scholarly journals Standardising intraoperative irrigation with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate in caesarean delivery to reduce surgical site infections: A single institution experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 24-33
Author(s):  
Theresa Mangold ◽  
Erin Kinzel Hamilton ◽  
Helen Boehm Johnson ◽  
Rene Perez
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
The Impact

Background Surgical site infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following caesarean delivery. Objective To determine whether standardising intraoperative irrigation with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate during caesarean delivery could decrease infection rates. Methods This was a process improvement project involving 742 women, 343 of whom received low-pressured 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation during caesarean delivery over a one-year period. Infection rates were compared with a standard-of-care control group (399 women) undergoing caesarean delivery the preceding year. Results The treatment group infection rate met the study goal by achieving a lower infection rate than the control group, though this was not statistically significant. A significant interaction effect between irrigation with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate and antibiotic administration time existed, such that infection occurrence in the treatment group was not dependent on antibiotic timing, as opposed to the control group infection occurrence, which was dependent on antibiotic timing. Conclusion Intraoperative irrigation with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate during caesarean delivery did not statistically significantly reduce the rate of infections. It did render the impact of antibiotic administration timing irrelevant in prevention of surgical site infection. This suggests a role for 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation in mitigating infection risk whether antibiotic prophylaxis timing is suboptimal or ideal.

58 Use of Abdominal Wall or Sucutaneous Drain to Reduce the Risk of Surgical Site Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Mistry ◽  
B Woolner ◽  
A John
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Standard Operating Procedure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Local Evidence ◽  
Audit Data ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Introduction Open abdominal surgery confers potentially greater risk of surgical site infections, and local evidence suggests use of drains can reduce this. Our objectives were: Assessing local rates and risk factors of infections and if use of drains can reduce the rates of infections. Method Retrospectively looking from 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2018, at patients following laparotomy or open cholecystectomy. Data collection on demographics, smoking/alcohol status, heart, respiratory or renal disease or diabetes, steroid use and CEPOD status, as well as use of drain and the outcome of infection using inpatient and online patient records. Results 84 patients included, 25 had drains inserted. There were 13 documented cases of surgical site infection, all of whom had no drain post-op. Other parameters shown to be most prevalent in the patients with a surgical site infection include being current/ex-smoker (8/13), having heart disease (9/13), and elective procedures. Conclusions Aiming to reduce the risk of surgical site infections can improve morbidity and potentially mortality outcomes. Our audit data showed that there appears to be a benefit of inserting intra-abdominal or subcutaneous drains. We will create a standard operating procedure of all patient to receive drains post-op and then re-audit to assess the impact this has on infection rates.

The impact of low-dose versus high-dose antibiotic prophylaxis regimens on surgical site infection rates after cesarean delivery

2019 ◽  
Vol 301 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio La Rosa ◽  
Chasey Omere ◽  
Tiffany Redfern ◽  
Mahmoud Abdelwahab ◽  
Nicholas Spencer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
The Impact

Administrative coding methods impact surgical site infection rates

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1461-1463
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Alsuhaibani ◽  
Mohammed A. Alzunitan ◽  
Kyle E. Jenn ◽  
Michael B. Edmond ◽  
Angelique M. Dains ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Coding System ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Coding Method ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
The Impact

AbstractWe performed a retrospective analysis of the impact of using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision procedure coding system (ICD-10) or current procedural terminology (CPT) codes to calculate surgical site infection (SSI) rates. Denominators and SSI rates vary depending on the coding method used. The coding method used may influence interhospital performance comparisons.

scholarly journals A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transparent Film Dressings and Conventional Occlusive Dressings for Elective Surgical Procedures

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (17) ◽  
pp. 2844-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moushira Hosny Ezzelarab ◽  
Omar Nouh ◽  
Ahmed Nabil Ahmed ◽  
Mervat Gaber Anany ◽  
Nevine Gamal El Rachidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
P Value ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infection Rate ◽  
Gauze Dressing ◽  
Clean Contaminated ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection is one of the major health-care-associated problems causing substantial morbidity and mortality and constituting a financial burden on hospitals as well. The wound management is one of the crucial evidence-based strategies in the reduction of surgical site infection rates AIM: To study the impact of standardisation of transparent semipermeable dressing procedure on the rate of surgical site infection in comparison with conventional dressing in clean and clean-contaminated surgeries. METHODS: The study included 100 patients who were admitted to surgical wards in Cairo university hospitals, for clean and clean-contaminated operations, in the period from February 2017 to August 2017. Immunocompromised and uncontrolled diabetic patients were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups; in the first group, patients wounds were covered using transparent semipermeable dressing, while the second group patients’ wounds were covered using conventional occlusive gauze dressing. Patients were followed up for criteria of infection every other day during the first week then at two weeks, three weeks and four weeks. RESULTS: In clean and clean-contaminated operations, the transparent dressing group showed a significantly lesser rate of surgical site infection at (2%), compared with the conventional occlusive gauze dressing group with a surgical site infection rate of (14%) (p-value of 0.02). CONCLUSION: The transparent semipermeable dressing is effective in reducing surgical site infection rate in clean and clean-contaminated operations.

