scholarly journals Monosomal karyotype in adult acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic impact and outcome after different treatment strategies

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 551-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Kayser ◽  
Manuela Zucknick ◽  
Konstanze Döhner ◽  
Jürgen Krauter ◽  
Claus-Henning Köhne ◽  
...  

We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of monosomal karyotype (MK) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the context of the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification and to evaluate the outcome of MK+ patients after allogeneic HSCT. Of 1058 patients with abnormal cytogenetics, 319 (30%) were MK MK+. MK+ patients were significantly older (P = .0001), had lower white blood counts (P = .0006), and lower percentages of BM blasts (P = .0004); MK was associated with the presence of −5/5q−, −7, 7q−, abnl(12p), abnl(17p), −18/18q−, −20/20q−, inv(3)/t(3;3), complex karyotype (CK), and myelodysplasia (MDS)–related cytogenetic abnormalities (P < .0001, each); and NPM1 mutations (P < .0001), FLT3 internal tandem duplications (P < .0001), and tyrosine kinase domain mutations (P = .02) were less frequent in MK+. Response to induction therapy and overall survival in MK+ patients were dismal with a complete remission rate of 32.5% and a 4-year survival of 9%. MK retained its prognostic impact in AML with CK, AML with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities, and in a revised definition (MK-R) excluding cases with recurrent genetic abnormalities according to WHO classification and those with derivative chromosomes not leading to true monosomies. In younger patients, allogeneic HSCT from matched related and unrelated donors resulted in a limited improvement of overall survival.

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Haferlach ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Helmut Löffler ◽  
Winfried Gassmann ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
...  

Purpose: On the basis of cytomorphology according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification, we evaluated the prognostic impact of dysplastic features and other parameters in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We also assessed the clinical significance of the recently introduced World Health Organization (WHO) classification for AML, which proposed dysplasia as a new parameter for classification. Patients and Methods: We analyzed prospectively 614 patients with de novo AML, all of whom were diagnosed by central morphologic analysis and treated within the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG)-92 or the AMLCG-acute promyalocytic leukemia study. Results: Patients with AML M3, M3v, or M4eo demonstrated a better outcome compared with all other FAB subtypes (P < .001); no prognostic difference was observed among other FAB subtypes. The presence or absence of dysplasia failed to demonstrate prognostic relevance. Other prognostic markers, such as age, cytogenetics, presence of Auer rods, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level at diagnosis, all showed significant impact on overall and event-free survival in univariate analyses (P < .001 for all parameters tested). However, in a multivariate analysis, only cytogenetics (unfavorable or favorable), age, and high LDH maintained their prognostic impact. Dysplasia was not found to be an independent prognostic parameter, but the detection of trilineage dysplasia correlated with unfavorable cytogenetics. Conclusion: Our results indicate that cytomorphology and classification according to FAB criteria are still necessary for the diagnosis of AML but have no relevance for prognosis in addition to cytogenetics. Our results suggest that the WHO classification should be further developed by using cytogenetics as the main determinant of biology. Dysplastic features, in particular, have no additional impact on predicting prognosis when cytogenetics are taken into account.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (29) ◽  
pp. 4791-4797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitri A. Breems ◽  
Wim L.J. Van Putten ◽  
Georgine E. De Greef ◽  
Shama L. Van Zelderen-Bhola ◽  
Klasien B.J. Gerssen-Schoorl ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate the prognostic value of various cytogenetic components of a complex karyotype in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Cytogenetics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in 1,975 AML patients age 15 to 60 years. Results Besides AML with normal cytogenetics (CN) and core binding factor (CBF) abnormalities, we distinguished 733 patients with cytogenetic abnormalities. Among the latter subgroup, loss of a single chromosome (n = 109) conferred negative prognostic impact (4-year OS, 12%; poor outcome). Loss of chromosome 7 was most common, but outcome of AML patients with single monosomy −7 (n = 63; 4-year OS, 13%) and other single autosomal monosomies (n = 46; 4-year OS, 12%) did not differ. Structural chromosomal abnormalities influenced prognosis only in association with a single autosomal monosomy (4-year OS, 4% for very poor v 24% for poor). We derived a monosomal karyotype (MK) as a predictor for very poor prognosis of AML that refers to two or more distinct autosomal chromosome monosomies (n = 116; 4-year OS, 3%) or one single autosomal monosomy in the presence of structural abnormalities (n = 68; 4-year OS, 4%). In direct comparisons, MK provides significantly better prognostic prediction than the traditionally defined complex karyotype, which considers any three or more or five or more clonal cytogenetic abnormalities, and also than various individual specific cytogenetic abnormalities (eg, del[5q], inv[3]/t[3;3]) associated with very poor outcome. Conclusion MK enables (in addition to CN and CBF) the prognostic classification of two new aggregates of cytogenetically abnormal AML, the unfavorable risk MK-negative category (4-year OS, 26% ± 2%) and the highly unfavorable risk MK-positive category (4-year OS, 4% ± 1%).


