Comparison of Microfracture with Extracellular Matrix Augmentation and Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for the Treatment of Medium-Size Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Category: Ankle; Arthroscopy; Basic Sciences/Biologics Introduction/Purpose: Historically, microfracture has been used to treat small talar osteochondral lesions (OLTs) with good results, while osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) has proven superior for the treatment of larger lesions. It is not clear which method is more effective for medium-sized lesions, around the critical size of 150 mm2 above which microfracture outcomes tend to be poor. While OAT carries the risk of co-morbidity at the knee and often requires a malleolar osteotomy, it is thought to result in superior repair tissue compared to microfracture by introducing native hyaline cartilage to the ankle. Microfracture, in contrast, results in the formation of structurally inferior fibrocartilage. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative benefits of OAT and microfracture in the treatment of medium-sized OLTs. Methods:: Patients treated for an OLT with OAT or microfracture by a single surgeon fellowship-trained in foot and ankle orthopedics between 2015 and 2018 were screened. Both OAT and microfracture techniques were augmented with a mixture of extracellular matrix and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) for every case included in this study. Patients treated without ECM-BMAC were excluded. Only patients with a lesion size between 80 and 165 mm2 were included. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Clinical outcomes were collected in the form of FAOS or PROMIS scores, depending on departmental standards at the time of treatment. MRIs were collected for radiographic analysis of cartilage repair tissue. MRIs were scored using the MOCART system by a fellowship trained radiologist and were also evaluated for the presence of cysts and edema. Patient charts were reviewed to determine rates of revision surgery and therapeutic injection for pain. Results:: 52 patients were identified who fit inclusion criteria. 27 of these patients received microfracture and 25 received OAT. The average lesion size for all patients was 117.5 mm2. Patients treated with OAT had significantly higher average total MOCART scores (69 vs. 55, p = 0.04) and significantly lower rates of cyst (14% vs. 55%, p <0.01), edema (59% vs. 90%, p = 0.04), revision surgery (0% vs. 19%, p = 0.05), and therapeutic injection for pain (4% vs. 30%, p = 0.03) compared to patients treated with microfracture. No significant differences were detected in patient reported outcome scores between groups for either FAOS or PROMIS. Age, BMI, lesion size, lesion location, and follow-up time were statistically indistinguishable between groups. Conclusion:: In treating OLTs, the native hyaline cartilage introduced by OAT appears to result in higher quality repair tissue when compared to microfracture, as evidenced by OAT patients’ higher MOCART scores and lower rates of cyst and edema. This advantage was also reflected in the fact that OAT patients required revision surgery and therapeutic injection for pain less frequently than did microfracture patients. OAT may offer benefits over MF that outweigh its greater risk of comorbidity when addressing medium-sized OLTs. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Debridement With Extracellular Matrix Augmentation and Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for Medium-Size Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.1177/1071100720980020 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 107110072098002

Author(s):

Oliver B. Hansen ◽

Stephanie K. Eble ◽

Karan Patel ◽

Taylor N. Cabe ◽

Carolyn Sofka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Extracellular Matrix ◽

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Magnetic Resonance Images ◽

Cartilage Tissue ◽

Medium Size ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Therapeutic Injection ◽

