Myeloma-Induced Alterations of Glutamine Metabolism Impair Bone Microenvironment Niche in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) cells are characterized by tight dependence on the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment that exerts a permissive role on cell growth and survival. In turn, MM cells markedly modify their microenvironment leading, in particular, to the development of osteolytic bone lesions. Recently, we demonstrated that metabolic alterations is a major feature of MM cells showing that BM plasma of MM patients is characterized by lower levels of Glutamine (Gln) and higher levels of Glutamate (Glu) and ammonium when compared with patients with smoldering MM (SMM) and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Uncertain Significance (MGUS). In the majority of MM patients MM cells are Gln-addicted since they strictly depend on extracellular Gln, do not express Glutamine Synthetase (GS), the enzyme that synthetizes Gln from Glu and ammonium, and are endowed with high levels of the Gln transporter ASCT2. Based on this evidence, we have hypothesized that the peculiar Gln metabolism of MM cells may have a significant impact on the relationship with the bone microenvironment and contribute to the development of osteolytic lesions. We firstly characterized a panel of human MM cell lines (HMCLs) for their GS expression and response to decreasing levels of Gln. The majority of HMCLs, which did not express GS, consumed large amounts of extracellular Gln but secreted nearly half of the amino acid as Glu. Two HMCLs, MM1.S and U266, with a sizable GS expression, were less sensitive to Gln deprivation and secreted less Glu in the extracellular space compared with GS-negative HMCLs. Consistently, the activity of the Glu exchanger x-CT (the product of SLC7A11 gene) was lower in GS-positive than in GS-negative cells. The response to Gln starvation was then studied in mesenchymal stromal cell line (MSC), as well as in osteoblastic (HOBIT) and pre-osteocytic cells (HOB-01). HOBIT and HOB-01 were more sensitive to Gln depletion than MSC. Indeed, while MSC showed a low EC50 for Gln (0.064mM), which is 10-times lower than the physiological blood Gln concentration (around 0.6 mM), the EC50 values of HOBIT and HOB-01 cells were 0.250 mM and 0.297mM, respectively. Furthermore, L-methionine sulfoximine (MSO), an irreversible inhibitor of GS, emphasized the effects of Gln deprivation on all the cell lines tested. Indeed, Gln deprivation enhanced the expression of GS, suggesting that both stromal and osteoblastic cells exploit the enzyme to counteract Gln deprivation. On the basis of these data, we assessed the effects of Gln and Glu on osteogenic differentiation by incubating MSC, either immortalized or primary, with an osteogenic medium containing different concentrations of Gln and Glu. After 2 weeks, compared with cells differentiated in high Gln/high Glu conditions, MSC incubated in the presence of decreased Gln and increased Glu showed lower osteogenic ability, as assessed by real time PCR and ALP staining. Lastly, MSC co-cultured for 72 hours with GS-negative, but not with GS-positive HMCLs, showed reduced viability and increased GS expression. Lastly, to put in a translational perspective these in vitro observations, we analyzed the BM plasma levels of Gln and Glu in a cohort of 41 patients with newly diagnosed MM, including 9 smoldering MM (SMM) and 32 active MM patients (20 of them with osteolytic bone disease, 12 of them without bone disease). All 20 osteolytic MM patients had more than three osteolytic lesions. We found that MM patients had lower Gln levels and higher Glu levels than SMM patients. Moreover, when compared with MM patients without bone disease, MM patients with bone disease showed lower levels of Gln and higher levels of Glu. The results of these analyses are being continuously updated increasing the number of samples tested. Overall, these results indicate that MM cells are able to create a low-Gln/high-Glu bone marrow microenvironment that sustains GS expression in bone cells and impairs their differentiation and viability. Thus, the peculiar metabolic milieu in the MM bone microenvironment affects the relationship between neoplastic and bone cells and may contribute to the development of osteolytic bone disease in MM patients. Disclosures Aversa: Astellas: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Basilea: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giuliani:Takeda Pharmaceutical Co: Research Funding; Celgene Italy: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutica: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Relationship between Bone Marrow PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression and the Presence of Osteolytic Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118200 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3183-3183

Author(s):

Federica Costa ◽

Marina Bolzoni ◽

Rosanna Vescovini ◽

Fabrizio Accardi ◽

Anna Benedetta Dalla Palma ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bone Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Osteolytic Lesions ◽

