Discontinuation Patterns in Patients Receiving Novel Oral Agents for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Veterans Health Administration

Introduction Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in adults, accounting for 25-30% of all leukemias in the United States. During the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift in CLL treatment, with increasing adoption of novel oral agents (NOAs) such as acalabrutinib (ACALA), duvelisib (DUV), ibrutinib (IBR), idelalisib (IDELA), and venetoclax (VEN) instead of traditional chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Unlike CIT, most NOAs are given daily for an indefinite period of time and are self-administered at home, raising concerns about adherence and discontinuation. The discontinuation patterns of NOAs in a real-world population of CLL patients is currently unknown. Methods Using the Veterans Administration (VA) Cancer Registry System and electronic healthcare records, we identified patients treated for CLL with NOAs in the VA from November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2018. Patients were followed from the first NOA dispensation until death or the end of the study observation (May 31, 2019). NOAs were selected in accordance with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelinesfor CLL and were extracted using pharmacy dispensation records. Discontinuation was defined as the absence of NOA dispensation within 60 days of estimated exhaustion of patient's NOA supply from the last recorded dispensation. A discontinuation event for each NOA treatment episode in each patient was classified as either 1) a drug holiday, if there was evidence of resumption of the same treatment without any other treatment interventions after the first discontinuation; or 2) permanent discontinuation, in which the treatment ceased without evidence of resumption for 60 days or there was evidence of new treatment initiation after the discontinuation of previous treatment. We report the proportion of discontinuation and exposure-adjusted discontinuation rates (e-AR), which were calculated using the length of NOA duration in person-time. Results We identified 1,196 CLL patients treated with NOAs from November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2018. The mean age at NOA initiation was 70.7 years; 96.7% of patients were male. The median time from diagnosis to NOA initiation was 56.5 months (0-189.5 months). Of the 1,196 patients treated with NOAs, 1,172 received IBR, 53 received IDELA, and 106 received VEN. There were few patients (<10)treated with ACALA and DUV, therefore these patientswere omitted from the final analyses. During a median follow-up of 18.9 months (0-65.3 months), 48.2% NOA treatment courses were followed by a discontinuation event. The proportions of patients who discontinued for IBR, IDELA, and VEN were 47.5%, 77.4%, and 41.5%. The e-AR of IBR, IDELA, and VEN are reported in Table 2. At the end of the study observation (May 2019), 52.6% of IBR, 22.6% of IDELA, and 58.3% of VEN treatment courses were still being administered. In first-line (L1) IBR, the median NOA treatment duration until the first discontinuation was 10.7 months (0.8-55.8 months), 12.6 months (0.5-62.0 months) in second-line (L2) IBR, and 12.2 months (0.78-57.8 months) in third-line or subsequent lines (L3+) IBR. In IDELA treatment courses, the median treatment duration until the first discontinuation was 17.8 months (1.9-41.6 months) in L2 and 4.3 months (1.7-26.2 months) in L3+. In VEN, the median treatment duration until the first discontinuation was 8.4 months (3.1-26.0 months) in L2 and 7.4 months (1.7-18.5 months) in L3+. Of 532 L1 IBR treatment courses with >1 dispensation, 96 (18%) were associated with a drug holiday and 97 (18%) with permanent discontinuation. These numbers were 64 (27%) and 50 (21%) for L2 IBR courses, and 90 (28%) and 76 (24%) for L3+ IBR courses. Similarly, 24 (67%) of L3 IDELA treatment courses with >1 dispensation were associated with permanent discontinuation. Among 63 L3+ VEN courses with >1 dispensation, 6 (10%) were associated with a drug holiday and 14 (22%) with permanent discontinuation. Conclusions To our knowledge, this study is the first to report on the NOA discontinuation in a nationwide VA cohort of CLL patients treated in a real-world setting. Our results suggest there is a substantial proportion of drug holidays and permanent discontinuation among commonly used NOAs. Further efforts will focus on understanding factors leading to discontinuation and the impact of discontinuation/drug holidays on clinical outcomes. Disclosures Biondo: Genentech, Inc.: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership. Halloran:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Shapouri:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Wu:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Sauer:University of Utah and SLC VA Medical Center: Employment. Halwani:Miragen: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptoms in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Results from the Phase II GIBB Study of the Combination of Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123630 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3491-3491 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alexey Danilov ◽

