Detection of S Phase Cells with an Antibody to Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA)

1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beppu
2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 5193-5202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Sabbioneda ◽  
Audrey M. Gourdin ◽  
Catherine M. Green ◽  
Angelika Zotter ◽  
Giuseppina Giglia-Mari ◽  
...  

Y-family DNA polymerases carry out translesion synthesis past damaged DNA. DNA polymerases (pol) η and ι are usually uniformly distributed through the nucleus but accumulate in replication foci during S phase. DNA-damaging treatments result in an increase in S phase cells containing polymerase foci. Using photobleaching techniques, we show that polη is highly mobile in human fibroblasts. Even when localized in replication foci, it is only transiently immobilized. Although ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is not required for the localization of polη in foci, it results in an increased residence time in foci. polι is even more mobile than polη, both when uniformly distributed and when localized in foci. Kinetic modeling suggests that both polη and polι diffuse through the cell but that they are transiently immobilized for ∼150 ms, with a larger proportion of polη than polι immobilized at any time. Treatment of cells with DRAQ5, which results in temporary opening of the chromatin structure, causes a dramatic immobilization of polη but not polι. Our data are consistent with a model in which the polymerases are transiently probing the DNA/chromatin. When DNA is exposed at replication forks, the polymerase residence times increase, and this is further facilitated by the ubiquitination of PCNA.


Microbiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 155 (11) ◽  
pp. 3748-3757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devanand Kumar ◽  
Neha Minocha ◽  
Kalpana Rajanala ◽  
Swati Saha

DNA replication in eukaryotes is a highly conserved process marked by the licensing of multiple origins, with pre-replication complex assembly in G1 phase, followed by the onset of replication at these origins in S phase. The two strands replicate by different mechanisms, and DNA synthesis is brought about by the activity of the replicative DNA polymerases Pol δ and Pol ϵ. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) augments the processivity of these polymerases by serving as a DNA sliding clamp protein. This study reports the cloning of PCNA from the protozoan Leishmania donovani, which is the causative agent of the systemic disease visceral leishmaniasis. PCNA was demonstrated to be robustly expressed in actively proliferating L. donovani promastigotes. We found that the protein was present primarily in the nucleus throughout the cell cycle, and it was found in both proliferating procyclic and metacyclic promastigotes. However, levels of expression of PCNA varied through cell cycle progression, with maximum expression evident in G1 and S phases. The subnuclear pattern of expression of PCNA differed in different stages of the cell cycle; it formed distinct subnuclear foci in S phase, while it was distributed in a more diffuse pattern in G2/M phase and post-mitotic phase cells. These subnuclear foci are the sites of active DNA replication, suggesting that replication factories exist in Leishmania, as they do in higher eukaryotes, thus opening avenues for investigating other Leishmania proteins that are involved in DNA replication as part of these replication factories.


2003 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrysoula J. Belessi ◽  
Aikaterini S. Parasi ◽  
Helen S. Manioudaki ◽  
Nikolaos P. Laoutaris ◽  
Nikolaos C. Legakis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (9) ◽  
pp. E2030-E2039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Janke ◽  
Grant A. King ◽  
Martin Kupiec ◽  
Jasper Rine

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, heterochromatin structures required for transcriptional silencing of the HML and HMR loci are duplicated in coordination with passing DNA replication forks. Despite major reorganization of chromatin structure, the heterochromatic, transcriptionally silent states of HML and HMR are successfully maintained throughout S-phase. Mutations of specific components of the replisome diminish the capacity to maintain silencing of HML and HMR through replication. Similarly, mutations in histone chaperones involved in replication-coupled nucleosome assembly reduce gene silencing. Bridging these observations, we determined that the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) unloading activity of Elg1 was important for coordinating DNA replication forks with the process of replication-coupled nucleosome assembly to maintain silencing of HML and HMR through S-phase. Collectively, these data identified a mechanism by which chromatin reassembly is coordinated with DNA replication to maintain silencing through S-phase.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2976-2985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Frampton ◽  
Anja Irmisch ◽  
Catherine M. Green ◽  
Andrea Neiss ◽  
Michelle Trickey ◽  
...  

Ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays a crucial role in regulating replication past DNA damage in eukaryotes, but the detailed mechanisms appear to vary in different organisms. We have examined the modification of PCNA in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We find that, in response to UV irradiation, PCNA is mono- and poly-ubiquitinated in a manner similar to that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However in undamaged Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells, PCNA is ubiquitinated in S phase, whereas in S. cerevisiae it is sumoylated. Furthermore we find that, unlike in S. cerevisiae, mutants defective in ubiquitination of PCNA are also sensitive to ionizing radiation, and PCNA is ubiquitinated after exposure of cells to ionizing radiation, in a manner similar to the response to UV-irradiation. We show that PCNA modification and cell cycle checkpoints represent two independent signals in response to DNA damage. Finally, we unexpectedly find that PCNA is ubiquitinated in response to DNA damage when cells are arrested in G2.


1994 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1177-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Beppu ◽  
Y Ishida ◽  
H Arai ◽  
T Wada ◽  
N Uesugi ◽  
...  

We estimated the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in HeLa S3 cells by flow cytometry with monoclonal antibody (MAb) PC10. HeLa cells were fixed with six different fixation procedures: 15-min and 30-min acetone, 15-min acetone followed by 15-min methanol (acetone/methanol), 30-min methanol, 15-min methanol followed by 15-min acetone (methanol/acetone), and a mixture of acetone and methanol. The fixed cells were applied to MAb PC10 against PCNA and then treated with FITC. With five fixation procedures except for acetone/methanol, PCNA was expressed in almost all cells with similar shapes and different FITC intensity levels on PCNA/DNA bivariate cytograms, whereas acetone/methanol fixation allowed PCNA detection in S-phase cells with a cytogram that showed a horseshoe-like pattern with a peak level at mid-S-phase. Flow cytometric dual parameter analysis of PCNA/BrdU was carried out in HeLa cells to confirm detection of PCNA in S-phase cells with acetone/methanol fixation. The population of cells stained for both parameters, i.e., S-phase cells, was obviously discriminated from that of the non-S-phase cell in PCNA/BrdU bivariate cytograms. These results strongly suggest that PCNA used with acetone/methanol fixation would be equal to BrdU as an S-phase marker.


1993 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
K M Connolly ◽  
M S Bogdanffy

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was evaluated as a marker of cell proliferation in formalin-fixed rat liver tissue through a comparative study with the thymidine analogue 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU). The comparison was conducted through the introduction of a dual immunohistochemical procedure that allows the simultaneous detection of the two antigens. The results of this study suggest that although statistically similar indexes for each can be achieved, what has been reported to be the "S-phase fraction" of PCNA-labeled nuclei is significantly different from the population of cells marked by BrdU. The data also suggest that the reason for this difference is that the "S-phase fraction" of PCNA-labeled nuclei is the population of cells in late G1- and early S-phases. BrdU, by comparison, is incorporated into cells only during DNA synthesis. Therefore, although BrdU and PCNA labeling techniques may both be effective for evaluating cell proliferation rates, it must be recognized that labeling indices derived from each are not entirely synonymous. The method presented here for the simultaneous labeling of PCNA and BrdU antigens may have utility in studies of cell cycle perturbations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document