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Roland B Walter

The acute leukemias are malignant clonal disorders characterized by aberrant differentiation and proliferation of transformed hematopoietic progenitor cells. These cells accumulate within the bone marrow and lead to suppression of the production of normal blood cells, with resulting symptoms from varying degrees of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia or from infiltration into tissues. They are currently classified by their presumed cell of origin, although the field is moving rapidly to genetic subclassification. This review covers epidemiology; etiology; classification of leukemia by morphology, immunophenotyping, and cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities; cytogenetics of acute leukemia; general principles of therapy; acute myeloid leukemia; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; and future possibilities. The figure shows the incidence of acute leukemias in the United States. Tables list World Health Organization (WHO) classification of acute myeloid leukemia and related neoplasms, expression of cell surface and cytoplasmic markers for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia and mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, WHO classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, WHO classification of acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage, WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes, European LeukemiaNet cytogenetic and molecular genetic subsets in acute myeloid leukemia with prognostic importance, cytogenetic and molecular subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, terminology used in leukemia treatment, and treatment outcome for adults with acute leukemia. This review contains 1 highly rendered figure, 9 tables, and 117 references.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda de Lourdes Nunes ◽  
Cybele de Andrade Paes ◽  
Mitiko Murao ◽  
Marcos Borato Viana ◽  
Benigna Maria De Oliveira

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (19) ◽  
pp. 4505-4511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Ingeborg Gaidzik ◽  
Richard Friedrich Schlenk ◽  
Simone Moschny ◽  
Annegret Becker ◽  
Lars Bullinger ◽  
...  

