scholarly journals Combined Hypomethylating Agents (HMA) and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors (HDACi) Exhibit Compelling Activity in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) with High Complete Response Rates in Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma (AITL)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1002-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Falchi ◽  
Jennifer Kimberly Lue ◽  
Francesca Montanari ◽  
Enrica Marchi ◽  
Jennifer E Amengual ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2

Abstract Introduction: PTCL may represent the prototypical epigenetic malignant disorder. First, recurring mutations in important epigenetic regulators, such as TET2, IDH2, and DNMT3, have been described across several PTCL subtypes, though especially in AITL. Second, HDACi have only been approved as single agents in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) PTCL, and exhibit T-cell lineage-specific activity across disease subtypes. Thirdly, preclinical evidence from our group suggests marked class synergism between HDACi and HMA. In addition, across a panel of diverse T-cell lymphoma lines, the combination of HDACi and HMA induced the expression of many cancer testis antigens and genes involved in the interferon pathway/viral antigen response. Based on this collective experience, a phase 1/2 trial of romidepsin (ROMI) and oral 5-azacitidine (AZA) was launched to determine if this activity is reproduced in patients with R/R PTCL. Methods: Patients with R/R lymphoma were eligible for the phase 1, whereas the phase 2 only enrolled patients with PTCL, and included both R/R and treatment-naïve individuals. The dose-escalation portion of the study followed a 3+3 design with progressively increasing dose intensity across 7 cohorts. The phase 1 primary objectives were determination of the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity. Phase 2 primary objectives were overall response rate (ORR, i.e., complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), progression free survival, and duration of response (DOR). Results: 36 patients have been enrolled to date, 26 in phase 1 and 10 in phase 2. In the intention-to-treat population the median age was 56 years [23-83] with 59% being males. Twelve patients had Hodgkin lymphoma, 8 had a B-cell lymphoma, and 16 had a T-cell lymphoma (6 enrolled in the phase 1 and 10 in phase 2). The median number of prior therapies was 6 [1-15] for the phase 1 population and 1 [0-6] for the phase 2. After a median of 2 cycles [0-16], all phase 1 patients have discontinued therapy, whereas 6 out of 10 patients in phase 2 are still on treatment after a median of 2.5 cycles [1-14]. No patient discontinued therapy due to adverse events (AE). The most frequent hematologic G3-4 AE included neutropenia (39%), lymphopenia (39%), and thrombocytopenia (28%). The most frequent non-hematologic G3-4 AE included febrile neutropenia (8%), hyponatremia (5%), and lung infection (5%). Other common G1-2 toxicities included hyperglycemia, hypoalbuminemia, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue. The recommended phase 2 dose for the combination was declared AZA 300 mg days 1-14 and ROMI 14 mg/m2 days 8, 15, and 22 on a 35-day cycle. Thirty-two patients are evaluable for response. Of these, 27 had measurable disease. The ORR and CR in the overall population are 41% and 22%, respectively. However, while only 2 (11%) patients with non-T-cell lymphoma responded, of which one was a CR, 11 of 14 (79%) patients with T-cell lymphoma responded, including 6 (43%) who attained CR (see waterfall plot in figure). Notably, all 6 evaluable patients with AITL responded, and 3 achieved a CR. Two of these 3 achieved PR before reaching CR. Responses have been durable and the median DOR has not been reached [0.2-13.1+ months]. The AUC for ROMI at 10 mg/m2 (N = 15) and 14 mg/m2 (N = 20) were 2021.5 +/- 1461.3 h*ng/mL and 1565.7 +/- 5656.2 h*ng/mL, respectively, with a median half-life of 4.8 and 4.9 hours respectively, which is comparable to single-agent values. Conclusions: The combination of AZA and ROMI is well tolerated, with cytopenias being the most common G3-4 AE. The combination appears to exhibit marked T-cell lineage-specific activity. The 100% ORR in AITL patients is unprecedented and warrants detailed follow-up. Ongoing sequencing analysis will evaluate the impact of recurring mutations on the clinical activity of the combination. The study is actively accruing (NCT01998035). Figure Figure. Disclosures O'Connor: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Nanatinostat (Nstat) and Valganciclovir (VGCV) in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive (EBV +) Lymphomas: Final Results from the Phase 1b/2 VT3996-201 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
Bradley M. Haverkos ◽  
Onder Alpdogan ◽  
Robert Baiocchi ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