Cd8 Cells ◽

Monoclonal Gammopathies ◽

Hla Dr ◽

Osteolytic Bone Disease

Abstract Alterations of the bone marrow (BM) immune-microenvironment characterize the progression of monoclonal gammopathies and the development of osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM). MM patients exhibit immune dysfunctions as impaired dendritic, NK and T cells, whereas the onset of MM osteolytic lesions is associated to an increased prevalence of Th17 cells. Recently, the pathophysiological role of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) pathway together with an increase of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the induction of tumor tolerance and immune evasion has been underlined with a therapeutic relevance. However, unclear data on the expression profile of PD-1/PD-L1 axis in MM patients have been reported and it is not known if this axis could be related with the presence of osteolytic bone disease. In order to elucidate these aspects, we analyzed a total cohort of 80 consecutives patients with monoclonal gammopathies, including 15 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 23 smoldering MM (SMM), 21 newly diagnosed MM (MMD) and 21 relapsed/refractory MM (MMR) patients. The presence of bone disease was checked by low-dose computerized tomography (CT) with or without positron emission tomography (PET) scan and by X-rays skeletal survey in 11 MM patients. 87% of MM patients displayed osteolytic lesions. High bone disease (HBD) was defined by the presence of 3 or more osteolytic lesions (62% of our cohort). Patients without bone lesions or with minus of 3 lesions were defined as low bone disease (LBD). BM mononuclear cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, evaluating plasma cells (PCs) (CD138+), monocytes (CD14+) and T cells (total CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+). PD-L1 (CD274) expression was evaluated on CD138+ and CD14+ cells, and PD-1 (CD279) on CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Lastly, in a subgroup of patients we analysed MDSC populations, including both granulocytic (gMDSCs) (CD11b+HLA-DR-CD14-CD15+) and monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs), (CD11b+HLA-DR-/lowCD14+CD15-). The percentage of BM CD3+PD-1+ cells increased from MGUS to MMR patients with a significant trend (p=0.004). Indeed, patients with active MM (MMD and MMR) showed both higher % of CD3+PD-1+ cells (median value: 48.5% vs 40.6%, p=0.001) and PD-1 median fluorescence intensity (MFI) on CD3+ (median value: 18.9 vs 16.7 MFI, p=0.024) as compared to patients with SMM and MGUS. CD4+PD-1+, but not CD8+PD-1+ cells are increased in active MM compared to SMM and MGUS patients (p=0.023). On the other hand, any significant difference was not observed in the PD-L1 expression on both BM CD138+ and CD14+ cells across patient groups. The percentage of BM MDSC populations did not significantly change across the different monoclonal gammopathies (p=0.14); moreover, comparing MM with SMM and MGUS patients, the % of gMDSCs was significantly reduced (median %: 12.5% vs 17%, p=0.04) and the % of mMDSCs was increased (median %: 0.36% vs. 0.24%) without reaching a statistical significance. Focusing on MM bone disease, we found that osteolytic MM patients displayed higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio compared to non-osteolytic ones (p=0.043). Regarding the PD-1 expression, the % of CD3+PD-1+ cells did not change (p=0.192), whereas the % of CD8+PD-1+ cells was significantly reduced in osteolytic patients compared to non-osteolytic ones (p=0.016). Consistently, among the BM CD8+ cells, a significant decrease of %PD-1+ cells was found in HBD vs LBD MM patients (median value: 46.9% vs 57.4%, p=0.045). Interestingly, when compared to LBD MM patients, HBD MM patients displayed a significant reduction of PD-L1 expression on both BM CD138+ PCs (median MFI value: 13.3 vs 21.6 MFI, p=0.007) and CD14+ cells (median MFI value: 15.4 vs 23.8 MFI, p=0.007). In a multivariate analysis, PD-1+ expression on CD8+ cells and PD-L1 MFI on CD138+ were significant independent factors related to the presence of HBD. In conclusion, our study indicates that the frequency of PD-1+ T cells increases across the progression of the monoclonal gammopathies. On the other hand, for the first time, we show in MM patients a significant relationship between the presence of extensive osteolytic bone disease and a reduced expression profile of BM PD-1/PD-L1 axis on CD8+ and CD138+ cells. We hypothesize that a less immune-suppressive profile could be related to the development of osteolysis consistent with the negative cross talk existing between PD-1/PD-L1 axis and Th17 cells. Disclosures Aversa: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Basilea: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giuliani:Takeda Pharmaceutical Co: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutica: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene Italy: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Increased Sclerostin Secretion in Multiple Myeloma Results in Stimulation of Osteoclastogenesis and Inhibition of Osteoblastogenesis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1819.1819 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1819-1819

