Increased Sclerostin Secretion in Multiple Myeloma Results in Stimulation of Osteoclastogenesis and Inhibition of Osteoblastogenesis

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1819-1819
Author(s):  
Homare Eda ◽  
Loredana Santo ◽  
Diana D. Cirstea ◽  
Samantha Pozzi ◽  
Miriam Canavese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Bone Homeostasis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Good Target ◽  
Osteolytic Bone Disease

Abstract Abstract 1819 Objectives: Osteoblasts (OB) and osteoclasts (OC), are an integral part of the bone microenvironment, and play a crucial role in myeloma growth and survival. Their imbalance results in osteolytic disease and elucidating the mechanisms underlying osteolytic lesions is important not only for the improvement of osteolytic bone disease but also for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). The osteocyte-secreted protein sclerostin, encoded by the SOST gene, is a potent inhibitor of osteoblastogenesis. It is regarded as a good target for osteoporosis treatment, but its role in MM remains to be determined. Our objective was to study the role of sclerostin in MM bone disease and determine if sclerostin directed strategies were a reasonable approach in MM. Methods and Results: Sclerostin concentration in patients' blood plasma and MM cell line supernatant stimulated by IL-6, FGF-2, TNFalpha, BMP7 and TGFbeta was detected by ELISA (ALPCO immunoassays). Increased level of sclerostin was detected in MM patient plasma (n=20, median: 4.73 ng/mL, range: 1.5–19.5 ng/mL). Plasma concentrations were significantly higher (p<0.01) when compared to sclerostin concentration in the plasma of leukemia patients (n=3), gastric cancer patients (n=40) and healthy volunteers (n=4). High sclerostin levels were not associated with extent of bone disease but rather correlated with tumor burden (High B2M, creatinine and LDH, and low Hb) suggesting an autocrine loop for sclerostin production. Because sclerostin is derived from mature OB or orteocytes, we measured levels during OB differentiation but we were unable to detect increased levels. We then measured sclerostin levels in RPMI-8226 MM cell line supernatant either alone or stimulated by cytokines D Systems). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that increased sclerostin levels in MM patients inhibit osteoblastogenesis and stimulate osteoclastogenesis. Taken together, sclerostin may be good target to inhibit myeloma bone disease and help restore normal bone homeostasis. Disclosures: Raje: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Research Funding.

Selective HDAC6 Inhibition Via ACY-1215, Either Alone or in Combination with Bortezomib, Restores Osteoblast Function and Suppresses Osteoclast Differentiation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2908-2908
Author(s):  
Loredana Santo ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Andrew L. Kung ◽  
Jen-Chieh Tseng ◽  
David Tamang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Homeostasis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Synergistic Cytotoxicity

