scholarly journals Perioperative Complications of Laminoplasty in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy -A Comparative Study Between Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110638
Author(s):  
Shingo Morishita ◽  
Toshitaka Yoshii ◽  
Hiroyuki Inose ◽  
Takashi Hirai ◽  
Masato Yuasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Medical Costs ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Systemic Complications ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Inpatient Database

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives Laminoplasty (LAMP) is one of the effective methods to successfully achieve surgical decompression in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). However, little evidence exists regarding the perioperative complications in LAMP for patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL) compared with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). We aimed to investigate the perioperative complication rates and medical costs of DCM, including OPLL and CSM patients who underwent LAMP using a large national inpatient database. Methods This study identified patients who underwent LAMP for OPLL and CSM from 2010 to 2016 using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We compared the incidence of perioperative complications (systemic and local), reoperation rates, medical costs during hospitalization, and mortality were between the OPLL and CSM groups after propensity score matching. Results This study included 22,714 patients (OPLL: 7485 patients, CSM: 15,229 patients). Consequently, 7169 pairs were matched. More perioperative systemic complications were detected in the OPLL group (one complication: 9.1% vs 7.7%; P = .002), especially for pneumonia (.5% vs .2%; P = .001) and dysphagia (.5% vs .2%; P = .004). The local complication rate was also higher in the OPLL group (paralysis: 1.1% vs .6%, P = .006; spinal fluid leakage: .4% vs .1%, P = .002). The hospitalization costs were approximately $2300 higher ($19,024 vs $16,770; P < .001) in the OPLL group. Conclusions More perioperative complications and higher medical costs were noted in patients with OPLL than in patients with CSM who underwent LAMP.

scholarly journals Perioperative Complications of Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison Between 3 Procedures

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822199830
Author(s):  
Mohamed Kamal Mesregah ◽  
Blake Formanek ◽  
John C. Liu ◽  
Zorica Buser ◽  
Jeffrey C. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Posterior Laminectomy ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
New Onset

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Objectives: To compare the perioperative complications of propensity score-matched cohorts of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), who were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior laminectomy with fusion, or laminoplasty. Methods: The Humana PearlDiver Patient Record Database was queried using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) and the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Propensity score-matched analysis was done using multiple Chi-squared tests with Bonferroni correction of the significance level. Results: Cohorts of 11,790 patients who had ACDF, 2,257 patients who had posterior laminectomy with fusion, and 477 patients who had laminoplasty, were identified. After propensity score matching, all the 3 groups included 464 patients. The incidence of dysphagia increased significantly following ACDF compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001, and in laminectomy with fusion compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001. The incidence of new-onset cervicalgia was higher in ACDF compared to laminoplasty, P = 0.005, and in laminectomy with fusion compared to laminoplasty, P = 0.004. The incidence of limb paralysis increased significantly in laminectomy with fusion compared to ACDF, P = 0.002. The revision rate at 1 year increased significantly in laminectomy with fusion compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001, and in ACDF compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001. Conclusions: The incidence of dysphagia following laminectomy with fusion was not different compared to ACDF. Postoperative new-onset cervicalgia and revisions were least common in laminoplasty. The highest rate of postoperative limb paralysis was noticed in laminectomy with fusion.

scholarly journals Comparison of Laminoplasty and Posterior Fusion Surgery for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nakashima ◽  
Shiro Imagama ◽  
Toshitaka Yoshii ◽  
Satoru Egawa ◽  
Kenichiro Sakai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Posterior Fusion ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Intensity Change ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract This prospective multicenter study formed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare at 27 institutions aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Controversy exists regarding the role of instrumented fusion in the context of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. Among the 479 patients enrolled, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, and increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments showed no significant differences. The overall risk of perioperative complications was lower in LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and C5 palsy was significantly lower in LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than in PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients with PF was significantly smaller than in those with LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at two years after surgery.