Author(s):

Homare Eda ◽

Loredana Santo ◽

Diana D. Cirstea ◽

Samantha Pozzi ◽

Miriam Canavese ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Cell Line ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bone Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Concentrations ◽

Bone Homeostasis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Good Target ◽

Osteolytic Bone Disease

Abstract Abstract 1819 Objectives: Osteoblasts (OB) and osteoclasts (OC), are an integral part of the bone microenvironment, and play a crucial role in myeloma growth and survival. Their imbalance results in osteolytic disease and elucidating the mechanisms underlying osteolytic lesions is important not only for the improvement of osteolytic bone disease but also for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). The osteocyte-secreted protein sclerostin, encoded by the SOST gene, is a potent inhibitor of osteoblastogenesis. It is regarded as a good target for osteoporosis treatment, but its role in MM remains to be determined. Our objective was to study the role of sclerostin in MM bone disease and determine if sclerostin directed strategies were a reasonable approach in MM. Methods and Results: Sclerostin concentration in patients' blood plasma and MM cell line supernatant stimulated by IL-6, FGF-2, TNFalpha, BMP7 and TGFbeta was detected by ELISA (ALPCO immunoassays). Increased level of sclerostin was detected in MM patient plasma (n=20, median: 4.73 ng/mL, range: 1.5–19.5 ng/mL). Plasma concentrations were significantly higher (p<0.01) when compared to sclerostin concentration in the plasma of leukemia patients (n=3), gastric cancer patients (n=40) and healthy volunteers (n=4). High sclerostin levels were not associated with extent of bone disease but rather correlated with tumor burden (High B2M, creatinine and LDH, and low Hb) suggesting an autocrine loop for sclerostin production. Because sclerostin is derived from mature OB or orteocytes, we measured levels during OB differentiation but we were unable to detect increased levels. We then measured sclerostin levels in RPMI-8226 MM cell line supernatant either alone or stimulated by cytokines D Systems). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that increased sclerostin levels in MM patients inhibit osteoblastogenesis and stimulate osteoclastogenesis. Taken together, sclerostin may be good target to inhibit myeloma bone disease and help restore normal bone homeostasis. Disclosures: Raje: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Selective HDAC6 Inhibition Via ACY-1215, Either Alone or in Combination with Bortezomib, Restores Osteoblast Function and Suppresses Osteoclast Differentiation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2908.2908 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2908-2908

Author(s):

Loredana Santo ◽

Teru Hideshima ◽

Andrew L. Kung ◽

Jen-Chieh Tseng ◽

David Tamang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Cell Growth ◽

Bone Formation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bone Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bone Homeostasis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Synergistic Cytotoxicity

Abstract Abstract 2908 Bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) is due to the disruption of the delicate balance between osteoblast (OB)-mediated bone formation and osteoclast (OC)-mediated bone resorption. Agents that target both tumor cells and restore normal bone homeostasis can improve long-term disease control and prolong MM patient survival. It has been demonstrated that in vitro pan HDAC inhibitors accelerate OB maturation and suppress OC maturation, while bortezomib triggers OB activation and inhibits osteoclastogenesis. However it has recently been shown that vorinostat (SAHA), a non-selective HDAC inhibitor, causes bone loss in vivo by inhibiting immature OB. Here, we evaluated effects of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-1215 (Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc), alone and in combination with bortezomib, on MM cell growth and related bone disease. ACY-1215 in combination with bortezomib has synergistic cytotoxicity due to simultaneous inhibition of the proteasome and aggresome pathways. We confirm the in vivo anti-MM activity of ACY-1215 in combination with bortezomib in two different xenograft mouse models: human MM injected subcutaneously; and luciferase-expressing human MM injected intravenously (disseminated MM model). Tumor growth was significantly delayed and overall host survival significantly prolonged in animals treated with combined therapy (34 vs 22 days, n=7, p<0.0011) in plasmacytoma model and (40 vs 17 days, n=12, p<0.0001) in disseminated model. Importantly, we show that ACY-1215 alone and in combination with bortezomib overcomes the proliferative effect of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and cytokines. MM cells stimulate OC formation and function, while inhibiting OB differentiation via both cell-to-cell contact and cytokine secretion. Therefore, osteoclastogenesis is an important therapeutic target in MM. In this context, we evaluated the effect of ACY-1215 (1μM) and bortezomib (2.5nM) on OCs generated from blood mononuclear cells stimulated with receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL). ACY-1215 alone and in combination with bortezomib inhibited OC differentiation, evidenced by a decreased number of TRAP positive multinucleated cells and bone-resorbing activity. In addition, ACY-1215 (1μM) significantly decreased cell growth of mature OC in co-culture with MM cell lines. We next examined the effect of ACY-1215, alone and in combination with bortezomib, on downstream targets in RANKL/RANK signaling. ACY-1215 plus bortezomib inhibits transcription factors implicated in OC differentiation including p-ERK, p-AKT, c-FOS and NFATC1. Since there is decreased OB function and new bone formation in MM, we next assessed the effect of ACY-1215 on OB differentiation. ACY-1215, alone and in combination, enhanced OB differentiation, evidenced by increased alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity and alizarin red staining. In addition, we show increased mRNA expression of b-catenin, osteocalcin, Runx2 and Sp7 (OB differentiation markers) in immature OB triggered by ACY-1215. Finally, ACY-1215 was not toxic to PHA stimulated PBMCs, suggesting a favorable side effect profile and therapeutic index. Our studies therefore demonstrate that ACY-1215, alone and in combination with bortezomib, can inhibit osteoclastogenesis enhance osteoblastogenesis, and inhibit MM cell growth. Based upon these studies, ongoing clinical trials are examining the efficacy of ACY-1215 in relapsed MM and associated bone disease. Disclosures: Hideshima: Acetylon: Consultancy. Kung:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Tamang:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Yang:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Jarpe:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. van Duzer:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Mazitschek:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bradner:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Anderson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: founder; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jones:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Raje:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prospective Investigation of Genetic Alterations in Osteolytic Lesions Compared to Paired Random Aspirates

