A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib with Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Introduction: Ph+ ALL accounts for 3-5% of pediatric ALL and is associated with improved outcomes when tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are added to chemotherapy, with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 58-60% and 70-86%, respectively. Ponatinib is a potent third-generation TKI pan-BCR-ABL1 inhibitor that is active against BCR-ABL1 and all identified single resistance mutations, including the gatekeeper alteration, T315I, which confers resistance to other TKIs. Ponatinib has marketing approval in more than 50 countries, which includes the United States and European Union, for adults with chronic-/accelerated-/blast-phase chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph+ ALL that are resistant/intolerant to other TKIs or are T315I+. Ponatinib may also overcome drug resistance in pediatric patients with relapsed or resistant Ph+ ALL. This study will assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of ponatinib in pediatric patients. Methods: This Phase 1/2, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study (NCT04501614) will enroll approximately 18 patients in Phase 1 and 68 patients in Phase 2, including those enrolled in Phase 1 at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients (aged ≥1 year to ≤21 years) with Ph+ ALL, Ph+ mixed phenotype acute leukemia, or Ph-like ALL (US only) with ABL class lesions will be enrolled. Enrolled patients must have either relapsed or are resistant or intolerant to ≥1 prior therapy with a BCR-ABL1-targeted TKI or have a BCR-ABL1 T315I mutation. Patients >16 years must have a Karnofsky performance status ≥50%; patients ≤16 years must have a Lansky Play Scale ≥50%. During Phase 1, prior to availability of an age-appropriate formulation (AAF), patients must weigh ≥30 kg and be able to swallow tablets. The Phase 1 study will establish the RP2D of ponatinib in combination with the chemotherapy backbone using the adult tablet formulation in patients able to swallow tablets. Patients will receive fixed doses of ponatinib based on body weight ranges. The initially selected doses are expected to achieve systemic exposures that approximately match adult exposures after a 30-mg dose. Dose selection for the AAF will be in a separate cohort and informed by the results of a relative bioavailability study in healthy adult volunteers. A rolling 6 design will be used for both cohorts; additional cohorts may be enrolled at lower or higher doses based on the emerging data. In both Phase 1 and Phase 2, patients will receive two 35-day blocks of therapy (reinduction and consolidation). Each block includes 29 days of study treatment consisting of daily ponatinib and a modified United Kingdom ALL R3 chemotherapy backbone regimen, followed by a rest period of at least 6 days with daily ponatinib only. Disease assessment will occur at the end of each block. Patients will undergo an end-of-treatment visit 25 to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment in the consolidation block, or earlier if the patient is proceeding to alternate therapy or optional ponatinib continuation therapy. For the Phase 1 study, the primary endpoint is the RP2D of ponatinib (tablet and AAF) in combination with chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints are complete response (CR) rate at the end of the reinduction block and characterization of BCR-ABL1 domain mutations prior to and following ponatinib treatment. For the Phase 2 study, the primary endpoint is the CR rate at the end of the reinduction block. Secondary endpoints will be summarized descriptively, and include the proportion of patients in continued CR or who achieve CR at the end of consolidation, the proportion with minimal residual disease-negative status <0.01% at the end of each block, and the proportion who relapsed or progressed, and time-to-event estimates including EFS, progression-free survival, and OS. The study will include approximately 70 study sites in approximately 16 countries. Disclosures Matloub: Takeda: Current Employment. Gore:Amgen, Novartis, Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding. Pui:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hanley:Takeda: Current Employment. Lu:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Current Employment. Leonard:Takeda: Current Employment. Granier:Incyte: Current Employment. Silverman:Servier: Other: advisory board; Syndax: Other: advisory board; Takeda: Other: advisory board. OffLabel Disclosure: Ponatinib has marketing approval in the United States and European Union for adult patients with chronic-/accelerated-/blast-phase chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph+ ALL that are resistant/intolerant to other TKIs or are T315I+. This trials-in-progress abstract describes a study in pediatric patients.

Download Full-text

A Systematic Review and a Survey Both Reveal Wide Heterogeneity across Trials and Investigators on Time-to-Event Endpoints Definitions in Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150603 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4502-4502

Author(s):

Côme Bommier ◽

Emanuele Zucca ◽

Catherine Thieblemont ◽

Jérôme Lambert

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Marginal Zone ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Marginal Zone Lymphoma ◽

