Off-Label High-Dose Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Phung ◽  
Arvin Ighani ◽  
Jorge R Georgakopoulos ◽  
Ron Vender ◽  
Lyne Giroux ◽  
...  

Background: Secukinumab is an anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adult patients. Despite its favourable safety and efficacy profile in clinical trials, some patients in clinical practice fail to respond adequately to the approved maintenance regimen of 300 mg subcutaneous monthly. Some clinicians manage these patients by using off-label high-dose secukinumab regimens, which include shortening the dosing interval to 300 mg every 2 or 3 weeks instead of monthly, or increasing the monthly dose to 450 mg. Objective: This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of high-dose secukinumab regimens for the treatment of psoriasis to inform real-world clinical practice. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review at 5 dermatology clinics for adult patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with an off-label high-dose secukinumab regimen. Efficacy was measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index or a Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 after dose escalation. Adverse events were recorded to assess safety outcomes. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in this case series, and 14 of them achieved efficacy from dose escalation with secukinumab based on our study endpoints. There was 1 case of the common cold and 1 upper respiratory tract infection reported after dose escalation. Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that dose escalation with secukinumab results in clinical benefit and is well tolerated among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who failed to respond adequately to the approved regimen. This work necessitates larger studies to fully characterize the efficacy and long-term safety profile of secukinumab dose escalation.

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Beecker ◽  
Jiyeh Joo

Treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis often requires systemic therapy, including biologics. Partial response to biologics and relapses are commonly managed with dose escalation. Secukinumab is a relatively new biologic that is currently used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis. There has been no literature published on dose escalation of secukinumab. This article describes the off-label use of a higher dose of secukinumab (450 mg every 4 weeks) instead of the standard dosing (300 mg every 4 weeks) in 2 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. The first case involves a male patient with a high body mass index (BMI) (≥30 kg/m2) and severe psoriasis who was started on secukinumab at 450 mg following a partial response to treatment with the standard 300-mg dose. His psoriasis significantly improved with the higher dose of secukinumab. The second case discusses a female patient with treatment-resistant psoriasis and a BMI of 31.6 kg/m2 who initially achieved a complete remission with standard dosing of secukinumab. Later, her psoriasis relapsed and she was dose-escalated to secukinumab 450 mg in an attempt to recapture response, but this dose escalation was unsuccessful. In both cases, there were no adverse events observed with a higher dose of secukinumab. These cases demonstrate that dose escalation of secukinumab (450 mg rather than on-label 300 mg every 4 weeks) may be considered in selected patients with incomplete clearance, particularly for those with a high BMI. However, secukinumab dose escalation may not be as beneficial in patients with loss of efficacy.


1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1504-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Grier ◽  
David G. Meyers

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of edetate sodium (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; EDTA) chelation therapy for atherosclerosis. METHODS: Literature search using MEDLINE, encompassing 1966 through May 1993. Further references were obtained from articles and books, and from citations obtained from the American Academy of Medical Preventics. RESULTS: 16 case reports or case series, 2 longitudinal studies, and 3 clinical trials were reviewed, along with testimonials cited in 19 books. CONCLUSIONS: Little valid scientific evidence is available. Although the postulated mechanisms of action for EDTA are biologically plausible and EDTA appears to be safe, it has not been proven effective. Indeed, the best evidence shows it to be ineffective. Therefore, EDTA chelation therapy should not be used in clinical practice to treat atherosclerosis.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey I. Estrin ◽  
Sean P. Elliott

