scholarly journals A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Navitoclax Plus Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myelofibrosis (TRANSFORM-2)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Kimberley Dilley ◽  
Jason Harb ◽  
Muhammad Jalaluddin ◽  
Jessica E. Hutti ◽  
Jalaja Potluri
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers a potential cure, most patients remain ineligible; other therapies, including approved JAK inhibitors (JAKi), do not control the broad array of manifestations associated with MF. Navitoclax is a potent, small molecule inhibitor of the antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) family members BCL-XL, BCL-2, and BCL-w and has been shown to potently enhance cytotoxicity of chemotherapy and radiation in cells derived from multiple tumor types. Preclinical data indicate that navitoclax may overcome JAK2 inhibitor resistance. Preliminary data from a Phase 2 study (NCT03222609) of navitoclax with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2i, for patients with primary or secondary MF who have previously received ruxolitinib suggest favorable spleen response rates and an acceptable safety profile (Harrison et al. EHA 2020. EP1081). TRANSFORM-2 aims to evaluate the combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib vs best available therapy (BAT) in adults with relapsed or refractory MF that is resistant to JAK2 inhibition. Study Design and Methods: This Phase 3, open-label study (NCT04468984) is designed to recruit patients aged ≥18 years with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, measurable splenomegaly, and who are experiencing MF-related symptoms. Patients must have received a single prior JAK2i for ≥24 weeks that was stopped due to lack of efficacy or for <24 weeks with disease progression while on therapy. Candidates for allo-HSCT, patients who have received prior treatment with a BH3-mimetic compound or >1 prior JAK2i, and patients with platelets <100 × 109/L will be excluded. The study will be conducted at approximately 173 sites in 23 countries. The planned sample size is 330 patients. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either navitoclax plus ruxolitinib, or BAT. Navitoclax will be administered orally at a starting dose of 200 mg (platelet count >150 × 109/L) or 100 mg escalated to 200 mg once daily if tolerated after ≥7 days (platelet count ≤150 × 109/L); navitoclax may be increased to 300 mg once daily after Week 25 Day 1 at the investigator's discretion, based on platelet count for patients with suboptimal spleen response; ruxolitinib will be administered orally at the prior stable dose if on ruxolitinib at study entry or at a dose of 10 mg twice daily if no longer on ruxolitinib. BAT options include hydroxyurea, interferon, ruxolitinib, fedratinib, or danazol, which will be administered at standard doses. Randomization stratification will be by region (US vs Japan vs EU vs rest of world), by Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System Plus score at randomization (intermediate-2 vs high risk), and by stable ruxolitinib dosing at randomization vs not on ruxolitinib/JAK2i. Treatment can continue until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation criteria have been met; disease assessments will be performed after 12 and 24 weeks even if discontinuing therapy, after which patients will enter posttreatment follow-up (discontinuation without progression) or survival follow-up (after progression). The primary endpoint is ≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline (SVR35) at Week 24, measured by magnetic resonance imaging, per International Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include ≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24, SVR35, duration of SVR35, change in fatigue from baseline, time to deterioration of physical functioning, anemia response, overall survival, leukemia-free survival, overall response, composite response, and reduction in grade of bone marrow fibrosis from baseline. Safety will be assessed via adverse event (AE) monitoring, physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiogram variables, and clinical laboratory testing. AEs will be graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v5.0. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint and binary secondary endpoints will be conducted using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Time-to-event secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a stratified log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios will be estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Disclosures Dilley: AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Harb:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Jalaluddin:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Hutti:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Potluri:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. OffLabel Disclosure: Navitoclax is an investigational drug for the treatment of myelofibrosis

Obinutuzumab or Rituximab Plus CHOP in Patients with Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results from an Open-Label, Randomized Phase 3 Study (GOYA)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 470-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
Marek Trněný ◽  
David Belada ◽  
Angelo M Carella ◽  