AbstractTo evaluate the incidence and clinical impact of WT1 gene mutations in younger adult patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML), sequencing of the complete coding region was performed in diagnostic samples from 617 patients who were treated on 3 German-Austrian AML Study Group protocols. WT1 mutations were identified in 78 (12.6%) of the 617 patients; mutations clustered in exon 7 (54 of 78) and exon 9 (13 of 78), but also occurred in exons 1, 2, 3, and 8. WT1 mutations were significantly associated with younger age, higher serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, higher blood blast counts, and the additional presence of FLT3-ITD (P < .001) and CEBPA mutations (P = .004). There was no difference in relapse-free survival and overall survival between patients with (WT1mut) or without WT1 mutations. Subset analysis showed that patients with the genotype WT1mut/FLT3-ITDpos had a lower complete remission rate (P = .003) and an inferior relapse-free survival (P = .006) and overall survival (P < .001) compared with those with the genotype WT1mut/FLT3-ITDneg. In conclusion, in our large cohort of younger adults with CN-AML, WT1 mutation as a single molecular marker did not impact on outcome. However, our data suggest a negative impact of the genotype WT1mut/FLT3-ITDpos.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 922-922
Author(s):  
Olga K Weinberg ◽  
Mahesh Seetharam ◽  
Li Ren ◽  
Lisa Ma ◽  
Katie Seo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although some studies have validated the 2001 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including the importance of multilineage dysplasia, others have suggested that multilineage dysplasia correlates with unfavorable cytogenetics but has no independent impact on prognosis. In 2008, the revised WHO classification system has expanded this category into “AML with myelodysplasia-related changes” (AML-MRC) that now includes 1) AML arising from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 2) AML with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities, and 3) AML with multilineage dysplasia. An individual case may fall into this category by meeting any of the criteria. The goal of the current study is to clinically characterize this newly defined AML-MRC subgroup. Methods: One-hundred consecutive AML patients diagnosed at Stanford University Hospital between 2005 and 2007 with adequate material for mutation analysis were studied. Cases were classified using the 2008 WHO criteria. Diagnostic cytogenetic findings were reviewed and patients were stratified into risk groups using Southwest Oncology Group criteria. Available flow cytometry immunophenotyping results were reviewed and all samples were tested for NPM, FLT3 (ITD and D835) and CEBPA mutations. Clinical parameters including hemogram data at time of diagnosis were reviewed. Clinical follow-up including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and complete remission (CR) rates were retrospectively determined. Kaplan-Meier methods and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare the clinical data. Results: The cases included 57 males and 43 females with a median age of 56 (range 17–81). Cytogenetic risk-group stratification resulted in 9 patients with favorable, 65 with intermediate and 19 with unfavorable risk status. Using the 2008 WHO criteria, there were 48 AML-MRC, 40 AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS), 9 AML with either t(8;21), inv(16) or t(15;17), and 3 therapy related AMLs. Overall, 26 patients had a NPM1 mutation (16 of which were FLT3 mutated), 25 had FLT3-ITD, 8 had FLT3-D835 and 9 had a CEBPA mutation (3 of which were FLT3 mutated). Compared to AML-NOS, patients with AML-MRC were significantly older (59 vs 51 years, p=0.014) and presented with lower hemoglobin (9 vs 11.2 g/dL, p=0.044), lower platelets (47 vs 54 K/uL, p=0.059), unfavorable cytogenetics (14/46 vs 3/36, p=0.014) and exhibited a decreased frequency of CEBPA mutation (0/46 vs 7/40, p=0.001) as compared to AML-NOS. Based on the flow cytometry immunophenotyping, the blasts from patients with AML-MRC more frequently expressed CD14 compared to AML-NOS (10/46 vs 4/36, p=0.048). Clinical outcome data showed that patients with AML-MRC had a significantly worse OS, PFS and CR compared to AML-NOS (Figure, all p<0.0001). Even after excluding the 14 patients with unfavorable cytogenetics from the AML-MRC group, the remaining patients with AML-MRC (defined solely by the presence of multilineage dysplasia) had worse outcomes compared to all AML-NOS patients (OS, p=0.013; PFS, p=0.012; CR, p=0.0076). Among 65 patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics, the outcome difference between the AML-MRC and AML-NOS groups remained significant (OS, p=0.0292; PFS, p=0.0232), also indicating prognostic significance of multilineage dysplasia. Within the AML-MRC group, univariate analysis showed that low platelets (<20,000/mm3), FLT3-D835 mutation and MDS-related cytogenetics correlated with OS (p=0.0456, p=0.0265, p=0.002 respectively) and PFS (p=0.0478, p=0.0626, p=0.001). A multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, performed on the entire group, identified unfavorable cytogenetic risk group, advanced age (> 60), FLT3-ITD and AML-MRC status as significant predictors of worse OS with the following respective hazard ratios: 2.82 (95% CI, 1.52–5.26), 2.11 (1.01–4.42), 1.98 (1.01–3.90), 1.92 (1.01–3.65). Conclusion: The newly defined WHO category of AML-MRC exhibits a significantly worse clinical outcome compared to AML-NOS and is predictive of worse overall survival in the multivariate analysis of AML patients, independent of age or cytogenetic risk group. These findings support the clinical, morphologic and cytogenetic criteria for this 2008 WHO AML category. Figure Figure


