scholarly journals A Feasibility and Safety Study of a Novel CD19-Directed Synthetic T-Cell Receptor and Antigen Receptor (STAR) T-Cell Therapy for Refractory and Relapsed (R/R) B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Xian Zhang ◽  
Jiasheng Wang ◽  
Yue Liu ◽  
Junfang Yang ◽  
Jingjing Li ◽  
...  

Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T -cell therapy has demonstrated high response rates among patients with B cell malignancies yet remission durability and safety could be improved. We have developed a novel double-chain chimeric receptor Synthetic T Cell Receptor and Antigen Receptor (STAR) consisting of 2 protein modules each containing an antibody light or heavy chain variable region, the T Cell Receptor (TCR) a or b chain constant region fused to the OX-40 co-stimulatory domain, with the 2 modules linked by a self-cleaving Furin-p2A sequence that allows the modules to be proteolytically separated and reconstituted (Fig. 1A). Here, we report pre-clinical and first-in-human phase I trial results of CD19 STAR-T cell therapy for CD19+ R/R B-ALL. Methods Peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells were obtained from healthy donors and patients for the pre-clinical and clinical studies, respectively. T-cells were transduced with the STAR lentiviral vector. A leukemia xenograft mouse model was used to assess the STAR T-cell antitumor function. For the clinical trial, from Dec. 2019 to Jun. 2020, 18 CD19+ R/R B-ALL patients (M/F 10:8) with a median age of 22.5 years (range: 6-68) were enrolled (NCT03953599). Patients received a conditioning regimen of IV fludarabine (25mg/m2/d) and cyclophosphamide (250mg/m2/d) for 3 days followed by a single STAR T-cell infusion. Once patients achieved complete remission (CR), they were given the option to proceed to consolidation allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) or not. Results In preclinical studies, we found CD19 STAR T-cells to be superior to conventional CAR (BBz CAR) measured by the following parameters: 1) faster/stronger T-cell activation within 3 hours (76.67±2.621% vs 46.4±9.318%; p=0.0253); 2) higher cytokine production (4100.92±174.4 pg/ml vs 2556.78±563.39 pg/ml; p<0.05, Fig.1B) ;3) superior target killing ability (effector: target [E: T] ratio=1:1, 50.39±1.74% vs 60.85±1.52%, p<0.05. E:T ratio>1:1, p<0.01, Fig.1B); 4) robust elimination of B-ALL in a xenograft mouse model, where a lower E:T ratio was sufficient to eliminate an equal number of tumor cells (E:T ratio =1:1, STAR vs. BBz-CAR, p<0.01, Fig.1C). In the phase I trial, the median observation time was 69 (20-180) days. The median pre-treatment bone marrow (BM) blast level was 7.0% (0.1%-86.6%). All 18 patients received a single infusion of STAR T-cells at a median dose of 1×106/kg (5×105/kg-2.5×106/kg): low dose (5×105/kg) (n=3), medium dose (1×106/kg) (n=8) and high-dose (2-2.5×106/kg) (n=7). Three early enrollees subsequently received a second consolidation infusion of STAR T-cells at 1×106/kg (n=2) and 2×106/kg (n=1). The median STAR T-cell production time was 9 (7-13) days with a transduction efficacy of 57.4% (41.0%-78.2%). Two weeks post STAR T-cell infusion, 18/18 (100%) patients achieved CR with a negative minimal residual disease (MRD) status. After a median of 57 (43-66) days following STAR T-cell therapy, 8/18 patients made a choice to pursue consolidation allo-HSCT and all have remained in CR after a median follow-up of 110 (75-180) days. Of the 10 patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, 1 relapsed on day 58 and died from relapse on day 63. This patient had a pre-CAR T-cell BM blast level of 86.6% with central nervous system leukemia. Another patient became MRD-positive with 0.09% blasts on day 30 per flow cytometry (FCM). The other 8 patients have remained in CR. Despite the achievement of a high CR rate, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred only in 10/18 (55.6%) patients with 8 Grade I, and 2 Grade II CRS. Two patients developed Grade III neurotoxicity. After STAR T-cell infusion, CD19 STAR T-cells in PB were followed by qPCR and FCM. We saw high in vivo proliferation and persistence regardless of the infusion dose. The median peak level was reached on day 8.5 (day 4-10) with 4.9×104 (0.104-175×104) copy number/ug PB genomic DNA detectable at 6 months. Conclusion This study demonstrates the superiority of STAR T-cells compared to conventional CAR T-cells in terms of signaling capacity, cytokine production capability and anti-tumor potency in an animal model. The Phase I first-in-human study demonstrated technical feasibility, clinical safety and efficacy of STAR-T in treating CD19+ R/R B-ALL. A high CR could be achieved on day 14 with low toxicity. Longer-term observation of these patients and studies of larger patient cohorts are warranted. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5204-5204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongxian Hu ◽  
Jingjing Feng ◽  
Mi Shao ◽  
He Huang