Habte A Yimer ◽

Michael Boxer ◽

John M Burke ◽

Sunil Babu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Health Status ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Global Health ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Future Health ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). GIBB (NCT02320487) is an open-label, single-arm phase II study of obinutuzumab (GA101; G) in combination with bendamustine (G-Benda) in patients with previously untreated CLL. A previous report from the GIBB study demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate of 89.2%, a complete response rate of 49.0%, and no unexpected safety signals with G-Benda (Sharman et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Here we report the final HRQoL data over 3 years from the GIBB study. Methods: Enrolled patients received G-Benda by intravenous infusion over six 28-day cycles: G 100mg on Day (D)1, 900mg on D2, and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of Cycle (C)1, then 1000mg on D1 of C2-6; benda 90mg/m2 on D2-3 of C1, and on D1-2 of C2-6. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) includes a global health status measure, 5 functional scales (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning), 8 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and an item on financial difficulties (Aaronson et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) is a 16-item module, specific to CLL, containing 4 multi-item scales (fatigue, treatment side effects, disease symptoms, and infection) and 2 single items (social activities and future health worries). Both questionnaires were completed by patients on C1D1 (baseline), C3D1, and C6D1, at the end of induction (EOI) treatment (defined as +28 days from C6D1 or early treatment termination visit), at the response visit (defined as 2-3 months after the EOI treatment for all patients who received study treatment and had not experienced disease progression), and every 3 months thereafter at follow-up visits for up to 2 years. In total, there were 14 timepoints where data were collected. HRQoL scores were linear transformed to a 0-100-point scale. Mean baseline scores and mean score changes from baseline at each visit were evaluated. A threshold of ≥10-point change in score represents a clinically meaningful difference. For symptoms, negative change scores from baseline reflect an improvement in symptom burden. For global health status and functioning, positive change scores from baseline reflect improvements. Results: The trial enrolled 102 patients. Median age was 61 years and 68.4% of patients were male. Ninety-eight patients (96%) completed a questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 other questionnaire during a follow-up visit. Questionnaire completion rates at 14 time points ranged from 96% at baseline to 66% at 27 months follow-up (Table 1). According to the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Figure 1), improvements were observed for global health status at all follow-up visits, and clinically meaningful improvements were observed at the response visit, 3 months follow-up, and 27 months follow-up. Clinically meaningful improvements in role functioning were observed at EOI and persisted throughout the 27-month follow-up. For fatigue, clinically meaningful improvements were observed at every visit starting from the end of treatment (EOT) visit. Improvements were also observed for insomnia with mean reductions from baseline ≥10 points at various time points during follow-up. There was no worsening in other patient-reported symptoms or functional status over time. Similarly, with the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 (Figure 2), clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed for fatigue, disease symptoms, and future health worries during treatment, at the EOT and/or throughout the follow-up. The largest improvement was observed for fatigue (-24.7) at the 24-month follow-up and future health worries (-25.4) at the 27-month follow-up. Conclusions: We previously reported that G-Benda is an effective regimen for first-line treatment of CLL with no unexpected safety signals. The HRQoL data from the GIBB trial suggest that G-Benda treatment consistently improved patient HRQoL over time. Several clinically meaningful improvements were observed in HRQoL, including global health status, functioning, symptoms, and future health worries. Disclosures Danilov: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Yimer:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy. Boxer:Gerson Lerman: Consultancy; Best Doctors: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Burke:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Babu:Genentech: Research Funding. Li:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. Mun:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trask:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masaquel:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment. Sharman:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: GAZYVA (obinutuzumab) is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody and is indicated: in combination with chlorambucil, for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia; in combination with bendamustine followed by GAZYVA monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapsed after, or are refractory to, a rituximab-containing regimen

Download Full-text

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.233.233 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 233-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Susan M. O'Brien ◽

Richard R. Furman ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Jan Burger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Management of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Treated with Proteasome Inhibitor Based Therapy at First Relapse in Routine Clinical Practice in Germany

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110937 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1953-1953 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

H. Tilman Steinmetz ◽

Moushmi Singh ◽

Andrea Lebioda ◽

Aurelien Mantonnier ◽

Leah Fink ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Available N ◽

Median Treatment ◽

Median Treatment Duration ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Patient Profiles