Tatyana A. Feldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction: EBV can be associated with several types of lymphomas, with reported frequencies of up to 8-10% in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 30-100% in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes, 80% in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and 15-30% in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), with adverse impact on outcomes. Nanatinostat (Nstat) is a Class-I selective oral HDAC inhibitor that induces the expression of the lytic BGLF4 EBV protein kinase in EBV + tumor cells, activating ganciclovir (GCV) via phosphorylation. This results in GCV-induced inhibition of viral and cellular DNA synthesis and apoptosis. Herein we report the final results from this exploratory study for patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas (NCT03397706). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 with histologically confirmed EBV + lymphomas (defined as any degree of EBER-ISH positivity), R/R to ≥1 prior systemic therapies with an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0×10 9/L, platelet count ≥50×10 9/L, and no curative treatment options per investigator were enrolled into 5 dose escalation cohorts to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) of Nstat + VGCV for phase 2 expansion. Phase 2 patients received the RP2D (Nstat 20 mg daily, 4 days per week + VGCV 900 mg orally daily) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal. Primary endpoints were safety/RP2D (phase 1b) and overall response rate (ORR) (phase 2); secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, duration of response (DoR), time to response, progression free survival and overall survival. Responses were assessed using Lugano 2014 response criteria beginning at week 8. Results: As of 18 June 2021, 55 patients were enrolled (phase 1b: 25; phase 2: 30). Lymphoma subtypes were DLBCL (n=7), extranodal NK/T-cell (ENKTL) (n=9), PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n=5), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=6), cutaneous T cell (n=1), HL (n=11), other B cell (n=3), and immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (IA-LPD) (n=13), including PTLD (n=4), HIV-associated (n=5), and other [n=4: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=2), common variable/primary immunodeficiency (n=2)]. Median age was 60 years (range 19-84), M/F 35/20, median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-11), 76% had ≥2 prior therapies, 78% were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 84% had exhausted standard therapies. EBER positivity ranged from <1 to 90% in 42 tumor biopsies with central lab review. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of all grades were nausea (38%), neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (34%), and constipation (31%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs in >10% of patients included neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (20%), and lymphopenia (14%). Dose reductions and interruptions due to treatment-related AEs were reported in 14 (25%) and 16 (29%) patients, respectively. Only 1 patient had to discontinue therapy. There were no cases of CMV reactivation. For 43 evaluable patients (EBER-ISH + with ≥ 1 post-treatment response assessment) across all histologies, the investigator-assessed ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 40% (17/43) and 19% (8/43) respectively. Patients with T/NK-NHL (n=15; all refractory to their last therapy) had an ORR of 60% (n=9) with 27% (n=4) CRs. Two patients (ENKTL and PTCL-NOS) in PR and CR respectively were withdrawn at 6.7 and 6.6 months (m) respectively for autologous stem cell transplantation. For DLBCL (n=6), ORR/CR was 67%/33% (both CRs were in patients refractory to first-line R-CHOP). For IA-LPD (n=13), ORR/CR was 30%/20% (PTLD: 1 CR, other: 1 CR, 1 PR). For HL (n=10), there was 1 PR (4 SD). The median DoR for all responders was 10.4 m, with a median follow-up from response of 5.7 m (range 1.9-34.1 m). For the 17 responders, 8 lasted ≥ 6 months. Conclusions: The combination of Nstat and VGCV was well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile and shows promising efficacy in patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas, particularly in refractory T/NK-NHL, a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas with dismal outcomes, with multiple durable responses. Further evaluation of this novel combination therapy for the treatment of recurrent EBV + lymphomas is ongoing in the phase 2 VT3996-202 trial. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baiocchi: Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy; viracta: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Codiak Biosciences: Research Funding; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy. Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Feldman: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Other: Study investigator. Brem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SeaGen: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KiTE Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys/Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Scheinberg: Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Alexion pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Joffe: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy. Katkov: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. McRae: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Royston: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Rojkjaer: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Porcu: Viracta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kiowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; DrenBio: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Pralatrexate: Phase 1/2 Study in Japanese Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4157-4157
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Maeda ◽  
Kensei Tobinai ◽  
Hirokazu Nagai ◽  
Takahiko Nakane ◽  