Abstract Background: Autologous T cells modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) has demonstrated exciting efficacy in treating leukemia and there has been some reports about the toxicities recently. However, the spectrum of capillary-leak syndrome (CLS) associated with CAR-T cell therapy has not been systematically evaluated, which can be a life threatening complication as results of the cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Therefore, as the use of CAR-T therapy continues to expand to broader applications, it is prudent to characterize the profile of CLS to help providers guide safe management. Method: We reviewed all acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients who had participated in the clinical trial from our center to receive CAR-T therapy between 2016-2018. Patients analyzed in the study received either CD19 CAR-T cells or CD19 plus CD22 CAR-T cells. The diagnosis of CLS includes edema, acute hypotension and hemoconcentration with hypoproteinemia or hypoalbuminemia. CRS grading was evaluated with Lee's criteria for CRS. Result: 42 ALL patients were included in this study with the mean age of 27(8-52) years old. 11(11/42, 26.2%) patients were diagnosed as CLS and 31 were not. It was observed that CLS was more common in patients who developed severe CRS. Patients with CLS was found to have high rate of hypotension and use of gamma globulin.(Table 1) Top level concentration of serum IL-6 in CLS patients was much higher than that in non-CLS patients (16438.7 vs 3292.7 pg/mL, p=0.0016), which is consistent with the well recognized concept of IL-6 as an indicator of CRS.(Figure 1) It is important to notice that CLS patients had lower levels of serum total protein (TP, 43.7 vs 52.8 g/L, p=0.0005) and serum albumin (ALB, 27.4 vs 33.8 g/L, p=0.0011), while the hemoglobin (HGB) concentration showed no difference, suggesting that TP and ALB might be better indicators for CLS than HGB, although hemoconcentration, hypoproteinemia and hypoalbuminemia are both important in diagnosis.(Figure 2) Moreover, there was no significant difference in age, gender, Ph type of ALL, type of CAR-T cells infused and death ratio.(Table 1) Although CRS has been reported to be related with disease burden before the therapy, our data showed no difference of it between the patients with and without CLS. Conclusion: In conclusion, we have evaluated a basic profile of CLS among CAR-T patients in our center and the study indicates that CLS warrants extra attention for patients who receive CAR-T therapy. Further investigations are required to elucidate best practices for prevention and management of CLS in CAR-T therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.



2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1947) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Kimmel ◽  
Frederick L. Locke ◽  
Philipp M. Altrock

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a remarkably effective immunotherapy that relies on in vivo expansion of engineered CAR T cells, after lymphodepletion (LD) by chemotherapy. The quantitative laws underlying this expansion and subsequent tumour eradication remain unknown. We develop a mathematical model of T cell–tumour cell interactions and demonstrate that expansion can be explained by immune reconstitution dynamics after LD and competition among T cells. CAR T cells rapidly grow and engage tumour cells but experience an emerging growth rate disadvantage compared to normal T cells. Since tumour eradication is deterministically unstable in our model, we define cure as a stochastic event, which, even when likely, can occur at variable times. However, we show that variability in timing is largely determined by patient variability. While cure events impacted by these fluctuations occur early and are narrowly distributed, progression events occur late and are more widely distributed in time. We parameterized our model using population-level CAR T cell and tumour data over time and compare our predictions with progression-free survival rates. We find that therapy could be improved by optimizing the tumour-killing rate and the CAR T cells' ability to adapt, as quantified by their carrying capacity. Our tumour extinction model can be leveraged to examine why therapy works in some patients but not others, and to better understand the interplay of deterministic and stochastic effects on outcomes. For example, our model implies that LD before a second CAR T injection is necessary.



Author(s):  
Bikash Pal ◽  
Bornika Chattaraj ◽  
Purnima Agrawal

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells or CAR T-cell therapy is a newly discovered method that has shown great promise for the global patient population to cure cancer. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells are generally prepared by removing T-cells from the patients’ blood and modifying them using genetic engineering, to express a Chimeric Antigen Receptor on their surface. The studies done so far have shown its major effectiveness against Beta-cell malignancy, ovarian carcinoma, and lymphoblastic leukemia. The therapy can cause Cytokine Release Syndrome, neurotoxicity syndrome, tumor lysis, etc. as its major adverse event. But recent improvements in the therapy has proved that these adverse events can be effectively minimized to a great extent. The future of CAR T-cell therapy is very promising and is expected to fulfil all global regulatory requirements as well as overcome any manufacturing and toxicological obstacles and become available for a large number of populations. This review is based on the overall prospects of CAR T-cell therapy, the major toxicity related problems, and the prospect of this therapy.



