scholarly journals “If You Could Wave a Magic Wand”: Treatment Barriers in the Rural Midwest

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 117822182110533
Author(s):  
Angela Clark ◽  
Jennifer Lanzillotta-Rangeley ◽  
Jack Stem
Keyword(s):  
Disease Process ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Medically Underserved ◽  
Treatment Barriers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Needs ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Community Health Survey

Introduction: The multigenerational health considerations and negative economic impacts related to the opioid epidemic are many. Increasing numbers of opioid-related fatalities are bolstered by barriers related to access to evidence-based treatment. Ohio is ranked second in the country for number of opioid-related deaths, and for many their treatment needs remain unmet due to impaired access to effective treatment, in rural, medically underserved areas of the state. Purpose: The goal of this study was to assess opioid use disorder treatment barriers in order to increase access to evidence-based treatment, wrap around services, and harm reduction efforts to support the reintegration of persons with substance use disorder back into society and subsequently reduce opioid fatalities in a rural, medically underserved region of Ohio. Methods: As part of a larger mixed-methods study design where a community health survey was randomly distributed to residents in a rural county in Ohio, this study used qualitative methods to triangulate findings. To supplement the data received from the surveys, 20persons with a diagnosed opioid use disorder (OUD) took part in focus group sessions guided by trained researchers. The sessions were transcribed, and the data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis method. Results: Three major themes emerged from the data: epigenetics and exposure, management of disease including re-integration into society, and disease process. The participant data created insight regarding the need to recognize OUD as a chronic condition that must be addressed with integrated components of medical, behavioral, and mental health morbidities throughout the lifespan and across generations. Conclusions: Findings from this study support the need for targeted interventions for integrated care and improved wrap around services such as transportation, sober living, and employment.

Championing Change to Save Lives: A Call to Action to Implement Reforms to Increase Use of Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder in Correctional Settings

2020 ◽  
pp. 073401682098162
Author(s):  
Sonia L. Canzater ◽  
Regina M. LaBelle
Keyword(s):  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Correctional Facilities ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Correctional Settings ◽  
Overdose Deaths

The disproportional rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) in U.S. correctional facilities make them prime intervention points to treat OUD utilizing medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), the evidence-based clinical standard of care. MOUD has been shown to be effective to support recovery and reduce recurrence of OUD, overdose deaths, and recidivism for justice-involved persons both while incarcerated and once they reenter their communities. Despite the high prevalence, most jails and prisons do not offer MOUD. Litigation has spurred expanded access in more facilities, but widespread MOUD access can only become a reality through a comprehensive effort of corrections officials, medical experts, advocates, legislators, and other champions to raise awareness and affect ideological and policy change. It is a legal and ethical imperative that the lives of justice-involved persons not be jeopardized by the lack of evidence-based treatment for OUD in correctional settings.

A review of the evidence to explain pharmacological basis of injection (ab)use of buprenorphine–naloxone tablets

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Tamoud Modak, MD, DM ◽  
Siddharth Sarkar, MD, MRCPsych ◽  
Yatan Pal Singh Balhara, MD
Keyword(s):  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Critical Examination ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Opioid Replacement Therapy ◽  
Pharmacological Basis

Opioid use disorder is a major public health problem, and opioid replacement therapy with buprenorphine (BPN) is a clinically effective and evidence-based treatment for it. To deter misuse of the tablet through the injecting route, BPN coformulated with naloxone (BNX) in 4:1 ratio is available in many countries. Despite this, significant diversion and injecting use of the BNX combination has been reported from across the world. In this article, the pharmacological properties of BPN and BNX and the evidence for their diversion are reviewed. Also, a critical examination is made of the evidence supporting the role of naloxone in reducing the agonist effects of BPN when used through the injecting route. Based on this evidence, a hypothesis explaining the continued diversion of BNX has been proposed.

Transitioning a patient from injectable opioid agonist therapy to sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone for the treatment of opioid use disorder using a microdosing approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e233715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mackenzie Duncan Gregory Caulfield ◽  
Rupinder Brar ◽  
Christy Sutherland ◽  
Seonaid Nolan
Keyword(s):  
Slow Release ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
First Line ◽  
Agonist Therapy ◽  
Opioid Agonist ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Opioid Agonist Therapy

In the wake of North America’s opioid crisis, access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is of critical importance. While buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone are currently indicated as first-line medications for the treatment of OUD, there are a proportion of individuals who do not benefit from these therapies. Recent Canadian guidelines suggest the use of alternate therapies, including slow-release oral morphine or injectable opioid agonist therapy (iOAT) for individuals unsuccessful with either methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone. While the guidelines highlight the need to intensify OUD treatment as disease severity increases, equally important is the consideration for deintensification of treatment (eg, from iOAT to an oral opioid agonist treatment (OAT) option) following successful stabilisation. Literature addressing how best to accomplish this, however, is currently lacking. Accordingly, the case presented here describes a patient that successfully transitions from iOAT to oral buprenorphine/naloxone using a novel induction approach termed microdosing.