Tatsu Shimoyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Western Countries ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Previous Phase

Abstract Introduction:Pralatrexate (PDX) is a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor with high affinity for reduced folate carrier 1 and folylpolyglutamate synthetase, resulting in extensive internalization and accumulation in tumor cells. In the previous phase 2 study for relapsed or refractory (R/R) PTCL in western countries, the overall response rate (ORR) was 29% (32 of 109 evaluable patients [pts]), as assessed by an independent central review (O'Connor et al. JCO 2011). We conducted this phase 1/2 study to evaluate the tolerability, safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of PDX in Japanese pts with R/R PTCL. Methods: Eligibility criteria included age ≥20, histologically confirmed PTCL according to the 2008 WHO classification, disease progression after ≥1 prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2. PDX was administered intravenously weekly for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles with concurrent vitamin B12 and folic acid. There were 2 cohorts in phase 1: Cohort 1 was at 30 mg/m2 of the US-approved dose and Cohort 2 would start at 20 mg/m2 if 30 mg/m2 was not tolerated. The primary endpoint was ORR in phase 2 and secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Response was evaluated by the independent central imaging review using the International Workshop Criteria (Cheson et al. JCO 1999). Cryotherapy and professional oral care (e.g. dental cleaning and oral hygiene instruction) by dentists before and during PDX treatment were recommended to reduce the severity of mucositis. An educational handbook was offered to all pts to learn symptoms, prevention and self-care of oral mucositis. Results:A total of 25 pts received ≥1 dose of PDX and were included in the safety analysis (median age 71 years; 68% male; median of 3 prior therapies; 32% refractory to the most recent therapy; 16% low risk, 48% low-intermediate risk, 24% high-intermediate risk and 12% high risk by International Prognostic Index). Of these, 3 pts were enrolled in phase 1 and 22 pts in phase 2. Two pts in phase 2 were excluded from the efficacy analysis due to lack of a confirmed diagnosis of PTCL by the central pathology review. In phase 1, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 3 pts for Cohort 1. In phase 2, using 30 mg/m2 as the recommended dose, the ORR was 45% (9 of 20 evaluable pts in phase 2; 90% CI, 26% to 65%) with 2 complete responses and 7 partial responses achieved in Cycle 1. At the time of data cut-off, median DoR of 9 responders was not reached (range, 1 to 358 days) and 4 responders were still on PDX treatment. The median PFS of all 20 evaluable pts was 150 days (95% CI, 43 to 183). Among 23 evaluable pts for efficacy in phase 1/2, 5 pts had died and median OS was not reached (range, 41 to 570 days) after a median follow-up of 183 days for censored cases. In contrast to the results from the previous phase 2 study in western countries showing the ORR of 8% (1 of 13) in pts with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), the ORR in AITL pts was 44% (4 of 9), which was similar to the ORR in pts with PTCL not otherwise specified (50%; 6 of 12) or pts with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (50%; 1 of 2) in this study. The plasma PDX concentration peaked immediately after intravenous injection over 3 to 5 minutes and the elimination half-life was about 10 to 20 minutes. The most common grade (G) 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (52%; 13 pts), thrombocytopenia (40%; 10 pts), leukopenia (28%; 7 pts), neutropenia (24%; 6 pts), anemia (20%; 5 pts). Mucositis was observed in 21 pts (84%) including G1 (20%; 5 pts), G2 (44%; 11 pts) and G3 (20%; 5 pts). G4 mucositis did not occur in any pts. Median duration of G2 mucositis was 8 days (range, 3 to 15) and that of G3 was 12 days (range, 8 to 17). According to the criteria for dose modification, the dose of PDX was reduced to 20 mg/m2 due to mucositis in 6 pts. One pt discontinued the treatment due to G2 mucositis recurrence after dose reduction. All 25 treated pts received ≥1 time cryotherapy at PDX administration and 20 of them continued it throughout the study. Thirteen pts received ≥1 time dental scaling or dental cleaning. Conclusion: PDX at 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 of 7 weeks was effective and well-tolerated in Japanese pts with R/R PTCL. Early oral or dental care potentially ameliorates mucositis and it may be useful for continuing PDX treatment more safely. This study was sponsored by Mundipharma KK. Disclosures Maeda: Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Tobinai:Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.: Consultancy; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria; SERVIER: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma KK: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nagai:Mundipharma KK: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Nakane:Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Shimoyama:Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Nakazato:Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Sakai:Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Ishikawa:Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Izutsu:Eisai: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Ueda:Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Mundipharma KK: Consultancy.