Abstract Background: Proteasome inhibitors (PI) represent an important therapeutic advance in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In 2017, three distinct PIs (bortezomib [BTZ], carfilzomib [CFZ] and ixazomib [IXA]) were available in Germany but real-world data describing their usage was scarce. Aim: To describe characteristics and treatment experience of PI-treated patients with RRMM in Germany. Methods: A national retrospective medical chart review included consecutive patients treated with at least one dose of PI-based regimen in participating hospitals/centers across Germany between January and June 2017. The following data were extracted until April 2018 or death of patient, whichever occurred first: patient demographics, disease characteristics and treatment history at diagnosis and at initiation of PI-based therapy. Physician assessed treatment response were also collected. Results: Physicians from 44 participating centers extracted 302 patient charts, including 219 patients in 2nd line (2L) and 83 in 3rd line treatment (3L), as shown in Figure 1. Results for 2L patients are described below (Table 1, Figure 2): BTZ-treated patients represented 42% of patients (n=92) with a PI-based therapy in 2L. BTZ was often combined with dexamethasone (dex) alone (77%). Median age was 74 years and 56.5% had an ECOG status ≥2 at 2L initiation. Most patients (86%) did not receive a prior transplant. Median treatment duration was 6 months among 40 patients who completed 2L; based on 38 narratives, 2L was ended as planned (47.4%). Where response was available (n=83), 25% of patients achieved a complete response/very good partial response [CR/VGPR]. Median time to next treatment (TTnT) was 7.5 months for 12 patients who moved to 3L. Patient profiles differed in terms of prior treatment exposure: 22% of patients had been treated with a BTZ-based therapy in both 1L and 2L and 62% switched therapies from 1L lenalidomide (len) to BTZ. None of the patients receiving len in 1L were transplanted. A CR/VGPR was achieved by 65% of prior BTZ-treated patients (13/20) and 30% of patients with prior len therapy (17/57). CFZ-treated patients: 48% (n=106) of patients received CFZ-based therapy in 2L. Of those, 56% (n=59) received CFZ in combination with len/dex (KRd) and 44% (n=47) with dex alone (Kd). Median age was 68 years, 60.4% had an ECOG status of 0-1 at 2L initiation and 49% had received a transplant. In 1L, 82% had received a BTZ-based regimen. Where response was mentioned (n=89), a CR/VGPR was reached in 53% of CFZ-treated patients. Median treatment duration was 6.5 months (24/106). Based on 21 narratives, the main reason for discontinuing CFZ in 2L was disease progression (47.6%). Median TTnT was 9.5 months for 10 patients who moved to 3L. The patient profiles by KRd or Kd combination were as follows: at KRd initiation, median age was 65 years, 10.2% of patients had an ECOG status ≥2 and 72.9% were transplanted. At Kd initiation, median age was 71 years, 76.6% of patients had an ECOG ≥2 and 19.1% were transplanted. IXA-treated patients (n=21) represented only 10% of PI-treated patients in 2L. Median age was 66 years, 71.4% had an ECOG status of 0-1 at 2L initiation, 33% were transplanted, and 72% had received a BTZ combination in 1L. Information on response was premature as it was only available for 13 patients with no CR reached (VGPR 77%). Median treatment duration was 4 months (n=9) and median TTnT was 10 months for 4 patients who moved into 3L. Limitation: The main limitation of the study was the sample size of IXA-treated patients due to open inclusion criteria to select patient charts. This analysis was not powered to compare between PIs. Hence, results are descriptive of the clinical experience with PI-based therapy to date and reflect current treatment practices in Germany in 2017. Conclusion: In Germany, distinct patient characteristics are observed in clinical practice by selected PI-based therapy. Patients treated with novel PI agents in 2L are generally younger and more transplanted than bortezomib-treated patients; these appear to be important considerations when tailoring therapy in RRMM. In addition, the choice between triplet or doublet therapy for CFZ-based combinations seems to reflect prior transplant status and patients' overall functional performance. Evidence suggests that use of novel PI agents such as CFZ can translate into deeper response in 2L. Disclosures Steinmetz: Amgen, Celgene, Novartis, Vifor: Research Funding; Amgen; BMS, Celgene, Hexal-Sandoz, Medice, Novartis; Janssen-Cilag; Pharmacosmos; Pfizer, Vifor; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis: Other: Travel grants. Singh:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lebioda:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mantonnier:Kantar Health: Employment, Other: Received funding to conduct this research. Fink:Kantar Health: Employment, Other: Received funding to conduct this research. Rieth:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Suzan:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gonzalez-McQuire:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Epidemiology of PNH and Real-World Treatment Patterns Following an Incident PNH Diagnosis in the US

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125867 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3407-3407 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jessica J Jalbert ◽

Umesh Chaudhari ◽

Haixin Zhang ◽

Jonathan Weyne ◽

Jamile M. Shammo

Keyword(s):