Outcome Scores

Background: Historically, microfracture has been used to treat small talar osteochondral lesions with good results, whereas osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) has proven effective for the treatment of larger lesions. It is not clear which method is more effective for medium-sized lesions around the critical size of 150 mm2, above which microfracture outcomes tend to be poor. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential advantages of OAT augmented with a combination of extracellular matrix and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) compared to debridement with ECM-BMAC (DEB) in the treatment of medium-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Methods: Clinical and radiographic data were collected retrospectively for patients treated by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were scored using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Tissue (MOCART) system and were evaluated for the presence of cysts and edema. Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria, with 25 who received an OAT procedure. Age, body mass index, lesion size, lesion location, and follow-up time were similar between groups. Average MRI follow-up times were 16.7 months for the OAT group and 20.3 months for the DEB group ( P = .38). Results: Patients treated with OAT had significantly higher average total MOCART scores (69 vs 55, P = .04) and significantly lower rates of cyst (14% vs 55%, P < .01), edema (59% vs 90%, P = .04), revision surgery (0% vs 19%, P = .05), and therapeutic injection for pain (4% vs 30%, P = .02) compared to patients treated with DEB. No significant differences were detected in patient-reported outcome scores between groups. Conclusion: The native hyaline cartilage introduced by OAT appears to result in higher-quality repair tissue when compared to DEB, as evidenced by OAT patients’ higher MOCART scores and lower rates of cyst and edema. There was no difference in clinical outcome scores, though OAT patients did not require revision surgery or therapeutic injection for pain as frequently as DEB patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes following Treatment of Talar Osteochondral Lesions with Micronized Cartilage Extracellular Matrix Mixed with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate vs Microfracture

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011419s00165 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (4) ◽

pp. 2473011419S0016

Author(s):

Mark C. Drakos ◽

Taylor N. Cabe ◽

Carolyn Sofka ◽

Peter Fabricant ◽

Jonathan Deland

Keyword(s):

Extracellular Matrix ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Lesion Size ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Group Iii ◽

Group I ◽

Cartilage Extracellular Matrix

Category: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Sports Introduction/Purpose: Historically, microfracture has been the standard surgical treatment for talar osteochondral lesions (OLTs); however, it is associated with unsatisfactory long-term results due to the formation of biomechanically inferior reparative fibrocartilage as opposed to normal hyaline-like cartilage. Thus, the optimal treatment for OLTs remains contested. Application of micronized allogenic cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) as an adjuvant therapy during the treatment of OLTs offers a promising option that could be administered arthroscopically to improve the quality of reparative tissue. The purpose of this study is to provide a case-control series comparing radiographic and functional outcomes following treatment of OLTs with an adjuvant mixture of micronized allogenic cartilage ECM and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) to those achieved following standard microfracture with or without BMAC. Methods: 194 patients (average age 37) with a minimum 1-year follow-up who were treated for an OLT by a fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon were screened for inclusion. 107 patients who received mixed micronized cartilage ECM and BMAC (Group I), 40 who were treated by microfracture augmented with BMAC (Group II), and 47 patients who were treated with traditional microfracture alone (Group III) were identified. Preoperative lesion size, lesion location, and concurrent injuries were recorded retrospectively. Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) were completed preoperatively and postoperatively through the prospective Registry database at the authors’ institution. Outcomes were assessed radiographically at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively by a trained radiologist using the MOCART scoring system. Linear regression modeling was used to assess differences in MOCART scores, post-operative FAOS scores, pre-to-postoperative change in FAOS, and the rate of revision surgery between groups I, II, and III. Results: The average MOCART score for Group I was 62.39, (average follow-up 16.13 months; n = 46), 58.8 (26.82 months; n =25) for Group II and, 55.36 (43.12 months; n=14) for Group III patients (p=0.57). The rate of revision surgery for OLTs treated using adjuvant micronized cartilage ECM was 5% and was significantly lower when compared to a 22.7% rate of revision surgery following microfracture with or without BMAC (p<0.001). Finally, when controlling for lesion size, changes in pre-to-postoperative FAOS Pain and Sports Activities were significantly different amongst the 3 treatment groups (p=0.05). Group I had the greatest improvement in Pain. Conclusion: Micronized allogenic cartilage extracellular matrix serves as an adjunctive therapy that may help improve patients’ radiographic and functional outcomes following treatment of OLTs when compared to outcomes following traditional microfracture. Specifically, use of adjunctive ECM appears to have better postop FAOS Pain scores when controlled for lesion size when compared to microfracture. There is a lower rate of revision surgery with the use of allogenic cartilage ECM in the short to intermediate term when compared with microfracture.

