Diazepam 15 mg and V. officinalis 100 mg promoted less change in the heart rate and blood pressure than a placebo.ConclusionsGiven the limitations of the findings due to the quality of the included studies and the different comparisons made between interventions, further RCTs are required to confirm the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in dentistry.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017057142.


Author(s):  
Martinus Løvik ◽  
Livar Frøyland ◽  
Margaretha Haugen ◽  
Sigrun Henjum ◽  
Kristin Holvik ◽  
...  

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis while regulating "other substances" in food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional and/ or physiological e ffect. It is added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. In this series of risk assessments of "other substances" the VKM has not evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of specified doses of L-threonine in food supplements, and it is based on previous risk assessments and articles retrieved from literature searches. According to information from NFSA, L-threonine is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NSFA has requested a risk assessment of 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day of L-threonine from food supplements.  L-threonine is an essential amino acid not known to cause any adverse health effects. Previous reports do not indicate a tolerable upper intake level, apart from an approval of a dose of 1150 mg/day by the Scientific Committee of the Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition (AESAN). Long-term studies in humans were not found. The only available human studies were: a small uncontrolled one-year pilot study with doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 g/day, one eight-week randomised controlled trial (RCT) using a dose of 7.5 g/day, and two 2-week RCTs using doses of 6 and 4.5 g/day. No adverse effects (diary method of registration of adverse effects) were reported in the eight-week clinical trial, and the only adverse effects observed in the two-week trials were one case of indigestion and one case of diarrhoea. A four-week rodent toxicity study indicated a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 854.3 mg/kg bw per day (only dose tested, no adverse effects observed).  The value used for comparison with the estimated exposure in the risk characterisation is the NOAEL defined in an 8-week randomised placebo controlled study in humans, 7500 mg/day. For a 70-kg individual, this corresponds to 107 mg/kg bw per day. Two human two-week studies and a small one-year pilot study support the notion that this dose will be well tolerated. The overall mean threonine intake according to NHANES III (3 g/day) is slightly larger than the doses requested for evaluation in the present risk assessment. No studies in children (10 to <14 years) and adolescents (14 to <18 years) were identified. Based on the included literature there was no evidence indicating that age affects the tolerance for relevant doses of threonine. Therefore, in this risk characterisation a tolerance as for adults, based on body weight, was assumed for these age groups. VKM concludes that: In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day L-threonine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In adolescents (14 to <18 years), the specified doses 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day L-threonine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. In children (10 to <14 years), the specified doses 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000 and 2400 mg/day L-threonine in food supplements are unlikely to cause adverse health effects. Children younger than 10 years were not within the scope of the present risk assessment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 436-438
Author(s):  
Edgar Garcia ◽  
Justin P. Reinert ◽  
Michael Veronin

While opioids have historically been the initial choice of analgesic for both acute and chronic pain, legislative and deprescribing trends as a result of the opioid epidemic have demonstrated an increase in the use of adjunctive therapies. These adjunctive agents are being utilized with increased frequency, especially in older adult patients, as a mechanism to mitigate any likelihood of dependency and in an effort to provide multimodal pain management. As this patient population can be more challenging because of comorbidities, the presence of polypharmacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic changes, it is important to evaluate the risk of any relevant adverse effects for opioids and adjuncts that can lead to higher risk of opioid toxicities. Gabapentin is one of the most commonly added adjunctive medications; however, its safety and efficacy in conjunction with opioids has not been exclusively considered in older adult patients in the perioperative setting. This report will summarize available evidence for gabapentin as an adjunctive therapy to opioids in older adult patients undergoing surgery.