Incidence Rate ◽

Real World ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

The United States ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Procedure Codes ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an acquired, life-threatening blood disease. While PNH is known to be a rare disease, the incidence and prevalence of the condition has been described only in a few small studies. In addition, while the International PNH registry is a rich source of data on real-world PNH patients globally, it is not possible to estimate the incidence and prevalence of PNH directly from the registry. As complement inhibitors are becoming the standard of care for PNH treatment, we also sought to explore how patients are managed following an incident PNH diagnosis. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of PNH and to describe real-world treatment patterns among patients newly diagnosed with PNH in the United States (US). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Truven US MarketScan Commercial/Medicare data (1 Jan 2015 to 30 June 2018), an employer-sponsored insurance claims database including annually approximately 30 million insured patients and their dependents' complete longitudinal records of inpatient services, outpatient services, and prescription drug claims covered under a variety of fee-for-service and capitated health plans. While these data are considered nationally representative of Americans with employer-provided health insurance, data come mainly from large employers. To estimate prevalence, we identified patients with ≥ 1 PNH diagnosis (ICD10: D59.5) among persons continually enrolled in the databases in 2017. To estimate incidence, we required ≥1-year of baseline enrolment and no PNH diagnosis or eculizumab exposure, identified using national drug codes [NDC] or procedure codes for drug administration, during the baseline period. Person-time accrued post-baseline until PNH diagnosis, end of study period, or disenrollment. We stratified incidence and prevalence estimates by age and sex and described patients with incident PNH in terms of demographics, comorbidities, and past-year healthcare resource utilization. Using Kaplan-Meier estimators, we estimated incidence of eculizumab initiation, timing of initiation, treatment duration, and risk of discontinuation/treatment holiday (>42 days between eculizumab exposures [i.e. 14-day exposure period + 28-day grace period between infusions], the equivalent of missing 2 infusions assuming a bi-weekly infusion schedule for eculizumab) following the incident PNH diagnosis. While accounting for censoring, we also investigated patterns of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, identified using procedure codes, in terms of incidence and timing of first transfusion following an incident PNH diagnosis. Results: The prevalence of PNH varied little between 2016 and 2017, from 12 to 13 per 1,000,000. The incidence rate over the study period was 5.7 per 1,000,000 person-years, representing 257 incident PNH cases. The incidence rate of PNH increased with age and was similar across sex. At diagnosis, mean age was 50.0 years (standard deviation [SD]: 18.6), 3.1% (8/257) were less than 18 years, 52.1% were women, 19.5% had a past-year diagnosis of aplastic anemia, 8.2% had a past-year diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, 14.0% had a past-year RBC transfusion, and 31.5% had been hospitalized in the past-year. Over a mean follow-up time of 385.6 days (SD: 253.2), 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3-14.1%) of patients initiated eculizumab on average 60.5 days (SD: 55.9) from PNH diagnosis. At 1 year, about one third of patients discontinued eculizumab or had taken a treatment holiday; average treatment duration was 328.2 days (SD:245.4). Cumulative incidence of RBC transfusions at 6 months and 1 year was 14.6% (10.1-18.9%) and 17.4% (12.2-22.3%), respectively. On average, the first RBC transfusion occurred within 63.6 days (SD: 114.4) of an incident PNH diagnosis. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, only a minority of patients recently diagnosed with PNH are initiated on eculizumab. Among PNH patients treated with eculizumab, less than 70% remain on treatment after 1 year. Findings must be interpreted in the context of limitations including lack of information on clone size, symptom burden, measures of disease activity, or bone marrow failure state which may affect treatment course. Future studies should explore factors affecting eculizumab initiation and persistence on treatment. Disclosures Jalbert: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chaudhari:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weyne:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shammo:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onconova: Research Funding; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astex Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Inhibition Of PI3K-δ and -γ Isoforms By IPI-145 In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Overcomes Signals From PI3K/AKT/S6 Pathway and Promotes Apoptosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4167.4167 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4167-4167 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Kumudha Balakrishnan ◽

Marisa Peluso ◽

Min Fu ◽

Nathalie Y. Rosin ◽

Jan A. Burger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Therapeutic Potential ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

B Cell Malignancies ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Enhanced Production ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract The functional relevance of the B cell Receptor (BCR) pathway and identification of protein kinases as therapeutic targets have recently shifted the paradigm for treatment of B cell malignancies. Inhibition of protein and lipid kinases (Bruton Tyrosine Kinase [BTK] and phosphoinositide 3-kinase [PI3K]) with ibrutinib and GS-1101 has been shown to be active in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Importantly, differential expression and function of PI3K isoforms support isoform-selective inhibition of this kinase in CLL. Whilst PI3K-α and PI3K-β are ubiquitously expressed, PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ are primarily restricted to leukocytes. Since CLL cells generally express high levels of active PI3K-δ, great interest has been focused on inhibition of PI3K-δ. However, given the distinct and non-overlapping roles of PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ in immune cells, exploration of the therapeutic potential of combined inhibition of both PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ in CLL patients is warranted. IPI-145 is a potent, orally bioavailable, inhibitor of PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoforms with KD values of 0.023 nM and 0.24 nM, respectively. Treatment of primary CLL cells (n=51) with IPI-145 (1 µM) resulted in significant apoptosis (median 33%; range 12 – 40%). Patients with mutated (n=13) or unmutated IGHV gene status (n=13), previously untreated (n=21) or treated (n=8), displayed no significant difference in apoptosis from IPI-145. Samples with different prognostic markers such as 13q (del) or FISH negative samples were equally sensitive to IPI-145. Side by side studies of IPI-145 with ibrutinib and GS-1101, revealed that IPI-145 is comparatively potent (IC50 7.6 µM, compared to >10 µM) in promoting apoptosis. Crosslinking with anti-IgM enhanced the survival of primary CLL cells in association with activation of PI3K-δ,γ/AKTSer473/pBadSer136/S6Ser235/236 pathway, which was in turn mitigated upon treatment with IPI-145 (n=9). Consistent with cell death, cleavage of PARP and decrease in anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 (but not Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL) was observed. Measurement of the C-C chemokine, CCL3, a biomarker for BCR signaling inhibition in CLL, demonstrated 15 to 48 – fold increase upon anti-IgM stimulation, which was reversed when cells were treated with 1 µM IPI-145 (10 to 80-fold decrease; n=6). Alternatively, co-culturing CLL primary cells with bone marrow stromal cells to mimic the leukemic microenvironment induced the protein levels of all four Class I PI3K isoforms and downstream PI3K/AKT/S6 signaling axis, which was significantly attenuated by IPI-145. To mimic the proliferative state in lymph node pseudofollicles, CLL cells were stimulated to proliferate with CD40L/IL-2/IL-10 and the effect of IPI-145 was measured. Both pAKT and Ki-67 expression were markedly inhibited in primary CLL cells at concentrations of IPI-145 in the low nanomolar range (EC50<10nM; n=2), suggesting a potent anti-proliferative effect of IPI-145 on CLL cells in the nodal environment. Given the significant role of the chemo-attractant, SDF-1, in the directed migration of B-cells, chemotaxis assay demonstrated reduction in migration of CLL cells towards SDF-1 in presence of IPI-145 (% control reduction - median 23%; range 2-42%; n=8). Furthermore, IPI-145 treatment enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (n=6). Taken together, these results demonstrate the potential of combined inhibition of the PI3K-δ and -γ isoforms in CLL, and support clinical investigation of IPI-145 in B-cell malignancies, including CLL. Disclosures: Balakrishnan: Infinity Pharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Peluso:Infinity Pharmaceuticals., Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Faia:Infinity Pharmaceuticals., Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kutok:Infinity Pharmaceuticals., Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. McGovern:Infinity Pharmaceuticals., Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gandhi:Infinity Pharmaceuticals., Inc: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptoms in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results from the Phase II GIBB Study of the Combination of Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.683.683 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 683-683