Download Full-text

No Difference in Outcomes Following Osteochondral Allograft with Fresh Precut Cores Compared to Hemi-Condylar Allografts

Cartilage ◽

10.1177/19476035211021911 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 194760352110219

Author(s):

Danielle H. Markus ◽

Anna M. Blaeser ◽

Eoghan T. Hurley ◽

Brian J. Mannino ◽

Kirk A. Campbell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Knee Injury ◽

Lesion Size ◽

Osteochondral Allograft ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Radiographic Outcomes ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Mean

Objective The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes at early to midterm follow-up between fresh precut cores versus hemi-condylar osteochondral allograft (OCAs) in the treatment of symptomatic osteochondral lesions. Design A retrospective review of patients who underwent an OCA was performed. Patient matching between those with OCA harvested from an allograft condyle/patella or a fresh precut allograft core was performed to generate 2 comparable groups. The cartilage at the graft site was assessed with use of a modified Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scoring system and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Results Overall, 52 total patients who underwent OCA with either fresh precut OCA cores ( n = 26) and hemi-condylar OCA ( n = 26) were pair matched at a mean follow-up of 34.0 months (range 12 months to 99 months). The mean ages were 31.5 ± 10.7 for fresh precut cores and 30.9 ± 9.8 for hemi-condylar ( P = 0.673). Males accounted for 36.4% of the overall cohort, and the mean lesion size for fresh precut OCA core was 19.6 mm2 compared to 21.2 mm2 for whole condyle ( P = 0.178). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes including Visual Analogue Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and Tegner ( P > 0.5 for each), or in MOCART score (69.2 vs. 68.3, P = 0.93). Conclusions This study found that there was no difference in patient-reported clinical outcomes or MOCART scores following OCA implantation using fresh precut OCA cores or size matched condylar grafts at early to midterm follow-up.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes following Microfracture with Extracellular Matrix Augmentation versus Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for the Treatment of Medium-Sized Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120s00387 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽

pp. 2325967120S0038

Author(s):

Carolyn Sofka ◽

Taylor Cabe ◽

Jonathan Deland ◽

Mark Drakos ◽

Karan Patel

Keyword(s):

Extracellular Matrix ◽

Physical Health ◽

Pain Intensity ◽

Physical Function ◽

Patient Group ◽

Pain Interference ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Postoperative Change ◽