Neil Chua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Rituximab (R) plus CHOP (R-CHOP) is standard-of-care treatment for previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Approximately 35-40% of patients (pts) will relapse following R-CHOP, and outcomes with salvage therapy remain poor. Obinutuzumab (GA101; GAZYVA/GAZYVARO; G) is a glycoengineered, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with greater direct cell death induction and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity/phagocytosis activity than R. In the Phase 2 GATHER study (NCT01414855), G plus CHOP (G-CHOP) demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in pts with advanced untreated DLBCL. GOYA (NCT01287741) is an open-label, multicenter, randomized Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of G-CHOP with R-CHOP in pts with previously untreated DLBCL. GOYA was sponsored by Roche with scientific support from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥18 years and had adequate hematologic function, ≥1 bi-dimensionally measurable lesion, an ECOG performance status (PS) of ≤2 and an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of ≥2 (high, high-intermediate or low-intermediate risk). Low-risk pts with an IPI score of 1 (but not due to age alone) or with an IPI score of 0 with bulky disease (one lesion ≥7.5cm) were also eligible. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive 8 (21-day) cycles of G (1000mg i.v. on Days [D] 1, 8, and 15, Cycle [C] 1 and D1, C2-8) or R (375mg/m2 i.v. on D1, C1-8) in combination with 6 or 8 cycles of CHOP (number of cycles preplanned in advance for all pts at each site). Preplanned radiotherapy was allowed for bulky or extranodal disease. The primary endpoint was investigator (INV)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS); for the target hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, the 3-year PFS was expected to improve from 60% to 68%. Secondary endpoints included: PFS assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC); overall survival (OS); complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR) with or without PET (assessed by INV or IRC according to modified Cheson 2007 criteria); and safety. Results: 1418 pts were randomized to study treatment: 706 to G-CHOP and 712 to R-CHOP. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the G-CHOP and R-CHOP arms: mean age, 62.0 years in both arms; ECOG PS ≥2, 12% vs. 14%; IPI score ≥3, 47% vs. 43%; Ann Arbor stage III-IV, 76% in both arms. Cell-of-origin distribution, as assessed by gene-expression profiling (NanoString), was similar in both treatment groups (GCB: 58% [271/471] G-CHOP, 58% [269/462] R-CHOP; ABC: 27% [125/471] G-CHOP, 26% [118/462] R-CHOP; Unclassified: 15.9% [75/471] G-CHOP, 16.2% [75/462] R-CHOP). For the primary endpoint of INV-assessed PFS, there was no significant difference between G-CHOP and R-CHOP (3-year PFS, 69% vs. 66%; stratified HR, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76, 1.12; p=0.3868; Table). Secondary endpoints, including PFS by IRC, OS, and end-of-treatment ORR/CR rate (with and without PET), were consistent with the primary endpoint, with no clinically meaningful differences observed between the treatment arms (Table). In a prespecified subgroup analysis of INV-assessed PFS, a stratified HR of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.50, 1.01) in favor of G-CHOP over R-CHOP was determined for pts with GCB DLBCL (3-year PFS, 79% vs. 70%). No new safety signals were identified. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs; 74% vs. 65%) and serious AEs (43% vs. 38%) were more common in the G-CHOP than in the R-CHOP arm. Grade ≥3 AEs of particular interest that were numerically more common with G-CHOP than R-CHOP included neutropenia (57% vs. 48%), infusion-related reactions (45% vs. 32%), infections (54% vs. 44%), and thrombocytopenia (8% vs. 3%). AEs resulting in withdrawal from treatment (12% [84/704] G-CHOP; 9% [60/703] R-CHOP) and AEs with fatal outcome (6% [41/704] G-CHOP; 4% [30/703] R-CHOP) were slightly more common with G-CHOP. The most common AEs leading to death were pneumonia (5 G-CHOP; 6 R-CHOP) and sepsis/septic shock (7 G-CHOP; 3 R-CHOP). Conclusions: The primary endpoint of this study was not met: G-CHOP did not significantly improve INV-assessed PFS compared with R-CHOP in previously untreated pts with DLBCL. No unexpected safety signals were identified. Further investigation of outcomes in subgroups is planned. Disclosures Vitolo: Gilead: Other: Honoraria for lectures; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Takeda: Other: Honoraria for lectures. Trněný:Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Celgene: Research Funding. Belada:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chua:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Lundbeck: Consultancy. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Kim:Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pinto:Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Helssin: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Burke:Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel Expenses; Millenium: Consultancy. Oestergaard:Roche: Employment. Wenger:Genentech: Employment. Fingerle-Rowson:F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Employment. Catalani:Roche: Employment. Nielsen:Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Sehn:roche/genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study Evaluating Navitoclax in Combination with Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis (TRANSFORM-1)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Jalaja Potluri ◽  
Jason Harb ◽  
Abdullah A. Masud ◽  
Jessica E. Hutti
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Marrow Fibrosis

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm with poor clinical outcomes. It is characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and an array of constitutional symptoms that impair quality of life. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potential curative therapy for MF, but HSCT is only accessible to a minority of patients and is associated with high morbidity and high rates of transplant-related mortality. JAK inhibitors (JAKi), including the JAK1/2i ruxolitinib and JAK2i fedratinib, are approved for the treatment of primary and secondary MF based on reduction in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms; however, they have little impact on bone marrow fibrosis and are not effective at managing all clinical manifestations of MF. Therefore, a substantial clinical need for novel therapies to improve the disease course of MF exists. Navitoclax is an oral, potent, small-molecule inhibitor of the antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) family proteins BCL-XL, BCL-2, and BCL-w and has demonstrated cell-killing activity in myeloproliferative neoplasm-derived cell lines and primary specimens ex vivo. Preliminary