scholarly journals Timing and burden of persistent critical illnessin UK intensive care units: An observational cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. 175114372110471
Author(s):  
David A Harrison ◽  
Ben C Creagh-Brown ◽  
Kathryn M Rowan

Background Persistent critical illness is a recognisable clinical syndrome defined conceptually as when the patient’s reason for being in the intensive care unit (ICU) is more related to their ongoing critical illness than their original reason for admission. Our objectives were: (1) to assess the day in ICU on which chronic factors (e.g., age, gender and comorbidities) were more predictive of survival than acute factors (e.g. admission diagnosis, physiological derangements) measured on the day of admission; (2) to assess the consistency of this finding across major patient subgroups and over time and (3) to compare case mix characteristics and outcomes for patients determined to develop persistent critical illness (based on ICU length of stay) with other patients. Methods Observational cohort study using a high-quality clinical database from the national clinical audit of adult critical care. 217 adult ICUs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 835,946 adult patients admitted to participating ICUs between 1 April 2009 and 31 March 2016. The main outcome measure was mortality at discharge from acute hospital. Results We fitted two statistical models (‘chronic’ and ‘acute’) and updated these based upon patients with an ICU length of stay of at least 1, 2, etc., up to 28 days. The discrimination of the chronic model first exceeded that of the acute model on day 11. Patients with longer stays (>10 days) comprised 9% of admissions but used 45% of ICU bed-days. After a mean ICU length of stay of 22 days and a subsequent 28 days in hospital, 30% died. Conclusions Persistent critical illness is commonly encountered in clinical practice and is associated with increased healthcare utilisation and adverse outcomes. Improvements in our understanding of the longer term outcomes and in the development of tools to aid prognostication are urgently required – for humane as well as health economic reasons.

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e036746
Author(s):  
Nahom Worku Teshager ◽  
Ashenafi Tazebew Amare ◽  
Koku Sisay Tamirat

ObjectiveTo determine the incidence and predictors of mortality among children admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at the University of Gondar comprehensive specialised hospital, northwest Ethiopia.DesignA single-centre prospective observational cohort study.ParticipantsA total of 313 children admitted to the ICU of the University of Gondar comprehensive specialised hospital during a one-and-a-half-year period.MeasurementsData were collected using standard case record form, physical examination and patient document review. Clinical characteristics such as systolic blood pressure, pupillary light reflex, oxygen saturation and need for mechanical ventilation (MV) were assessed and documented within the first hour of admission and entered into an electronic application to calculate the modified Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2) Score. We fitted the Cox proportional hazards model to identify predictors of mortality.ResultThe median age at admission was 48 months with IQR: 12–122, 28.1% were infants and adolescents accounted for 21.4%. Of the total patients studied, 59.7% were males. The median observation time was 3 days with (IQR: 1–6). One hundred and two (32.6%) children died during the follow-up time, and the incidence of mortality was 6.9 deaths per 100 person-day observation. Weekend admission (adjusted HR (AHR)=1.63, 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.62), critical illness diagnoses (AHR=1.79, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.85), need for MV (AHR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.39 to 4.01) and modified PIM 2 Score (AHR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.36 to 1.72) were the predictors of mortality.ConclusionThe rate of mortality in the PICU was high, admission over weekends, need for MV, critical illness diagnoses and higher PIM 2 scores were significant and independent predictors of mortality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-387
Author(s):  
Boris Tseitkin ◽  
◽  
Johan Mårtensson ◽  
Glenn M Eastwood ◽  
Alastair Brown ◽  
...  

Background: Persistent critical illness (PerCI) is defined as an intensive care unit (ICU) admission lasting  10 days. The in-hospital complications associated with its development are poorly understood. Aims: To test whether PerCI is associated with a greater prevalence, rate and specific types of in-hospital complications. Methods: Single-centre, retrospective, observational case–control study. Results: We studied 1200 patients admitted to a tertiary ICU from 2010 to 2015. Median ICU length of stay was 16 days (interquartile range [IQR], 12–23) for PerCI patients v 2.3 days (IQR, 1.1–3.7) for controls, and median hospital length of stay was 41 days (IQR, 22–75) v 8 days (IQR, 4–17) respectively. A greater proportion of PerCI patients received acute renal replacement therapy (37% v 6.8%) or underwent reintubation (17% v 1%) and/or tracheostomy (36% v 0.6%); P < 0.0001. Despite these complications, PerCI patients had similar hospital mortality (29% v 27%; P = 0.53). PerCI patients experienced a greater absolute number of complications (12.1 v 4.0 complications per patient; P < 0.0001) but had fewer exposure-adjusted complications (202 v 272 complications per 1000 hospital bed-days; P < 0.001) and a particularly high overall prevalence of specific complications. Conclusions: PerCI patients experience a higher prevalence, but not a higher rate, of exposure-adjusted complications. Some of these complications appear amenable to prevention, helping to define intervention targets in patients at risk of PerCI. Funding: Austin Hospital Intensive Care Trust Fund.


2021 ◽  
pp. dtb-2021-000056

AbstractOverview of: Azoulay É, Castro P, Maamar A, et al. Outcomes in patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy who were admitted to intensive care (CARTTAS): an international, multicentre, observational cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8:e355–64.


Critical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. R229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronwen A Connolly ◽  
Gareth D Jones ◽  
Alexandra A Curtis ◽  
Patrick B Murphy ◽  
Abdel Douiri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document