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4419.4419 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4419-4419

Author(s):

Sandra Sauer ◽

Jens Hillengass ◽

Barbara Wagner ◽

Daniel Spira ◽

Marc Andre Weber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Copy Number ◽

Research Funding ◽

Iliac Crest ◽

Genetic Alterations ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Single Nucleotide ◽

Osteolytic Lesions ◽

Myeloma Cells

Abstract Background: Bone disease is the most frequent clinical manifestation of multiple myeloma. In this prospective study we ask whether osteolytic lesions (OL) are driven by myeloma cells showing a different background of genetic alterations in terms of chromosomal aberrations and expressed single nucleotide variants (SNVs) compared to random aspirates (RA) from diffuse myeloma cell infiltration at the iliac crest (spatial genetic heterogeneity). Material and Methods: Consecutive sample-pairs (n=41) were prospectively obtained by CT-guided biopsies of OLs as well as simultaneous random bone marrow aspirates of the iliac crest, the latter undergoing CD138-purification of myeloma cells, in transplant eligible patients with previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma, after written informed consent. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were used as germline control. Plasma cell infiltration in biopsies was quantified histologically. Samples pairs (n=8) were subjected to RNA-sequencing (Illumina HiSeq2000), gene expression profiling using DNA-microarrays (Affymetrix U133 2.0), whole exome sequencing (Illumina NextSeq 500), and arrayCGH (Affymetrix cytoscan array). Results and Discussion: Expressed single nucleotide variants.The spectrum of mutated genes in our samples comprises two of the most frequently mutated in symptomatic myeloma, i.e. KRAS and FAM46C, alongside those implicated in myeloma pathophysiology, e.g. mutations in IRF4, FGFR3, and CD200. In total, 1-10 clonal expressed non-synonymous SNVs were exclusively found in OL compared to RA, comprising e.g. WHSC1, FAM46C, and ROCK1P1. In 2/8 patients (25%), no expressed clonal differences between RA and OL were present. Single nucleotide variants.In investigated samples, 77-1569 non-synonymous SNVs appear with an allele frequency of ≥10% in OL and RA, clustering in 4-5 groups. The clonal constitution can vary, but subclones are detectable in both. Subclonal complexity is maintained (subclones remain present) in OL compared to RA, and the vast majority of subclonal changes is present in both, especially for expressed non-synonymous SNVs, incompatible with an "osteolytic clonal variant" driving OL in the majority of patients. Copy number alterations and loss of heterozygosity.Subtle differences in copy number between OL and RA are present. However, only 1/8 patients (12.5%) showed further "gained" aberrations in OL compared to RA, i.e. deletions on chromosome 7p, 8p, and 11p as well as 19p gain. Loss of heterozygosity was observed in 3/8 patients (37.5%) with a shared pattern between OL and RA in all of them. Conclusions: In our prospective study, the majority of alterations is shared between RA and OL. Spatial heterogeneity is present, but nature and frequency of alterations detectable exclusively in OL make them unlikely candidates in most myeloma patients for being causative for generation of OL. Disclosures Hillengass: Novartis: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goldschmidt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Durie:Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Hose:EngMab: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Travel grant; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Sequence of Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter? Retrospective Evaluation of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received Bortezomib Followed by Lenalidomide or Vice Versa,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3979.3979 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3979-3979