Perceived Benefits and Harms of Involuntary Civil Commitment for Opioid Use Disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 718-734
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Evans ◽  
Calla Harrington ◽  
Robert Roose ◽  
Susan Lemere ◽  
David Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Civil Commitment ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Access ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Ethics Framework ◽  
Vulnerable Patients ◽  
Underserved Patients ◽  
Legal Consequences

Involuntary civil commitment (ICC) to treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) prevents imminent overdose, but also restricts autonomy and raises other ethical concerns. Using the Kass Public Health Ethics Framework, we identified ICC benefits and harms. Benefits include: protection of vulnerable, underserved patients; reduced legal consequences; resources for families; and “on-demand” treatment access. Harms include: stigmatizing and punitive experiences; heightened family conflict and social isolation; eroded patient self-determination; limited or no provision of OUD medications; and long-term overdose risk. To use ICC ethically, it should be recognized as comprising vulnerable patients worthy of added protections; be a last resort option; utilize consensual, humanizing processes; provide medications and other evidence-based-treatment; integrate with existing healthcare systems; and demonstrate effective outcomes before diffusion. ICC to OUD treatment carries significant potential harms that, if unaddressed, may outweigh its benefits. Findings can inform innovations for ensuring that ICC is used in an ethically responsible way.

scholarly journals Translating evidence-based treatment for digital health delivery: a protocol for family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa using telemedicine

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hambleton ◽  
D. Le Grange ◽  
J. Miskovic-Wheatley ◽  
S. Touyz ◽  
M. Cunich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Young People ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Treatment Needs ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Family Based Treatment ◽  
Family Based

Abstract Background Family-based treatment (FBT) is an efficacious outpatient intervention for young people diagnosed with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). To date, treatment to protocol has relied on standard face-to-face delivery. Face-to-face therapy is subject to geographic, temporal and human factors, rendering it particularly susceptible to inequities and disruption. This has resulted in poorer service provision for rural and regional families, and recently a significant challenge to providing face-to-face services during the COVID-19 global pandemic. The present study examines whether FBT for AN can be successfully translated to a digital delivery platform to address these access issues. Method Forty young people aged 12 to 18 years who meet DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for AN, and live in a rural or regional setting, will along with their family be recruited to the study. Trained therapists will provide 18 sessions of FBT over 9 months via telemedicine to the home of the young person and their family. The analysis will examine treatment effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. Discussion The study addresses the treatment needs of families not able to attend face-to-face clinical services for evidence-based treatment for eating disorders. This might be due to several barriers, including a lack of local services or long travel distances to services. There has been a recent and unprecedented demand for telemedicine to facilitate the continuity of care during COVID-19 despite geographical circumstances. If delivering treatment in this modality is clinically and economically effective and feasible, it will facilitate access to potentially lifesaving, evidence-based treatments for families formerly unable to access such care and provide evidence for the continuity of services when and where face-to-face treatment is not feasible.

scholarly journals Beyond Antibiotics: A Practical Guide for the Infectious Disease Physician to Treat Opioid Use Disorder in the Setting of Associated Infectious Diseases

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Seval ◽  
Ellen Eaton ◽  
Sandra A Springer
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Infectious Disease Physician ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Acute Injection

Abstract Infections are a common cause of hospitalization for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), and hospital admissions are rising in the context of the worsening US opioid crisis. Infectious disease (ID) physicians are frequently the first point of medical contact for these patients. In this article, we discuss the integration of evidence-based management of OUD and patient-centered care of hospitalized persons with acute injection-related infections. We describe the following components of a comprehensive approach for OUD with inpatient ID consultations: (1) how to screen for OUD; (2) how to initiate the 3 US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for OUD (buprenorphine, methadone, and extended-release naltrexone); (3) how to manage acute pain and opioid-related conditions; and (4) how to link and integrate ID and OUD treatment after hospital discharge. These strategies reduce unplanned discharges and increase completion of recommended antimicrobial regimens.

scholarly journals Predictors of Premature Discontinuation of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in the United States

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia Stafford ◽  
Wesley Marrero ◽  
Rebecca B. Naumann ◽  
Kristen Hassmiller Lich ◽  
Sarah Wakeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Substance Use ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Living Situation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Targeted Interventions

Over the last few decades, opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose have dramatically increased. Evidence shows that treatment for OUD, particularly medication for OUD, is highly effective; however, despite decreases in barriers to treatment, retention in OUD treatment remains a challenge. Therefore, understanding key risk factors for OUD treatment discontinuation remains a critical priority. We built a machine learning model using the Treatment Episode Data Set-Discharge (TEDS-D). Included were 2,446,710 treatment episodes for individuals in the U.S. discharged between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 (the most recent available data). Exposures contain 32 potential risk factors, including treatment characteristics, substance use history, socioeconomic status, and demographic characteristics. Our findings show that the most influential risk factors include characteristics of treatment service setting, geographic region, primary source of payment, referral source, and health insurance status. Importantly, several factors previously reported as influential predictors, such as age, living situation, age of first substance use, race and ethnicity, and sex had far weaker predictive impacts. The influential factors identified in this study should be more closely explored to inform targeted interventions and improve future models of care.

Harm Reduction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonal Batra ◽  
Noah Villegas ◽  
Erin Zerbo
Keyword(s):  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Historical Context ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Maladaptive Behaviors ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Humanistic Approach ◽  
Female Sex Work

Harm reduction is defined as a set of policies, programs, and practices aimed at reducing the negative health, social, and economic consequences associated with various behaviors. Although classically applied to the treatment of substance use disorders, its scope has broadened over time to include high-risk sexual activity, nonadherence to treatment, and other behaviors that may lead to negative consequences. In addition to providing relevant historical context for scenarios encountered, this chapter uses a case to demonstrate how a provider might take a nonjudgmental and humanistic approach to identifying maladaptive behaviors and apply evidence-based, realistic interventions to reduce associated harms. Specific topics discussed include opioid use disorder, tobacco use disorder, female sex work, and nonadherence to psychotropic medications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document