scholarly journals Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Vs. Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH) for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors or Secondary Brain Metastases

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Lee ◽  
Frank Oley ◽  
Mimi Lo ◽  
Richard Fong ◽  
Mary McGann ◽  
...  

Background: Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies is challenging as there is an increased risk of recurrent VTE and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have historically been the standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for CAT treatment, but patients with CNS malignancies have limited representation in the supporting clinical trials. This multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to LMWH for CAT in patients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases. Patients/Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, adult patients with a diagnosis of primary brain tumor or secondary brain metastases who received either a DOAC or LMWH for CAT were evaluated. The primary outcome was the incidence of any bleeding event within a 6-month period following the initiation of anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of recurrent VTE events, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and minor bleeding, within a 6-month period following the initiation of anticoagulation. Patients were excluded if their indication for anticoagulation was stroke, non-cancer-associated VTE, or VTE prophylaxis, were on LMWH for one week or less while bridging to warfarin, or received a diagnosis of VTE at an outside hospital. All bleeding events were defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for non-parametric continuous variables. Results: Between January 1, 2012 to October 9, 2019, one-hundred eleven patients met inclusion criteria. Of the patients who met inclusion criteria, 26 (23.4%) patients had primary brain tumors and 85 (76.6%) patients had secondary brain metastases. Bleeding events occurred in 7 of 55 patients (12.7%) in the DOAC group compared to 13 of 56 (23.2%) patients in the LMWH group (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.27). Recurrent VTE events occurred in 3 of 55 (5.5%) patients in the DOAC group compared to 3 of 56 (5.4%) patients in the LMWH group (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.21-4.83). Major bleeding occurred in 3 of 55 (5.5%) patients in the DOAC group, compared to 4 of 56 (7.1%) patients in the LMWH group (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.18-3.26). There were no differences in the rates of CRNMB and rates of minor bleeding between groups. Conclusion: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, therapeutic anticoagulation with DOACs showed no significant difference in bleeding events or recurrent VTE events when compared to LMWH, in patients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases. We conclude that DOACs may be potentially safe and efficacious for VTE treatment in patients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases. As prescribing practices are expected to continue to shift towards DOACs, this study provides preliminary evidence of the safety of DOACs in this high-bleeding risk patient population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2009 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven W. Hwang ◽  
Mohab M. Abozed ◽  
Andrew Hale ◽  
Rebecca L. Eisenberg ◽  
Tomas Dvorak ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guowei Zhang ◽  
Ruirui Cheng ◽  
Huijuan Wang ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Xiangtao Yan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110250
Author(s):  
Eric M. Coons ◽  
Britta A. Staubes ◽  
Ashley L. Casey ◽  
Stephanie A. Elagizi-Youssef ◽  
Alaa E. Mohammed ◽  
...  

Background Evidence for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cirrhosis is limited. Few patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class B and C cirrhosis have been studied. Objective To compare major bleeding rates in patients with cirrhosis receiving a DOAC versus warfarin. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adults with cirrhosis receiving a DOAC versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism, portal-vein thrombosis, or atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was the rate of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included time to major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, all bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and new thromboembolic events. The study was approved by the Ochsner Health System Institutional Review Board. Results A total of 44 patients receiving a DOAC and 41 patients receiving warfarin were included. Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients receiving a DOAC and 6 patients receiving warfarin (9.1% vs 14.6%; P = 0.881). Rates of major bleeding were similar in 24 DOAC and 17 warfarin patients with CTP Class B (4.2% vs 17.6%; P = 0.37) and 8 DOAC and 9 warfarin patients with CTP Class C (37.5% vs 11.1%; P = 0.41) cirrhosis. Secondary bleeding and efficacy outcomes were similar between cohorts. The study was limited by a small sample size. Conclusion and Relevance Treatment with DOACs in patients with cirrhosis was associated with a similar rate of major bleeding compared with warfarin. Inclusion of CTP class C patients in future studies remains valuable to evaluate safety and efficacy of DOACs in this population.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 2264-2268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge I. Quintero ◽  
Laura L. Cárdenas ◽  
Mónica Navas ◽  
Maria P. Bautista ◽  
Guillermo A. Bonilla ◽  
...  

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1405
Author(s):  
Chin-Hsiao Tseng

Background: The risk of benign brain tumors (BBT) associated with metformin use has not received much attention. Therefore, a retrospective cohort study was designed to investigate such an association in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: We used the database of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance to enroll 152,176 ever users and 16,120 never users of metformin for the follow-up of incidence of BBT and a more specific outcome of cerebral meningioma. The patients were newly diagnosed with T2DM between 1999 and 2005; and they were followed up from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2011. Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. Results: During follow-up, 111 never users and 557 ever users were diagnosed with BBT. For BBT, the respective incidence rates for never users and ever users were 153.95 per 100,000 person-years and 77.61 per 100,000 person-years. While ever users were compared to never users, the hazard ratio was 0.502 (95% confidence interval: 0.409–0.615). A dose-response pattern was seen when ever users were categorized into tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (cutoffs: <27.10 months, 27.10–58.27 months and >58.27 months) with respective hazard ratios of 0.910 (0.728–1.138), 0.475 (0.375–0.602) and 0.243 (0.187–0.315). For cerebral meningioma, the overall hazard ratio was 0.506 (0.317–0.808); and the hazard ratios comparing the respective tertiles to never users were 0.895 (0.531–1.508), 0.585 (0.346–0.988) and 0.196 (0.104–0.369). Conclusions: A reduced risk of BBT and cerebral meningioma is observed in metformin users in patients with T2DM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document