Surgical Site Infection Rate Drops to 0% Using a Vacuum-Assisted Closure in Contaminated/ Dirty Infected Laparotomy Wounds

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Lozano-Balderas ◽  
Alejandro Ruiz-Velasco-Santacruz ◽  
Jose Antonio Diaz-Elizondo ◽  
Juan Antonio Gomez-Navarro ◽  
Eduardo Flores-Villalba
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Vacuum Assisted Closure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Delayed Closure

Wound site infections increase costs, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Techniques used for wounds management after laparotomy are primary, delayed primary, and vacuum-assisted closures. The objective of this study is to compare infection rates between those techniques in contaminated and dirty/ infected wounds. Eighty-one laparotomized patients with Class III or IV surgical wounds were enrolled in a three-arm randomized prospective study. Patients were allocated to each group with the software Research Randomizer® (Urbaniak, G. C, & Plous, S., Version 4.0). Presence of infection was determined by a certified board physician according to Centers for Disease Control's Criteria for Defining a Surgical Site Infection. Twenty-seven patients received primary closure, 29 delayed primary closure, and 25 vacuum-assisted closure, with no exclusions for analysis. Surgical site infection was present in 10 (37%) patients treated with primary closure, 5 (17%) with primary delayed closure, and 0 (0%) patients receiving vacuum-assisted closure. Statistical significance was found between infection rates of the vacuum-assisted group and the other two groups. No significant difference was found between the primary and primary delayed closure groups. The infection rate in contaminated/dirty-infected laparotomy wounds decreases from 37 and 17 per cent with a primary and delayed primary closures, respectively, to 0 per cent with vacuum-assisted systems.

scholarly journals 411: The impact of low dose versus high dose antibiotic prophylaxis regimens on surgical site infection rates after cesarean delivery

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. S244-S245
Author(s):  
Mauricio La Rosa ◽  
Chasey Omere ◽  
Tiffany Redfurn ◽  
Mahmoud Abdelwahab ◽  
Nicholas Spencer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals An observational study of incidence of surgical site infections in gastrointestinal surgeries

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 3595
Author(s):  
Jenishkumar Vijaykumar Modi ◽  
Darshit Kalaria
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Surgical Site Infection Rate ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Surgery Department

Background: This study analysed the incidence of surgical site infections in gastrointestinal surgeries and its risk factors. so this study helped us in reducing surgical site infection by avoiding or minimizing that risk factors.Methods: The present study was conducted at general surgery department, SMIMER, Surat. An observational study of 400 cases that have undergone abdominal surgery in SMIMER hospital and were followed up from the day of operation to 30 days after discharge was done.Results: The overall infection rate for a total of the 400 cases was 17.25%. The incidence rate in this study was well within the infection rates of 2.8% to 17% seen in other studies. Different studies from India at different places have shown the SSI (surgical site infection) rate to vary from 6.09% to 38.7%.Conclusions: Our study reveals that though SSIs have been widely studied since a long time, they still remain as one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in surgically treated patients.

scholarly journals 891. Is Post-discharge Surveillance of Surgical Patients Really Worth It? Results Observed in Three Years of a Multicenter Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S479-S481
Author(s):  
Rafaela Tonholli Pinho ◽  
Luciana Coelho Tanure ◽  
Joice Ribeiro Lopes ◽  
Bárbara Caldeira Pires ◽  
Flávio Henrique Batista de Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Belo Horizonte

Abstract Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) can account for 25% of all nosocomial infections and contribute significantly to the economic burden resulting from infectious complications. To control this problem, an active surveillance program with the feedback of SSI rates to surgeons can reduce subsequent rates by up to 40%, since 19% to 65% of these infections are diagnosed after patient discharge. However, there is no standard method for conducting surveillance outside the hospital and the best methodology is still unknown. For many hospitals, SSI surveillance has three main objectives: to feedback surgeons with their SSI rates; to evaluate SSI rates over time, identifying outbreaks; and to compare data among different institutions. This study aims to answer the crucial question: is surveillance after patient discharge worthwhile? Methods Prospective surveillance according to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) protocol of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at Hospital Lifecenter, Hospital Madre Teresa and Hospital Universitário Ciências Médicas, tertiary care centers, which serve the metropolitan area of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The data were collected between Jan/2017 and Dec/2019. Results In almost three years of study, the infection rate data were calculated with and without surveillance. The monthly analysis by clinic showed that the inclusion of post-discharge patients in the computed rates increases its value, but not significantly. Of 22.009 patients analyzed, in Lifecenter Hospital, 229(1%) had SSI. This percentage refers to the infection rate with the post-discharge survey, while the rate of surgical infection without vigilance corresponds to 202(0,9%) (Table 1). The surveillance for Madre Teresa, those numbers were: 29.770, 382(1,3%) and 351(1,2%), respectively (Table 2). In Hospital Universitário Ciências Médicas: 20.286, 447 (2,2%) and 215(1,1%) (Table 3). Table 1 - Surgical site infection: data with and without post-discharge surveillance. Hospital Lifecenter (Jan/ 2017 to Jul/2019): month-by-month analysis. Table 2 - Surgical site infection: data with and without post-discharge surveillance. Hospital Madre Teresa (Jan/ 2017 to Dec/2019): month-by-month analysis. Table 3 - Surgical site infection: data with and without post-discharge surveillance. Hospital Universitário Ciências Médicas (Jan/ 2017 to Dec/2019): month-by-month analysis. Conclusion SSI post-discharge surveillance is indicated only for specific procedures. However, once the endemic curve with the infection rate did not change with the inclusion of post-discharge SSI, the study strongly suggests that surveillance after the discharge of the surgical patient is not necessary. Graph 1 - Surgical site infection: rates with and without post-discharge surveillance. Hospital Lifecenter (Jan/2017 to Jul/2019): endemic curve. Graph 2 - Surgical site infection: rates with and without post-discharge surveillance. Hospital Madre Teresa (Jan/2017 to Jul/2019): endemic curve. Graph 3 - Surgical site infection: rate with and without post-discharge surveillance. Hospital Universitário Ciências Médicas (Jan/2017 to Jul/2019): endemic curve. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document