Author(s):

Jeffrey P. Sharman ◽

Habte Yimer ◽

Michael Boxer ◽

Nicholas Di Bella ◽

Sunil Babu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Future Health ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Eortc Qlq

Abstract Introduction: Maintenance and/or improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). GIBB (NCT02320487) is an ongoing, open-label, single-arm Phase II study of the combination of obinutuzumab (GA101; G) and bendamustine (B) (BG) in patients with previously untreated CLL. A previous report from the GIBB study demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate of 89.2%, a complete response rate of 49.0%, and no unexpected safety signals with BG (Sharman et al. ASCO 2017). Here, we present the HRQoL data from GIBB. Methods: In the GIBB trial, patients received BG by intravenous infusion over six 28-day cycles: obinutuzumab 100mg on Day (D)1, 900mg on D2, and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of Cycle 1, then 1000mg on D1 of Cycles 2-6; B 90mg/m2 on D2-3 of Cycle 1, and on D1-2 of Cycles 2-6. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life - Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire includes a global health status measure, 5 functional scales (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning), 8 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and an item on financial difficulties (Aaronson et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) is a 16-item module, specific to CLL, containing 4 multi-item scales (fatigue, treatment side effects, disease symptoms, and infection) and 2 single items (social activities and future health worries; EORTC website, accessed July 25, 2017). Both questionnaires were completed by patients on D1 of Cycles 1 (baseline), 3, and 6, at the end of induction treatment (defined as +28 days from D1 of Cycle 6 or early treatment termination visit), at the response visit (defined as 2-3 months after the end of induction treatment, for all patients who received study treatment and had not experienced disease progression), and every 3 months thereafter at follow-up visits. HRQoL scores were linear transformed to a 0-100 point scale. Mean baseline scores and mean score changes at each visit were evaluated. A threshold of ≥10-point change in score represents a clinically meaningful difference. Results: Of 102 patients enrolled in the trial, 98 completed a questionnaire at baseline and at least one other questionnaire during a follow-up visit. Questionnaire completion rates were 86.7%, 77.6%, 80.6%, and 86.7% at Cycles 3, 6, at the end of induction treatment, and at the response visit, respectively. Median age was 61 years and 68.4% of patients were male. According to the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Figure 1), clinically meaningful improvements were observed for global health status at the response visit, and for role functioning at the end of induction treatment and at the response visit. A trend was observed for improvement in emotional functioning. The greatest improvement in HRQoL score was observed for fatigue (mean baseline score: 37.64), with mean changes from baseline of −4.01, −5.48, −11.67, and −16.34 at Cycles 3, 6, at the end of induction treatment, and at the response visit, respectively. Improvements were also observed for insomnia (mean baseline score: 33.33), with mean changes from baseline of −6.59, −9.09, −9.7, and −10.98, respectively. There was no worsening in other patient-reported symptoms or functional status over time. Similarly, with the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 (Figure 2), clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed for fatigue, disease symptoms, and future health worries during treatment, at the end of induction treatment and/or at the response visit. The greatest change at the response visit was observed for fatigue (−21.23) and future health worries (−20.24). A positive trend was also observed for improvements in the social activities scale. Conclusions: We previously reported that BG is an effective regimen for first-line treatment of CLL with no unexpected safety signals. In addition, the HRQoL data from the GIBB trial suggest that BG treatment improves patient HRQoL. Several clinically meaningful improvements were observed in HRQoL, including global health status, functioning, symptoms, and future health worries at the time of the response visit. Disclosures Sharman: Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: GIBB is sponsored by Genentech Inc. Third-party editorial support, under the direction of Anthony Masaquel, was provided by Lynda McEvoy of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Yimer: Juno pharma: Equity Ownership; Bellucum Pharma: Equity Ownership. Babu: Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy. Li: Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mun: Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trask: Genentech: Employment, Other: stock. Masaquel: Genentech Inc.: Employment, Other: I Receive Roche stock options. Reyes: Genentech Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Retrospective Non-Interventional Assessment of the Use of Idelalisib in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in Spain

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126588 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5473-5473 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Christelle M Ferra ◽

Manuel Perez Encinas ◽

Javier Lopez Jimenez ◽

Macarena Ortiz ◽

Santiago Osorio-Prendes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fungal Infections ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Cumulative Probability ◽

Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia ◽

Grade 3

Background Idelalisib is a PI3-kinase inhibitor specific for the delta isoform, approved (in combination with rituximab or ofatumumab) for the treatment of adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (R/R CLL). Although the efficacy of idelalisib was reported in clinical trials, it is unclear how this translates into Real World. Methods A non-interventional retrospective study was conducted in Spain to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with R/R CLL that started treatment with idelalisib between 1 February 2015 and 31 December 2017. The Time from start of idelalisib treatment to either the start of a new anti CLL therapy or death (Time to Next Treatment or Death - TNTD) was defined as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to discontinuation (TTD) and safety, especially Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI): ≥ grade 3 transaminase elevations, diarrhea /colitis, pneumonitis, neutropenia,Cytomegalovirus, bacterial, fungal and respiratory virus infections (RVI),Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PjP). Results Investigators from 21 centers included 77 patients in the study. The median age was 72.1 years (48-86) and 67.5% (n=52) were male. The main baseline characteristics were: Binet stage B-C in 32.5% (n=25), 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in 35.1% (n=27) and the median number previous lines of therapy was 4 (1-16). With a median follow up time of 14.4 months (1.2-44.4), 27 patients (35.1%) had started a new treatment and 19 (24.7%) had died. The median TNTD was 17.1 months (95% CI 14.0-22.3) in the overall population and 13.8 months (95% CI 7.9-15.2) in patients that discontinued idelalisib. The median OS has not been reached, with a cumulative probability of surviving at 1 and 2 years of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.91) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.78). During follow-up 54 patients (70.1%) discontinued idelalisib: 39 (72.3%) due to toxicity and 10 (18.5%) due to disease progression. The median TTD was 13.0 months (95% CI 7.7-15.8); 5.3 months (95%CI 3.8-8.0) in patients who discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events (SAE) or AESI and 10.5 months (95% CI 0.5-16.0) in those who did so due to progressive disease. A total of 355 AEs were reported, of which 29.0% (n=103) were SAE. 181 AESIs were recorded: the most frequent were neutropenia (n=67; 22 grade >3), diarrhea/colitis (n=37; 14 grade >3) and bacterial infections (n=24; 14 grade >3). Other AESI were CMV infections (n=11), grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis (n=7), RVI (n=6), fungal infections (n=5), grade ≥ 3 transaminase elevations (n=3) and PjP (n=1). The median time from Idelalisib start to first AESI was 9.5 months (95%CI 5.5-15.3). During follow-up, 19 deaths were registered, 10 of which were caused by idelalisib-related SAEs (4 respiratory infections, 2 pneumonitis, 1 diarrhea/colitis). The time from SAE related to idelalisib that led to death, to death was 0.8 months (95% CI 0.7-1.7). Conclusions This real world study shows results of effectiveness of idelalisib consistent with the efficacy findings of the 312-0116 clinical trial. Toxicity was the most common reason for idelalisib discontinuation. Findings of adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of idelalisib and no new drug-related adverse events were identified. This is a Gilead Sciences sponsored study. Disclosures Perez Encinas: GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding; CELGENE: Consultancy; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Lopez Jimenez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Honoraria, Other: Education funding. Ortiz:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Cordoba:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; FUNDACION JIMENEZ DIAZ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: Employment; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ramirez Payer:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. González-Barca:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celtrion: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kiowa: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Martín Sánchez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Sanchez:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Baltasar Tello:JANSSEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; ABBVIE: Honoraria; ROCHE: Honoraria; GILEAD: Honoraria. Amutio:NOVARTIS: Consultancy; JANSSEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria; ROCHE: Honoraria; GILEAD SCIENCES: Consultancy, Honoraria; TAKEDA: Consultancy; GSK: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; MUNDIPHARMA: Consultancy. Vidal Maceñido:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Fernandez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Loscertales:Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Rodríguez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Alaez:ROCHE: Consultancy. Ramroth:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Palla:Gilead Sciences: Employment.

Download Full-text

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Transfusion Burden Among US Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123425 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3499-3499

Author(s):

Sudipto Mukherjee ◽

S. Lane Slabaugh ◽

Ronda Copher ◽

Jonathan Johnson ◽

Paul Buzinec ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Median Treatment ◽