Time To Event ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Background: Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an indolent and heterogeneous B-cell lymphoma. Because of its very indolent course, many time-to-endpoints are used across MZL trials without clear consensus on their definitions. Our aim was to carry out a description of the endpoints used in trials involving MZL patients and to point out the different definitions of time-to-event (TTE) endpoints, both in the literature and among the MZL experts. Methods: We searched over the last 35 years via PubMed, The Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov and clinicaltrialsregister.eu for published and registered clinical trials using the keyword "marginal zone lymphoma". We excluded studies focusing on pediatric populations, cutaneous MZL and on use of allogenic stem cell transplant. Endpoints were reviewed and definitions were analyzed. Afterwards, an online questionnaire was sent to a panel of leading international experts involved in the conduct of lymphoma clinical trials. Experts were selected for their commitment in published phase 2/phase 3 indolent lymphoma trials or for their membership in international lymphoma study groups (International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group, Lymphoma Research Foundation). The questionnaire proposed 12 criteria to define Progression-free survival (PFS), Event-free survival (EFS), Time to failure (TTF), and Time to next treatment (TTNT). Results: 1192 references were identified by the initial screening. Among the 309 included references (111 published, 198 registered), 213 (69%) were phase 2, 65 (21%) phase 1/2 and 31 (10%) phase 3 trials. The majority of them were open-label (n=295, 95%) non-randomized (n=256, 83%) trials, included all subtypes of MZLs (n=239, 77%), and also non-MZL patients (n=232, 75%). Among phase 1/2 and 2 trials, Overall/complete response rate (ORR/CRR) was the most used primary endpoint (n=196, 70.5%), followed by PFS (n=28, 10.1%); in phase 3 trials PFS was the most used primary endpoint (n=18, 58.1%; ORR/CRR n=6, 19.4%, p<0.001). Overall, the most frequent secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS, n=153, 50%), PFS (n=142, 46%) and ORR/CRR (n=116, 38%). Distribution of endpoints was similar when considering trials with only MZL patients. Time-to-event endpoints definitions were inconsistent across published trials, with up to 9 different definitions of EFS and TTF, and 4 different definitions of Duration of response. A total of 60 MZL experts from 16 different countries (Europe 66%, Northern America 26%, Asia 4%, Oceania 2%, Southern America 2%) took the questionnaire. Forty-nine (82%) of them were clinicians hematologists, and the other were oncologists, radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, or radiotherapists. Eighty percent and 75% of them had already been primary investigator or coinvestigator in a prospective clinical trial including either MZL-only patients or MZL patients merged with other lymphoma patients, respectively. Among the experts' answers, a total of 23 different definitions of PFS were retrieved, 44 of EFS, 38 of TTF and TTNT. The main divergences concerned the consideration as event of: the add-on of a new therapy and the non-lymphoma related death for PFS; the treatment discontinuation due to adverse events and the add-on of a new therapy for EFS and TTF; the progression of the disease for TTNT. Conclusion: Trials involving MZL patients showed marked heterogeneity both in the choice and definitions of primary and secondary endpoints, thus hampering comparability between trials. This heterogeneity was confirmed through a survey among leading international MZL experts. If PFS and TTNT definitions have been well established by the Food Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, a consensus shall be pursued on EFS and TTF definitions within the MZL community. Disclosures Zucca: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biomedicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celltrion Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead, Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Other: Travel Support. Thieblemont: Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses , Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Hospira: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses .

Download Full-text

Weekly Carfilzomib with Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results from the Phase 1/2 Study Champion-1 (NCT01677858)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.373.373 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 373-373 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

James Berenson ◽

Alan Cartmell ◽

Roger Lyons ◽

Wael Harb ◽

Dimitrios Tzachanis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

The United States ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Carfilzomib is an irreversible proteasome inhibitor that is approved as a single agent in the United States and other countries for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone is also approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed MM. The approved dose and schedule of carfilzomib is a twice-weekly, 10-min intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles (starting dose: 20 mg/m2 [days 1 and 2 of cycle 1]; escalated to a target dose of 27 mg/m2 thereafter). Here we present updated results from the multicenter, phase 1/2 study CHAMPION-1 (NCT01677858), which evaluated the safety and efficacy of once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone (Kd) in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MM (1-3 prior lines of therapy) were eligible. Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-min IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. The phase 1 portion of the study utilized a standard 3+3 dose-escalation scheme. All patients received carfilzomib at 20 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1; patients received 45, 56, 70, or 88 mg/m2 beginning on day 8 of cycle 1 in successive dose-level cohorts until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg (IV or oral administration) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1-8; dexamethasone was omitted on day 22 in cycles ≥ 9. In the phase 2 portion, patients received carfilzomib at the MTD (carfilzomib dose of 20 mg/m2 on cycle 1, day 1; escalating to the MTD for subsequent doses) and dexamethasone at the same dose and schedule. Kd was administered until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary objective of the phase 1 portion was to determine the MTD of carfilzomib in the Kd regimen; the primary objective of the phase 2 portion was to determine the overall response rate (ORR [≥partial response]). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in phase 1; the MTD of carfilzomib was determined to be 70 mg/m2. Results are presented for all patients treated with Kd at the carfilzomib MTD in both the phase 1b (n=15) and phase 2 (n=89) portions of the study. Among these 104 patients, median patient age was 68.5 years (range, 41-88). Patients received a median of 1 prior line of therapy (range, 1-3); 83% of patients had received prior bortezomib (BTZ), 49% of patients were BTZ-refractory, 27% were LEN-refractory, and 16% were refractory to both BTZ and LEN. Median carfilzomib treatment duration was 7.7 months (range, 0.03-24.2). The ORR was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68%-85%); the clinical benefit rate (≥minimal response) was 84% (95% CI: 75%-90%). Kaplan-Meier median progression-free survival was 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.0-not estimable). Twelve patients (12%) discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. The most common adverse events of any grade and of grade ≥3 are shown in the Table. Five patients died on study: 1 patient each had cause of death reported as disease progression, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and cardiopulmonary arrest. The mean area under the curve and maximum concentration following a 70-mg/m2 carfilzomib dose was 1050 ng×h/mL and 2510 ng/mL, respectively. At 1 hour post dosing of carfilzomib 70 mg/m2, the activity of the predominant chymotrypsin-like proteasome catalytic subunit in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (ie, low molecular mass polypeptide 7) was strongly inhibited (97% inhibition as determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ProCISE]; 93% inhibition as determined by a fluorogenic substrate assay). Conclusions: CHAMPION-1 is the first clinical study to evaluate carfilzomib on a weekly dosing schedule. Once-weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2) with dexamethasone demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability with promising efficacy for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The dose and schedule of carfilzomib used in the CHAMPION-1 study (20/70 mg/m2) is currently being compared with the regulatory-approved carfilzomib dose and schedule (20/27 mg/m2 administered twice-weekly) in the ongoing, phase 3, superiority study ARROW (NCT02412878). Disclosures Lyons: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Insyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Harb:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Boccia:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Moss:Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rifkin:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schupp:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dixon:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ou:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderl:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berdeja:Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pharmacokinetic / Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Simulations Guide Selection of the Dose for Administration of Efgartigimod Subcutaneously in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial in Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153261 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3165-3165