data from a Phase 2 study (NCT03222609) of ruxolitinib-experienced patients with primary or secondary MF have shown favorable spleen responses and tolerability with navitoclax plus ruxolitinib (Harrison et al. EHA 2020. EP1081). TRANSFORM-1 aims to evaluate the combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib vs placebo and ruxolitinib in adults with primary or secondary MF who have not previously received a JAK2i. Study Design and Methods: In this Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04472598), patients aged ≥18 years with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF with measurable splenomegaly, evidence of MF-related symptoms, no prior treatment with JAK2i, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score ≤2 will be eligible for enrollment. Candidates for allo-HSCT and those who have received prior treatment with a BH3-mimetic compound or BET inhibitor will be excluded. Patients will be enrolled across 130 sites in approximately 17 countries. Planned target enrollment is 230 patients. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive navitoclax or placebo, plus ruxolitinib. Randomization stratification factors include intermediate-2 vs high-risk MF and platelet count ≤200 × 109/L vs >200 × 109/L. Navitoclax will be administered orally at a starting dose of 200 mg (platelet count >150 × 109/L) or 100 mg escalated to 200 mg once daily if tolerated after ≥7 days (platelet count ≤150 × 109/L). Ruxolitinib will be administered orally at a starting dose of 20 mg (platelet count >200 × 109/L) or 15 mg (platelet count 100-200 × 109/L) twice daily. Treatment may continue until the end of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation criteria have been met. Patients who discontinue without progression will enter post-treatment follow-up; after disease progression or initiation of post-treatment cancer therapy, patients will enter survival follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study is ≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline (SVR35) at Week 24, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, per International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Secondary endpoints include ≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24 (measured by Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v4.0), duration of SVR35, change in fatigue from baseline, time to deterioration of physical functioning, anemia response per IWG criteria, SVR35 per IWG, reduction in grade of bone marrow fibrosis from baseline, overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and overall response and composite response per IWG criteria. Exploratory endpoints include progression-free survival. Safety will be assessed throughout the study via adverse event (AE) monitoring, physical examinations, vital sign measurements, electrocardiogram variables, and clinical laboratory testing. AEs will be graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v5.0. The primary statistical analysis will be conducted using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, and time-to-event secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a stratified log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios will be estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Disclosures Potluri: AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Harb:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Masud:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options . Hutti:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. OffLabel Disclosure: Navitoclax is an investigational drug for the treatment of myelofibrosis

A randomized phase II/III study of naptumomab estafenatox plus IFN-α versus IFN-α in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3073-3073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Hawkins ◽  
Martin Eric Gore ◽  
Yaroslav Shparyk ◽  
Vladimir Bondar ◽  
Oleg Gladkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
To Receive

3073 Background: Naptumomab estafenatox/ANYARA (Nap) is a fusion protein of an antibody (5T4) and a superantigen (SEA/E-120). After phase I studies (Borghaei. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27:4116) a prospective, randomized phase II/III trial of Nap + IFN-α (A) vs IFN-α (I) was conducted. Methods: Patients (pts) with RCC were randomized in an open label study to receive A or I. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, response rate and safety. Baseline (bl) plasma IL-6 was predictive of pazopanib (Tran. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13:827) and MVA-5T4 vaccine (Harrop. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012, 61:2283) benefit in RCC pts. IL-6 and anti-SEA/E-120 antibodies (a-S) were analyzed. A subgroup SG1 had bl levels below median for IL-6 (<7 pg/ml) and a-S. Another subgroup SG2 had IL-6 below 13 pg/ml (Tran. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13:827) and excluding upper quartile of a-S according to phase 1 levels (Borghaei. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27:4116). Results: From 5/2007 to 10/2010 513 pts were treated (ITT) with a median follow-up time for censored pts of 43 months. Unexpectedly, pts in certain territories had increased bl a-S (median of 61 pmol/ml in Russia vs 34 in UK). The table summarizes efficacy results. The primary endpoint was not met. Multivariate analysis adjusted for risk scores and subsequent TKI usage verified Nap benefit in pts with low IL-6 and normal a-S. Nap was well tolerated. Pyrexia (A:46%/I:18%), nausea (21%/11%), back pain (18%/6%), vomiting (16%/7%) and chills (12%/4%) were more common after Nap. Conclusions: The study did not meet primary endpoint. In pts with low IL-6 and normal levels of a-S, addition of Nap to IFN-α improves OS and PFS. The results warrant further studies with Nap in sequence or combo with e.g. TKIs in this subgroup. More generally, as bl IL-6 appears to be prognostic and predictive of outcome on treatment with TKIs and immunotherapies this may be a stratification factor for RCC studies. Clinical trial information: NCT00420888. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals OR23-07 Results From the Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled CHIASMA OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients with Acromegaly