Abstract Abstract 2908 Bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) is due to the disruption of the delicate balance between osteoblast (OB)-mediated bone formation and osteoclast (OC)-mediated bone resorption. Agents that target both tumor cells and restore normal bone homeostasis can improve long-term disease control and prolong MM patient survival. It has been demonstrated that in vitro pan HDAC inhibitors accelerate OB maturation and suppress OC maturation, while bortezomib triggers OB activation and inhibits osteoclastogenesis. However it has recently been shown that vorinostat (SAHA), a non-selective HDAC inhibitor, causes bone loss in vivo by inhibiting immature OB. Here, we evaluated effects of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-1215 (Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc), alone and in combination with bortezomib, on MM cell growth and related bone disease. ACY-1215 in combination with bortezomib has synergistic cytotoxicity due to simultaneous inhibition of the proteasome and aggresome pathways. We confirm the in vivo anti-MM activity of ACY-1215 in combination with bortezomib in two different xenograft mouse models: human MM injected subcutaneously; and luciferase-expressing human MM injected intravenously (disseminated MM model). Tumor growth was significantly delayed and overall host survival significantly prolonged in animals treated with combined therapy (34 vs 22 days, n=7, p<0.0011) in plasmacytoma model and (40 vs 17 days, n=12, p<0.0001) in disseminated model. Importantly, we show that ACY-1215 alone and in combination with bortezomib overcomes the proliferative effect of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and cytokines. MM cells stimulate OC formation and function, while inhibiting OB differentiation via both cell-to-cell contact and cytokine secretion. Therefore, osteoclastogenesis is an important therapeutic target in MM. In this context, we evaluated the effect of ACY-1215 (1μM) and bortezomib (2.5nM) on OCs generated from blood mononuclear cells stimulated with receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL). ACY-1215 alone and in combination with bortezomib inhibited OC differentiation, evidenced by a decreased number of TRAP positive multinucleated cells and bone-resorbing activity. In addition, ACY-1215 (1μM) significantly decreased cell growth of mature OC in co-culture with MM cell lines. We next examined the effect of ACY-1215, alone and in combination with bortezomib, on downstream targets in RANKL/RANK signaling. ACY-1215 plus bortezomib inhibits transcription factors implicated in OC differentiation including p-ERK, p-AKT, c-FOS and NFATC1. Since there is decreased OB function and new bone formation in MM, we next assessed the effect of ACY-1215 on OB differentiation. ACY-1215, alone and in combination, enhanced OB differentiation, evidenced by increased alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity and alizarin red staining. In addition, we show increased mRNA expression of b-catenin, osteocalcin, Runx2 and Sp7 (OB differentiation markers) in immature OB triggered by ACY-1215. Finally, ACY-1215 was not toxic to PHA stimulated PBMCs, suggesting a favorable side effect profile and therapeutic index. Our studies therefore demonstrate that ACY-1215, alone and in combination with bortezomib, can inhibit osteoclastogenesis enhance osteoblastogenesis, and inhibit MM cell growth. Based upon these studies, ongoing clinical trials are examining the efficacy of ACY-1215 in relapsed MM and associated bone disease. Disclosures: Hideshima: Acetylon: Consultancy. Kung:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Tamang:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Yang:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Jarpe:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. van Duzer:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Mazitschek:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bradner:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Anderson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: founder; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jones:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Raje:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Myeloma-Induced Alterations of Glutamine Metabolism Impair Bone Microenvironment Niche in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4481-4481
Author(s):  
Denise Toscani ◽  
Martina Chiu ◽  
Giuseppe Taurino ◽  
Emanuela Vicario ◽  
Valentina Marchica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Bone Microenvironment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Osteolytic Lesions ◽  
Osteolytic Bone Disease ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) cells are characterized by tight dependence on the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment that exerts a permissive role on cell growth and survival. In turn, MM cells markedly modify their microenvironment leading, in particular, to the development of osteolytic bone lesions. Recently, we demonstrated that metabolic alterations is a major feature of MM cells showing that BM plasma of MM patients is characterized by lower levels of Glutamine (Gln) and higher levels of Glutamate (Glu) and ammonium when compared with patients with smoldering MM (SMM) and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Uncertain Significance (MGUS). In the majority of MM patients MM cells are Gln-addicted since they strictly depend on extracellular Gln, do not express Glutamine Synthetase (GS), the enzyme that synthetizes Gln from Glu and ammonium, and are endowed with high levels of the Gln transporter ASCT2. Based on this evidence, we have hypothesized that the peculiar Gln metabolism of MM cells may have a significant impact on the relationship with the bone microenvironment and contribute to the development of osteolytic lesions. We firstly characterized a panel of human MM cell lines (HMCLs) for their GS expression and response to decreasing levels of Gln. The majority of HMCLs, which did not express GS, consumed large amounts of extracellular Gln but secreted nearly half of the amino acid as Glu. Two HMCLs, MM1.S and U266, with a sizable GS expression, were less sensitive to Gln deprivation and secreted less Glu in the extracellular space compared with GS-negative HMCLs. Consistently, the activity of the Glu exchanger x-CT (the product of SLC7A11 gene) was lower in GS-positive than in GS-negative cells. The response to Gln starvation was then studied in mesenchymal stromal cell line (MSC), as well as in osteoblastic (HOBIT) and pre-osteocytic cells (HOB-01). HOBIT and HOB-01 were more sensitive to Gln depletion than MSC. Indeed, while MSC showed a low EC50 for Gln (0.064mM), which is 10-times lower than the physiological blood Gln concentration (around 0.6 mM), the EC50 values of HOBIT and HOB-01 cells were 0.250 mM and 0.297mM, respectively. Furthermore, L-methionine sulfoximine (MSO), an irreversible inhibitor of GS, emphasized the effects of Gln deprivation on all the cell lines tested. Indeed, Gln deprivation enhanced the expression of GS, suggesting that both stromal and osteoblastic cells exploit the enzyme to counteract Gln deprivation. On the basis of these data, we assessed the effects of Gln and Glu on osteogenic differentiation by incubating MSC, either immortalized or primary, with an osteogenic medium containing different concentrations of Gln and Glu. After 2 weeks, compared with cells differentiated in high Gln/high Glu conditions, MSC incubated in the presence of decreased Gln and increased Glu showed lower osteogenic ability, as assessed by real time PCR and ALP staining. Lastly, MSC co-cultured for 72 hours with GS-negative, but not with GS-positive HMCLs, showed reduced viability and increased GS expression. Lastly, to put in a translational perspective these in vitro observations, we analyzed the BM plasma levels of Gln and Glu in a cohort of 41 patients with newly diagnosed MM, including 9 smoldering MM (SMM) and 32 active MM patients (20 of them with osteolytic bone disease, 12 of them without bone disease). All 20 osteolytic MM patients had more than three osteolytic lesions. We found that MM patients had lower Gln levels and higher Glu levels than SMM patients. Moreover, when compared with MM patients without bone disease, MM patients with bone disease showed lower levels of Gln and higher levels of Glu. The results of these analyses are being continuously updated increasing the number of samples tested. Overall, these results indicate that MM cells are able to create a low-Gln/high-Glu bone marrow microenvironment that sustains GS expression in bone cells and impairs their differentiation and viability. Thus, the peculiar metabolic milieu in the MM bone microenvironment affects the relationship between neoplastic and bone cells and may contribute to the development of osteolytic bone disease in MM patients. Disclosures Aversa: Astellas: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Basilea: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giuliani:Takeda Pharmaceutical Co: Research Funding; Celgene Italy: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutica: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding.