Author(s):

Waleed Ghanima ◽

Vickie McDonald ◽

Shivi Jain ◽

Monica Carpenedo ◽

Esther N. Oliva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction Efgartigimod (ARGX-113) is a human IgG1-derived Fc fragment that binds with high affinity to FcRn in a pH dependent way, resulting in a blockade of FcRn-mediated recycling of IgGs. This leads to rapid degradation of all IgGs, including disease associated autoantibodies. The efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of intravenously (IV) administered efgartigimod have been assessed during a Phase 1 study in healthy subjects (Ulrichts P. JCI. 2018;128), Phase 2 studies in patients with Myasthenia gravis (MG) (Howard JF. Neurol. 2019;92) and Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) (Newland AC. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:178-187), and a Phase 3 study in MG (Howard JF. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20). These studies have demonstrated that a dose of 10 mg/kg efgartigimod, administered in four weekly (qw) IV infusions, achieves close to maximal immunoglobulin G (IgG) reduction and a significant reduction of pathogenic autoantibodies in patients with ITP and MG. Furthermore, this dose was well-tolerated in all populations. Based on the results of the Phase 2 study in Primary ITP, a Phase 3 study was designed for IV administration in patients with persistent or chronic primary ITP (ADVANCE NCT04188379). To allow for a convenient SC administration of efgartigimod at a dose that achieves a similar PD effect comparable to IV 10 mg/kg, a co-formulation with rHuPH20 SC was developed (recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20, an enzyme used to increase the dispersion and absorption of co-administered substances when administered subcutaneously). Here we describe the dose selection process for the SC dose to be used in a Phase 3 study of patients with persistent or chronic ITP. Methods PK and PD data from a Phase 1 study, including 32 healthy adult male subjects receiving 750 mg, 1250 mg, 1750 mg, or 10 mg/kg single SC injections of efgartigimod co-mixed with rHuPH20 (8 subjects/dose group), were used for a PK/PD analysis to predict the efgartigimod PH20 SC dose that would result in a similar PD effect compared to the benchmark dose from previous studies of 10 mg/kg IV (1 hour infusion and body weight of 70 kg). Results Weekly SC administration of 1000 mg efgartigimod co-mixed with 2000 U/mL rHuPH20 was predicted to result in comparable maximum total IgG reduction after the 4 th SC injection (days 22-29) as after the 4 th IV infusion of 10 mg/kg administered qw (Figure 1). Additionally, the area under the curve for total IgG concentration after the 4th dose (days 22-29) and trough IgG reduction (measured prior to dose on day 29) were predicted to be comparable between weekly 1000 mg SC and the weekly 10 mg/kg IV benchmark dose. No statistically significant effect of body weight on the PK and PD of efgartigimod PH20 SC was found. Discussion These results informed the weekly SC dose administration schedule in ADVANCE SC, a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04687072) for evaluation of efficacy and safety of efgartigimod PH20 SC in adults with persistent or chronic primary ITP. Efgartigimod PH20 SC or placebo PH20 SC will be given weekly on visits 1-4 and then either weekly or every other week from visits 5 to 16, as determined by platelet counts. The frequency of administration will remain unchanged for the last 7 weeks (visits 17 to 24) to evaluate the sustainable platelet count improvement as the primary objective. Secondary objectives include extent of disease control (overall platelet count response, use of rescue treatment, and changes in concurrent ITP therapy), bleeding events, and quality of life assessments. ADVANCE SC recruitment is currently ongoing across approximately 70 sites in Asia-Pacific, Europe, Japan, Latin America, Middle East, Africa, and USA. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ghanima: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Principia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. McDonald: Bayer, Sobi, Novartis, Amgen, argenx: Honoraria; Grifols: Research Funding. Jain: GBT: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Argenx: Other: advisory board; Sanofi: Other: advisory board; DOVA: Other: advisory board. Oliva: Novartis, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Consultancy; Alexion, argenx, Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hultberg: argenx: Current Employment, Patents & Royalties. Gandini: argenx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Hofman: argenx: Current Employment. Van Bragt: Curare Consulting BV: Other: Partner; argenx: Consultancy. Parys: argenx: Current Employment. van Hoorick: argenx: Current Employment. Miyakawa: Sanofi: Consultancy; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; argenx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Broome: Alexion, argenx, Apellis, Sanofi: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Study of Sea-CD70 in Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136203 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 23-24