Patient Reported

Objectives: The aim of this study is to directly compare clinical outcomes following the treatment of medium-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) using a microfracture technique augmented with Extracellular Matrix and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (MFX) versus OAT to determine which treatment is superior for medium-sized lesions. Methods: Patients treated for an OLT between 2015 and 2018 by a single surgeon, fellowship-trained in sports medicine and foot and ankle, were screened for this study. Retrospective chart review determined treatment, lesion size, lesion location, concurrent injuries, and demographic information. Patients at a minimum of 12 months follow-up, treated with MFX or OAT, and lesions sized 80-165mm2 were eligible for inclusion. All surgical repairs were augmented with an adjuvant mixture of micronized cartilage extracellular matrix and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC). Patient-reported functional outcomes were collected through our institution’s prospective Registry database. Patients treated prior to March 2016 were administered preoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaires. Those treated after this date were administered preoperative Physical Function, Pain Interference, Global Physical Health, Global Mental Health, Depression, and Pain Intensity Patient-Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) domains. Both FAOS and PROMIS were administered postoperatively. Postoperative MRIs were assessed using a modified magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. Student’s paired and two-group t-tests were used to evaluate for statistically significant pre-to-postoperative change and differences between procedure groups (p less than 0.05). Results: Twenty-seven patients treated with MFX (age range, 14-58) and twenty-three patients treated using OAT (age range, 22-64) were identified. All OAT patients received a single-plug transplantation. The final average lesion size ± standard deviation (SD) for patients treated with MFX was 115.44mm2± 22.51 (range, 156-80mm2) and 121.78mm2± 23.98 (range, 165-80mm2) for those treated using OAT (p=0.34). On average, functional outcome scores improved pre-to-postoperatively across all scales within both groups. Statistically significant improvements were detected in PROMIS Physical Function (Δ=8.32, p=0.01), Pain Interference (Δ=-7.15, p=0.02), Global Physical Health (Δ=5.87, p=0.03), and Pain Intensity (Δ=-7.06, p=0.05) domains for the MFX cohort. For the OAT patient group, significant pre-to-postoperative change was seen in the FAOS subcategories of Pain (Δ=28.70, p=0.03), Sports Activities (Δ=43.12, p<0.01), and Quality of Life (Δ=43.75, p=0.01); overall FAOS score (Δ=29.93, p=0.01); and PROMIS Physical Function (Δ=13.66, p=0.01), Pain Interference (Δ=-14.58, p<0.01), Global Physical Health (Δ=12.2, p=0.01), Depression (Δ=-4.13, p=0.02), and Pain Intensity (Δ=-16.56, p=0.02) domains. On average, with the exception of the postoperative Sports Activities subscale, postoperative FAOS and pre-to-postoperative change in FAOS were higher and greater in the OAT patient group. Similarly, on average, the OAT group had better PROMIS t-scores indicating higher function or less pain and greater pre-to-postoperative change in each PROMIS domain. The OAT cohort’s average postoperative Pain Interference t-score (± SD) of 43.09 (± 5.81) and Depression t-score of 40.06 (± 6.84) were significantly lower than their respective counterparts in the MFX cohort: 50.08 (± 9.47) for Pain Interference and 48.09 (± 7.86) in Depression. (Table 1) Finally, the mean overall MOCART score was 55.67 (± 24.11) within the MFX cohort, average follow-up 15.29 months, and 71 (± 15.60) within the OAT cohort average follow-up 15.8 months. This difference was also statistically significant (p=0.04). Conclusion: The OAT group had a higher MOCART score indicating the use of a single osteochondral autograft plug may result in better structural repair than microfracture abrasion chondroplasty augmented with a mixture of adjuvant ECM-BMAC. In addition, higher average FAOS scores, better average PROMIS t-scores, and greater pre-to-postoperative change in the OAT patient group indicate functional results may be better in this group as well. Specifically, significantly lower Pain Interference and Depression domains and significantly higher Global Mental Health scores indicate patients treated using OAT experience less pain and better psychological benefits postoperatively compared to patients treated using MFX. These results suggest filling the lesion with transplanted autograft bone and native, hyaline cartilage may perform better than and the biomechanically inferior fibrocartilage produced following microfracture even when augmented with adjuvant therapy. OAT may result in better overall clinical outcomes, specifically in a population of patients with medium sized lesions (range, 80 mm2 -165 mm2).

Download Full-text

Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Are Clinical Outcomes Maintained 10 Years Later?

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546521992471 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 036354652199247

Author(s):

Jae Han Park ◽

Kwang Hwan Park ◽

Jae Yong Cho ◽

Seung Hwan Han ◽

Jin Woo Lee

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Lesion Size ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽

Factors Associated ◽

The Mean

Background: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) is considered the first-line treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). However, the long-term stability of the clinical success of BMS remains unclear. Purpose: To investigate the long-term clinical outcomes among patients who underwent BMS for OLT and to identify prognostic factors for the need for revision surgery. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 202 ankles (189 patients) that were treated with BMS for OLT and had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The visual analog scale for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Prognostic factors associated with revision surgery were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard regression models and log-rank tests. Results: The mean lesion size was 105.32 mm2 (range, 19.75-322.79); 42 ankles (20.8%) had large lesions (≥150 mm2). The mean visual analog scale for pain improved from 7.11 ± 1.73 (mean ± SD) preoperatively to 1.44 ± 1.52, 1.46 ± 1.57, and 1.99 ± 1.67 at 1, 3 to 6, and ≥10 years, respectively, after BMS ( P < .001). The mean ankle-hindfoot score also improved, from 58.22 ± 13.57 preoperatively to 86.88 ± 10.61, 86.17 ± 10.23, and 82.76 ± 11.65 at 1, 3 to 6, and ≥10 years after BMS ( P < .001). The FAOS at the final follow-up was 82.97 ± 13.95 for pain, 81.81 ± 14.64 for symptoms, 83.49 ± 11.04 for activities of daily living, 79.34 ± 11.61 for sports, and 78.71 ± 12.42 for quality of life. Twelve ankles underwent revision surgery after a mean 53.5 months. Significant prognostic factors associated with revision surgery were the size of the lesion (preoperative magnetic resonance imaging measurement ≥150 mm2; P = .014) and obesity (body mass index ≥25; P = .009). Conclusion: BMS for OLT yields satisfactory clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 13.9 years. The success of the surgery may depend on the lesion size and body mass index of the patient.

