scholarly journals CalliSpheres Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Presents With Better Efficacy and Equal Safety Compared to Conventional TACE in Treating Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381983075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Xiang ◽  
Lin Long ◽  
Yuanhui Yao ◽  
Zhiyong Fang ◽  
Zhiming Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

The aim of this study was to compare the treatment response, survival, liver function, and adverse event incidence of drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres microspheres with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Seventy-three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (using CalliSpheres microspheres) or conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment were consecutively enrolled. Treatment response was assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at month 1/month 3/month 6; posttreatment, liver function indexes, and adverse events were recorded. Progression-free survival and overall survival were also calculated. Objective response rate of patients at months 1, 3, and 6, disease control rate of patients and objective response rate of nodules at month 3 were increased in drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group compared with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group. In addition, drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres microspheres was an independent factor for predicting better objective response rate at month 1. Patients in drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group achieved longer progression-free survival and similar overall survival compared to those in conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group; Cox proportional hazards regression model analyses revealed that drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres microspheres was associated with better progression-free survival while it did not affect overall survival. Meanwhile, most of the occurrences of abnormal liver function indexes were similar between 2 groups, whereas drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group had a higher percentage of patients with total bile acid ≥2 upper limit of normal compared to conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization group at month 1. Moreover, the adverse event incidences between 2 groups were similar. In conclusion, drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres microspheres achieves better treatment response and progression-free survival while equal safety compared to conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Recurrent or Residual Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Erhua Yao ◽  
Jinghong Chen ◽  
Xiaofang Zhao ◽  
Yinyan Zheng ◽  
Xianheng Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Palliative Treatment ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with recurrent or residual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods. Between June 2008 and July 2015, thirty-three patients with HCC were treated by SBRT. There were 63 lesions in 33 patients. A total dose of 39–45 Gy/3–5 fractions was delivered to the 70–80% isodose line. Results. Objective response rate (CR + PR) was 84.8% at 6 months. The overall survival rate was 87.9%, 75.8%, 57.6%, and 45.5% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 19 months. At 3 months, AFP decreased by more than 75% in 51.5% of patients (17/33). Overall survival was significantly different (P<0.001) between the group of patients for whom AFP decreased more than 75% and the group for whom AFP decreased by less than 75%. The AFP-negative rate was 48.5% (16/33) after 6 months. Eight patients (24.2%) had grade 1-2 transient fatigue, and 11 patients (33.3%) had grade 1-2 gastrointestinal reactions within 1 month. Conclusion. SBRT is a promising noninvasive and palliative treatment with acceptable toxicity for recurrent or residual HCC after TACE.