Author(s):

Ahmed Aribi ◽

Anjali S Advani ◽

William Donnellan ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

Marcello Rotta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Immune Evasion ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Steering Committee ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myeloid Malignancies

Background SEA-CD70 is being developed in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Current treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) MDS or r/r AML and outcomes remain poor. SEA-CD70 is an investigational humanized, non-fucosylated monoclonal antibody targeting CD70. Expression of CD70 is limited in normal tissue, but is aberrantly expressed on malignant myeloid blasts while absent from healthy hematopoietic progenitor cells. CD70 and its ligand, CD27, may play a role in malignant blast cell survival and/or tumor immune evasion. SEA-CD70 uses a novel sugar-engineered antibody (SEA) platform to produce a non-fucosylated antibody with enhanced effector function. The proposed mechanism of action of SEA-CD70 includes elimination of CD70 positive cells via enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and mediation of complement-dependent cytoxicity (CDC). Additionally, SEA-CD70 has the potential to block the interaction of CD70 with CD27, which may disrupt signals that enhance blast proliferation and survival and may modulate the immune system to limit immune evasion and increase antigen specific T cell responses. Methods SGNS70-101 is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, and cohort expansion study designed to establish the safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of SEA-CD70 in pts with myeloid malignancies (NCT04227847). Dose escalation is ongoing. In dose escalation, pts must have r/r MDS with 5-20% blasts which has failed prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA), and have no other therapeutic options known to provide clinical benefit for MDS. After conclusion of dose escalation, monotherapy expansion cohorts will be opened for pts with MDS and for pts with AML. Primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended expansion dose of SEA-CD70. Secondary objectives are to assess antitumor activity, PK, and immunogenicity of SEA-CD70. Once dose escalation is complete and the recommended monotherapy dose is identified, combination cohorts will be considered in AML and MDS. The study is currently enrolling with sites opening in the US and EU. Disclosures Aribi: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Advani:OBI: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Donnellan:Kite Pharma/Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; TCR2 Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celularity: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Ryvu Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fathi:Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; NewLink Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; TrovaGene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blue Print Oncology: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rotta:Merck: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Vachani:Blueprint: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Yang:AROG: Research Funding; Protagonist: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Ho:Seattle Genetics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Garcia-Manero:Novartis: Research Funding; Helsinn Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Onconova: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acceleron Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results of a Phase 2 Study of PD 0332991 in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2940.2940 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2940-2940

Author(s):

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Luciano J Costa ◽

Nisreen A. Haideri ◽

Georg Hess ◽

Seema Singhal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

D 20 ◽

Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Abexinostat, a Pan-Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor, in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of an Ongoing Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.256.256 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 256-256 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Vincent Ribrag ◽

Won Seog Kim ◽

Reda Bouabdallah ◽

Soon Thye Lim ◽

Bertrand Coiffier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Hdac Inhibitors ◽