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 526-526
Author(s):  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Martin S. Tallman ◽  
Wensheng He ◽  
Brent Logan ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 526 In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), the indications for matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants and unrelated donor (URD) haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are different. We sought to determine the prognostic impact of donor type on the outcomes of AML with adverse risk karyotype in CR1, a high-risk AML population considered as a standard indication for MSD and URD HSCT. We evaluated the outcomes of 584 patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for AML with adverse risk karyotype in CR1 between 1995 and 2006, reported to the CIBMTR. Adverse risk karyotype was defined according to SWOG/ECOG classification. Cytogenetics abnormalities were further classified as: complex karyotype (3 or more abnormalities), 32%; and Non-complex divided as abnormal chromosome 7, 25%; chromosome 5, 9%; MLL gene rearrangements, 18%; t (6;9), 5%; and others, 10%. 226 patients underwent MSD and 358 URD. URD were classified based on high resolution typing as:” well matched” [n=254 (71%)] with no known disparity at HLA A, B, C, DRB1; and, “partially matched” [n=104 (29%)] with one locus known or likely mismatched. Previous MDS was present in 19% and 14% had therapy-induced (t-AML). Conditioning regimens were myeloablative and reduced intensity in 74% and 26%, respectively. At 3 years treatment-related mortality (TRM) incidence was 28% (95% CI 24-31); relapse 36%(32-40); disease-free survival (DFS) 36%(32-41) and overall survival (OS) 39%(35-44). Multivariate analyses are summarized in the table. “Well matched” URD and MSD yielded similar DFS and OS, while outcomes were significantly inferior for “partially matched” URD. Cytogenetically defined subsets had similar outcomes. Evaluated as a time-dependent covariate, chronic GVHD had a significantly lower risk of relapse (RR 0.68, p=0.046), while acute GVHD had no effect (RR 0.99, p=0.96). “Well matched” URD and MSD lead to similar DFS and OS in AML CR1patients with adverse risk karyotype. The pool of patients who may benefit from graft-vs-leukemia effect generated with allogeneic HSCT may be considerably expanded with “well-matched” URD HSCT. If a suitable MSD is not availabel, “well-matched” URD should be strongly considered where a MSD HSCT would otherwise be undertaken. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2594-2594
Author(s):  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
Piera Angelillo ◽  
Laura Vicari ◽  
Clelia Criscuolo ◽  
Felicetto Ferrara

Abstract Abstract 2594 Background: Abnormalities affecting long arm of chromosome 3 are rare but recurrent in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and are detected in a variable percentage of AML patients according to different series. The 2008 World Health Organization classification recognizes AML with inv(3)(q21q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) as a distinct subtype characterized by a poor prognosis. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation seems to improve outcome in eligible patients with these aberrations. Inappropriate expression of the ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) was demonstrated in virtually all patients with t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) and inv(3)(q21q26.2); as well as in a majority of patients with other 3q26 rearrangements. Other chromosome 3 abnormalities are rarely recognized in AML patients; clinical and prognostic relevance of these alterations is not yet defined. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic impact of chromosome 3 abnormalities on disease characteristics and treatment outcome in AML. Patients and methods: A total of 580 consecutive adult patients were diagnosed with AML at our institution between February 2002 and July 2012. Conventional cytogenetic analysis performed on diagnostic bone marrow samples detected the presence of 3q abnormalities in 16 patients (2.7%). Two patients were lost to follow-up and were not evaluated for survival analysis. Molecular status of FLT3 and NPM1 was also performed and results are available for 10 patients. Median follow-up time for patients in this series was 47 months ( range 6–125). Results: There were 10 male and 6 female patients, the median age being 64.5 years (range 33–81), 10 patients had de novo AML while 6 evolved from a previously diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Karyotype from MDS phase was available in 2 patients; both acquired 3q rearrangement at time of progression to AML. At time of diagnosis median haemoglobin value was 9.0 g/dL (range 4–11); median leucocyte count was 10.5 × 103̂/L (range 2.3 – 431). Median platelet count was 116 × 109̂/L (range 28 – 529), consistently with previous studies, which have shown that these patients present with higher platelet count at diagnosis when compared with no 3q rearranged ones. Regarding cytogenetic features 3 patients had t(3;3)(q21;q26), 3 patients had inv(3) (q21; q26), 3 patients showed a balanced rearrangement involving 3q26, while 6 patients harbored a del3q. One patient showed monosomy 3. Additional chromosomal changes were demonstrated in 5 patients, two of them had a complex karyotype (see Table 1), 3 had a monosomy 7. Thirteen patients out of 14 received intensive induction chemotherapy; complete remission (CR) was achieved in 5 patients (CR rate: 35.7%), the remaining 7 patients were resistant to induction as well as to salvage chemotherapy. Four patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. Median overall survival in this series is 5.5 months (range 0 – 20). At present only one patient is still alive and in CR, 20 months after diagnosis. Median disease free survival (DFS) for patients achieving a CR was 9 months (range 6–20). Median overall survival for patients resistant to first-line therapy was 3 months (range 0–6). Clinical features and treatment outcome of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Conclusions: The incidence of 3q abnormalities in our single institution series is 2.4%, in keeping with previous studies. Our findings confirm the association between these alterations and thrombocytosis at diagnosis, preceding MDS or multilineage dysplasia, presence in all FAB subtypes (except M3), association with additional chromosomal abnormalities as well as the poor response to conventional chemotherapy (CR rate 35.7%), and very short DFS in spite of obtaining CR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (20) ◽  
pp. 5613-5621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie M. Noordermeer ◽  
Mathijs A. Sanders ◽  
Christian Gilissen ◽  
Evelyn Tönnissen ◽  
Adrian van der Heijden ◽  
...  