The Interaction of Bortezomib with P-Gp, MRP-1 and BCRP Drug Transporters: Implications for Therapeutic Applications of Bortezomib in Advanced Multiple Myeloma and Other Neoplasias.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1729-1729
Author(s):  
Melissa G Ooi ◽  
Robert O'Connor ◽  
Jana Jakubikova ◽  
Justine Meiller ◽  
Steffen Klippel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Cancer Resistance ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bortezomib Treatment

Abstract Abstract 1729 Poster Board I-755 Background Multidrug transporters are energy-dependent transmembrane proteins which can efflux a broad range of anticancer drugs and thereby play a role in resistance to the actions of substrate agents. Classically, three transporters, p-glycoprotein (Pgp; MDR-1; ABCB1), multidrug resistant protein-1 (MRP-1; ABCC1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; MXR; ABCG2), have been found to have the broadest substrate specificity and a strong correlation with drug resistance in vitro and in vivo in many models and forms of cancer. We have sought to characterize the interaction of bortezomib with these transporters and thereby explore the potential for these agents to play a role in resistance. Bortezomib is a novel proteosome inhibitor with significant activity in multiple myeloma, although subsets of patients remain refractory to the activity of the drug. Hence, better characterization of the interactions of this drug with classical resistance mechanisms may identify improved treatment applications. Methods and Results We investigated the role of these transporters by using isogenic cell line models which are resistant due to overexpression of a particular transporter: DLKP lung cancer cell line that overexpresses MRP-1; DLKP-A which overexpresses Pgp; and DLKP-SQ-Mitox which overexpresses BCRP. DLKP-A cells exhibited a 4.6-fold decrease in responsiveness to bortezomib compared to parental DLKP cells. In DLKP-SQ-Mitox, bortezomib-induced cytotoxicity was comparable to DLKP. When bortezomib was combined with elacridar, a Pgp and BCRP inhibitor, significant synergy was evident in DLKP-A (100% viable cells with single agent treatment versus 11% with the combination), but not DLKP-SQ-Mitox. Sulindac, an MRP-1 inhibitor, combined with bortezomib failed to produce any synergy in MRP-1 positive DLKP cells. Conversely, combination assays of Pgp substrate cytotoxics such as doxorubicin with Bortezomib were largely additive in nature. This indicates that bortezomib has little, if any, direct Pgp inhibitory activity, as combinations of a traditional Pgp inhibitor (such as elacridar) and doxorubicin would show marked synergy rather than just an additive effect in Pgp positive cells. To further characterize the extent of this interaction with Pgp, we conducted cytotoxicity assays in cell lines with varying levels of Pgp overexpression. NCI/Adr-res (ovarian cancer, high Pgp overexpression), RPMI-Dox40 (multiple myeloma, moderate Pgp overexpression) and A549-taxol (lung cancer, low Pgp overexpression). The combination of bortezomib and elacridar that produced the most synergy was in cell lines expressing moderate to high levels of Pgp expression. Cell lines with lower Pgp expression produced an additive cytotoxicity. We next examined whether bortezomib had any direct effect on Pgp expression. In RPMI-Dox40 cells, Pgp expression is reduced in a time-dependent manner with bortezomib treatment. Conclusions Our studies therefore show that bortezomib is a substrate for Pgp but not the other drug efflux pumps. In tumor cells expressing high levels of Pgp, the efficacy of bortezomib is synergistically enhanced by combinations with a Pgp inhibitor, while bortezomib treatment itself can reduce the expression of Pgp. This study suggests that in the subset of patients with advanced multiple myeloma or solid tumors which express high levels of Pgp, inhibition of its function could contribute to enhanced responsiveness to bortezomib. Disclosures Richardson: millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, speakers bureau up to 7/1/09; MLNM: speakers bureau up to 7/1/09. Mitsiades:Millennium Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb : Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck &Co: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: licensing royalties ; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono : Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biotest AG: Consultancy, Research Funding.