New Drugs ◽

Tumor Type ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, by blocking HDAC enzymes, can regulate acetylation states of histones and other non-histone proteins. Hyperacetylation of histones in cells can cause transcriptional activation of tumor suppressor genes, as well as genes involved in cell cycle control, cell division, and apoptosis, resulting in antitumor activity. Currently, 3 HDAC inhibitors (HDACi), vorinostat, romidepsin, and belinostat, are approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (T-CL). HDACi in development also show promising results in B-cell malignancies and solid tumors. Abexinostat, an orally available hydroxamate-containing HDACi with good tolerability, differs from approved HDACi due to its unique pharmacokinetic profile and oral dosing schedule, twice daily 4 hours apart, which allows for continuous exposure at concentrations required for efficient tumor cell killing (Mitsiades, et al. Blood. 2003; unpublished data). Abexinostat may, therefore, offer an active and potentially less-toxic treatment option for cancer with a wider therapeutic index than other HDACi in development. Abexinostat showed manageable toxicity and durable responses, including some complete responses (CR), particularly in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) (Evens ICML 2013; Morschhauser, Invest New Drugs, 2015). Methods: In this phase 2 trial, pts aged ≥18 years with relapsed/refractory NHL or CLL received oral abexinostat at 80 mg BID for 14 days of a 21-day cycle and continued until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The 80 mg BID dose, which corresponds to the recommended phase 2 dose of 45 mg/m2 BID, was identified in phase 1 of the study (Morschhauser, Invest New Drugs, 2015). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, time to tumor progression, duration of response, disease-free survival, and time to treatment failure. Results: A total of 100 pts (median age, 66.5 years; 52% >65 years; 55% male) were enrolled between Oct 2011 and Jul 2014, including 16 with CLL, 17 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 18 with FL, 16 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 18 with T-CL, and 15 with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) or other NHL subtypes. The median number of prior regimens across all lymphoma subtypes was 3 (range, 1-11) with a median of 4.5 prior regimens (range, 1-11) for FL pts. All pts received at least one dose of study drug; 55% discontinued due to progressive disease and 25% due to adverse events. Seven pts remain on treatment. Among the 87 pts evaluable for efficacy, ORR was 28% (CR, 5%). Responses by histology are shown in the table. Highest responses were observed in FL, T-CL, and DLBCL with ORRs of 56%, 40%, and 31% and median durations of response of 26.0 weeks (range, 0.1-90.4), 32.1 weeks (range, 6.3-51.3), and 8.1 weeks (range, 3.1-59.0), respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and any serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 86% and 46% of pts, respectively. The most frequently reported grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were thrombocytopenia (80%), neutropenia (27%), and anemia (22%). The incidence of any-grade diarrhea was 47% (grade ≥3, 3%). The most commonly reported SAEs included thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (7%), and pneumonia (6%). The most frequent toxicities that led to discontinuation included hematologic events, such as thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Gastrointestinal toxicities leading to discontinuation were infrequent with 1 episode of vomiting being reported. Conclusions: Abexinostat has a manageable toxicity profile in pts with various NHL subtypes that is similar to other HDACi and comparable to other single-agent therapies currently in development. Promising efficacy was observed with abexinostat, especially in FL, T-CL, and DLBCL, with an ORR ≥30% in these subtypes, consistent with the results of an independent study of abexinostat in lymphomas that used a week-on-week-off schedule (Evens ICML 2013). Further investigation of the safety and efficacy of abexinostat in these indications implementing the less dose-intense interval on a week-on-week-off schedule is planned. Table. Response With Abexinostat by Tumor Type Tumor type ORR, % (CR, %) Overall (N=87) 28% (5%) FL (n=16) 56% (6%) T-CL (n=15) 40% (7%) DLBCL (n=16) 31% (6%) MCL (n=13) 15% (8%) MZL/other (n=13) 15% (0%) CLL (n=14) 0% (0%) Disclosures Ribrag: Pharmamar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: abexinostat in NHL and CLL. Coiffier:CELLTRION, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Luan:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Graef:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Genentech Inc./Roche: Other: Advisory boards.

Download Full-text

Weekly Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (wCCyd) in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results of a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1828.1828 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1828-1828 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Sara Bringhen ◽

Davide Rossi ◽

Alessandra Larocca ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Piero Galieni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background Carfilzomib is a novel second generation proteasome-inhibitor with significant anti-MM activity and favorable toxicity profile. In a recent phase 1/2 study in relapsed/refractory patients (pts) a weekly schedule of carfilzomib in combination with dexamethasone showed to be effective (overall response rate of 77%) and safe (ASCO 2015). The ongoing phase 3 ARROW study is comparing once- with twice-weekly carfilzomib. In the newly diagnosed setting, no data are available on weekly carfilzomib. We designed a phase 1/2 study of weekly carfilzomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (wCCyd) for newly diagnosed MM pts. Results of the dose-escalation phase 1 portion of study were previously reported (Palumbo A et al, Blood 2014), the maximum tolerated dose of weekly carfilzomib was established as 70 mg/m2. Here we report efficacy and safety results of the phase 2 portion of the study. Methods Newly diagnosed pts ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation due to age or co-morbidities were enrolled in the phase 2 portion of the study. Pts received IV carfilzomib at the maximum tolerated dose 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 combined with oral cyclophosphamide at 300 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and oral dexamethasone at 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22, in 28-daycycles. After the completionof 9 cycles, pts received 28-day maintenance cycles with carfilzomib at 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 until disease progression or intolerance. The primary objectives were to determine the efficacy and safety of wCCyd. The secondary objectives included the evaluation of time to progression, progression-free survival, time to next therapy and overall survival. Response was assessed according to the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded following NCI-CTCAE v4. Results As of July 15, 2015, 47 newly diagnosed MM pts were enrolled in the phase 2 portion of the study. Median age was 72 years, 23% of pts were older than 75 years, 30% had ISS stage III, 34% had unfavorable FISH profile [t(4;14) or t (14;16) or del17p or amp1]. Toxicityand response data were available in 40 pts, who completed atleast the first cycle; 7 pts were still receiving their first cycle of treatment. Pts received a median of 6 cycles (range 1-9). Overall, 80% of pts achieved at least a partial response, 60% at least a very good partial response, and 28% a near complete response. Responses improved over time (Table 1). During the study, 9 pts progressed or died, the progression-free survival at 1 year was 75%. Grade (G) 3-4 drug-related adverse events included neutropenia (22%, 9 pts), thrombocytopenia (7%, 3 pts), infection (10%, 4 pts), acute pulmonary edema (5%, 2 pts), creatinine increase (5%, 2 pts), fever (2.5%, 1 pt), fatigue (2.5%, 1 pt) and headache (2.5%, 1 pt). G1-2 hypertension was reported in 6 pts (15%). No peripheral neuropathy was reported. Overall, the wCCyd regimen was well tolerated, 4 pts (10%) required carfilzomib dose-reduction (G3 hematologic toxicities [2 pts], G3 headache [1 pt] and G2 fatigue [1 pt]) and 9 pts (22%) required treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (2 infections, 1 acute pulmonary edema, 1 creatinine increase, 1 fever, 1 pt condition, 1 second tumor, 1 pericardial effusion, 1 sudden death). Conclusions This is the first prospective study evaluating once-weekly carfilzomib in treatment-naïve MM. wCCyd therapy appears safe and effective in newly diagnosed MM pts. Responses became deeper with subsequent cycles and toxicities were manageable. The response rate observed with weekly carfilzomib compares favorably with similar studies with standard twice-weekly carfilzomib infusion. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Table 1. 2nd cycle 6th cycle 9th cycle Complete Response 17% 26% 33% At least near Complete Response 29% 39% 40% At least Very Good Partial Response 66% 82% 87% At least Partial Response 86% 87% 87% Disclosures Bringhen: Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Novartis: Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Use off-label of drugs for the dose and/or schedule and/or association. Larocca:Janssen-Cilag, Celgene: Honoraria. Offidani:Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Sanofi, Amgen, Mundipharma: Honoraria. Gaidano:Celgene, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Onyx, Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Janssen-Cilag, Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Melflufen, a Peptidase Targeted Therapy, and Dexamethasone in an Ongoing Open-Label Phase 2a Study in Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Including an Initial Report on Progression Free Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3029.3029 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3029-3029