scholarly journals ZUMA-11: A Phase 1/2 Multicenter Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) + Utomilumab Patients with Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4084-4084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Reshef ◽  
David B. Miklos ◽  
John M. Timmerman ◽  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
Nabila N. Bennani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T

Background: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is associated with poor outcomes to standard salvage therapy (Crump M, et al. Blood. 2017). In SCHOLAR-1, a large multicenter, patient-level, retrospective study, patients with R/R diffuse LBCL had a 26% objective response rate (ORR) to the next line of therapy, a 7% complete response (CR) rate, and a median overall survival of 6.3 months (Crump M, et al. Blood 2017). Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved for patients with R/R LBCL with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. With a median follow-up of 27.1 months in ZUMA-1, the ORR with axi-cel was 83% (58% CR rate) in patients with refractory LBCL (Locke FL, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Activation of the costimulatory receptor 4-1BB (CD137) on CAR T cells may enhance axi-cel antitumor activity by enhancing T cell proliferation, function, and survival. Utomilumab (uto), an investigational monoclonal antibody agonist of the 4-1BB pathway, enhanced T cell function and survival in preclinical studies (Fisher TS, et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012) and had favorable single-agent safety in patients (Segal NH, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2018). Possible mechanisms of resistance to axi-cel are thought to be suboptimal CAR T cell expansion an exclusionary tumor microenvironment and CD19 target antigen loss (Neelapu SS, et al. Blood 2017, Rossi JM, et al J Immunother Cancer. 2018). Combination strategies that increase proliferation, expansion, and persistence of CAR T cells or prevent activation-induced cell death of CAR T cells may improve clinical outcomes observed with axi-cel. ZUMA-11 is a Phase 1/2 study investigating the efficacy and safety of axi-cel + uto in patients with refractory LBCL. Methods: The primary objectives of this study are to determine the safety, recommended Phase 2 dosing and timing (Phase 1), and efficacy (Phase 2) of axi-cel + uto in adult patients with refractory LBCL. Patients with progressive or stable disease as the best response to second-line chemotherapy or relapse ≤ 12 months after autologous stem cell transplantation, a prior anti-CD20 antibody and anthracycline-containing regimen, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 are eligible. Patients with histologically proven primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma, history of Richter's transformation or chronic lymphocytic lymphoma, prior CAR T cell therapy, or central nervous system involvement of lymphoma are ineligible. In Phase 1, ≈24 patients in ≤ 3 cohorts will receive a single dose of axi-cel and escalating doses of uto (10, 30, or 100 mg) using a 3 + 3 design in up to 4 of 6 cohorts. The recommended uto dose will be based on dose-limiting toxicities and other factors. Patients will be leukapheresed and may receive optional, nonchemotherapy bridging therapy per investigator decision. After conditioning chemotherapy, patients will receive a single infusion of axi-cel (target dose, 2 × 106 CAR T cells/kg) on Day 0 followed by uto on Day 1 and every 4 weeks for 6 months or until progressive disease. Patients will be treated one at a time during Phase 1, and patients treated with axi-cel will be staggered by ≥ 2 weeks. Day 21 uto administration will be explored if toxicity is unacceptable with Day 1 administration. The primary endpoints are incidence of dose-limiting toxicities in Phase 1 and CR rate in Phase 2. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and levels of CAR T cells and cytokines in blood. This study uses a single-arm design to estimate the true CR rate; with a sample size of 27 patients, of which ≤ 3 patients will have been treated in the Phase 1 portion, the maximum half-width of the 95% confidence interval about response will be ≥ 21%. ZUMA-11 is open and accruing patients. Disclosures Reshef: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Miklos:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Becton Dickinson: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; AlloGene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene-Juno: Consultancy. Timmerman:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; ImmunGene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Jacobson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Humanigen: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support. Bennani:Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rossi:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Sherman:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Sun:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Palluconi:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Kim:Kite, A Gilead Company: Employment. Jain:Kite/Gilead: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Venetoclax Shows Low Therapeutic Activity in BCL2-Positive Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: A Phase 2 Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ballotta ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Stefano Pileri ◽  
Riccardo Bruna ◽  
Monica Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Bcl2 Protein

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) have a poor prognosis, with an expected survival of less than 1 year using standard salvage therapies. Recent advances in our understanding of the biology of PTCL have led to identifying B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL2) protein as a potential therapeutic target. BLC2 inhibitor venetoclax was investigated in a prospective phase II trial in patients with BCL2-positive R/R PTCL after at least one previous standard line of treatment (NCT03552692). Venetoclax given alone at a dosage of 800 mg/day resulted in one complete response (CR) and two stable diseases (SDs) among 17 enrolled patients. The majority of patients (88.2%) interrupted the treatment due to disease progression. No relationship with BCL2 expression was documented. At a median follow-up of 8 months, two patients are currently still on treatment (one CR and one SD). No case of tumor lysis syndrome was registered. Therefore, venetoclax monotherapy shows activity in a minority of patients whose biological characteristics have not yet been identified.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03552692, EudraCT number 2017-004630-29).