CYC065, a Potent Derivative of Seliciclib Is Active In Multiple Myeloma In Preclinical Studies

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2999-2999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Pozzi ◽  
Diana Cirstea ◽  
Loredana Santo ◽  
Doris M Nabikejje ◽  
Kishan Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Preclinical Studies ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 2999 Multiple myeloma (MM) is a treatable but incurable hematological malignancy and novel targeted therapies are under investigation. MM is characterized by dysregulation of the cell cycle, consequent to the overexpression of cyclins and their related kinases, the cyclins dependent kinases (CDK), a group of Ser/Thr proteine kinases. CDKs represent a promising therapeutic target, and inhibitors have been developed for anticancer treatment. We have previously studied seliciclib in the context of MM. CYC065, a second generation CDK inhibitor is the more potent derivative of seliciclib. It is mainly active on CDK 2, 5 and 9, involved in progression of the cell cycle and protein transcription. It has already shown promising results in preclinical studies in breast cancer and acute leukemia. We tested CYC065 in in vitro experiments in MM. Our preliminary data in 7 MM cell lines showed cytotoxicity of CYC065, both in MM cell lines sensitive as well as resistant to conventional chemotherapy, with an IC50 ranging between 0.06 and 2μ M, at 24 and 48h. Tritiated thymidine uptake assay confirmed the antiproliferative effects of CYC065 in MM, and its ability to overcome the growth advantage conferred by co-culture with bone marrow stromal cells derived from MM patients, and cytokines like interleukin 6 (10ng/ml) and insulin like growth factor-1 (50ng/ml). The anti-proliferative effect was evident both at 24 and 48h, starting at concentrations as low as 0.015μ M. The AnnexinV/PI assay in the MM1.s cell line confirmed CYC065's ability to induce apoptosis in a time dependent manner starting at 9 hours of treatment, at a concentration of 0.125 μ M, inducing 82% of apoptosis after 48h of exposure. Cell cycle analysis in the same MM1.s cell line showed an increase of subG1 phase, starting at 9 hours of treatment, at 0.125 μ M of CYC065. Preliminary results of western blot analysis confirmed the apoptotic effect of CYC065 in the MM1s cell line, highlighted by the cleavage of caspase 3, 8, 9 and PARP. The compound was tested in primary CD138+ cells isolated from three refractory MM patients, confirming its efficacy at 0.125 μ M, both at 24 and 48h. Comparative analysis in PBMCs from normal donors, for the evaluation of the drug toxicity is ongoing and will be presented. In conclusion our preliminary data confirm the efficacy of CYC065 in MM cell lines and primary MM cells, at nanomolar concentrations. Ongoing mechanistic and in vivo studies will delineate its role in the now increasing spectrum of CDK inhibitors in MM and better define its potential for clinical development in MM. Disclosures: Green: Cyclacel: Employment. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Scadden:Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Raje:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding.