Download Full-text

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/03635465211015419 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 036354652110154

Author(s):

Adam M. Johannsen ◽

Justin W. Arner ◽

Bryant P. Elrick ◽

Philip-C. Nolte ◽

Dylan R. Rakowski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rotator Cuff ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Rotator Cuff Repair ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Double Row ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Cuff Repair

Background: Modern rotator cuff repair techniques demonstrate favorable early and midterm outcomes, but long-term results have yet to be reported. Purpose: To determine 10-year outcomes and survivorship after arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence 4. Methods: The primary TOE rotator cuff repair procedure was performed using either a knotted suture bridge or knotless tape bridge technique on a series of patients with 1 to 3 tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus. Only patients who were 10 years postsurgery were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected pre- and postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Failure was defined as progression to revision surgery. Results: A total of 91 shoulders (56 men, 31 women) were included between October 2005 and December 2009. Mean follow-up was 11.5 years (range, 10.0-14.1 years). Of 91 shoulders, 5 (5.5%) failed and required revision surgery. Patient-reported outcomes for patients who survived were known for 80% (69/86). Outcomes scores at final follow-up were as follows: ASES, 93.1 ± 10.8; SANE, 87.5 ± 14.2; QuickDASH, 11.1 ± 13.5; and SF-12 physical component summary (PCS), 49.2 ± 10.1. There were statistically significant declines in ASES, SANE, and SF-12 PCS from the 5-year to 10-year follow-up, but none of these changes met the minimally clinically important difference threshold. Median satisfaction at final follow-up was 10 (range, 3-10). From this cohort, Kaplan-Meier survivorship demonstrated a 94.4% survival rate at a minimum of 10 years. Conclusion: Arthroscopic TOE rotator cuff repair demonstrates high patient satisfaction and low revision rates at a mean follow-up of 11.5 years. This information may be directly utilized in surgical decision making and preoperative patient counseling regarding the longevity of modern double-row rotator cuff repair.

Download Full-text

Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis With Lateral Ligament Stabilization for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in Patients With Ankle Instability

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/23259671211007439 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. 232596712110074

Author(s):

Jakob Ackermann ◽

Fabio A. Casari ◽

Christoph Germann ◽

Lizzy Weigelt ◽

Stephan H. Wirth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Cartilage Repair ◽

Ankle Instability ◽

Lesion Size ◽

Lateral Ligament ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Radiographic Outcomes

