Macroscopic Evaluation of the Trimmed Frozen Block Is a Helpful Tool for Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins of Breast Cancer Specimens

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 693-700
Author(s):  
Mafalda Trippel ◽  
Julia Slotta-Huspenina ◽  
Karen Becker ◽  
Tilman Rau ◽  
Stefan Paepke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Frozen Section ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Additional Tool ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
Intraoperative Margin Assessment

Introduction. The evaluation of the trimming surfaces (TS) of tissue blocks from frozen sections may serve as a supplementary examination tool for the intraoperative determination of resection margins of breast cancer specimens. This study aimed at the investigation of the feasibility and reliability of this technique, which has been described only very rarely in literature. Methods. Two observers assessed digital images from TS obtained from 57 resection margins. Findings were correlated with the diagnosis of the frozen section (FS) alone and the final diagnosis on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material. Results. The determination of the resection margin on TS was estimated as feasible for all cases. Interobserver congruence rate for TS was 96% (κ = 0.81), which was lower compared with FFPE (100%, κ = 1.0) but superior to FS (89%, κ = 0.67). Intraobserver congruence of the 2 reviewers was 96.5% and 93.0% between TS and FFPE, and 91.1% and 92.5% between FS and FFPE, respectively. The combination of both intraoperative consultation techniques showed similar congruence but a slight improvement for the sensitivity (0.75 to 0.875) for the diagnosis of tumor at the resection margin in FFPE for Reviewer 1 but was unchanged for Reviewer 2. Conclusion. The additional evaluation of TS can be a helpful additional tool for intraoperative margin assessment of breast cancer specimens, in particular, when processing artifacts of FS are encountered.

scholarly journals Multiplexed Plasmonic Nano-Labeling for Bioimaging of Cytological Stained Samples

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3509
Author(s):  
Paule Marcoux-Valiquette ◽  
Cécile Darviot ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Andrée-Anne Grosset ◽  
Morteza Hasanzadeh Kafshgari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Accurate Determination ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Fine Needle Biopsy ◽  
Dark Field ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin ◽  
Dark Field Microscopy ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded

Reliable cytopathological diagnosis requires new methods and approaches for the rapid and accurate determination of all cell types. This is especially important when the number of cells is limited, such as in the cytological samples of fine-needle biopsy. Immunoplasmonic-multiplexed- labeling may be one of the emerging solutions to such problems. However, to be accepted and used by the practicing pathologists, new methods must be compatible and complementary with existing cytopathology approaches where counterstaining is central to the correct interpretation of immunolabeling. In addition, the optical detection and imaging setup for immunoplasmonic-multiplexed-labeling must be implemented on the same cytopathological microscope, not interfere with standard H&E imaging, and operate as a second easy-to-use imaging method. In this article, we present multiplex imaging of four types of nanoplasmonic markers on two types of H&E-stained cytological specimens (formalin-fixed paraffin embedded and non-embedded adherent cancer cells) using a specially designed adapter for SI dark-field microscopy. The obtained results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed optical method for quantitative and multiplex identification of various plasmonic NPs, and the possibility of using immunoplasmonic-multiplexed-labeling for cytopathological diagnostics.

scholarly journals Overexpression of circulating MiR-30b-5p identifies advanced breast cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Estevão-Pereira ◽  
João Lobo ◽  
Sofia Salta ◽  
Maria Amorim ◽  
Paula Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Liquid Biopsies ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Bodily Fluids ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
Formalin Fixed

Abstract Background Breast cancer (BrC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in women, mainly due to recurrent and/or metastatic events, entailing the need for biomarkers predictive of progression to advanced disease. MicroRNAs hold promise as noninvasive cancer biomarkers due to their inherent stability and resilience in tissues and bodily fluids. There is increasing evidence that specific microRNAs play a functional role at different steps of the metastatic cascade, behaving as signaling mediators to enable the colonization of a specific organ. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the biomarker performance of microRNAs previously reported as associated with prognosis for predicting BrC progression in liquid biopsies. Methods Selected microRNAs were assessed using a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in a testing cohort of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary (n = 16) and metastatic BrC tissues (n = 22). Then, miR-30b-5p and miR-200b-3p were assessed in a validation cohort #1 of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary (n = 82) and metastatic BrC tissues (n = 93), whereas only miR-30b-5p was validated on a validation cohort #2 of liquid biopsies from BrC patients with localized (n = 20) and advanced (n = 25) disease. ROC curve was constructed to evaluate prognostic performance. Results MiR-30b-5p was differentially expressed in primary tumors and paired metastatic lesions, with bone metastases displaying significantly higher miR-30b-5p expression levels, paralleling the corresponding primary tumors. Interestingly, patients with advanced disease disclosed increased circulating miR-30b-5p expression compared to patients with localized BrC. Conclusions MiR-30b-5p might identify BrC patients at higher risk of disease progression, thus, providing a useful clinical tool for patients’ monitoring, entailing earlier and more effective treatment. Nonetheless, validation in larger multicentric cohorts is mandatory to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals The impact of RNA extraction method on accurate RNA sequencing from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Marczyk ◽  
Chunxiao Fu ◽  
Rosanna Lau ◽  
Lili Du ◽  
Alexander J. Trevarton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin ◽  
Ffpe Samples ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Formalin Fixed

Abstract Background Utilization of RNA sequencing methods to measure gene expression from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples in translational research and clinical trials requires reliable interpretation of the impact of pre-analytical variables on the data obtained, particularly the methods used to preserve samples and to purify RNA. Methods Matched tissue samples from 12 breast cancers were fresh frozen (FF) and preserved in RNAlater or fixed in formalin and processed as FFPE tissue. Total RNA was extracted and purified from FF samples using the Qiagen RNeasy kit, and in duplicate from FFPE tissue sections using three different kits (Norgen, Qiagen and Roche). All RNA samples underwent whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (wtRNAseq) and targeted RNA sequencing for 31 transcripts included in a signature of sensitivity to endocrine therapy. We assessed the effect of RNA extraction kit on the reliability of gene expression levels using linear mixed-effects model analysis, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and differential analysis. All protein-coding genes in the wtRNAseq and three gene expression signatures for breast cancer were assessed for concordance. Results Despite variable quality of the RNA extracted from FFPE samples by different kits, all had similar concordance of overall gene expression from wtRNAseq between matched FF and FFPE samples (median CCC 0.63–0.66) and between technical replicates (median expression difference 0.13–0.22). More than half of genes were differentially expressed between FF and FFPE, but with low fold change (median |LFC| 0.31–0.34). Two out of three breast cancer signatures studied were highly robust in all samples using any kit, whereas the third signature was similarly discordant irrespective of the kit used. The targeted RNAseq assay was concordant between FFPE and FF samples using any of the kits (CCC 0.91–0.96). Conclusions The selection of kit to purify RNA from FFPE did not influence the overall quality of results from wtRNAseq, thus variable reproducibility of gene signatures probably relates to the reliability of individual gene selected and possibly to the algorithm. Targeted RNAseq showed promising performance for clinical deployment of quantitative assays in breast cancer from FFPE samples, although numerical scores were not identical to those from wtRNAseq and would require calibration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document