A Phase II Study of Modified Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVD-lite) for Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4217-4217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth K. O'Donnell ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Andrew J. Yee ◽  
Carol A. Huff ◽  
Frank G. Basile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is primarily a disease of older adults with median age at diagnosis of 66 years. Although melphalan and prednisone-based regimens were traditionally the most accepted treatment options, recent use of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in this older, transplant-ineligible population as presented in the FIRST trial is the new standard of care in these patients (pts) (NEJM 2014). Here, we sought a regimen that incorporates optimal novel agents in transplant-ineligible, older pts that balances efficacy with toxicity. Building on our promising prior experience with RVD in predominantly younger pts (Blood 2010), our study evaluated a 3-drug regimen of modified RVD in the transplant-ineligible population. Methods: Modified RVD ("RVD-lite") was administered over a 35-day cycle. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given on days 1-21; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 once weekly subcutaneously (SC) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; and dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23 for pts ≤75 yrs and days 1, 8, 15, 22 for pts older than 75 yrs. Intravenous (IV) bortezomib was used in cycle 1 for the first 10 pts for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Eligibility requirements included ECOG performance status ≤ 2 and acceptable hepatic, renal and hematologic function. The primary objective was to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) of modified RVD in transplant-ineligible pts. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the safety profile, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival, response rate with respect to cytogenetics, and the PK profile of IV and SC bortezomib. Exploratory analysis will determine minimal residual disease (MRD) status by deep sequencing and correlate with outcomes in patients who achieve a VGPR or better. Results: Fifty-three eligible pts have enrolled between 4/17/13 and 7/25/15, and of those, 50 received at least one dose of therapy. Median age at study entry was 72 years (range 65-91) with 29 women and 24 men. ECOG performance status of pts enrolled was 0 in 25 (47%), 1 in 20 (38%), and 2 in 8 (15 %) pts. The ISS stage was I in 21 (40%), II in 16 (30%), and III in 16 (30%) pts. Treatment-related toxicities were reported for 49 pts. Fatigue was the most commonly reported toxicity occurring in 31/49 (63%), and was mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable (25/31). Peripheral neuropathy of any grade was reported in 21/49 (43%) pts including grade 1 (11, 22%), 2 (9, 18%), and 3 (1, 2%). Grade 3 or greater toxicities included hypophosphatemia in 15 (31%) and rash in 5 (10%) pts. PK data comparing IV and SC dosing showed no significant differences in plasma concentrations of bortezomib at 5 hours. In the SC route, high body mass index (BMI) patients tended to have low concentration at both the 5 and 30 minute measures but not at 5 hours. There was no correlation with BMI using the IV route. At the planned analysis after 4 cycles that now includes 40 pts, the investigator-reported ORR of PR or better was 90% (CR - 10, VGPR - 14, PR - 12, SD - 4). Five pts withdrew from the study after less than 4 cycles. Of those, one withdrew for worsening adrenal insufficiency, one for rash attributed to lenalidomide, one at the Investigator's discretion, and two for excessive travel distance. Five additional pts have been enrolled but have not completed 4 cycles. Of 48 evaluable patients, the median survival has not been reached. Median duration of follow-up is 17.2 months and the 1-year PFS is 95% (95% CI 0.888, 1) and 2-year PFS is 68% (95% CI 0.512, 0.908). Exploratory data on bone marrow samples on pts achieving VGPR or better have been collected and analysis for MRD is in process. Gene expression profiling was performed using MMprofiler (SkylineDx). High-risk signature will be correlated with pt outcomes. Conclusions: ModifiedRVD is a well-tolerated and highly effective regimen in the transplant-ineligible population. The ORR rate after 4 cycles suggests that this combination at modified doses and on a weekly schedule is very active. The side effect profile proved manageable and was well tolerated in an older population despite the variance of performance status at study entry. There were no significant differences in plasma concentrations of bortezomib observed between IV and SC dosing. The study is fully accrued and this analysis suggests that alternative dosing and schedule of RVD may both improve tolerability and enhance clinical benefit in newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible MM pts. Disclosures O'Donnell: Millennium: Consultancy. Laubach:Novartis: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Anderson:Millennium: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Oncopep: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raje:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

scholarly journals MYC Overexpressing Multiple Myeloma Are Dependent on GLS1

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 853-853
Author(s):  
Katarina K Jovanovic ◽  
Léa Fléchon ◽  
Mairead Reidy ◽  
Jihye Park ◽  
Xavier Leleu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Glutamine Metabolism ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Advisory Committees

