Using Data-Based Individualization to Intensify Behavioral Interventions

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese M. Cumming ◽  
Sue C. O’Neill
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
The Third ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavior Disabilities ◽  
Behavioral Supports ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Tier 3 ◽  
And Behavior

Students receiving behavioral supports in the third tier of the schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) framework are often identified as having emotional and behavior disabilities. Although educators implement evidence-based practices with fidelity, these practices are not always effective in supporting students with emotional and behavior disabilities to improve their behavior. This article provides an overview of the process of data-based individualization (DBI) to intensify behavioral interventions for students identified as having emotional and behavior disabilities receiving Tier 3 supports. The steps of the DBI process are explained, with a focus on using data to intensify interventions. These practices are examined as components of the broader SWPBIS Tier 3 framework.

Examining Teaming and Tier 2 and 3 Practices Within a PBIS Framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072110510
Author(s):  
Rhonda N. T. Nese ◽  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Data Use ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Behavior Support ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Core Feature

One core feature of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS) is a systems-level teaming process for coordinating staff implementation of evidence-based practices and monitoring student progress across all three tiers. Prior research has shown schools that report regular teaming and team-based data use are more likely to successfully adopt and sustain implementation of multi-tiered systems of behavior support. However, more research is currently needed to better understand the various teaming configurations, structures, and practices commonly used by PBIS teams in typical schools, particularly at advanced tiers. For the current study, members of school and district PBIS teams representing 718 schools were surveyed to better understand (a) teaming configurations and practices currently being used in schools implementing PBIS and (b) common interventions that PBIS teams report implementing at Tiers 2 and 3. Survey findings are discussed, along with implications of those results for future research and practice in applied settings.

An analysis of teacher perceived barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practices

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13
Author(s):  
John J. Wheeler ◽  
Stacy L. Carter ◽  
Samuel E. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Widespread Implementation

Evidence-based practices in the field of special education within the United States has been well defined in the literature yet challenges persist with the widespread implementation of these practices within school settings. There are many factors that can negatively influence the portability of these practices in classroom settings that remain unaddressed in the literature. The results of a qualitative evaluation aimed at determining teacher’s perspectives on barriers to implementing evidence-based procedures in the area of positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) are described. Data analysis revealed several highly pertinent barriers that teachers face in their attempts to implement evidence-based practices in the classroom. Recommendations for minimizing these implementation barriers are discussed.

Funding Support for School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support Implementation and Scale-Up

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Gage ◽  
Jennifer Freeman ◽  
Robert H. Horner ◽  
George Sugai ◽  
Timothy J. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Effective Practices ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Implementation Effort ◽  
General Funding

The process of selecting, implementing, and scaling-up evidence-based practices is a major focus and difficult accomplishment for states. Renewed commitment to improving student outcomes has led directly to the need for effective practices implemented at scale. The funding decisions made at state, regional, and district levels remain a key to large-scale implementation of effective practices. In this article, we summarize the funding decisions of nine states that implemented School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) across at least 500 schools or 30% of the schools in the state. A survey about funding sources, funding levels, and funding decisions was completed by the key implementers in each state, and a follow-up interview was used to clarify and confirm initial information. The results indicate that different states used different funding approaches, but in general, funding of SWPBIS was provided predominantly through special education sources and that initial demonstrations led to larger scale implementation when state policy makers developed creative procedures for using multiple funding sources within a unified implementation effort. Implications for funding the scaling of evidence-based practices are discussed.

Variables Contributing to Abandonment and Readoption of SWPBIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-77
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Sarah E. Pinkelman ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Personnel ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
School Administrator ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
New School ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Perceived Reasons

There is a dearth of research examining school and district factors associated with the abandonment of evidence-based practice in schools. In this mixed methods study, we surveyed 23 school personnel working with 30 schools that abandoned and then readopted school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). Our aims were to identify critical features abandoned and perceived reasons for abandonment and readoption of SWPBIS practices. SWPBIS features most often abandoned included data-based decision making and school-wide acknowledgment systems. Lack of staff buy-in was the most commonly reported reason for abandonment, and a new school administrator was the most commonly reported reason for readoption. Implications for research and how schools could safeguard against abandonment of evidence-based practices are discussed.

Teachers’ Characteristics and Ratings for Evidence-Based Behavioral Interventions

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Stormont ◽  
Wendy Reinke ◽  
Keith Herman
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Management ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Practice Guide ◽  
General Educator ◽  
Level Of Training ◽  
And Behavior

The vast majority of schools today are not prepared to support children's social behavior needs. One challenge is that teachers may not be knowledgeable of evidence-based practices that can be utilized with children. This study explored teachers’ agreement ratings for evidence-based and nonevidence-based behavior management practices for children with emotional and behavior needs, and whether specific teacher characteristics (educational level, amount of education and training using behavioral interventions, and position as a special or general educator) yielded differences in ratings. A survey was developed based on an extensive review of the literature in this area. The survey questions that were the main focus for this study were taken from an Institute for Educational Sciences practice guide. A total of 363 teachers of early childhood and elementary-age students served as participants. Overall, special educators had higher ratings for evidence-based practices and lower ratings for nonevidence-based practices than general educators’ ratings. Special educators also reported more confidence in their interventions. Graduate level of education was associated with lower ratings for nonevidence-based practices than undergraduate level. Teacher-rated level of training and education implementing behavior interventions was not associated with agreement with evidence or nonevidence-based practices. These findings are discussed.