This chapter summarizes the landmark experience of introducing clean intermittent catherization in a small case series of pediatric and adult patients with incomplete bladder emptying due to various etiologies. Patients were taught to self-catheterize themselves after having washed their hands, or their mothers were instructed to do so. All adult patients reported that control of their urinary difficulties helped them return to “live a normal, happy life.” The pediatric patients remained afebrile and continent, without urinary tract infections during the study period. Most adult patients also remained free from urinary tract infections during the study period. This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of a clean, non-sterile approach to intermittent catheterization.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2194-2194
Author(s):  
Sally Arai ◽  
Renee Letsinger ◽  
Laura Johnston ◽  
Ginna Laport ◽  
Robert Lowsky ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: High dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is the most effective treatment for recurrent and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Disease recurrence is still a major cause of treatment failure. Augmented BCNU-regimens are reported to have good outcomes but greater pulmonary toxicity. A novel transplant regimen incorporating gemcitabine and vinorelbine, active drugs in HL different from alkylating agents, was tested to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine and to assess safety and efficacy at the MTD. Methods: In this phase I/II study, dose escalation was performed with gemcitabine in combination with vinorelbine followed by BCNU at reduced dose, etoposide (VP-16), cyclophosphamide (CY) and AHCT. The first 7 patients had dose escalation of gemcitabine before determining the MTD at 1250 mg/m2 on the basis of elevated liver transaminases and a symptom complex of fever, headache, and skin toxicity. For phase II, a total of 92 patients with recurrent or refractory HL have been treated at the MTD to establish safety and efficacy. The regimen consists of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 IV at 10 mg/min and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on day-13 and day-8, BCNU 10 mg/kg on day-6, VP-16 60 mg/kg on day-4, CY 100 mg/kg on day-2. Regimen-related toxicity, freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) were endpoints of the trial. Results: 70 patients were high risk (based on stage IV disease at relapse, failure to achieve minimal disease, or B symptoms at relapse) and 22 patients were low risk (having no risk features). Median age was 33 years. Median follow-up is 2 years (.26–6.8 years). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days. Regimen-related toxicities of grade 3 skin rash, fever, headache and liver transaminase elevations were transient. Remarkable was the reduction in incidence of systemic steroid-requiring pulmonary toxicity <100 days post-transplant to 15.2% (14 of 92 patients treated at the MTD), as compared to our standard regimen incidence of 35%. Also encouraging is the OS at 2 years for the entire group of 81% (+/−9%) and FFP at 2 years of 71%(+−11%). By risk factors, FFP at 2 years was 95%(+−10%), 75%(+−14%), 64%(+−22%), and 19%(+−31%) for patients with 0, 1, 2, or 3 risk factors. These results compare favorably to the historical FFP of 41% for patients with one or more of these same risk factors (Horning 1997). In the current study, having 1 or 2 risk factors resulted in similar FFP with the new regimen (p=.46) and significantly improved FFP as compared to patients with 3 risk factors (1 vs 3, p<.001; 2 vs 3, p=.004)- see figure. Conclusions: This novel transplant regimen for HL has decreased incidence of pulmonary toxicity compared with augmented BCNU-regimens and is associated with encouraging OS and FFP, even in the high risk groups. Figure Figure


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 203S-211S ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Fehlings ◽  
Jefferson R. Wilson ◽  
Lindsay A. Tetreault ◽  
Bizhan Aarabi ◽  
Paul Anderson ◽  
...  

Introduction: The objective of this guideline is to outline the appropriate use of methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS) in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address key questions related to the use of MPSS in acute SCI. A multidisciplinary Guideline Development Group used this information, in combination with their clinical expertise, to develop recommendations for the use of MPSS. Based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), a strong recommendation is worded as “we recommend,” whereas a weaker recommendation is indicated by “we suggest.” Results: The main conclusions from the systematic review included the following: (1) there were no differences in motor score change at any time point in patients treated with MPSS compared to those not receiving steroids; (2) when MPSS was administered within 8 hours of injury, pooled results at 6- and 12-months indicated modest improvements in mean motor scores in the MPSS group compared with the control group; and (3) there was no statistical difference between treatment groups in the risk of complications. Our recommendations were: (1) “We suggest not offering a 24-hour infusion of high-dose MPSS to adult patients who present after 8 hours with acute SCI”; (2) “We suggest a 24-hour infusion of high-dose MPSS be offered to adult patients within 8 hours of acute SCI as a treatment option”; and (3) “We suggest not offering a 48-hour infusion of high-dose MPSS to adult patients with acute SCI.” Conclusions: These guidelines should be implemented into clinical practice to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in SCI patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S58-S58
Author(s):  
Jessica Harris ◽  
David Faleck