Abstract Aberrations in protein ubiquitination have recently been identified in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We studied whether expression changes of more than 1600 ubiquitination related genes correlated with clinical outcome in 525 adult AML patients. High expression of one of these genes, BRE, was observed in 3% of the cases and predicted favorable prognosis independently of known prognostic factors (5-year overall survival: 57%). Remarkably, unsupervised expression profiling showed that 86% of high BRE-expressing patients were confined to a previously unrecognized cluster. High BRE expression was mutually exclusive with FLT3 ITD, CEBPA, IDH1, and IDH2 mutations, EVI1 overexpression, and favorable karyotypes. In contrast, high BRE expression co-occurred strongly with FAB M5 morphology and MLL-AF9 fusions. Within the group of MLL-AF9–positive patients, high BRE expression predicted superior survival, while normal BRE expression predicted extremely poor survival (5-year overall survival of 80% vs 0%, respectively, P = .0002). Both the co-occurrence of high BRE expression with MLL-AF9 and its prognostic impact were confirmed in an independent cohort of 436 AML patients. Thus, high BRE expression defines a novel subtype of adult AML characterized by a favorable prognosis. This work contributes to improved risk stratification in AML, especially among MLL-AF9–positive patients.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (9) ◽  
pp. 1906-1908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga K. Weinberg ◽  
Mahesh Seetharam ◽  
Li Ren ◽  
Katie Seo ◽  
Lisa Ma ◽  
...  

Although some studies have validated the 2001 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including the importance of multilineage dysplasia, others have suggested that multilineage dysplasia correlates with unfavorable cytogenetics but has no independent impact on prognosis. In 2008, the revised WHO classification has expanded this category into “AML with myelodysplasia-related changes” (AML-MRC). We evaluated the clinical, pathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features of 100 AML patients using the 2008 WHO criteria. Patients underwent genetic screening for NPM1, FLT3-ITD, FLT3-D835, and CEBPA mutations. Compared with patients with AML, not otherwise specified, patients with AML-MRC were significantly older (P = .014), presented with a lower hemoglobin (P = .044), more frequently expressed CD14 (P = .048), and exhibited a decreased frequency of CEBPA mutations (P = .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with AML-MRC had a significantly worse overall survival, progression-free survival, and complete response compared with AML-not otherwise specified (all P < .001). These data support the clinical, morphologic, and cytogenetic criteria for this 2008 WHO AML category.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document