Background: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) has been shown to result in favorable clinical outcomes in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Though, the influence of ankle instability on cartilage repair of the ankle has yet to be determined. Purpose/Hypothesis: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with and without concomitant lateral ligament stabilization (LLS) undergoing AMIC for the treatment of OLT. It was hypothesized that the outcomes would be comparable between these patient groups. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Twenty-six patients (13 with and 13 without concomitant ankle instability) who underwent AMIC with a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 1.5 years were enrolled in this study. Patients were matched 1:1 according to age, body mass index (BMI), lesion size, and follow-up. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and Tegner, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores were obtained at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A musculoskeletal radiologist scored all grafts according to the MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) 1 and MOCART 2.0 scores. Results: The patients’ mean age was 33.4 ± 12.7 years, with a mean BMI of 26.2 ± 3.7. Patients with concomitant LLS showed worse clinical outcome measured by the AOFAS (85.1 ± 14.4 vs 96.3 ± 5.8; P = .034) and Tegner (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 4.4 ± 2.3; P = .012) scores. Postoperative CAIT and AOFAS scores were significantly correlated in patients with concomitant LLS ( r = 0.766; P = .002). A CAIT score >24 (no functional ankle instability) resulted in AOFAS scores comparable with scores in patients with isolated AMIC (90.1 ± 11.6 vs 95.3 ± 6.6; P = .442). No difference was seen between groups regarding MOCART 1 and 2.0 scores ( P = .714 and P = .371, respectively). Conclusion: Concurrently performed AMIC and LLS in patients with OLT and ankle instability resulted in clinical outcomes comparable with isolated AMIC if postoperative ankle stability was achieved. However, residual ankle instability was associated with worse postoperative outcomes, highlighting the need for adequate stabilization of ankle instability in patients with OLT.

Download Full-text

Smoking Is Associated with Anterior Ankle Impingement After Isolated Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Cartilage ◽

10.1177/1947603520959405 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 194760352095940

Author(s):

Arnd F. Viehöfer ◽

Fabio Casari ◽

Felix W.A. Waibel ◽

Silvan Beeler ◽

Florian B. Imhoff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcome ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Duration Of Symptoms ◽

Ankle Impingement ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Specific Factors ◽

Anterior Ankle Impingement

Objective To determine potential predictive associations between patient-/lesion-specific factors, clinical outcome and anterior ankle impingement in patients that underwent isolated autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). Design Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 34.7 ± 15 years who underwent isolated cartilage repair with AMIC for OLTs were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 1.9 years. Patients completed AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) scores at final follow-up, as well as Tegner scores at final follow-up and retrospectively for preinjury and presurgery time points. Pearson correlation and multivariate regression models were used to distinguish associations between patient-/lesion-specific factors, the need for subsequent surgery due to anterior ankle impingement and patient-reported outcomes. Results At final follow-up, AOFAS and Tegner scores averaged 92.6 ± 8.3 and 5.1 ± 1.8, respectively. Both body mass index (BMI) and duration of symptoms were independent predictors for postoperative AOFAS and Δ preinjury to postsurgery Tegner with positive smoking status showing a trend toward worse AOFAS scores, but this did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.054). Nine patients (25.7%) required subsequent surgery due to anterior ankle impingement. Smoking was the only factor that showed significant correlation with postoperative anterior ankle impingement with an odds ratio of 10.61 when adjusted for BMI and duration of symptoms (95% CI, 1.04-108.57; P = 0.047). Conclusion In particular, patients with normal BMI and chronic symptoms benefit from AMIC for the treatment of OLTs. Conversely, smoking cessation should be considered before AMIC due to the increased risk of subsequent surgery and possibly worse clinical outcome seen in active smokers.

Download Full-text

Twenty-Two-Year Outcome of Cartilage Repair Surgery by Perichondrium Transplantation

Cartilage ◽

10.1177/1947603520958146 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 194760352095814 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maarten P. F. Janssen ◽

Esther G. M. van der Linden ◽

Tim A. E. J. Boymans ◽

Tim J. M. Welting ◽

Lodewijk W. van Rhijn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cartilage Repair ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Treatment Success ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Long Term Outcome ◽