Multitiered Systems of Supports, Response to Intervention, and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Samantha Bates ◽  
LaShonda Linnen ◽  
Stephanie Columbia ◽  
Dawn Anderson-Butcher
Keyword(s):  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Students At Risk ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Based ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

This chapter covers the Response to Intervention framework, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, and multitiered systems of supports (MTSS). The Response to Intervention framework is a central step in implementing a successful MTSS framework. MTSS delivers school-based supports across three tiers: tier 1 (universal), tier 2 (targeted), and tier 3 (individualized). The MTSS framework is a resource that enables schools to use data not only to identify students at risk for poor learning outcomes but also to monitor student progress and deliver evidence-based interventions. The chapter provides examples of ways social workers can maximize the utility of these models and school teams to improve student outcomes.

Optimal Timing for Launching Installation of Tier 2 and 3 Systems of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072199608
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine patterns in implementation of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) systems to identify timings of installation that led to higher implementation of advanced tiers. Extant data from 776 schools in 27 states reporting on the first 3 years of Tier 2 implementation and 359 schools in 23 states reporting on the first year of Tier 3 implementation were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found that higher Tier 1 implementation predicted subsequent Tier 2 and Tier 3 implementation. In addition, waiting 2 or 3 years after initial Tier 1 implementation to launch Tier 2 systems predicted higher initial Tier 2 implementation (compared with implementing the next year). Finally, we found that launching Tier 3 systems after Tier 2 systems, compared with launching both tiers simultaneously, predicted higher Tier 2 implementation in the second and third year, so long as Tier 3 systems were launched within 3 years of Tier 2 systems. These findings provide empirical guidance for when to launch Tier 2 and 3 systems; however, we emphasize that delays in launching advanced systems should not equate to delays in more intensive supports for students.

scholarly journals Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Wilcox ◽  
Cristina Fernandez Conde ◽  
Amy Kowbel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Teacher Capacity ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Full Inclusion ◽  
Current State ◽  
Inclusive Settings ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Data Based Decision Making

There are longstanding calls for inclusive education for all regardless of student need or teacher capacity to meet those needs. Unfortunately, there are little empirical data to support full inclusion for all students and even less information on the role of data-based decision making in inclusive education specifically, even though there is extensive research on the effectiveness of data-based decision making. In this article, we reviewed what data-based decision making is and its role in education, the current state of evidence related to inclusive education, and how data-based decision making can be used to support decisions for students with reading disabilities and those with intellectual disabilities transitioning to adulthood. What is known about evidence-based practices in supporting reading and transition are reviewed in relationship to the realities of implementing these practices in inclusive education settings. Finally, implications for using data-based decisions in inclusive settings are discussed.

Clinical Interventions in Problem-Solving Courts

2019 ◽  
pp. 33-49
Author(s):  
David DeMatteo ◽  
Kirk Heilbrun ◽  
Alice Thornewill ◽  
Shelby Arnold
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Therapeutic Communities ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Clinical Interventions ◽  
Trauma Informed Care ◽  
Problem Solving Courts ◽  
Trauma Informed ◽  
Assessment Procedures

This chapter focuses on the clinical interventions most commonly delivered in problem-solving courts. The chapter begins with a discussion of the Risk-Needs-Responsivity Model, which provides a foundational context for the interventions used in problem-solving courts and highlights the importance of targeting offender needs—criminogenic needs—related to key outcomes (e.g., reduced recidivism, reduced relapse to drug use). The authors then discuss the various screening and risk assessment procedures used to admit offenders to problem-solving courts, the clinical interventions used in problem-solving courts (e.g., cognitive-behavioral interventions, 12-step programs, therapeutic communities, case management, trauma-informed care), and the use of evidence-based practices in problem-solving courts. The authors note the role of problem-solving courts as a watchdog for service provision and conclude with a section discussing “next steps” for expanding evidence-based interventions in problem-solving courts.

Evidence-Based Practices for Teaching Learners with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Whitley
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Emotional And Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Relationship Building ◽  
Behavioral Disorder ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Social And Emotional ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tiered System

Students identified with emotional and behavioral disorders (E/BD) comprise a diverse group in terms of academic, social, emotional, and behavioral strengths and needs. Identification and diagnostic criteria and terminologies vary widely across and within many countries and school systems, resulting in a complex research base. Estimates of prevalence range from 4 to 15% of students meeting criteria for an emotional and/or behavioral disorder or difficulty. Approaches to teaching learners with E/BD have shifted since the turn of the 21st century from an individual, deficit-focused perspective to a more ecological framework where the environments interacting dynamically with the learner are considered. Research increasingly demonstrates the benefits of multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) where the needs of most students can be met through universal preventative and whole-class approaches. Students who do not find success at the first level of supports receive increasingly specialized services including intensive, wraparound services that involve partners beyond school walls. MTSS are common across North America and beyond and are typically focused on externalizing behaviors; positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) is the most prevalent multi-tiered system currently being implemented. Since the mid-2000s, efforts have been made to focus on academic as well as behavioral goals for students, often through the inclusion of response-to-intervention approaches. Comprehensive strategies that combine academic and behavioral support while drawing on learner strengths and relationship-building are successfully being adopted in elementary and secondary settings. Approaches include social and emotional learning, mindfulness, peer-assisted learning, and a range of classroom-based instructional and assessment practices that support the academic, social, and emotional development of students with E/BD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document