2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (571) ◽  
pp. eaaz6667
Author(s):  
Meixi Hao ◽  
Siyuan Hou ◽  
Weishuo Li ◽  
Kaiming Li ◽  
Lingjing Xue ◽  
...  

Treatment of solid tumors with T cell therapy has yielded limited therapeutic benefits to date. Although T cell therapy in combination with proinflammatory cytokines or immune checkpoints inhibitors has demonstrated preclinical and clinical successes in a subset of solid tumors, unsatisfactory results and severe toxicities necessitate the development of effective and safe combinatorial strategies. Here, the liposomal avasimibe (a metabolism-modulating drug) was clicked onto the T cell surface by lipid insertion without disturbing the physiological functions of the T cell. Avasimibe could be restrained on the T cell surface during circulation and extravasation and locally released to increase the concentration of cholesterol in the T cell membrane, which induced rapid T cell receptor clustering and sustained T cell activation. Treatment with surface anchor-engineered T cells, including mouse T cell receptor transgenic CD8+ T cells or human chimeric antigen receptor T cells, resulted in superior antitumor efficacy in mouse models of melanoma and glioblastoma. Glioblastoma was completely eradicated in three of the five mice receiving surface anchor-engineered chimeric antigen receptor T cells, whereas mice in other treatment groups survived no more than 64 days. Moreover, the administration of engineered T cells showed no obvious systemic side effects. These cell-surface anchor-engineered T cells hold translational potential because of their simple generation and their safety profile.



2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381983106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxiang Zhang ◽  
Lingyu Wang

T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are 2 types of adoptive T-cell therapy that genetically modify natural T cells to treat cancers. Although chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has yielded remarkable efficacy for hematological malignancies of the B-cell lineages, most solid tumors fail to respond significantly to chimeric antigen receptor T cells. T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy, on the other hand, has shown unprecedented promise in treating solid tumors and has attracted growing interest. In order to create an unbiased, comprehensive, and scientific report for this fast-moving field, we carefully analyzed all 84 clinical trials using T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy and downloaded from ClinicalTrials.gov updated by June 11, 2018. Informative features and trends were observed in these clinical trials. The number of trials initiated each year is increasing as expected, but an interesting pattern is observed. NY-ESO-1, as the most targeted antigen type, is the target of 31 clinical trials; melanoma is the most targeted cancer type and is the target of 33 clinical trials. Novel antigens and underrepresented cancers remain to be targeted in future studies and clinical trials. Unlike chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, only about 16% of the 84 clinical trials target against hematological malignancies, consistent with T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy’s high potential for solid tumors. Six pharma/biotech companies with novel T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell ideas and products were examined in this review. Multiple approaches have been utilized in these companies to increase the T-cell receptor’s affinity and efficiency and to minimize cross-reactivity. The major challenges in the development of the T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy due to tumor microenvironment were also discussed here.



2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 926-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Kagoya ◽  
Tingxi Guo ◽  
Brian Yeung ◽  
Kayoko Saso ◽  
Mark Anczurowski ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (30) ◽  
pp. 2759-2768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey L. Doran ◽  
Sanja Stevanović ◽  
Sabina Adhikary ◽  
Jared J. Gartner ◽  
Li Jia ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Genetically engineered T-cell therapy is an emerging treatment of hematologic cancers with potential utility in epithelial cancers. We investigated T-cell therapy for the treatment of metastatic human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated epithelial cancers. METHODS This phase I/II, single-center trial enrolled patients with metastatic HPV16-positive cancer from any primary tumor site who had received prior platinum-based therapy. Treatment consisted of autologous genetically engineered T cells expressing a T-cell receptor directed against HPV16 E6 (E6 T-cell receptor T cells), a conditioning regimen, and systemic aldesleukin. RESULTS Twelve patients were treated in the study. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the phase I portion. Two patients, both in the highest-dose cohort, experienced objective tumor responses. A patient with three lung metastases experienced complete regression of one tumor and partial regression of two tumors, which were subsequently resected; she has no evidence of disease 3 years after treatment. All patients demonstrated high levels of peripheral blood engraftment with E6 T-cell receptor T cells 1 month after treatment (median, 30%; range, 4% to 53%). One patient’s resistant tumor demonstrated a frameshift deletion in interferon gamma receptor 1, which mediates response to interferon gamma, an essential molecule for T-cell–mediated antitumor activity. Another patient’s resistant tumor demonstrated loss of HLA-A*02:01, the antigen presentation molecule required for this therapy. A tumor from a patient who responded to treatment did not demonstrate genetic defects in interferon gamma response or antigen presentation. CONCLUSION Engineered T cells can induce regression of epithelial cancer. Tumor resistance was observed in the context of T-cell programmed death-1 expression and defects in interferon gamma and antigen presentation pathway components. These findings have important implications for development of cellular therapy in epithelial cancers.