A Systematic Review of Definitions for Dysphagia and Dysphonia in Patients Treated Surgically for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110357
Author(s):  
Lindsay Tetreault ◽  
Stefan F. Lange ◽  
Silky Chotai ◽  
Mercedes Lupo ◽  
Michael T. Kryshtalskyj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Sound Production ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Study Design: Systematic review. Surgical decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with perioperative complications, including difficulty or discomfort with swallowing (dysphagia) as well as changes in sound production (dysphonia). This systematic review aims to (1) outline how dysphagia and dysphonia are defined in the literature and (2) assess the quality of definitions using a novel 4-point rating system. Methods: An electronic database search was conducted for studies that reported on dysphagia, dysphonia or other related complications of DCM surgery. Data extracted included study design, surgical details, as well as definitions and rates of surgical complications. A 4-point rating scale was developed to assess the quality of definitions for each complication. Results: Our search yielded 2,673 unique citations, 11 of which met eligibility criteria and were summarized in this review. Defined complications included odynophagia (n = 1), dysphagia (n = 11), dysphonia (n = 2), perioperative swelling complications (n = 2), and soft tissue swelling (n = 3). Rates of dysphagia varied substantially (0.0%-50.0%) depending on whether this complication was patient-reported (4.4%); patient-reported using a modified Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (43.1%) or the Bazaz criteria (8.8%-50.0%); or diagnosed using an extensive protocol consisting of clinical assessment, a bedside swallowing test, evaluation by a speech and language pathologist and a modified barium swallowing test/fiberoptic endoscopy (42.9%). The reported incidences of dysphonia also ranged significantly from 0.6% to 38.0%. Conclusion: There is substantial variability in reported rates of dysphagia and dysphonia due to differences in data collection methods, diagnostic strategies, and definitions. Consolidation of nomenclature will improve evaluation of the overall safety of surgery.

scholarly journals Combined Anterior and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Hung Kuo ◽  
Yi-Hsuan Kuo ◽  
Chih-Chang Chang ◽  
Hsuan-Kan Chang ◽  
Li-Yu Fay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Continuous Type ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
Post Operation

Objective:Cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is not uncommon among Asian ethnic groups. Despite reports comparing the pros and cons of anterior- and posterior-only approaches, the optimal management remains debatable. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent a combined anterior and posterior approach, simultaneous circumferential decompression and fixation, for cervical OPLL.Method:The study retrospectively reviewed patients with OPLL and who underwent circumferential decompression and fixation, combined anterior corpectomy and posterior laminectomy. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale of neck and arm pain, the Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, Neck Disability Index, and Nurick scores at each time-point of evaluation. Radiological evaluations included plain and dynamic radiographs and computed tomography for every patient within 2 years post-operation. Subgroup analyses were further performed between the groups, with and without intra-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage.Results:A total of 41 patients completed the follow-up for more than 2 years (mean = 39.8 months) and were analyzed. Continuous-type OPLL was the most common (44%), followed by segmental (27%), mixed (22%), and localized types (7%) in the cohort. Myelopathy and all other functional outcomes improved significantly at 2 years post-operation (all p &lt; 0.05). There were 13 (32%) patients who had intra-operative CSF leakage. At 2 years post-operation, there were no differences in the demographics, functional outcomes, and complication rates between the CSF-leakage and no-leakage groups. The CSF-leakage group had more patients with continuous-type OPLL than the no-leakage group (77 vs. 29%, p = 0.004 &lt; 0.05). During the follow-up, there was no secondary or revision surgery for pseudomeningocele, pseudarthrosis, or other surgery-related complications.Conclusions:Simultaneous circumferential decompression and fixation combine the surgical benefits of sufficient decompression by the posterior approach and direct decompression of OPLL by the anterior approach. It is an effective surgical option for patients with cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL, given that myelopathy unanimously improved without neurological complications in this study. The fusion rates were high, and reoperation rates were low. Despite higher rates of CSF leakage, there were no related long-term sequelae, and minimal wound complications.

Prevalence of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (19) ◽  
pp. 1320-1328
Author(s):  
Xinyuan Liao ◽  
Zhenxiong Jin ◽  
Lei Shi ◽  
Yin Zhao ◽  
Shengyuan Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

scholarly journals Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nakashima ◽  
Shiro Imagama ◽  
Toshitaka Yoshii ◽  
Satoru Egawa ◽  
Kenichiro Sakai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Posterior Fusion ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Intensity Change ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractThis prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document