Introduction. MYC alterations trigger transition from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to multiple myeloma (MM). They also represent secondary genomic events inducing tumor progression. MYC localization to the nucleus and the short life of the protein are key factors that limit its direct targeting. To overcome these issues, we sought to determine the top genomic dependencies in MYC overexpressing MM by analyzing large-scale knockdown screening, followed by functional validations. Methods. We performed in silico analyses from the Dependency Map (Achilles 2.4.3) together with CCLE (Affymetrix U133+2 expression array), CLUE (Connectivity Map) and MM patient datasets (Chng et al. 2007, Gutiérrez et al. 2010, MMRF RG Dataset), to look for gene dependencies and differentially expressed pathways in MYC OE cancer cell lines and MM patient samples. We generated an isogenic model of MYC OE in U266 MM cell line by using EF1A-C-MYC lentiviral vector, and performed RNA sequencing, a quantitative proteomic analysis by Tandem Mass Tag mass spectrometry (TMT-MS) and a drug screening with ~2000 compounds. To further investigate dependency on glutamine metabolism in MYC OE cell lines, we treated them with GLS1 inhibitor CB-839 and siRNA targeting GLS1 in several cell lines with various MYC expressions and in our isogenic model. Results. By analyzing correlations between MYC expression and gene ATARiS scores corresponding to the effect of over 9000 knockdowns in 236 cell lines, we identified specific vulnerabilities of MYC overexpressing cells for the genes involved in glutamine metabolism and cell cycle pathways. Top dependencies were observed with MYC binding protein MAX (r = -0.51, p &lt; .001), representing an internal control as it is a co-activator of MYC, followed by GLS1 (r = -0.48, p &lt; .001) and SLC1A1 (r = -0.42, p &lt; .001), both involved in glutamine metabolism, together with E2F6 (r = -0.41, p &lt; .001), involved in cell cycle. To further validate dependencies obtained from Achilles data, we generated an isogenic model of MYC OE in U266 (a low c-myc expressing MM cell line). GSEA analysis of RNA seq data showed strong enrichments of translation and cell cycle pathways, with similar results observed in CCLE and MM patient data. Quantitative proteomics analysis of U266 isogenic model showed overexpression of genes involved in glutamine transport (SLC1A5; FC = 1.28, p &lt; .05), glucose metabolism (HK2; FC = 3.68, p &lt; .001) and cell cycle progression (CDK6; FC = 2.85, p &lt; .001). To explore the therapeutic potential of these dependencies, we performed a primary screen of 1902 small-molecules and identified 47 compounds with potent activity on U266/MYC model. Validation screen of these hits identified three leading compounds to which U266/MYC cells showed highest sensitivity at 10 µM concentration - Torin-2 (U266/C 40.28 ± 6.74% vs. U266/MYC 16.05 ± 3.21%), LY2835219 (U266/C 52.70 ± 9.63% vs. U266/MYC 5.52 ± 0.89%) and AT7519 (U266/C 43.03 ± 4.02% vs. U266/MYC 30.13 ± 4.90%), targeting proteins involved in translation and cell cycle pathways. For the functional validation of GLS1 dependency in MYC overexpressing cells, MYC OE cell lines were treated with GLS1 inhibitors CB-839 and 968. MYC high MM cell lines showed higher sensitivity to CB-839 inhibitor compared to MYC low cell lines at 1 µM concentration, after 48 (KMS-12-BM 14.19 ± 0.07%, KMS-18 31.56 ± 2.84%, MM.1S 23.21 ± 1.21% vs. NCI-H1650 46.49 ± 3.48%, U266 52.72 ± 4.99%, LOUCY 37.14 ± 1.14%, OVCAR-3 64.14 ± 5.19%) and 72 h (KMS-18 19.69 ± 3.15%, MM.1S 15.09 ± 1.28% vs. NCI-H1650 34.82 ± 0.95%, U266 61.73 ± 1.70%, LOUCY 46.27 ± 6.27%, OVCAR-3 65.34 ± 1.23%). This suggests that GLS1 dependency in MYC OE cells offers a therapeutic window for the use of GLS1 inhibitors in MM. Conclusion. By using a combination of different datasets and models, we characterized the main dependencies in MYC overexpressing MM. Glutamine metabolism and cell cycle emerged as strong dependencies by using therapeutic inhibitors. Altogether, our results demonstrate that MYC OE MM cells are dependent on glutamine metabolism and cell cycle, and these findings can potentially lead to development of new therapeutic approaches in MM patients. Disclosures Leleu: Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Carsgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manier:Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Sequence of Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter? Retrospective Evaluation of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received Bortezomib Followed by Lenalidomide or Vice Versa,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3979-3979
Author(s):  
Amila M Patel ◽  
Viet Q. Ho ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
Daniel Sullivan ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Abstract 3979 Background: In recent years, proteasome inhibition with bortezomib (Bort) and immunomodulation with lenalidomide (Len) has resulted in improved outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma. However, neither of these treatment options offers a cure for patients, as they will eventually relapse and require alternate therapy. The optimal sequence of therapy with these two agents has yet to be established. Methods: All adult patients with multiple myeloma who received both Bort and Len non-concurrently at our institution between January 2004 and August 2010 were included in this analysis. The primary endpoints were overall survival and response (partial response or better) to therapy among two groups of patients: Group A, those who received len-based therapy followed by bort-based therapy and, Group B, those who received bort-based therapy followed by len-based therapy. Results: 208 patients were identified and divided into the two groups (97 in Group A, 111 in Group B). Baseline demographics are summarized in Table 1. Patients in Group B were younger (60 vs 57 years; p=0.03), had more bone disease (61% vs 77%; p=0.03), and were more likely to receive a stem cell transplant (57% vs 71%; p=0.04). The median overall survival was not statistically different between the 2 groups (Group A versus Group B: 78.5 vs. 74.0 months, respectively; p=0.62). The sequence of therapy was not predictive of overall survival within subgroups (including patients with poor risk cytogenetics, elevated beta2-microglobulin, presence of bone disease), with the exception of patients with a serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dl at diagnosis. In this case, Group B had a better median overall survival than Group A (24.1 vs 53.9 months, p=0.01). In addition, among patients who have received Len and Bort without intervening therapy (n= 158), no difference in overall survival was noted in Group A and B. There was also no statistically significant difference in response rates (partial response or better) to bort-based therapy between Group A and B (68.7% vs. 77.2% respectively, p= 0.265) nor to len-based therapy between Group A and B (60.4% vs. 73.6% respectively, p=0.168). Multivariable analysis identified baseline renal dysfunction and the presence of bone disease at diagnosis as predictors of worse outcomes however the sequence of therapy was not a predictor of outcome. ISS stage and b2m were not entered in the logistic regression model as these were only available on 30–40% of patients at baseline. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the only study that has examined the impact of sequence of therapy with immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors in myeloma. This data suggests that the sequence of therapy with these agents is only relevant in patients who have baseline renal insufficiency (≥2 mg/dl at diagnosis); therefore, a bort-based treatment should be considered as first-line therapy in these patients. Disclosures: Alsina: Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allergan: Research Funding. Djulbegovic:Millenium: Research Funding. Baz:Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding.