Author(s):  
Sasan Ghaffari ◽  
Nastaran Khalili ◽  
Nima Rezaei

AbstractCancer immunotherapy has gained attention as the supreme therapeutic modality for the treatment of various malignancies. Adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) is one of the most distinctive modalities of this therapeutic approach, which seeks to harness the potential of combating cancer cells by using autologous or allogenic tumor-specific T-cells. However, a plethora of circumstances must be optimized to produce functional, durable, and efficient T-cells. Recently, the potential of ACT has been further realized by the introduction of novel gene-editing platforms such as the CRISPR/Cas9 system; this technique has been utilized to create T-cells furnished with recombinant T-cell receptor (TCR) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that have precise tumor antigen recognition, minimal side effects and treatment-related toxicities, robust proliferation and cytotoxicity, and nominal exhaustion. Here, we aim to review and categorize the recent breakthroughs of genetically modified TCR/CAR T-cells through CRISPR/Cas9 technology and address the pearls and pitfalls of each method. In addition, we investigate the latest ongoing clinical trials that are applying CRISPR-associated TCR/CAR T-cells for the treatment of cancers.



2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 1979-1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuexin Xu ◽  
Alicia J. Morales ◽  
Michael J. Cargill ◽  
Andrea M. H. Towlerton ◽  
David G. Coffey ◽  
...  

Abstract 5T4 (trophoblast glycoprotein, TPBG) is a transmembrane tumor antigen expressed on more than 90% of primary renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and a wide range of human carcinomas but not on most somatic adult tissues. The favorable expression pattern has encouraged the development and clinical testing of 5T4-targeted antibody and vaccine therapies. 5T4 also represents a compelling and unexplored target for T-cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T-cell therapy. Our group has previously isolated high-avidity CD8+ T-cell clones specific for an HLA-A2-restricted 5T4 epitope (residues 17–25; 5T4p17). In this report, targeted single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on 5T4p17-specific T-cell clones to sequence the highly variable complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) of T-cell receptor α chain (TRA) and β chain (TRB) genes. Full-length TRA and TRB sequences were cloned into lentiviral vectors and transduced into CD8+ T-cells from healthy donors. Redirected effector T-cell function against 5T4p17 was measured by cytotoxicity and cytokine release assays. Seven unique TRA-TRB pairs were identified. All seven TCRs exhibited high expression on CD8+ T-cells with transduction efficiencies from 59 to 89%. TCR-transduced CD8+ T-cells demonstrated redirected cytotoxicity and cytokine release in response to 5T4p17 on target-cells and killed 5T4+/HLA-A2+ kidney-, breast-, and colorectal-tumor cell lines as well as primary RCC tumor cells in vitro. TCR-transduced CD8+ T-cells also detected presentation of 5T4p17 in TAP1/2-deficient T2 target-cells. TCR-transduced T-cells redirected to recognize the 5T4p17 epitope from a broadly shared tumor antigen are of interest for future testing as a cellular immunotherapy strategy for HLA-A2+ subjects with 5T4+ tumors.



2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (21) ◽  
pp. eaaz3223 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Lindner ◽  
S. M. Johnson ◽  
C. E. Brown ◽  
L. D. Wang

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the care of refractory B cell malignancies and holds tremendous promise for many aggressive tumors. Despite overwhelming scientific, clinical, and public interest in this rapidly expanding field, fundamental inquiries into CAR T cell mechanistic functioning are still in their infancy. Because CAR T cells are manufactured from donor T lymphocytes, and because CARs incorporate well-characterized T cell signaling components, it has largely been assumed that CARs signal analogously to canonical T cell receptors (TCRs). However, recent studies demonstrate that many aspects of CAR signaling are unique, distinct from endogenous TCR signaling, and potentially even distinct among various CAR constructs. Thus, rigorous and comprehensive proteomic investigations are required for rational engineering of improved CARs. Here, we review what is known about proximal CAR signaling in T cells, compare it to conventional TCR signaling, and outline unmet challenges to improving CAR T cell therapy.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document