Author(s):

Amila M Patel ◽

Viet Q. Ho ◽

Kenneth H. Shain ◽

Daniel Sullivan ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bone Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Abstract Abstract 3979 Background: In recent years, proteasome inhibition with bortezomib (Bort) and immunomodulation with lenalidomide (Len) has resulted in improved outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma. However, neither of these treatment options offers a cure for patients, as they will eventually relapse and require alternate therapy. The optimal sequence of therapy with these two agents has yet to be established. Methods: All adult patients with multiple myeloma who received both Bort and Len non-concurrently at our institution between January 2004 and August 2010 were included in this analysis. The primary endpoints were overall survival and response (partial response or better) to therapy among two groups of patients: Group A, those who received len-based therapy followed by bort-based therapy and, Group B, those who received bort-based therapy followed by len-based therapy. Results: 208 patients were identified and divided into the two groups (97 in Group A, 111 in Group B). Baseline demographics are summarized in Table 1. Patients in Group B were younger (60 vs 57 years; p=0.03), had more bone disease (61% vs 77%; p=0.03), and were more likely to receive a stem cell transplant (57% vs 71%; p=0.04). The median overall survival was not statistically different between the 2 groups (Group A versus Group B: 78.5 vs. 74.0 months, respectively; p=0.62). The sequence of therapy was not predictive of overall survival within subgroups (including patients with poor risk cytogenetics, elevated beta2-microglobulin, presence of bone disease), with the exception of patients with a serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dl at diagnosis. In this case, Group B had a better median overall survival than Group A (24.1 vs 53.9 months, p=0.01). In addition, among patients who have received Len and Bort without intervening therapy (n= 158), no difference in overall survival was noted in Group A and B. There was also no statistically significant difference in response rates (partial response or better) to bort-based therapy between Group A and B (68.7% vs. 77.2% respectively, p= 0.265) nor to len-based therapy between Group A and B (60.4% vs. 73.6% respectively, p=0.168). Multivariable analysis identified baseline renal dysfunction and the presence of bone disease at diagnosis as predictors of worse outcomes however the sequence of therapy was not a predictor of outcome. ISS stage and b2m were not entered in the logistic regression model as these were only available on 30–40% of patients at baseline. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the only study that has examined the impact of sequence of therapy with immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors in myeloma. This data suggests that the sequence of therapy with these agents is only relevant in patients who have baseline renal insufficiency (≥2 mg/dl at diagnosis); therefore, a bort-based treatment should be considered as first-line therapy in these patients. Disclosures: Alsina: Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allergan: Research Funding. Djulbegovic:Millenium: Research Funding. Baz:Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Increased Sclerostin Secretion in Multiple Myeloma Plays a Central Role in Osteolytic Bone Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3989.3989 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3989-3989

Author(s):

Homare Eda ◽

Loredana Santo ◽

Diana Cirstea ◽

Andrew J. Yee ◽

Anuj Mahindra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Mrna Expression ◽