scholarly journals Therapeutic effectiveness and safety of sintilimab-dominated triple therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Dai ◽  
Xingchen Cai ◽  
Joseph Mugaanyi ◽  
Yelei Liu ◽  
Shuqi Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has shown promising results in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sintilimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade, combined with sorafenib and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization in this patient population, compared with sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy. This was a 22 months single center retrospective cohort study in China. 80 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included, with diagnosis confirmed by either histologic, cytologic or diagnostic imaging analysis. The patients were divided into three groups based on therapeutic regimen: sintilimab monotherapy (sintilimab group, n = 22), sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy (duplex group, n = 23), sintilimab-sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined therapy (triple group, n = 35). The principal evaluation criteria were overall survival and progression free survival in the population, assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Secondary evaluation criteria were safety, objective response rate and disease control rate. From March 1st, 2019 to December 31, 2020, 80 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included and divided into three treatment groups (22 received sintilimab monotherapy, 23 received sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy, and 35 received sintilimab-sorafenib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization). The median overall survival of all patients was 11.0 months (95% CI 7.7–14.3). Median overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI NE–NE), 9.0 months(95% CI 6.3–11.7)and 3.0 months (95% CI 1.9–4.1, p < 0.0001) in the triple therapy, duplex and sintilimab groups respectively, while the corresponding median progression-free survival were 5.0 months (95% CI 2.9–7.1, p < 0.001), 4.0 months (95% CI 2.8–5.2) and 2.0 months (95% CI 1.7–2.3). Disease control and clinical benefits rates were higher in the triple therapy group (80%, 95% CI 63.1–91.6, p < 0.001; 54.3%, 95% CI 36.6–71.2, p < 0.01) compared to the sintilimab group. Median duration of disease control was 4.0 months (95% CI NE–NE, p < 0.01) in the triple therapy group, longer than that of the duplex group (2.0 months, 95% CI 0.9–3.1) and sintilimab group (2.0 months, 95% CI 0.8–3.2). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 26.3% of 80 patients with hypertension was the most common event observed (38, 47.5%), however, other severe toxic effects were infrequent. Sintilimab combined with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization might have more beneficial effects on overall and progression-free survival and on the duration of disease control outcomes than both sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This triple therapy model might represent an innovative and effective option for inoperable liver cancer.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Effectiveness and Safety of Sintilimab-Dominated Triple Therapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Dai ◽  
Xingchen Cai ◽  
Joseph Mugaanyi ◽  
Yelei Liu ◽  
Shuqi Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Abstract PurposeImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has shown promising results in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sintilimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade, combined with sorafenib and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization in this patient population, compared with sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy.MethodsThis was a 22 months single center retrospective cohort study in China. 80 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included, with diagnosis confirmed by either histologic, cytologic or diagnostic imaging analysis. The patients were divided into three groups based on therapeutic regimen: sintilimab monotherapy (sintilimab group, n=22), sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy (duplex group, n=23), sintilimab-sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined therapy (triple group, n=35). The principal evaluation criteria were overall survival and progression free survival in the intention-to-treat population, assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Furthermore, safety, objective response rate, disease control rate and so on were analyzed.ResultsFrom March 1st, 2019 to December 31, 2020, 80 intend-to-treat patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included into three treatment groups (22 received sintilimab monotherapy, 23 received sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy, and 35 received sintilimab-sorafenib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization). The median overall survival of all patients was 11.0 months (95% CI, 7.7-14.3). Median overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI, NE-NE), 9.0 months（95% CI，6.3-11.7）and 3.0 months (95% CI，1.9-4.1, p < 0.0001) in the triple therapy, duplex and sintilimab groups respectively, while the corresponding median progression-free survival were 5.0 months (95% CI，2.9-7.1 , p < 0.001), 4.0 months (95% CI，2.8-5.2) and 2.0 months (95% CI，1.7-2.3). Disease control and clinical benefits rates were higher in the triple therapy group (80%, 95% CI, 63.1-91.6, p < 0.001; 54.3%, 95% CI, 36.6-71.2, p < 0.01) compared to the sintilimab group. Median duration of disease control was 4.0 months (95% CI, NE-NE, p < 0.01) in the triple therapy group, longer than that of the duplex group (2.0 months, 95% CI, 0.9-3.1) and sintilimab group (2.0 months, 95% CI, 0.8-3.2). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 26.3% of 80 patients with hypertension was the most common event observed (38, 47.5%), however, other severe toxic effects were infrequent. ConclusionsSintilimab combined with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization might have more beneficial effects on overall and progression-free survival and on the duration of disease control outcomes than both sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This triple therapy model might represent an innovative and effective option for inoperable liver cancer.

Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Wei Peng ◽  
Yao-Jun Zhang ◽  
Min-Shan Chen ◽  
Li Xu ◽  
Hui-Hong Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Allocation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Tumor Number ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Purpose To compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 189 patients with HCC less than 7 cm at a single tertiary referral center between October 2006 and June 2009. Patients were randomly asssigned to receive TACE combined with RFA (TACE-RFA; n = 94) or RFA alone (n = 95). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end point was recurrence-free survival, and the tertiary end point was adverse effects. Results At a follow-up of 7 to 62 months, 34 patients in the TACE-RFA group and 48 patients in the RFA group had died. Thirty-three patients and 52 patients had developed recurrence in the TACE-RFA group and RFA group, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 4-year overall survivals for the TACE-RFA group and the RFA group were 92.6%, 66.6%, and 61.8% and 85.3%, 59%, and 45.0%, respectively. The corresponding recurrence-free survivals were 79.4%, 60.6%, and 54.8% and 66.7%, 44.2%, and 38.9%, respectively. Patients in the TACE-RFA group had better overall survival and recurrence-free survival than patients in the RFA group (hazard ratio, 0.525; 95% CI, 0.335 to 0.822; P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.575; 95% CI, 0.374 to 0.897; P = .009, respectively). There were no treatment-related deaths. On logistic regression analyses, treatment allocation, tumor size, and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas treatment allocation and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Conclusion TACE-RFA was superior to RFA alone in improving survival for patients with HCC less than 7 cm.