Author(s):  
Rosana Carvalho Silva ◽  
Maria Augusta Montenegro ◽  
Carlos A.M. Guerreiro ◽  
Marilisa M. Guerreiro

ABSTRACT:Rationale:Clobazam has been used successfully in adults and children with partial epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of clobazam as add-on therapy in children with epileptic encephalopathy.Methods:This was a retrospective study conducted at the pediatric epilepsy clinic of our university hospital. Children less than 18-years of age with epileptic encephalopathy were included in the study. Clobazam was introduced as add-on therapy, starting with 5 mg/Kg/day and increased in minimally effective doses, up to the maximum tolerated dose. Data were obtained from clinical files and follow-up visits.Results:Ninety-seven patients were included in the study (39 girls), aged between 1 and 17-years-old (mean = 9.9). Twenty-six patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, seven had myoclonic astatic epilepsy, nine had West syndrome and, in 57 patients, the type of epileptic encephalopathy could not be determined. Clobazam dosage ranged from 5 to 60 mg/day (mean = 37.5 mg/day). Forty (41%) patients presented with adverse events, most of which were mild and transitory, and clobazam needed to be withdrawn in only 11 patients. Nine (9.2%) patients were seizure-free after clobazam adjunctive therapy. In 11 (11.3%) patients seizure improvement was >75%, in 16 (16.5%) it was >50%, in 17 (17.5%) improvement was <50% and in 44 (45.5%) there was no change in seizure frequency. Three patients were lost to follow-up. In 85% of the patients with seizure improvement, the results lasted for more than one year.Conclusion:Clobazam is safe and effective in the treatment of epileptic encephalopathies of childhood.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1559-1568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Pamela Frances Wand ◽  
Brian Draper ◽  
Henry Brodaty ◽  
Carmelle Peisah

AbstractObjectives:To follow-up a cohort of older people who self-harmed, their carer, and general practitioner (GP) and examine their reflections on the self-harm, care experiences, and outcomes.Design:Qualitative in-depth interviews.Setting:Two teaching hospitals and associated community services.Participants:Twelve-month follow-up of participants aged 80 or older who self-harmed, their nominated carers, and GPs.Measurements:A geriatric psychiatrist gathered data through patient and carer interviews using a narrative inquiry approach and from medical records. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. N-VIVO facilitated data organization for thematic analysis. Questionnaires sent to the patient’s GP examined their perspectives and aspects of care relating to the self-harm.Results:Nineteen patients (63% baseline sample), 29 carers (90.6%), and 11 GPs (36.7%) were available at follow-up. Themes emerging from patients were “denial and secrets;” “endless suffering;” “more invalidation;” “being heard;” and “miserable in care.” Themes from carer interviews were “denial and secrets;” “patient’s persistent wish to die;” “abandonment by clinicians;” “unending burden for the carer;” and “distress regarding placement.” General practitioner themes were “the problem is fixed;” “the troops have arrived;” and “I understand.”Conclusions:Factors contributing to self-harm persisted at follow-up. Positive and negative responses were identified in the older person’s system, highlighting areas for potential intervention. A conceptual framework for understanding self-harm in the very old was derived that emphasized the importance of understanding individual needs, the interpersonal context of the older person, and carer burden. Interventions should improve communication, facilitate shared understanding of perspectives, and provide support at all levels.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maija Heiro ◽  
Hans Helenius ◽  
Saija Hurme ◽  
Timo Savunen ◽  
Erik Engblom ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Antoun ◽  
Pierre Cherfane ◽  
Bouchra Sojod

Introduction. To evaluate outcomes of wide-diameter (6 mm) implants immediately provisionalized with cement-retained single crowns in posterior molar sites.Materials and Methods. Forty-eight consecutive patients received a total of 53 moderately rough-surface, 6 mm diameter implants in healed sites. All implants were immediately provisionalized with a cement-retained provisional crown. Final prosthesis with cement-retained porcelain fused to metal crowns was delivered 3–6 months later. Patients were followed up for 1 year. Outcome measures were implant failures and success rate, complications, marginal bone levels, bone level changes, papilla index, bleeding on probing, and inflammation.Results. One patient was lost to follow-up. At one year, the implant survival and success rate were 98.1%. The mean marginal bone loss after 1 year was −0.17±1.84 mm. Ideal papilla score was recorded at 83.8% of the sites. More than 95.6% of the sites showed no bleeding or inflammation. No procedure-related or device-related adverse events were reported.Conclusion. Wide-diameter (6 mm) implants can safely and successfully replace single posterior molars. Longer follow-up studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term success of these implants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document