Hand hygiene practices among healthcare workers in a newborn unit of a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
Serah K Ngugi ◽  
Florence V Murila ◽  
Rachel N Musoke
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Referral Hospital ◽  
World Health ◽  
Tertiary Referral ◽  
Improvement Strategy ◽  
Tertiary Referral Hospital ◽  
Effective Measure ◽  
Hospitalised Patients

Background: Health care-associated infection (HCAI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalised patients, particularly neonates. Compliance with hand hygiene (HH) recommendations is the simplest and most effective measure in preventing this infection. Objectives: To determine the HH practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the newborn unit of a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya, their knowledge and perceptions regarding HCAI and importance of HH, and barriers to the recommended HH practices. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the HCWs’ compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) ‘5 Moments for Hand Hygiene’ and a structured self-administered questionnaire adopted from the WHO knowledge and perception of HCW questionnaires was used to answer the secondary objectives. Results: The overall HH compliance rate was 15%. HCWs were twice more likely to take a HH action ‘after’ than ‘before’ a patient care procedure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–4.19; P = 0.03). Nurses and nursing students had statistically significant lower compliance (OR 0.41; 95% CI = 0.18-0.91; p=0.016) and (OR 0.21; 95% CI = 0.06-0.70; p = 0.004) respectively, compared to the doctors. More than half (52%) of the HCWs were unaware of the five moments/indication for HH. Lack of supplies, forgetfulness and use of gloves were the commonly cited barriers to HH compliance. Discussion: HH compliance rate among HCWs in the newborn unit of the tertiary referral hospital was very low. The observed and reported barriers to optimal HH compliance demonstrate a necessity for the adoption of the WHO recommended multimodal HH improvement strategy in this unit.

scholarly journals Hand Hygiene Compliance Study at a Large Central Hospital in Vietnam

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cam Le ◽  
Erik Lehman ◽  
Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Timothy Craig
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
World Health ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Cultural Attitudes ◽  
Knowledge And Attitude ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Lack of proper hand hygiene among healthcare workers has been identified as a core facilitator of hospital-acquired infections. Although the concept of hand hygiene quality assurance was introduced to Vietnam relatively recently, it has now become a national focus in an effort to improve the quality of care. Nonetheless, barriers such as resources, lack of education, and cultural norms may be limiting factors for this concept to be properly practiced. Our study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude of healthcare workers toward hand hygiene and to identify barriers to compliance, as per the World Health Organization’s guidelines, through surveys at a large medical center in Vietnam. In addition, we aimed to evaluate the compliance rate across different hospital departments and the roles of healthcare workers through direct observation. Results showed that, in general, healthcare workers had good knowledge of hand hygiene guidelines, but not all believed in receiving reminders from patients. The barriers to compliance were identified as: limited resources, patient overcrowding, shortage of staff, allergic reactions to hand sanitizers, and lack of awareness. The overall compliance was 31%; physicians had the lowest rate of compliance at 15%, while nurses had the highest rate at 39%; internal medicine had the lowest rate at 16%, while the intensive care unit had the highest rate at 40%. In summary, it appears that addressing cultural attitudes in addition to enforcing repetitive quality assurance and assessment programs are needed to ensure adherence to safe hand washing.

scholarly journals Hand hygiene compliance among rural healthcare workers of Nepal

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95
Author(s):  
Ajay Kumar Rajbhandari ◽  
Reshu Agrawal Sagtani ◽  
Kedar Prasad Baral
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Hand Washing ◽  
World Health ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Introductions: Transmission of healthcare associated infections through contaminated hands of healthcare workers are common. This study was designed to explore the existing compliance of hand hygiene among the healthcare workers workings in different level of health care centers of Makwanpur district of Nepal. Methods: This was a cross sectional observational study conducted in Makwanpur district, Nepal, during 2015. Healthcare workers from nine healthcare centers were selected randomly for the study. Standard observation checklists and World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene were used to assess the compliance of hand hygiene during patient care. Results: There were 74 participants. Overall compliance for hand washing was 24.25% (range 19.63 to 45.56). Complete steps of hand washing were performed by 38.3% of health care workers. The factors associated for noncompliance were lack of time (29.3%), example set by seniors (20%), absence or inadequate institution protocol (20%) and unfavourable health care setting (> 20%). Conclusions: Overall hand washing compliance rate amongst the healthcare workers in rural health facilities of Nepal were low (24.25%).

scholarly journals Hand hygiene knowledge, perception and practice of healthcare workers in a Turkish university hospital intensive care unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (08) ◽  
pp. 744-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uluhan Sili ◽  
Pinar Ay ◽  
Huseyin Bilgin ◽  
Seyhan Hidiroglu ◽  
Volkan Korten
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
World Health ◽  
Training Methods ◽  
Cross Sectional