Major Revision ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Ikdc Score

Objective The main purpose of the present study was to assess the risk for major revision surgery after perichondrium transplantation (PT) at a minimum of 22 years postoperatively and to evaluate the influence of patient characteristics. Design Primary outcome was treatment success or failure. Failure of PT was defined as revision surgery in which the transplant was removed, such as (unicondylar) knee arthroplasty or patellectomy. The functioning of nonfailed patients was evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. In addition, the influence of patient characteristics was evaluated. Results Ninety knees in 88 patients, aged 16 to 55 years with symptomatic cartilage defects, were treated by PT. Eighty knees in 78 patients were eligible for analysis and 10 patients were lost to follow-up. Twenty-eight knees in 26 patients had undergone major revision surgery. Previous surgery and a longer time of symptoms prior to PT were significantly associated with an increased risk for failure of cartilage repair. Functioning of the remaining 52 patients and influence of patient characteristics was analyzed using their IKDC score. Their median IKDC score was 39.08, but a relatively young age at transplantation was associated with a higher IKDC score. Conclusions This 22-year follow-up study of PT, with objective outcome parameters next to patient-reported outcome measurements in a unique group of patients, shows that overall 66% was without major revision surgery and patient characteristics also influence long-term outcome of cartilage repair surgery.

Download Full-text

Outcomes Following Treatment of Talar Osteochondral Lesions with a Mixture of Particulate Allogenic Cartilage Extracellular Matrix and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Case Control Series

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967119s00324 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽

pp. 2325967119S0032

Author(s):

Mark C. Drakos ◽

Taylor Nicole Cabe ◽

Carolyn Sofka ◽

Peter D. Fabricant ◽

Jonathan T. Deland

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Extracellular Matrix ◽

Bone Marrow Aspirate ◽

Case Control ◽

Osteochondral Lesions ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Cartilage Extracellular Matrix

Objectives: There continues to be a general lack of consensus regarding the optimal treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Microfracture, once considered the gold-standard, has been associated with poor long-term results due to the formation of biomechanically inferior reparative fibrocartilage as opposed to hyaline cartilage. Particulate allogenic cartilage extracellular matrix offers a promising solution as an adjuvant therapy; however, there is currently minimal objective evidence to indicate its effect on post-operative outcomes. This study compares post-operative radiographic and clinical outcomes following treatment of OLTs with an adjuvant mixture of particulate cartilage extracellular matrix and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) against outcomes following microfracture with or without BMAC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with an OLT and treated by a fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon were screened for inclusion. Those whose surgical intervention included microfracture, microfracture augmented with BMAC alone, or microfracture augmented with a mixture of BMAC and particulate allogenic cartilage extracellular matrix were eligible for this case-control study. Lesion size, location, and concurrent injuries were recorded following retrospective chart review. Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) were collected pre-operatively and at a minimum of 1 year post-operatively through the prospective Registry database at the authors’ institution. Modified magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring evaluated the structural quality of repaired lesions on MRIs collected greater than six months post-operatively. Differences in post-operative MOCART and FAOS scores were evaluated using ANOVA tests. Results: Forty-seven patients treated with microfracture alone, forty-seven treated with microfracture augmented by BMAC, and fifty-two treated with an adjuvant mixture of particulate allogenic cartilage extracellular matrix and BMAC were identified at a minimum of 2 years post-operatively. Average MOCART scores were significantly different between treatment groups (p=0.03). At an average follow-up of 10.86 months, patients who received adjunctive therapy had an average MOCART score of 73.5 ± 11.13. At an average follow-up of 23.06 months and 43.6 months respectively, patients treated with microfracture and BMAC and microfracture alone scored 63.33 ± 22.23 and 55 ± 23.92. There was no detectable statistically significant difference in post-operative FAOS scores between treatment groups. With respect to revision surgery, two patients (3.84%) originally treated with adjuvant particulate cartilage extracellular matrix and BMAC have required a secondary surgery as opposed to nine patients (9.57%) treated with microfracture and BMAC or microfracture alone. Conclusion: Increases in post-operative FAOS scores compared to pre-operative FAOS scores for all treatment groups indicate patients’ function and symptoms improved regardless of intervention received. However, significantly higher MOCART scores for the particulate cartilage extracellular matrix and BMAC treatment group suggest adjuvant treatment may help achieve better post-operative fill and structural integrity. Thus, long-term outcomes and the quality of reparative tissues may be improved through use of adjuvant treatments such as particulate allogenic cartilage extracellular matrix and BMAC.

Download Full-text