Increased Sclerostin Secretion in Multiple Myeloma Plays a Central Role in Osteolytic Bone Disease

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3989-3989
Author(s):  
Homare Eda ◽  
Loredana Santo ◽  
Diana Cirstea ◽  
Andrew J. Yee ◽  
Anuj Mahindra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Bone Homeostasis ◽  
Osteolytic Lesions ◽  
Osteolytic Bone Disease

Abstract Abstract 3989 Bone Marrow Stromal Cells (BMSC), Osteoblasts (OB) and osteoclasts (OC) are a central part of the bone microenvironment and play a crucial role in multiple myeloma (MM) growth and survival. Their imbalance results in osteolytic lesions. Understanding the mechanisms underlying osteolytic lesions is important not only for the improvement of osteolytic bone disease but also for the treatment of MM. The osteocyte-secreted protein sclerostin, encoded by the SOST gene, is a potent inhibitor of osteoblastogenesis. However, the role of Sclerostin in MM remains to be elucidated. Our objective was to evaluate the role of sclerostin in MM bone disease and confirm that sclerostin directed strategies are an effective approach in MM. We observed higher levels of sclerostin in MM patients' plasma compared to leukemia patients, gastric cancer patients and healthy volunteers. Importantly, sclerostin levels were associated with an increase in tumor burden suggesting that MM cells are associated with the increase levels of sclerostin. Sclerostin concentrations similar to those detected in MM patients' plasma inhibited OB differentiation and an anti-sclerostin neutralizing antibody (R&D Systems) reversed this effect. Furthermore, sclerostin increased TRAP positive OC numbers differentiated from MM patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and their function as detected by pit formation assay. This was associated with stimulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases II (CaMKII) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling in preosteoclasts reversed by specific inhibitors with consequent inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, sclerostin stimulated JNK and CaMKII phosphorylation, stimulated mRNA expression of RANKL and inhibited mRNA expression of OPG in MM patient derived BMSC. RANKL plays a crucial role in promoting OC differentiation and OPG, the decoy receptor for RANKL, inhibits OC differentiation; therefore our results indicate that sclerostin accelerates OC differentiation by JNK and CaMKII signaling stimulation in BMSC in addition to its direct affect against OC. We next examined OB derived from MM patients' BMSC cocultured with the MM cell line INA6 by using cell culture inserts to avoid cell-cell contact. INA6 inhibited OB differentiation and sclerostin neutralizing antibody reversed the INA6 effect as assessed by qPCR and alizarin red staining. Interestingly, co-culture with MM cells stimulated sclerostin mRNA expression and sclerostin protein expression in OB well as in OB cocultures with MM cells. Moreover recombinant CCL3 protein stimulated sclerostin mRNA expression in MM cells. Because CCL3 is secreted by MM cells, these data suggest in part the mechanism by which sclerostin is increased in MM-OB cocultures. These data suggest sclerostin is secreted by MM cells and OB and inhibits osteoblastogenesis and stimulates osteoclastogenesis directly and indirectly. Neutralizing sclerostin levels reverses these effects. Taken together, our data suggest that sclerostin is a good target to inhibit myeloma bone disease and help restore normal bone homeostasis. Disclosures: Raje: Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Eli-Lilly: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Relationship between Bone Marrow PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression and the Presence of Osteolytic Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3183-3183
Author(s):  
Federica Costa ◽  
Marina Bolzoni ◽  
Rosanna Vescovini ◽  
Fabrizio Accardi ◽  
Anna Benedetta Dalla Palma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Osteolytic Lesions ◽  
Cd8 Cells ◽  
Monoclonal Gammopathies ◽  
Hla Dr ◽  
Osteolytic Bone Disease