Introduction: While improvement of hand hygiene (HH) compliance is considered as the best approach to reduce healthcare-associated infections, the instructional interventions in HH among healthcare workers of intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital was not successful enough. The following study was conducted to evaluate HH knowledge, perception, practice and effectiveness of the trainings among healthcare workers of ICU in our hospital. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU containing 8 medical and 16 surgical beds with 284 filled questionnaires about HH knowledge and 1187 observed opportunities for HH compliance. Results: Overall observed HH compliance rate was 40.6%; lowest compliance was 21.7% for “before clean/aseptic procedure” indication and highest compliance was 68.6% for “after touching a patient” indication. Although > 90% healthcare workers correctly identified the World Health Organization’s five indications for HH, 82 – 85% failed to recognize non-indications, i.e. when it was not necessary to perform HH. Our study showed that 15.1% of healthcare workers neither received nor felt the need for HH training. Conclusions: Despite regular HH trainings, healthcare workers could not differentiate when HH was not required which suggested failure to understand HH rationale. This may explain poor HH compliance rates. A systematic study is needed in order to find out the reasons behind of this noncompliance and improve HH training methods for educating healthcare workers.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Multiplex Real-time PCR and WHO Criteria for Diagnosing Childhood Bacterial Meningitis in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Iran

2022 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gholamreza Pouladfar ◽  
Anahita Sanaei Dashti ◽  
Mohammad Rahim Kadivar ◽  
Maedeh Jafari ◽  
Bahman Pourabbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Meningitis ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Referral Hospital ◽  
World Health ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae Type ◽  
Tertiary Referral ◽  
Tertiary Referral Hospital ◽  
Who Criteria

Background: Childhood bacterial meningitis (BM) requires prompt and precise diagnosis to provide proper treatment and decline mortality and morbidity. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosing BM in children admitted to a tertiary referral hospital in Shiraz, southern Iran. Materials: We included all 492 children aged one month to 17 years suspected of meningitis who had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leukocytosis admitted to Nemazi Hospital from August 2016 to September 2017. The CSF specimens were examined for routine analysis, Gram staining, and culture. A multiplex real-time PCR was used to identify Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and Neisseria meningitidis in the CSF samples. Seven viruses were also investigated using real-time PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using the WHO criteria and the multiplex real-time PCR results. Results: Seventy-four CSF samples had leukocytosis. Nineteen (22.9%) patients had BM caused by S. pneumoniae (n = 14), Hib (n = 2), Salmonella enterica (n = 2), and N. meningitidis (n = 1). The PCR test detected all cases, except for two with Salmonella meningitis (sensitivity 89.4%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 96%). The WHO criteria detected all cases, except three who received antibiotics at least four days before performing lumbar puncture (sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 98.2%, PPV 94.1%, and NPV 94.7%). Enterovirus was the most common viral etiology (6.75%). Conclusions: The WHO criteria and the multiplex real-time PCR had high accuracy in our setting, and their use could decrease the antibiotic over-prescription in febrile children suspected of meningitis.

Successful Implementation of the World Health Organization Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy in a Referral Hospital in Mali, Africa

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetta Allegranzi ◽  
Hugo Sax ◽  
Loséni Bengaly ◽  
Hervé Riebet ◽  
Daouda K. Minta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
World Health Organization ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
World Health ◽  
Improvement Strategy ◽  
Hand Hygiene Improvement ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization

Objective.To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the World Health Organization hand hygiene improvement strategy in a low-income African country.Design.A before-and-after study from December 2006 through June 2008, with a 6-month baseline evaluation period and a follow-up period of 8 months from the beginning of the intervention.Setting.University Hospital, Bamako, Mali.Participants.TWO hundred twenty-four healthcare workers.Methods.The intervention consisted of introducing a locally produced, alcohol-based handrub; monitoring hand hygiene compliance; providing performance feedback; educating staff; posting reminders in the workplace; and promoting an institutional safety climate according to the World Health Organization multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy. Hand hygiene infrastructure, compliance, healthcare workers' knowledge and perceptions, and handrub consumption were evaluated at baseline and at follow-up.Results.Severe deficiencies in the infrastructure for hand hygiene were identified before the intervention. Local handrub production and quality control proved to be feasible, affordable, and satisfactory. At follow-up, handrubbing was the quasi-exclusive hand hygiene technique (93.3%). Compliance increased from 8.0% at baseline to 21.8% at follow-up (P< .001). Improvement was observed across all professional categories and medical specialities and was independently associated with the intervention (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.5). Knowledge enhanced significantly (P< .05), and perception surveys showed a high appreciation of each strategy component by staff.Conclusions.Multimodal hand hygiene promotion is feasible and effective in a low-income country. Access to handrub was critical for its success. These findings motivated the government of Mali to expand the intervention nationwide. This experience represents a significant advancement for patient safety in developing countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document