Medical Claims ◽

Median Treatment Duration

Introduction: Symptomatic anemia transfusion support represents a significant problem for patients with MDS. The principal strategy in managing these patients remains supportive care with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. However, there is paucity of real-world data regarding patterns of use of ESA and other therapies, and its impact on transfusion needs in these patients early in their clinical course. To address this question, we performed a retrospective claims-based study to characterize treatment patterns and transfusion burden in patients with MDS. Methods: In this retrospective claims analysis of a large national health insurance plan, all patients aged ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed MDS (≥ 2 medical claims with an International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th Revision [ICD-9 or ICD-10] diagnosis codes ≥ 30 days apart) identified between January 2012 and May 2018 were included. Index date was defined as date of first diagnosis. Continuous health plan enrollment for ≥ 6 months pre- and 3 months post-index date was required. RBC transfusion status was evaluated during the 16 weeks prior to first diagnosis as well as 16 weeks prior to and immediately following line of therapy (LOT) 1 and LOT2. Transfusion burden categories were adapted and modified from the proposed International Working Group 2018 revised criteria (Platzbecker U, et al., Blood. 2019;133(10):1096-1107). Categories included transfusion independence (TI), defined as patients receiving no transfusions during the observation period; low (LTB), moderate (MTB), and high transfusion burden (HTB) were defined by patient's having 1-3, 4-7, and ≥ 8 unique dates for a transfusion during the observation periods, respectively. Therapies in each LOT were captured using pharmacy and medical claims data. The end of a LOT was defined after ≥ 60-day gap in therapy, a claim for any new or additional MDS therapy, or patient death; LOT durations are described for non-censored patients. Results: Among the 3,587 patients identified (mean age = 74.9 years, 44.3% female), transfusion burden during 16 weeks prior to index was: 78.8% TI, 19.2% LTB, 1.9% MTB, and 0.2% HTB. Among the 1,935 patients who received LOT1, transfusion burden in the 16 weeks preceding LOT1 was: 57.0% TI, 36.3% LTB, 5.6% MTB, and 1.1% HTB. The top 5 regimens in LOT1 were ESA monotherapy (61.9%), hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy (19.2%), white blood cell growth factor (WBCGF) monotherapy (3.5%), immunomodulators (3.3%), and HMA + ESA (2.7%) (Figure). Of 824 patients who received LOT2, transfusion burden prior to LOT2 was: 49.4% TI, 28.6% LTB, 16.5% MTB, and 5.5% HTB. The top 5 regimens in LOT2 were ESA monotherapy (44.2%), HMA monotherapy (12.1%), HMA + ESA (9.2%), WBCGF + ESA (6.9%), and WBCGF monotherapy (6.4%) (Figure). In LOT1, the median treatment duration for ESA monotherapy was 2.8 months (mean = 5.2 months, standard deviation [SD] = 6.8) whereas in LOT2, the median treatment duration was 2.0 months (mean = 3.7 months, SD = 5.0). Amongst patients receiving ESA monotherapy as LOT2, 90.4% had prior ESA monotherapy as LOT1. In patients treated with HMA monotherapy in LOT1 that also experienced a LOT2, 39.1% moved on to a variety of LOT2 regimens (Table), while in 15.5% ESAs were combined with HMA (Table). Conclusions: Our results show that at the time of diagnosis, 20% of MDS patients were transfusion dependent, but up to 50% require treatment. The high rate of ESA use is likely due to anemia-related symptoms. In those treated with ESA monotherapy, approximately 50% have a LOT1 duration that is < 3 months, and interestingly, the majority of patients restart a second LOT with an ESA as the most common regimen. Additional analyses are necessary to determine whether this indicates a switch in ESA agent, escalation in dose of prior ESA, treatment cycling due to elevated hemoglobin, or other reasons. Considering the short median treatment duration and worsening of transfusion dependency beyond first line, there remains a high unmet need for MDS therapy that more effectively slows the progression of transfusion dependence. Disclosures Mukherjee: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC (PHAR, LLC): Consultancy; McGraw Hill Hematology Oncology Board Review: Other: Editor. Slabaugh:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Copher:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Johnson:Optum: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Buzinec:Optum: Employment. Mearns:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Study of Idelalisib Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients ≥65 Years with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1986.1986 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1986-1986 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Andrew D. Zelenetz ◽

Nicole Lamanna ◽

Thomas J. Kipps ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Lymphoid Tissues ◽

Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Systemic Therapies

Abstract BACKGROUND: PI3K-delta (δ) is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells and plays a role in homing and retention in lymphoid tissues. PI3Kδ signaling is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib (Zydelig, IDELA,), a potent and selective orally administered inhibitor of PI3Kδ, in combination with rituximab weekly x 8 has yielded an ORR of 97% in patients (pts) ≥65 years with previously untreated CLL or SLL (O’Brien, ASCO 2013). This report describes the preliminary experience in treating a similar cohort of pts with IDELA monotherapy. METHODS: Enrollment began in November, 2013. Treatment-naive pts ≥65 yrs with CLL or SLL, requiring treatment per IWCLL 2008 criteria, and with measurable lymphadenopathy, were treated with IDELA 150 mg bid continuously. Response assessment, at pre-determined time points, was investigator determined using either physical exam or CT scans per investigator discretion, using modified IWCLL guidelines (Hallek 2008, Cheson 2012). RESULTS: As of 21 July 2014, 37 pts were enrolled: 78% male; CLL/SLL in 92%/8%; median age 70 years; 73% Rai III or IV; WHO 0-1/2 in 97%/3%. 46% had ≥1 B-symptom. Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were present in 14% and 57% respectively. Adverse prognostic factors: 14% del(17p) and/or TP53 mutated; 22% del(11q); 41% IGHV unmutated; β-2 microglobulin median 4.35 mg/L (range: 2.1-12.4). The median idelalisib exposure was 4.8 months (range 0.9-8.5). There has been one discontinuation at 3 mo for respiratory distress, assessed as related to a prior condition. The median absolute lymphocyte count was 59.7 K/µl (range: 0.8-294) at baseline peaking at 100 K/µl (range: 2-385) at week 4. 27 pts were evaluable for response, having reached the first evaluation time point of 8 weeks. Of these 27, the ORR was 81% with 9 (33%) PR and 13 (48%) PR with lymphocytosis. Splenomegaly has responded in 88% of 17 evaluable pts and hepatomegaly in 75% of 4 evaluable pts. The most frequent treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) (% all Grade/% Grade ≥3) were rash (27/3), URI (16/0), constipation (14/0), cough (14/0), nausea (11/0), pyrexia (11/0), arthralgia (8/0), back pain (8/0), diarrhea (8/3), and pneumonia (8/5). Pneumonitis was observed in 2 pts (5%), Gr ≥3 in 1(3%). Gr ≥3 treatment emergent lab abnormalities included transaminase elevation (8%), anemia (5%), and neutropenia (20%); there was no Gr ≥3 thrombocytopenia. One pt had a TEAE leading to dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: IDELA has substantial single agent activity in treatment-naïve pts with CLL or SLL. Early lymphocytosis is observed with monotherapy in this population, as opposed to an attenuation of lymphocytosis seen in the earlier cohort treated with IDELA plus weekly rituximab. IDELA was well tolerated and had a manageable safety profile in this preliminary analysis. Disclosures Zelenetz: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Lamanna:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kipps:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Coutre:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. O'Brien:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Aiello:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cho:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dubowy:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ibrutinib Plus Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR) Is Associated with Greater Reductions in Fatigue Than Placebo Plus BR Among Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Fatigue

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.267.267 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 267-267

Author(s):

Shana Traina ◽

Graeme Fraser ◽

Paula Cramer ◽

Rodrigo Santucci Silva ◽

Sebastian Grosicki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Group Performance ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Fatigue Score ◽

Travel Grant ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Over Time

Abstract Introduction: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may have reduced health-related quality of life (HRQL) such as severe fatigue during the course of their disease and its treatment. While current treatments aim to increase progression-free survival, it is also important to maintain good HRQL for as long as possible. Methods: Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, once-daily, oral, covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is approved in patients with previously treated CLL and in patients with CLL with del17p, and has recently been shown to reduce the risk of disease progression or death by 80% when added to standard chemoimmunotherapy with BR. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, where patients with active CLL following ≥ 1 prior therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive BR (≤ 6 cycles) with either ibrutinib (420 mg daily) (n = 289) or placebo (n = 289), HRQL and fatigue data were examined. Measures included the FACIT-Fatigue, EORTC QLQ-C30-CLL16, and EQ-5D-5L, which capture general physical and emotional impacts of disease and treatments as well as CLL-specific symptoms. Because examination of mean values may obscure meaningful changes in outcomes, fatigue scores were also examined by baseline quartile with respect to clinical, sociodemographic, and HRQL factors as well as for change over time. Individual CLL symptom items were also examined. The association between changes in hemoglobin levels and fatigue was also examined. Results: Of the 578 patients enrolled, 540 (93%) provided FACIT-Fatigue responses at baseline. No notable mean changes from baseline over time were observed in any HRQL scores within or between the treatment groups. Those in the lowest fatigue score quartile (ie, worst baseline fatigue) were more likely to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1, be in a later stage of disease, have more cytopenias, a greater number of prior therapies, and worse HRQL. Among those with the worst baseline fatigue, unadjusted results indicate apparent improvements in fatigue score over time for both treatments during the first 6 cycles of BR therapy, and subsequently greater continued improvements in fatigue were observed with ibrutinib + BR versus placebo + BR (p < 0.05 at cycle 10) (Figure 1). Similarly, for those with the worst baseline fatigue, mean hemoglobin values appear to increase over time after cycle 2, with comparable changes in each arm (Figure 2). In addition, of the patients who reported feeling ill or unwell at baseline (item 38 on CLL16), a greater proportion reported a return to wellness with ibrutinib + BR (40.0%) versus placebo + BR (27.3%) at cycle 10. This pattern was consistently observed from cycle 2 through cycle 19. Conclusions: These data suggest that addition of ibrutinib to BR is not associated with a negative impact on HRQL and that, among patients with the worst fatigue at baseline, ibrutinib appears to be associated with greater reductions in fatigue versus placebo. Improvements in fatigue appear to be consistent with improvements in hemoglobin and improvements in CLL disease status. Disclosures Traina: Janssen: Employment. Fraser:Hoffman LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cramer:Astellas: Other: Travel grant; Mundipharma: Other: Travel grant; Glaxo Smith Klein/Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hoffman LaRoche: Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Travel grant, Research Funding. Santucci Silva:Novartis: Other: Travel reimbursement; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel reimbursement, Research Funding; Hoffman LaRoche: Other: Travel reimbursement, Research Funding. Dilhuydy:Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Mundipharma: Honoraria. Mahler:Janssen: Employment, Other: Travel reimbursement. Salman:Janssen/J&J: Employment, Equity Ownership. Howes:Janssen/J&J: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text