Abstract Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related colitis (irColitis) is a frequent complication of ICI use in cancer. Treatment algorithms have been adapted from the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including the use of infliximab (IFX) for patients with irColitis refractory to corticosteroids. The efficacy of IFX dose-escalation in patients not responding to standard dose IFX, a common practice in patients with severe IBD, has not been reported in irColitis. Methods We describe a retrospective study of patients treated with IFX dose escalation (i.e. 10mg/kg dose) after failure of standard dose IFX (5mg/kg) for irColitis at a tertiary care center in New York City between 2016–2020. Clinical response was defined as improvement in diarrhea to CTCAE Grade ≤1. Results Ten patients were treated with high dose IFX for refractory irColitis. High dose IFX was started after a median of 2 (IQR 2-2) doses of standard dose IFX for non-response (n=2) or incomplete response (n=8). Five (50%) patients had a clinical response to high dose IFX after a median of 4 (IQR 3–6) days. Five (50%) patients were refractory to high dose IFX and were treated with Vedolizumab (n= 5) and/or fecal microbiota transplantation (n=2). Patients were followed for a median 457 (IQR 325–567) days from initiation of ICI therapy. No adverse events attributed to IFX were observed in any of the patients. Discussion In this series of patients with irColitis refractory to standard dose IFX, high dose IFX was successful in inducing response in 50% of patients. Prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the role and optimal dosing of IFX in irColitis.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3910-3910
Author(s):  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Leslie A Andritsos ◽  
Joseph M. Flynn ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3910 Background: The cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, flavopiridol, and the immunomodulatory agent, lenalidomide, are active in heavily pre-treated CLL patients (pts) with bulky adenopathy and adverse cytogenetics, although dose escalation of these two agents has been limited by tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and tumor flare. Furthermore, these agents do not deplete T-cells, and combination therapy may result in greater efficacy and less infectious toxicity than observed with fludarabine or alemtuzumab combinations. Methods: We conducted a phase I trial of combined flavopiridol and lenalidomide in pts with CLL relapsed after at least 1 prior therapy, WBC < 150,000/mm3, ANC > 1000/mm3, platelets > 30,000/mm3, and creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL. Treatment consisted of flavopiridol alone, 30 mg/m2 bolus + 30–50 mg/m2 4-hour continuous IV infusion (CIVI) days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1. Starting in cycle 2, flavopiridol 30 mg/m2 bolus + 30–50 mg/m2 4-hour CIVI days 3, 10, and 17 was combined with lenalidomide 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10, 15, or 25 mg days 1–21 every 35 days. All pts received 20 and 4 mg of dexamethasone 30 minutes prior to and 24 hours after flavopiridol, respectively, to minimize cytokine release symptoms. Pegfilgrastim was administered on day 18 of cycles 2–8. Results : Thirty pts (18 males) with a median age of 60 (range 42–74) previously treated with a median of 3 prior therapies (range 1–10) were enrolled. All pts received prior fludarabine and 40% were fludarabine refractory. Seventy-three percent of patients were Rai stages III-IV, 60% pts had bulky adenopathy > 5 cm, 60% pts had del(17p13.1), 37% pts had del(11q22.3), and 83% pts had a complex karotype. Twenty-five pts completed two or more cycles of therapy (median 3.5, range 1–8). Five pts completed only one cycle of therapy and were removed prior to receiving lenalidomide due to progressive disease (n=2), TLS requiring dialysis (n=2), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n=1). Pts received 2.5 mg (n=6), 5.0 mg (n=7), 7.5 mg (n=4), and 10 mg (n=3) of lenalidomide with 30 mg/m2 bolus + 30 mg/m2 4-hour CIVI flavopiridol and 5 patients have received 10 mg of lenalidomide with 30 mg/m2 bolus + 50 mg/m2 4-hour CIVI flavopiridol. DLT consisting of grade 3–4 transaminitis persisting > 7 days occurred in 2 pts treated with 2.5 mg (n=1) and 5.0 mg of lenalidomide (n=1), respectively. Grade 3–4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia (60%), diarrhea (57%), transient transaminitis (47%), neutropenia (47%), hyperglycemia (47%), infection (43%, pneumonia in 5 pts, upper respiratory tract infection in 2 pts, cellulitis in 1 pt, herpes simplex stomatitis in 1 pt, oral candidiasis in 1 pt, catheter-associated in 1 pt, and febrile neutropenia without a source in 2 pts), hypokalemia (37%), anemia (33%), hypophosphatemia (33%), hypocalcemia (17%), hyperkalemia (17%), TLS requiring dialysis (7%), tumor flare (3%), and rash (3%). In 23 evaluable pts who completed 1 or more cycles of combined lenalidomide and flavopiridol, partial responses were observed in 13 pts (57%), including 7 pts with del(17p13.1), 6 pts with del(11q22.3), 9 pts with complex cytogenetics, 5 fludarabine-refractory pts, and 6 pts with bulky lymphadenopathy. Six pts were able to proceed to allogeneic transplant after 1–3 cycles, and 4 of these pts remain in remission. Median PFS and OS are 7 months (range 0–24 months; 95% CI 5, 11) and 23 months (range 0–27 months; 95% CI 13, 27), respectively. No significant differences have been observed in the single agent and combination PK parameters (AUC, Cmax, T ½, and Clearance) of lenalidomide and flavopiridol. Conclusions: Combined flavopiridol and lenalidomide is well tolerated without increased risks of TLS or tumor flare, with significant activity in pts with bulky, cytogenetically high-risk CLL. This combination regimen could be utilized to de-bulk high risk pts prior to stem cell transplantation or prior to other oral therapies. The MTD has not been reached and dose escalation continues at a lenalidomide dose that exceeds the single agent MTD in CLL of 5 mg (Maddocks et al, Blood 114: abstract 3445, 2009). Future evaluation of continued maintenance lenalidomide after initial combination therapy is planned. This trial is supported by NCI 1R21 CA133875, NCI P50-CA140158, NCI K23 CA109004, NCI U01 CA076576, LLS SCOR 7080–06, and the D. Warren Brown Foundation. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Flavopiridol and lenalidomide are off-label for the treatment of CLL.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung-Chih Lai ◽  
Wang-Huei Sheng ◽  
Jann-Tay Wang ◽  
Aristine Cheng ◽  
Yu-Chung Chuang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document