Author(s):

Peter M. Voorhees ◽

Valeria Magarotto ◽

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Torben Plesner ◽

Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Study Drug ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background: Melflufen is a highly potent anti-angiogenic compound that triggers rapid, robust and irreversible DNA damage and exerts its cytotoxicity through alkylation of DNA. The lipophilicity of melflufen leads to rapid and extensive distribution into tissues and cells where it binds directly to DNA or is readily metabolized by intracellular peptidases into hydrophilic alkylating metabolites. With targeted delivery of alkylating metabolites to tumor cells in vitro (such as multiple myeloma that are rich in activating peptidase), melflufen exerts a 20-100 fold higher anti-tumor potency and produces a 20 fold higher intracellular concentration of alkylating moieties compared with melphalan. Methods: Melflufen is evaluated in combination with dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg weekly in an ongoing Phase 1/2a study. RRMM patients with measurable disease and at least 2 prior lines of therapy are eligible (NCT01897714). Phase 1 established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of melflufen to be 40 mg every 3 weeks in combination with low dose dex. The primary objective of Phase 2a is the overall response rate and safety of the MTD in a total of 55 patients. Response was investigator assessed at the end of each cycle by IMWG criteria. Here we present the Phase 2 data as of 14 July 2015 data-cut. Results: Thirty-one patients were dosed at the MTD. The median time from initial diagnosis to first dose of melflufen was 6 years (1-15). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (2-9). 97% of patients were exposed to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), 90% to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), 77% to melphalan, and 71% had received prior autologous stem cell transplant. 58% were double refractory (IMiDs and PIs) and 42% were triple refractory (IMiDs, PIs and alkylators). In total, 121 doses of melflufen have been given (1-11 cycles). Median treatment duration was 13 weeks with 9 patients still ongoing. One patient completed therapy as planned, 15 patients discontinued due to AEs (48%) and 6 due to progression (19%). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response (protocol defined as ≥2 doses of melflufen with baseline and follow-up response assessments). One patient achieved a very good partial response and 10 patients achieved partial response (PR) (1 unconfirmed, still ongoing) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 48%. Three additional patients achieved minimal response (MR) for a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 61%. Time to clinical benefit and response was rapid with 93% of patients achieving ≥ MR after 1-3 cycles and 64% achieving PR after only 1-3 cycles. Eight patients maintained stable disease and 1 patient had early progressive disease. Similar ORRs were seen in PI-refractory (43%), IMiD-refractory (40%), alkylator-refractory (62%), double-refractory (38%) and triple-refractory (50%) patients. The median progression free survival (PFS) is currently at 7.6 months (95% confidence interval: 3.4 - ∞) based on 14 events in 30 patients. The most frequent adverse events (AE), all grades, occurring in >10% of patients, regardless of relationship to study drug were thrombocytopenia (94%), anemia (84%), neutropenia (61%), leukopenia (42%), pyrexia (36%), asthenia (32%), fatigue and nausea (26%), bone pain (19%), cough, diarrhea, dyspnea, mucosal inflammation and upper respiratory infection (16%) and constipation and epistaxis (13%). Treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 AEs were reported in 27 patients (87%). Those occurring in >5% of patients were thrombocytopenia (68%), neutropenia (55%), anemia (42%), leukopenia (32%) and febrile neutropenia, fatigue, pyrexia, asthenia and hyperglycemia each occurred in 6% of patients. Serious AEs occurred in 9 patients (29%), but were only assessed as related to study drug in 5 patients (16%) including 3 febrile neutropenia, 1 fever and 1 pneumonia. Cycle length has recently been increased to 28 days to improve tolerability with respect to hematologic toxicity. Conclusion: Melflufen has promising activity in heavily pretreated RRMM patients where conventional therapies have failed. The current ORR is 48% and CBR is 61%. Similar results were seen across patient populations regardless of refractory status. The median PFS is encouraging at 7.6 months. Hematologic toxicity was common, but non-hematologic AEs were infrequent. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Voorhees: Millennium/Takeda and Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array BioPharma, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, and Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline,Onyx Pharmaceuticals and Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sonneveld:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene and Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Plesner:Roche and Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen and Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mellqvist:Celgene, Amgen, Mundipharma and Novartis: Honoraria. Byrne:Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Harmenberg:Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Nordstrom:Oncopeptides: Employment. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria. Richardson:Oncopeptides, Celgene and Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Ruxopeg, a Multi-Center Bayesian Phase 1/2 Adaptive Randomized Trial of the Combination of Ruxolitinib and Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN)-Associated Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110785 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 581-581 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Juliette Soret-Dulphy ◽

