The Effects of Certain Gimbal Orders and Workloads on Target Acquisition
If air-to-ground imaging sensors are mounted to aircraft by different gimbal order systems, the scenery at the displays will rotate differently, even though the flight paths are identical. Eighteen experienced pilots were tested to investigate the effects such scene motions might have on target detection, recognition, and identification performance, and also on operator workload. The Martin Marietta 600:1 scale terrain model was used to provide the imagery of three gimbal orders: roll-pitch, yaw-pitch, and pitch-yaw. Target runs simulated started at 20k ft. slant range, and maintained a 4k ft. altitude, and 2500 or 5000 feet offset. They were 30-second runs at a speed of 350 knots. The pitch-yaw gimbal order was associated with the greatest range-to-target scores and the lightest workloads. Also, the workload measured for each gimbal order and the workload measured for a word task from the Montana Meaningfulness Scale were added together for each subject. The sum was the estimated workload for that subject for the combined tasks, which were presented on two monitors. The six subjects with the heaviest workload estimates and the six with the lightest were compared on range-to-target scores. The heavy workload group demonstrated a trend effect for improved performance compared to the light workload group, p < .01. However, significant degraded performance occurred when the results of all subjects for this words and target task were compared with similar trials in which the second display was monitored during the observer's spare time only.