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization using anthracyclines-loaded drug eluting microspheres for treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Pooled analyses.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 287-287
Author(s):  
Thierry De Baere ◽  
Filipe Veloso Gomes ◽  
Gontran Verset ◽  
Gerardo Tovar-Felice ◽  
Katerina Malagari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Bridge To Transplant ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Drug Eluting

287 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization either with Lipiodol (cTACE) or with drug eluting microspheres (DEM-TACE) is indicated for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to curative treatments in patients with preserved liver function. Safety of TACE is becoming more important with its increased use as a bridge to transplant or downstaging to resection, but also for preservation of liver function in case of subsequent immuno-combination therapies. LifePearl microspheres is a novel DEM comprised of polyethylene-glycol with reported good safety profile and efficacy in smaller series. Our purpose was to assess safety and efficacy of TACE using anthracycline loaded LifePearl for the treatment of patients with unresectable HCC in a pooled analysis of studies with available more than 500 patient’s level data. Methods: We pooled patient level data from 5 single arm studies. Safety was assessed by close monitoring of adverse events according to CTCAE (v4.03). Tumor response was assessed, according to mRECIST and RECIST1.1 and analyzed as best overall response to account for differences in time of imaging follow-up between studies. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate event rates for time to event outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), time to unTACEable progression (TTUP) and overall survival (OS) censoring patients at time of surgery or transplantation. Results: Out of 586 patients, 85.5%, 13.5% and 1.0% were Child Pugh A, B and C, respectively. BCLC stages 0, A, B and C were 13.6%, 43.4%, 41.1% and 1.9% respectively. The mean number of HCC lesions was 2.1±1.5 and mean sum of tumor diameters was 49.3±32.9mm. In 19% of patients alpha-feto protein level was > 200ng/ml. A mean of 1.9±1.3 DEM-TACEs were performed per patient. A total of 197 events were reported including 2.6 % grade 4 and 1.5% grade 5, mostly related to post-embolization syndrome. Complete response, partial response and stable disease were 60.2%, 27.1% and 7.4% respectively providing an objective response and disease control rates of 87,3% and 94,7% respectively. 10% of patients were transplanted or resected. Median OS, PFS and TTUP is indicated in the table below. OS was 89.2%, 80.2% and 69.7% at 12, 18 and 24 months respectively. Conclusions: The treatment of patients with unresectable HCC with anthracycline loaded LifePearl showed good tolerance with acceptable toxicity and high tumor response rate that translated into promising PFS, TTUP and OS. [Table: see text]

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

scholarly journals TILs and Anti-PD1 Therapy: An Alternative Combination Therapy for PDL1 Negative Metastatic Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Yin ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Xiangling Sun ◽  
Ruili Li ◽  
Cuihua Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Background. We investigated the efficacy of TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy in patients with metastatic cervical cancer with low MSI expression and PDL1-negative. Methods. A total of 80 patients were put on TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy, and the progression-free survival time (PFS) and overall survival time (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that could predict the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer in the previously described patients. Results. The objective response rate was 25%, whereas the mPFS and mOS were 6.1 and 11.3 months, respectively. The therapeutic efficacy was influenced by the characteristics of TILs, infection with HPV, and development of fever just after the therapy. Conclusion. Overall, our results show that the combination therapy of TILs and anti-PD1 significantly improves the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer.

scholarly journals Randomized Open-Label Phase II Trial of Apitolisib (GDC-0980), a Novel Inhibitor of the PI3K/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway, Versus Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (14) ◽  
pp. 1660-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Mark R. Lackner ◽  
Stéphane Oudard ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
Christy Ralph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to compare dual inhibition of PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) by apitolisib (GDC-0980) against single inhibition of mTORC1 by everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and Methods Patients with clear-cell mRCC who progressed on or after vascular endothelial growth factor–targeted therapy were randomly assigned to apitolisib 40 mg once per day or to everolimus 10 mg once per day. End points included progression-free survival, safety, overall survival, and objective response rate. Biomarker assessments were conducted. Results Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned. After 67 events, stratified analysis revealed that median progression-free survival was significantly shorter for apitolisib than for everolimus (3.7 v 6.1 months; hazard ratio, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.23 to 3.63; P < .01]); apitolisib was not favored in any stratification subgroup. Median overall survival was not significantly different but trended in favor of everolimus (16.5 v 22.8 months; hazard ratio, 1.77 [95% CI, 0.97 to 3.24; P = .06]). The objective response rate was 7.1% for apitolisib and 11.6% for everolimus. Patients administered apitolisib with a greater incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more likely to discontinue treatment (31% v 12% for everolimus). No drug-related deaths were observed. Apitolisib in comparison with everolimus was associated with substantially more high-grade hyperglycemia (40% v 9%) and rash (24% v 2%). Apitolisib pharmacokinetics suggested a relationship between exposure, and rash and hyperglycemia. Retrospective biomarker analyses revealed a relationship between VHL mutation status and outcome with everolimus but not with apitolisib. High hypoxia-inducible factor 1α protein expression was associated with better outcome in both arms. Conclusion This study demonstrated that dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition by apitolisib was less effective than was everolimus in mRCC, likely because full blockade of PI3K/mTOR signaling resulted in multiple on-target adverse events. VHL mutation and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression may be predictive of an mTOR inhibitor benefit, although prospective validation is required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document