Abstract Alterations of the bone marrow (BM) immune-microenvironment characterize the progression of monoclonal gammopathies and the development of osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM). MM patients exhibit immune dysfunctions as impaired dendritic, NK and T cells, whereas the onset of MM osteolytic lesions is associated to an increased prevalence of Th17 cells. Recently, the pathophysiological role of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) pathway together with an increase of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the induction of tumor tolerance and immune evasion has been underlined with a therapeutic relevance. However, unclear data on the expression profile of PD-1/PD-L1 axis in MM patients have been reported and it is not known if this axis could be related with the presence of osteolytic bone disease. In order to elucidate these aspects, we analyzed a total cohort of 80 consecutives patients with monoclonal gammopathies, including 15 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 23 smoldering MM (SMM), 21 newly diagnosed MM (MMD) and 21 relapsed/refractory MM (MMR) patients. The presence of bone disease was checked by low-dose computerized tomography (CT) with or without positron emission tomography (PET) scan and by X-rays skeletal survey in 11 MM patients. 87% of MM patients displayed osteolytic lesions. High bone disease (HBD) was defined by the presence of 3 or more osteolytic lesions (62% of our cohort). Patients without bone lesions or with minus of 3 lesions were defined as low bone disease (LBD). BM mononuclear cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, evaluating plasma cells (PCs) (CD138+), monocytes (CD14+) and T cells (total CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+). PD-L1 (CD274) expression was evaluated on CD138+ and CD14+ cells, and PD-1 (CD279) on CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Lastly, in a subgroup of patients we analysed MDSC populations, including both granulocytic (gMDSCs) (CD11b+HLA-DR-CD14-CD15+) and monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs), (CD11b+HLA-DR-/lowCD14+CD15-). The percentage of BM CD3+PD-1+ cells increased from MGUS to MMR patients with a significant trend (p=0.004). Indeed, patients with active MM (MMD and MMR) showed both higher % of CD3+PD-1+ cells (median value: 48.5% vs 40.6%, p=0.001) and PD-1 median fluorescence intensity (MFI) on CD3+ (median value: 18.9 vs 16.7 MFI, p=0.024) as compared to patients with SMM and MGUS. CD4+PD-1+, but not CD8+PD-1+ cells are increased in active MM compared to SMM and MGUS patients (p=0.023). On the other hand, any significant difference was not observed in the PD-L1 expression on both BM CD138+ and CD14+ cells across patient groups. The percentage of BM MDSC populations did not significantly change across the different monoclonal gammopathies (p=0.14); moreover, comparing MM with SMM and MGUS patients, the % of gMDSCs was significantly reduced (median %: 12.5% vs 17%, p=0.04) and the % of mMDSCs was increased (median %: 0.36% vs. 0.24%) without reaching a statistical significance. Focusing on MM bone disease, we found that osteolytic MM patients displayed higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio compared to non-osteolytic ones (p=0.043). Regarding the PD-1 expression, the % of CD3+PD-1+ cells did not change (p=0.192), whereas the % of CD8+PD-1+ cells was significantly reduced in osteolytic patients compared to non-osteolytic ones (p=0.016). Consistently, among the BM CD8+ cells, a significant decrease of %PD-1+ cells was found in HBD vs LBD MM patients (median value: 46.9% vs 57.4%, p=0.045). Interestingly, when compared to LBD MM patients, HBD MM patients displayed a significant reduction of PD-L1 expression on both BM CD138+ PCs (median MFI value: 13.3 vs 21.6 MFI, p=0.007) and CD14+ cells (median MFI value: 15.4 vs 23.8 MFI, p=0.007). In a multivariate analysis, PD-1+ expression on CD8+ cells and PD-L1 MFI on CD138+ were significant independent factors related to the presence of HBD. In conclusion, our study indicates that the frequency of PD-1+ T cells increases across the progression of the monoclonal gammopathies. On the other hand, for the first time, we show in MM patients a significant relationship between the presence of extensive osteolytic bone disease and a reduced expression profile of BM PD-1/PD-L1 axis on CD8+ and CD138+ cells. We hypothesize that a less immune-suppressive profile could be related to the development of osteolysis consistent with the negative cross talk existing between PD-1/PD-L1 axis and Th17 cells. Disclosures Aversa: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Basilea: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giuliani:Takeda Pharmaceutical Co: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutica: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene Italy: Other: Avisory Board, Research Funding.

scholarly journals VTE Rates and Safety Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRD) with or without Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1835-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M Piedra ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document