Pralatrexate Is Active in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): Results of a Multicenter, Dose-Finding Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 919-919
Author(s):  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Madeleine Duvic ◽  
Youn Kim ◽  
Jasmine M Zain ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 919 Background: Pralatrexate enters cancer cells via the reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC-1) and is efficiently polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS), leading to high intracellular retention. In a Phase 1/2 study of patients with hematologic malignancies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in aggressive T-cell lymphoma with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 30 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 of 7 weeks. The generally indolent course of CTCL may be better treated at lower doses in a maintenance fashion if a lower incidence and severity of adverse events can be achieved while preserving activity. PDX-010 is an open-label, single-agent, multicenter, Phase 1 dose-reduction trial in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. The primary objective is to identify an optimal dose and schedule of pralatrexate for these patients. Methods: Eligibility included mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); with disease progression after at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The pralatrexate dose and schedule started at 30 mg/m2 by IV push on 3 of 4 weeks and subsequent cohorts received reduced doses (20, 15, 10 mg/m2) and/or schedules (3/4 or 2/3 weeks) of pralatrexate based on tolerability. All patients received supplementation with vitamin B12 1 mg intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and folic acid 1 mg orally once daily. As we sought a well tolerated regimen the definition of DLTs to trigger dose reduction included toxicities such as grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 mucositis/stomatitis, and any toxicity leading to dose omission or reduction in cycle 1. If DLT occurred and a response was seen, the following cohort was opened at the next lower dose or next less frequent schedule. Response was evaluated by modified severity-weighted adjustment tool (SWAT) every 2 cycles for 6 months and then every 4 cycles. For patients with lymph node involvement, scans were completed at baseline and upon clinical response or end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Results: Thirty-one patients received pralatrexate, with 18 (58%) men and median age of 57 yrs (range, 30-81). Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 1-25). Cohorts at the following doses/schedules were enrolled: 30 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=2), 20 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=3), 20 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=7), 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=6), 15 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=3), and 10 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=10). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 72 days (range, 7-491+); 4 patients received >10 cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were mucositis (18 patients [58%]), nausea (14 patients [45%]), fatigue (14 patients [45%]), pyrexia (7 patients [23%]), vomiting (6 patients [19%]), anemia (6 patients [19%]), and edema (5 patients [16%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities in >1 patient each were mucositis (4 patients [13%]) and anemia (2 patients [6%]). Mucositis was dose limiting (≥ grade 2) in 8 patients (26%). A total of 11 responses were observed, including 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. In the 18 patients who received pralatrexate at a dose intensity of 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks or greater, the objective response rate was 56% (10/18 patients). This appeared to be the threshold dose for substantial activity in CTCL, below which the incidence of responses decreased in this dose de-escalation trial. Conclusion: Pralatrexate shows impressive activity in the treatment of relapsed CTCL. The optimal dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability for CTCL was determined to be pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly on 3 of 4 weeks. This cohort is being expanded to better assess efficacy and durability. Disclosures: Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Duvic:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.

Final Results From a Pivotal, Multicenter, International, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Romidepsin In Progressive or Relapsed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Following Prior Systemic Therapy

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 114-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
H. Miles Prince ◽  
Francine M Foss ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy

Abstract Abstract 114 Background: Romidepsin is a potent HDAC inhibitor approved by the FDA for patients (pts) with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. Durable clinical benefit and tolerability of romidepsin in pts with recurrent or refractory PTCL have been previously observed in a phase 2 trial conducted by the National Cancer Institute. The aim of this phase 2, single-arm, open-label registration study was to evaluate the activity of romidepsin in a larger number of pts with progressive or relapsed PTCL. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed PTCL (PTCL NOS, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ALCL [ALK-1 negative], other subtypes) who failed or were refractory to ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy, and had measurable disease and ECOG performance status 0–2 were eligible. Exclusions included inadequate bone marrow or other organ function and significant cardiovascular abnormalities. Pts received romidepsin 14 mg/m2 as a 4-h IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles; treatment could be extended for stable disease (SD) or response. The primary endpoint was rate of complete response (CR + CRu) as evaluated by a central Independent Review Committee (IRC) using International Working Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. IRC assessment consisted of a 2-step process, with initial radiographic review of images (CT, MRI) followed by an overall clinical assessment based on the radiology evaluations, photographs, and relevant clinical parameters. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR): CR + CRu + partial response (PR), investigator-assessed responses, duration of response, time to response, and safety. Results: 131 pts from 48 US, European, and Australian sites were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of romidepsin (as-treated population); 130 patients had histologically confirmed PTCL by central review. Mean age of all pts was 59.4 y (range, 20–83) and median time since diagnosis was 1.25 y (range, 0–17). Median number of prior systemic therapies was 2 (range, 1–8). 21 pts (16%) had failed a prior stem cell transplant. Responses assessed by the IRC are noted in the table below. Longest duration of response is 26+ mo and 16 (94%) of the 17 pts with a CR had not progressed as of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010). Investigator-assessed responses included 21 pts (16%) with CR + CRu, 18 pts (14%) with PR for an ORR of 30%. Currently, 13 pts continue to receive treatment (range, 10–36 cycles). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 126 of 131 pts (96%). AEs reported in ≥ 20% of pts were nausea (59%), fatigue (41%), vomiting (38%), thrombocytopenia (38%), diarrhea (35%), pyrexia (34%), neutropenia (30%), anorexia (28%), constipation (28%), anemia (23%), and dysgeusia (21%). AEs ≥ grade 3 were reported for 86 pts (66%), with the most common (≥ 5%) being pneumonia (5%), pyrexia (5%), sepsis (5%), and vomiting (5%). 60 pts (46%) had at least 1 serious AE: the most frequently reported (≥ 5%) were pyrexia (7%), pneumonia (5%), vomiting (5%), and sepsis (5%). 22 pts (17%) withdrew due to AEs. 8 pts (6%) died within 30 days of the last dose of romidepsin; 1 death, due to sepsis, was assessed as possibly related to treatment. Conclusions: Complete and durable responses were observed with single agent romidepsin in pts with relapsed PTCL. These data support the therapeutic potential for romidepsin in relapsed PTCL and suggest that romidepsin is a strong candidate for inclusion in future novel regimens for these diseases. As of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010), the median duration of follow-up for CR is 8.2 mo. Disclosures: Coiffier: Gloucester: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Romidepsin is indicated for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Romidepsin is not currently approved for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Pro:Celgene: Research Funding. Prince:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Foss:Celgene: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Allos: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Sokol:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Caballero:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Padmanabhan:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shustov:Celgene: Research Funding. Nichols:Celgene: Employment. Carroll:Celgene: Employment. Balser:Gloucester Pharmaceutical: Consultancy. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals A Phase 1/1b Open-Label, Multicenter, Two-Part Study of SETD2 Inhibitor EZM0414 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1679-1679
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Jay Yang ◽  
Neelu Yadav ◽  
Helen Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease of monoclonal plasma cells. More than 40% of patients with MM harbor translocations of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene on chromosome 14, leading to overexpression of putative oncogenes which can ultimately lead to plasma cell-derived, post-malignancy MM. One such translocation, t(4;14), is seen in 15% of patients and juxtaposes IGH control elements with two genes on chromosome 4, FGFR3 and MMSET. Patients harboring the (4;14) translocation have a poor response to standard of care therapies and an overall poor prognosis. MMSET expression has been confirmed as a driver in t(4;14) MM pathogenesis, but MMSET inhibitors have not yet been successfully developed in the clinic. Since MMSET generates the substrate for Su(var)3-9, enhancer of zeste, trithorax domain-containing 2 (SETD2) activity, SETD2 inhibition offers promise for targeting the underlying oncogenic mechanism in t(4;14) MM. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of lymphoma in the United States, with a 5-year relative survival rate of 53% in patients diagnosed with stage IV DLBCL. Given the poor survival outcomes and low remission rates for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL, there is a need for better treatment options. Although SETD2 mutations are described in DLBCL, the mechanism of action of SETD2 inhibitors remains unclear. EZM0414 is a potent and selective, orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of SETD2. Preclinical data have demonstrated antitumor activity of EZM0414 in both t(4;14) and non-t(4;14) MM and DLBCL models. This study (enrollment scheduled to begin Q3 2021) will evaluate the safety and efficacy of EZM0414 when administered as monotherapy in patients with R/R MM with or without t(4;14), or with R/R DLBCL. Study Design and Methods: This first-in-human, 2-part, multicenter, open-label study will enroll patients aged ≥18 years with R/R MM who have received prior treatment with immune modulators, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 therapy, or who are intolerant to established therapies known to provide clinical benefit in MM, or with R/R DLBCL who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including treatment with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP); rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (R-EPOCH); rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (R-hyper CVAD); or other standard of care therapies. Patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation will be excluded from this study. The first part of the study will be a phase 1 dose escalation study using a Bayesian optimal interval design to evaluate the safety and tolerability of EZM0414 in patients with R/R MM with or without t(4;14), or with R/R DLBCL. Six dose levels of 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, and 900 mg administered once daily will be tested. Patients will be enrolled and treated in a cohort size of 3, and up to 36 patients will be enrolled to evaluate at least 10 patients at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The MTD will be selected at the dose level with a target dose-limiting toxicity rate ≤25%. The second part of the study (phase 1b) will be a dose expansion at the MTD in patients with R/R MM with or without t(4;14), or with R/R DLBCL using the Bayesian optimal phase 2 design. Dose expansion will include 3 cohorts of up to 20 patients each. Cohort 1 will enroll