Bone Disease ◽

Crucial Role ◽

Research Funding ◽

Neutralizing Antibody ◽

Bone Homeostasis ◽

Osteolytic Lesions ◽

Osteolytic Bone Disease

Abstract Abstract 3989 Bone Marrow Stromal Cells (BMSC), Osteoblasts (OB) and osteoclasts (OC) are a central part of the bone microenvironment and play a crucial role in multiple myeloma (MM) growth and survival. Their imbalance results in osteolytic lesions. Understanding the mechanisms underlying osteolytic lesions is important not only for the improvement of osteolytic bone disease but also for the treatment of MM. The osteocyte-secreted protein sclerostin, encoded by the SOST gene, is a potent inhibitor of osteoblastogenesis. However, the role of Sclerostin in MM remains to be elucidated. Our objective was to evaluate the role of sclerostin in MM bone disease and confirm that sclerostin directed strategies are an effective approach in MM. We observed higher levels of sclerostin in MM patients' plasma compared to leukemia patients, gastric cancer patients and healthy volunteers. Importantly, sclerostin levels were associated with an increase in tumor burden suggesting that MM cells are associated with the increase levels of sclerostin. Sclerostin concentrations similar to those detected in MM patients' plasma inhibited OB differentiation and an anti-sclerostin neutralizing antibody (R&D Systems) reversed this effect. Furthermore, sclerostin increased TRAP positive OC numbers differentiated from MM patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and their function as detected by pit formation assay. This was associated with stimulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases II (CaMKII) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling in preosteoclasts reversed by specific inhibitors with consequent inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, sclerostin stimulated JNK and CaMKII phosphorylation, stimulated mRNA expression of RANKL and inhibited mRNA expression of OPG in MM patient derived BMSC. RANKL plays a crucial role in promoting OC differentiation and OPG, the decoy receptor for RANKL, inhibits OC differentiation; therefore our results indicate that sclerostin accelerates OC differentiation by JNK and CaMKII signaling stimulation in BMSC in addition to its direct affect against OC. We next examined OB derived from MM patients' BMSC cocultured with the MM cell line INA6 by using cell culture inserts to avoid cell-cell contact. INA6 inhibited OB differentiation and sclerostin neutralizing antibody reversed the INA6 effect as assessed by qPCR and alizarin red staining. Interestingly, co-culture with MM cells stimulated sclerostin mRNA expression and sclerostin protein expression in OB well as in OB cocultures with MM cells. Moreover recombinant CCL3 protein stimulated sclerostin mRNA expression in MM cells. Because CCL3 is secreted by MM cells, these data suggest in part the mechanism by which sclerostin is increased in MM-OB cocultures. These data suggest sclerostin is secreted by MM cells and OB and inhibits osteoblastogenesis and stimulates osteoclastogenesis directly and indirectly. Neutralizing sclerostin levels reverses these effects. Taken together, our data suggest that sclerostin is a good target to inhibit myeloma bone disease and help restore normal bone homeostasis. Disclosures: Raje: Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Eli-Lilly: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124403 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1835-1835 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Katrina M Piedra ◽

Hani Hassoun ◽

Larry W. Buie ◽

Sean M. Devlin ◽

Jessica Flynn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cancer Trial ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

Download Full-text

Beta-Blockers Improved Survival Outcomes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Evaluation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3306.3306 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3306-3306

Author(s):

Yi L. Hwa ◽

Qian Shi ◽

Shaji Kumar ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Mayo Clinic ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Beta Blockers ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Cardiac Medication

Abstract Introduction: A recent study revealed an antiproliferative and apoptotic effect of propranolol on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Our previous small matched case-control study showed longer survival in patients with propranolol and other beta-blockers (BB) intake than those without. This larger scale study was conducted to confirm the positive association of BB and MM survival. Methods: We identified 1971 newly diagnosed pts seen at Mayo Clinic between 1995 and 2010. Cardiac medication usage after diagnosis of MM was extracted from patient records and categorized based on BB intake. Cause of death was collected with death due to MM as the primary interest event and death due to cardiac disease or other reasons as competing risk events. The primary outcomes were MM disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence functions and Kaplan-Meier method were used to estimate the 5-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of MM death and OS rate, respectively. DSS and OS were compared by Gray's test and log-rank test, respectively. Multivarable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted cause-specific HR (HRCSadj.) and hazard ratio (HRadj.) for DSS and OS, respectively, adjusting for demographics, disease characteristics, diagnosis year, and various chemotherapies. Results: 930 (47.2%) of MM patients had no intake of any cardiac medications; 260 (13.2%) had BB only; 343 (17.4%) used both BB / non-BB cardiac medications; and 438 patients (22.2%) had non-BB cardiac drugs. Five-year CIR of MM death and OS rate were shown in table. Superior MM DSS was observed for BB only users, compared to patients without any cardiac drugs (HRCSadj., .53, 95% confidence interval [CI], .42-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj., .49, 95% CI, .38-.63, padj.<.0001). Patients received both BB and other cardiac drugs also showed superior MM DSS than non-cardiac drugs users (HRCSadj.., .54, 95% CI, .44-.67, padj.<.0001) and non-BB cardiac drug users. (HRCSadj., .50, 95% CI, .40-.62, padj.<.0001). MM DSS does not differ between BB users with and without other cardiac drugs (padj.=0.90). Multivariable analysis showed the same pattern for OS. None of the MM therapies impacted the differences in DSS and OS among BB intake groups (interaction padj.>.60). Conclusion: MM patients with BB intake showed reduced risk of death due to MM and overall mortality compared to patients who used non-BB cardiac or never used cardiac drugs. The result warrants further investigation for anti-cancer effect of BB in MM. Disclosures Shi: Mayo Clinic: Employment. Kumar:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy. Gertz:NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Results of a Phase I Study of Pnk-007, Allogeneic, Off the Shelf NK Cell, Post Autologous Transplant in Multiple Myeloma (NCT02955550)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128467 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4451-4451