Matthieu Resche-Rigon ◽

Francoise Boyer-Perrard ◽

Fiorenza Barraco ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Interferon Alpha ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Disease Assessment ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allele Burden ◽

Dose Combination

Abstract Background MPN-associated myelofibrosis (MF) is a condition characterized by splenomegaly, anemia, bone marrow (BM) fibrosis and debilitating symptoms. About 80% of patients (pts) harbor a driver mutations in JAK2, CALR or MPL genes that can be used as biomarkers for minimal residual disease assessment. Ruxolitinib (Rux) is a JAK inhibitor approved in intermediate or high risk (HR) MF to improve symptoms and splenomegaly but with little impact on the malignant clone and fibrosis. Interferon alpha (IFNa) can reduce mutant allele burden and fibrosis but is often poorly tolerated in highly symptomatic pts. The RUXOPEG study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of Rux + IFNa in MF (NCT02742324). Methods RUXOPEG is a multi-center Bayesian Phase 1/2 adaptive trial. Phase 1 includes up to 9 cohorts of 3 pts with increasing doses of both drugs. Tested doses of Rux and IFNa are 10, 15 and 20 mg BID, and 45, 90 and 135 mcg/week, respectively. Phase 2 will randomize between the 2 best dose combinations selected from phase 1. Primary objective: identify the most efficacious dose combination that also satisfies safety requirements. Primary tolerance criterion is the occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT) within 45 days; primary efficacy criterion is >50% reduction in spleen length within 6 months. Secondary objectives include molecular response, reduction of BM fibrosis, quality of life and symptoms evolution, event-free and overall survival. The planned total enrollment is 42 pts. Key inclusion criteria are: diagnosis of MF (WHO criteria), intermediate or HR (IPSS), need of active therapy, presence of a driver mutation. Key exclusion criteria: prior treatment (or contra-indication) with Rux or IFNa, eligibility for stem cell transplantation, inadequate liver, cardiac or renal function, autoimmune disease, history of depression. Enrolment in 5 cohorts was completed in June 2018, and the last cohort for phase 1 will be opened in August. This abstract reports the current available data for the 5 cohorts who have completed the primary endpoint, but the presentation will provide the detailed analysis of primary and secondary endpoints of phase 1, which will be available in October 2018. Results Among the 15 pts currently enrolled in phase 1, 6 were females, mean age was 60.9 years (range: 38-72), 8 had primary MF, 5 post ET and 2 post PV MF. Median spleen size was 6 cm (range 0 - 18) by palpation and 18 cm (range 10-25) by imaging. Mean (range) blood counts were: hemoglobin 12 g/dL (8.5 - 13.8), WBC 18.3 G/L (8 - 35.5), platelets 457 G/L (157 - 906) and 6 pts had circulating blasts. 12 pts had JAK2V617F and 2 had CALR mutations; karytotype was normal in 9 pts, abnormal in 5 (very HR in 3). In 10 pts analyzed by NGS so far, 8 had additional mutations (1 in 5 pts, 3 in 1, and 4 in 2) in TET2 (n= 5), ASXL1 (4), DNMT3A (2), TP53 (2), SF3B1 (1) and SRSF2 (1) genes. Safety: No DLT was observed in the 5 cohorts (primary safety criterion), the highest tested dose combination being Rux 15 mg BID + IFNa 135 mcg/week. The last cohort will test Rux 20 mg BID + IFNa 135 mcg/week. 4 serious adverse events have been reported: 1 AML transformation (very HR cytogenetics, 3% circulating blasts at baseline), 1 thrombotic event, 1 squamous cell carcinoma and 1 aggravation of Raynaud's phenomenon. Efficacy: preliminary data show a clear decrease in spleen size at 6 months (median 0 cm by palpation, range 0-9; 12.1 cm by imaging, range 10-21) and improvement in blood counts (mean, range): hemoglobin 10.5 g/dL (9.7 - 12.5), WBC 8.6 G/L (5.4 - 11.1), platelets 267 G/L (80 - 486). According to IWG criteria, all the 10 pts evaluable at time of abstract preparation responded (3 partial response, 7 hematological improvement). JAK2V617F allele burden decreased from a mean of 75% (range 43- 96) at baseline to 46% (range 24 - 84) at 6 months. Encouraging results were also found in a patient with 5 mutations (figure1) with a clear decrease in JAK2V617F, ASXL1, DNMT3A and EZH2 mutations after 12 months of treatment. Conclusion RUXOPEG is the first study to formally assess the safety and efficacy of Rux + IFNa combination in MF patients never exposed to either drugs before. The first 5 dose combinations tested showed no DLT, confirming that this combination was generally well tolerated. Preliminary efficacy results are encouraging, including in patients who received very low doses of both drugs. Full results of the 6 cohorts tested in phase 1 and doses selected for phase 2 will be presented. Disclosures Kiladjian: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Giraudier:Novartis: Research Funding. Cassinat:Novartis: Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