patients with t(4;14)-positive R/R MM, cohort 2 will enroll patients with t(4;14)-negative R/R MM, and cohort 3 will enroll patients with R/R DLBCL. The primary endpoints will be determining safety, dose-limiting toxicities, the MTD, and a recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary endpoints include the objective response rate, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Exploratory endpoints include a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile analysis and the determination of mechanism of action biomarkers, such as histones and histone methylation. The study design will include a futility assessment in the phase 1b part of the study, which will be initiated when clinical data from the first 10, 15, and 20 enrolled patients in the expansion cohort are available. Disclosures Richardson: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding. Niesvizky: BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Yang: Epizyme, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: May own stock/options. Yadav: Epizyme, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Hsu: Epizyme, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Flowers: Iovance: Research Funding; Adaptimmune: Research Funding; Guardant: Research Funding; Denovo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Biopharma: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Epizyme, Inc.: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; 4D: Research Funding; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; Nektar: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Allogene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Xencor: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; EMD: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Ziopharm: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase Ib/IIa Trial of the Combination of Romidepsin, Lenalidomide and Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Shows Complete Responses in Relapsed and Refractory T-Cell Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2991-2991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Mehta-Shah ◽  
Alison J Moskowitz ◽  
Matthew Lunning ◽  
Peggy Lynch ◽  
Mark Scheuerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background:Epigenetic manipulation and immunomodulation are therapeutic strategies in hematologic malignancies. In our previous study, the combination of romidepsin and lenalidomide demonstrated a 58% overall response rate, complete response rate of 11% and median event free survival was 16 weeks in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma. Given the potential synergy of proteasome inhibitors with histone deacetylase inhibitors and lenalidomide, we conducted a phase Ib/IIa study to evaluate the safety and toxicity of romidepsin and lenalidomide in combination with carfilzomib in pts with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Here we report the safety, toxicity, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) from the completed phase I portion of the study as well as the efficacy data from the completed T-cell lymphoma phase IIa cohort. Methods: The phase I portion evaluated toxicity and defined MTD. The clinicalactivity of the combination of romidepsin, lenalidomide, and carfilzomib was assessed in the phase I and lineage specific phase IIa cohorts. Romidepsin and carfilzomib were given IV on days 1, 8 and lenalidomide was given orally on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. A standard 3+3 dose escalation schema was followed: The starting dose was romidepsin 8 mg/m2,lenalidomide 15 mg, carfilzomib 36mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined in cycle 1 as ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 3 hematologic toxicity resulting in a significant delay of treatment or inability to receive day 1 of cycle 2 due to continued drug related toxicity. Tumor response was based on disease-specific criteria.Pts could be treated until progression, intolerance, or response adequate to allow allogeneic transplantation. Results:20 pts were enrolled with 19 evaluable for toxicity (1 patient with T-cell lymphoma progressed prior to receipt of any study drug). 17 pts were treated for T-cell lymphoma (11 in the phase 1 portion and 6 in the phase IIa cohort): peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS)-9, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL)-4 (one with concurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-DLBCL), mycosis fungoides (MF)-2, transformed MF-1, extra-nodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL)-1. 3 pts in the phase 1 portion were treated for B-cell lymphoma: DLBCL-3. The T-cell lymphoma cohort is complete and efficacy data is reported here. Dose level 2 (romidepsin 8 mg/m2,lenalidomide 15 mg, carfilzomib 45mg/m2) exceeded the MTD with 2/6 DLTs: 1 pt with grade 3 thrombocytopenia resulting in treatment delay and 1 pt with grade 4 thrombocytopenia. There were no DLTs among 6 pts treated in dose level 1 (romidepsin 8 mg/m2,lenalidomide 15 mg, carfilzomib 36mg/m2) and dose level 1 was deemed the MTD. Grade 3-4 toxicities in >10% pts included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. SAEs included: infection-3, progression of disease resulting in hospitalization-3, fever-2, febrile neutropenia-1, DVT-1, edema-1, dyspnea-1, atrial flutter-1, generalized weakness-1, and vomiting with diarrhea-1. Of the 16 pts with T-cell lymphoma evaluable for response, the overall response rate was 50% (8/16, 95% CI: 25 to 75%). The complete responses rate was 31% (5/16, 95% CI: 11 to 59%) and the partial response rate was 19% (3/16, 95% CI: 4 to 46%). Complete responses were seen in AITL (4/5) and PTCL-NOS (1/8) with 3 pts in CR proceeding to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Partial responses were seen in PTCL-NOS-1, AITL-1, and transformed MF-1. In T-cell lymphoma, the median event free survival for all pts was 9.7 weeks (95% CI: 6.0 to NR) and for responders was not reached (95% CI: 15.0 to NR). The median time to response was 5.8 weeks. The median duration of response was 9.6 weeks (95% CI: 8.0 to NR). 