Author(s):

Sarah A. Holstein ◽

Sarah Cooley ◽

Parameswaran Hari ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Catherine R Balint ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Single Infusion ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: PNK-007 is an allogeneic, off the shelf cell therapy product enriched for CD56+/CD3- NK cells expanded from placental CD34+ cells. PNK-007 cells exhibit cytotoxicity against various cancer cell types, including multiple myeloma (MM), and secrete cytokines during co-culture with cancer cells. This is a Phase I study of single infusion PNK-007 after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in MM. Methods: Placental CD34+ cells were cultivated in the presence of cytokines for 35 days to generate PNK-007 under cGMP standards followed by release testing. HLA matching and KIR mismatching were not used. Four treatment arms were evaluated on patients (pts) following ASCT: 10 million (M) cells/kg Day (D) 14 with or without recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2), 30M cells/kg D14 with rhIL-2, or 30M cells/kg D7 with rhIL-2. rhIL-2 was administered subcutaneously at 6M units every other day for up to 6 doses to facilitate PNK-007 expansion. Pts received variable pre-ASCT induction therapy. Maintenance therapy was permitted after the Day 90-100 visit (D90). Subjects were followed for up to 1-year. Results: 15 pts who received PNK-007 (12 of whom received rhIL-2) were followed on this study. Pts aged 44-69 yrs included 12 newly diagnosed (ND)MM and 3 relapsed/refractory (RR)MM. The 3 RRMM pts had received 1, 2 or 5 prior lines of therapy, with 2 pts having previous ASCT. All pts had been exposed to immunomodulatory drug (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). No serious adverse events (AEs) were attributable to PNK-007 and no dose-limiting toxicity, GvHD, graft failure or graft rejection were observed. 12/15 pts started maintenance therapy following the transplant while participating in this study, at the physician's discretion. Based on physician assessed responses by International Myeloma Working Group pre-ASCT, of the NDMM pts 10/12 achieved VGPR or better (1 CR and 9 VGPR), 1/12 achieved PR and 1/12 was not assessed during pre-ASCT induction. By D90 10/12 pts achieved VGPR or better (5 CR or sCR and 5 VGPR), 1/12 maintained PR and 1/12 stable disease. At 1-year 9/11 achieved VGPR or better (4 CR or sCR and 5 VGPR), 2/11 were not assessed and 1 was removed from the study prior to 1 year due to failure to respond to ASCT. Of the RRMM pts 2/3 achieved PR and 1/3 was not assessed during pre-ASCT induction, by D90 2/3 achieved VGPR and the pt that had not been assessed pre-ASCT achieved PR. At 1-year, 1 pt maintained VGPR, 1 pt was not assessed and 1 pt did not continue to the 1-year visit. Using a validated Euro-flow minimal residual disease (MRD) assay of bone marrow aspirate (BMA) samples, of the NDMM pts 4/12 were MRD negative (MRD-) pre-ASCT; by D90 9/12 were MRD-. At 1-year 6/12 were MRD-, 2/12 had insufficient BMA to perform testing, 2/12 refused BMA procedure, 1/12 did not convert to MRD-, and 1 was removed from the study prior to 1-year due to failure to respond to ASCT. Of the RRMM pts 0/3 were MRD- pre-ASCT with 1/3 having insufficient BMA to perform testing; by D90 1/3 were MRD-. At 1-year 1/3 was MRD-, 1/3 did not convert to MRD- and 1 pt did not continue to the 1-year visit. PNK-007 infusion did not interfere with immune reconstitution kinetics. Platelet, neutrophil, and absolute lymphocyte counts recovered by day 28 post-ASCT in 12/15 patients. All pts' sera tested negative for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies at all timepoints indicating the absence of humoral immunity and alloantibodies to PNK-007. Conclusion: PNK-007 is the first fully allogeneic, off the shelf CD34+ derived NK cell product in MM clinical trials. A single infusion of PNK-007 up to 30M cells/kg with and without rhIL-2 was well tolerated in the post-ASCT setting. We established the feasibility of infusing PNK-007 as early as 7 days post-ASCT without negative impact on blood count recovery or successful engraftment. BMA MRD- status was observed in 7/9 MRD evaluable pts at 1-year post ASCT. These clinical data are encouraging and warrant further evaluation. Disclosures Holstein: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sorrento: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cooley:Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hari:Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jagannath:BMS: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau. Balint:Celgene: Equity Ownership; Celularity, Inc: Employment. Van Der Touw:Celularity, Inc: Employment. Zhang:Celularity Inc: Employment. Hariri:Celularity Inc: Employment. Vij:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Metaphase Cytogenetics for Risk Stratification in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122291 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4396-4396