No Engraftment Advantage after Single or Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant (CBT) with the Addition of a Non-HLA Matched Off-the-Shelf Expanded Cord Blood Unit Compared to Conventional CBT: Results of a Randomized Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130716 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 146-146 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Filippo Milano ◽

Andrew R Rezvani ◽

Joanne Kurtzberg ◽

Chatchada Karanes ◽

Jonathan A Gutman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cord Blood ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cell Dose ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

Cord Blood Transplant ◽

Secondary Endpoints

Background: Based on pilot study data demonstrating safety and excellent survival [Blood 2014 124:46] in acute leukemia patients undergoing myeloablative cord blood transplant (CBT) plus infusion of an off-the-shelf non-HLA matched expanded CB unit (OTS) for bridging hematopoiesis, a randomized trial was conducted to determine whether myeloablative CBT with or without an OTS would confer more rapid neutrophil (ANC) engraftment and therefore a survival advantage. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, randomized controlled phase II trial (RCT) with a primary endpoint of ANC engraftment defined as the first of 2 consecutive days in which neutrophil count ≥ 500 cells/μL. Secondary endpoints included platelet engraftment, overall survival (OS), disease free-survival (DFS), acute/chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse. 160 patients were enrolled between February 2013 and June 2018. Patients were randomized to receive either a conventional single or double CBT (SOC group) (n=78) or SOC + OTS (OTS group) (n=82). Unmanipulated CB units had to be at least 4/6 HLA-matched to the patient (intermediate resolution for HLA-A, -B and allele-level for HLA-DRB1) with no HLA matching required for the OTS. Patient disease (AML=68, ALL=77, MDS=7, CML/other=8), disease risk, gender, age, race, ethnicity, CMV serology, performance score and HLA-match were balanced between the two study groups. Patients received conditioning with either FLU 75mg/m2, TBI 13.2 Gy, CY120 mg/kg or with FLU 150mg/m2, TBI 4Gy, CY 50 mg/kg and Thiotepa 10 mg/kg. Cyclosporin and MMF were used for GVHD prophylaxis in all patients (Table 1). Results: The median follow-up of surviving patients was 15 months. Approximately 30% of patients enrolled were <18 years and most patients received the high dose TBI (13.2Gy) regimen (85% in OTS group and 91% in SOC group). The median pre-cryopreserved total nucleated cell dose was 5.4 × 107/kg for both groups while the median pre-cryopreserved CD34 cell dose was 0.30 and 0.28 × 106/kg for the OTS and SOC group, respectively. Patients in the OTS group received an additional median CD34+ cell dose of 10.5x106/kg. Median time to ANC engraftment was similar between the 2 groups, at 20 days (range 7-46) in the OTS group and 19 days (13-51) in the SOC group. Five patients experienced graft failure, 2 in the OTS group and 3 in the SOC group. Similarly, no difference was seen for median time to platelet engraftment [38 days (35-43) vs. 40 days (30-42) for the OTS and the SOC group]. Peripheral blood chimerisms performed weekly (day 7-28) revealed that the initial circulating myelomonocytes present in the peripheral blood of OTS patients at day 7 were nearly all generated from the OTS product. Contribution to engraftment of the OTS graft was transient, and generally undetectable after day 21. All outcomes were similar between the two groups. OS and DFS at 2 years were 70% and 60% vs 61% and 55% for the OTS and the SOC groups, respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse and NRM at 2 years were 18% and 21% in the OTS group and 21% and 22% in the SOC group. Grade III-IV aGVHD was 16% and 14% for the and the SOC group, respectively. The OTS product was well tolerated, and serious adverse events rates similar between the 2 groups. Patients continue to be followed through 2 years to assess cGVHD, and graft-relapse-free-survival. Conclusion: In this multi-center RCT, no significant difference was observed in the primary or secondary endpoints. Importantly, while the median time to ANC recovery in the OTS group was unchanged (20 days) from our pilot study, the observed time to neutrophil recovery in the SOC group was 7 days quicker than expected based on previously observed outcomes following myeloablative CBT (median 26 days). During the 5 years that this study was open to accrual, the criteria for CB donor selection have improved, now regularly utilizing CD34+ cell content and high-resolution HLA-typing where available, as has the quality of the CB inventory. This RCT highlights that delayed engraftment should no longer be a barrier in the consideration of SOC CBT for patients with hematological malignancies. As expected, and observed consistently following CBT, both groups demonstrated low incidence of severe acute GVHD and relapse at 2 years. Interventions in CBT should focus on improving immune reconstitution and reducing the risk of NRM but must be easily adopted into SOC in order to be adopted clinically. Disclosures Milano: ExCellThera: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Rezvani:Kaleido: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: one-time compensation from advisory boards; Nohla Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: one-time compensation from advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Principal investigator ; U.S. Department of Justice: Other: Expert medical witness; Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Other: Brother is employed. Delaney:Nohla Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; Biolife Solutions: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text