3 pts underwent allogeneic transplantation following this therapy and another 2 pts with CR remain in continuous remission. Median duration of follow up was 20.4 weeks (range 3.4-40.9 weeks). Conclusions: The MTD dose for phase 2 study was identified as romidepsin 8mg/m2, lenalidomide 15mg and carfilzomib 36mg/m2. No unexpected toxicities have emerged. The preliminary overall and complete response rates of this regimen are promising in T-cell lymphoma, particularly in AITL, and warrants further study. An expansion cohort in B-cell lymphoma cohort is ongoing. Disclosures Moskowitz: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Lunning:Gilead: Consultancy; Bristol-Myer-Squibb: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Kumar:Celgene: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Advisory Board. Zelenetz:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Hamlin:Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xencor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding. Noy:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding. Palomba:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Dogan:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Consulting Cancer Panel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Peerview Institute: Consultancy. Horwitz:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; Huya: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals ZUMA-4: A Phase 1/2 Multicenter Study of KTE-X19 in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-42
Author(s):  
Alan S. Wayne ◽  
Gerard Michel ◽  
Daniel W. Lee ◽  
André Baruchel ◽  
Sonali Chaudhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Phase ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Publicly Traded

Background: Although approximately 80% - 85% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common childhood malignancy, achieve durable complete remissions (CRs) after initial treatment, the remaining 15% - 20% of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) ALL have unfavorable outcomes (Leukemia2018;32:2316-25; N Engl J Med 2015;373:1541-52) and could benefit from effective new therapies. KTE-X19 is an autologous, anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved for the treatment of R/R mantle cell lymphoma and under investigation for additional R/R hematologic malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia, adult ALL, and pediatric B cell ALL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). KTE-X19 treatment has shown high rates of CRs, with a manageable safety profile for adult patients with R/R B cell ALL in the Phase 1 portion of ZUMA-3, including those with poor risk factors (J Clin Oncol 2019;37[suppl, abstr]:7006). ZUMA-4 is an ongoing Phase 1/2 study evaluating KTE-X19 in pediatric and adolescent patients with R/R B cell ALL or NHL (NCT02625480). End-of-Phase 1 interim analysis of ZUMA-4 showed the feasibility of KTE-X19 therapy with optimized dosing and adverse event (AE) management strategies for the treatment of pediatric patients with R/R ALL (Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019;66[suppl]:S24). The protocol for Phase 2 of ZUMA-4 has been amended to include broader B cell ALL enrollment criteria with a focus on patients with early relapse associated with poorer outcomes, and an NHL cohort was added. Methods: Key B cell ALL enrollment criteria include age ≤ 21 years, weight ≥ 10 kg, and B cell ALL that is primary refractory, relapsed within 18 months of first diagnosis, R/R after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, or R/R after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at least 100 days prior to enrollment. Criteria for disease burden have been amended to also include patients with minimal residual disease-positive disease at enrollment. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL are eligible if intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or if R/R after ≥ 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. Patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia lymphoid blast crisis or clinically significant infections are not eligible. For B cell NHL, key enrollment criteria include age < 18 years, weight ≥ 10 kg, histologically confirmed diffuse large B cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL NOS), primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma (BL), Burkitt-like lymphoma or unclassified B cell lymphomas intermediate between DLBCL and BL, with ≥ 1 measurable lesion. For NHL, disease must be primary refractory, R/R after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, or R/R after autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation ≥ 100 days prior to enrollment. Patients with acute graft-versus-host disease or chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring treatment within 4 weeks of enrollment are not eligible. Patients with central nervous system-1 disease (no detectable lymphoblasts in cerebrospinal fluid), with central nervous system-2 disease (detectable disease, but white blood cell count < 5/μL in cerebrospinal fluid) without clinically evident neurologic changes, or who had prior blinatumomab treatment can be included in the ALL and NHL cohorts. Patients with prior CD19-directed therapy, except for blinatumomab, are excluded. Patients receive conditioning chemotherapy with fludarabine 25 mg/m2 on Days −4, −3, and −2 and cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2 on Day −2 followed by a single infusion of KTE-X19 at a target dose of 1 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg on Day 0. The study has completed the Phase 1 portion and is currently enrolling in Phase 2, with a target accrual of approximately 50 additional patients with ALL and 16 with NHL. For ALL, the primary Phase 2 objective is to evaluate KTE-X19 efficacy as assessed by overall CR rate (CR + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery). For NHL, the primary Phase 2 objective is KTE-X19 efficacy assessment by objective response rate (complete response + partial response). Secondary Phase 2 objectives for ALL and NHL cohorts include safety and tolerability, additional efficacy endpoints, and changes in patient-reported outcome scores. ZUMA-4 is currently recruiting at 23 sites in the United States, Canada, France, and the Netherlands. Disclosures Wayne: Servier: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding. Lee:Amgen Oncology: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy. Baruchel:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy. Brown:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Servier: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Hermiston:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krueger:Atara: Other: Travel support; Kite, a Gilead Company: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; no honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Shen:Gilead: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Other: Travel support. Tailford:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Masouleh:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document