Author(s):

Patrick Mellors ◽

Moritz Binder ◽

Rhett P. Ketterling ◽

Patricia Griepp ◽

Linda B Baughn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Risk Stratification ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Risk Modeling ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Improve Risk Stratification

Introduction: Abnormal metaphase cytogenetics are associated with inferior survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). These abnormalities are only detected in one third of cases due to the low proliferative rate of plasma cells. It is unknown if metaphase cytogenetics improve risk stratification when using contemporary prognostic models such as the revised international staging system (R-ISS), which incorporates interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Aims: The aims of this study were to 1) characterize the association between abnormalities on metaphase cytogenetics and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed MM treated with novel agents and 2) evaluate whether the addition of metaphase cytogenetics to R-ISS, age, and plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) improves model discrimination with respect to OS. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 483 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with proteasome inhibitors (PI) and/or immunomodulators (IMID) who had metaphase cytogenetics performed prior to initiation of therapy. Abnormal metaphase cytogenetics were defined as MM specific abnormalities, while normal metaphase cytogenetics included constitutional cytogenetic variants, age-related Y chromosome loss, and normal metaphase karyotypes. Multivariable adjusted proportional hazards regression models were fit for the association between known prognostic factors and OS. Covariates associated with inferior OS on multivariable analysis included R-ISS stage, age ≥ 70, PCLI ≥ 2, and abnormal metaphase cytogenetics. We devised a risk scoring system weighted by their respective hazard ratios (R-ISS II +1, R-ISS III + 2, age ≥ 70 +2, PCLI ≥ 2 +1, metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities + 1). Low (LR), intermediate (IR), and high risk (HR) groups were established based on risk scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 in modeling without metaphase cytogenetics, and scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-6 in modeling incorporating metaphase cytogenetics, respectively. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival analysis was stratified by LR, IR, and HR groups in models 1) excluding metaphase cytogenetics 2) including metaphase cytogenetics and 3) including metaphase cytogenetics, with IR stratified by presence and absence of metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities. Survival estimates were compared between groups using the log-rank test. Harrell's C was used to compare the predictive power of risk modeling with and without metaphase cytogenetics. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 66 (31-95), 281 patients (58%) were men, median follow up was 5.5 years (0.04-14.4), and median OS was 6.4 years (95% CI 5.7-6.8). Ninety-seven patients (20%) were R-ISS stage I, 318 (66%) stage II, and 68 (14%) stage III. One-hundred and fourteen patients (24%) had high-risk abnormalities by FISH, and 115 (24%) had abnormal metaphase cytogenetics. Three-hundred and thirteen patients (65%) received an IMID, 119 (25%) a PI, 51 (10%) received IMID and PI, and 137 (28%) underwent upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). On multivariable analysis, R-ISS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.29-1.97, p < 0.001), age ≥ 70 (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.83-2.93, p < 0.001), PCLI ≥ 2, (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.16-2.00, p=0.002) and abnormalities on metaphase cytogenetics (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.75, p=0.019) were associated with inferior OS. IR and HR groups experienced significantly worse survival compared to LR groups in models excluding (Figure 1A) and including (Figure 1B) the effect of metaphase cytogenetics (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). However, the inclusion of metaphase cytogenetics did not improve discrimination. Likewise, subgroup analysis of IR patients by the presence or absence of metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities did not improve risk stratification (Figure 1C) (p < 0.001). The addition of metaphase cytogenetics to risk modeling with R-ISS stage, age ≥ 70, and PCLI ≥ 2 did not improve prognostic performance when evaluated by Harrell's C (c=0.636 without cytogenetics, c=0.642 with cytogenetics, absolute difference 0.005, 95% CI 0.002-0.012, p=0.142). Conclusions: Abnormalities on metaphase cytogenetics at diagnosis are associated with inferior OS in MM when accounting for the effects of R-ISS, age, and PCLI. However, the addition of metaphase cytogenetics to prognostic modeling incorporating these covariates did not significantly improve risk stratification. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Akcea: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding. Leung:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text