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Leanne Samson ◽  
Lisa B Nachtigall ◽  
Maria Fleseriu ◽  
Murray B Gordon ◽  
William Henry Ludlam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Reference Range ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Many patients taking long-acting somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) injections as first-line medical therapy in acromegaly report limitations, including ongoing disease symptoms especially near injection cycle end and injection site pain. Oral octreotide capsules may provide an alternative to monthly injections. The phase 3 Octreotide capsules versus Placebo Treatment In MultinationAL centers (OPTIMAL) study assessed efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules in patients with acromegaly controlled on injectable SRLs. A multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 56 adult patients with active acromegaly. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age, had evidence of active disease (IGF-I ≥ 1.3 x ULN ≥3 months after last pituitary surgery), and an average IGF-I ≤ 1.0 x ULN on a stable dose of SRL injections (octreotide or lanreotide). At baseline (1 month following the last injection), patients were randomized to receive octreotide capsule or placebo (28 per group) for 36 weeks, followed by an optional open-label oral octreotide extension. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining biochemical response, defined as IGF-I ≤ 1.0 x ULN (2-value average at weeks 34 and 36). Secondary endpoints included need for rescue with injectable SRLs, GH response (GH &lt; 2.5 ng/mL), and time to loss of IGF-I response (IGF-I &gt;1.0 and ≥ 1.3x ULN for 2 consecutive visits). Safety and tolerability were assessed. The primary endpoint was met, as 58% of patients receiving octreotide capsules maintained IGF-I response vs 19% receiving placebo (P=0.008). Mean IGF-I levels in patients receiving octreotide capsules were within the reference range at treatment end (0.97 x ULN) vs patients receiving placebo (1.69 x ULN). All secondary endpoints were met. Of patients receiving octreotide capsules, 75% completed 36 weeks without need for rescue therapy. However, 68% of the placebo group required rescue therapy. GH response was maintained at week 36 in a significantly larger proportion of patients receiving octreotide capsules than placebo (78% vs 30%; P=0.001). Median time to loss of IGF-I response was not reached by the end of the study for patients receiving octreotide capsules vs 16 weeks for the placebo group (P &lt;0.0001). Five patients in the placebo group had IGF-I levels in the reference range at the end of 36 weeks. Only 2 (7% of placebo group) did not meet loss of response criteria anytime throughout the study. Octreotide capsules were safe and well tolerated; no new/unexpected safety signals were observed. Most patients (55/56) experienced at least one treatment emergent adverse event; most were mild or moderate in intensity. Overall, 90% of patients who completed the trial on octreotide capsules opted to enter the open label extension phase. These phase 3 data demonstrate octreotide capsules to be potentially safe and effective for the treatment of adults with acromegaly.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Caplacizumab in Japanese Patients with Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (iTTP): An Open-Label, Phase 2/3 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Miyakawa ◽  
Kazunori Imada ◽  
Satoshi Ichikawa ◽  
Hitoji Uchiyama ◽  
Yasunori Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Immune Mediated

Abstract Introduction Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), or acquired TTP (aTTP), is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy that requires prompt treatment to improve patient outcomes. Caplacizumab is a von Willebrand factor (VWF)-directed antibody fragment that rapidly inhibits VWF-platelet interaction and prevents microthrombi formation in iTTP. Based on efficacy and safety demonstrated in the Phase 3 HERCULES trial, caplacizumab, in conjunction with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression, is approved in the USA and EU for aTTP. The aim of this Phase 2/3 study (NCT04074187), conducted in Japan, was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab in Japanese patients with iTTP. Methods Japanese patients aged ≥18 years with a clinical diagnosis of iTTP who had received ≤1 TPE were enrolled in this single-arm, open-label study. Patients received caplacizumab in conjunction with TPE and immunosuppression, during daily TPE, and for ≥30 days after discontinuation of TPE. Treatment extension was allowed for ≤8 weeks in case of persistent ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) deficiency defined by the investigator and patients were followed for 4 weeks after end of caplacizumab treatment. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a recurrence of iTTP during the overall study period, assessed in the per-protocol (PP) population; recurrence rate ≤20% was the success criterion. Key secondary endpoints were assessed in the PP and modified intention-to-treat (mITT) populations. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed in the safety population. PP population included patients who completed treatment and follow-up per protocol or had a recurrence of iTTP; mITT and safety populations included patients with ≥1 dose of caplacizumab. All analyses were descriptive. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results A total of 21 patients were enrolled and treated with caplacizumab; 6 patients discontinued (adverse event: n=2, physician decision: n=4), and 15 patients were included in the PP population. In the mITT population, median age (range) was 59 (22-86) years; 16 (76%) patients presented with an initial episode; median (range) platelet count at baseline was 21.5 (8-78) ×10 9/L;10 (48%) patients received rituximab; median duration (range) of caplacizumab exposure during the overall treatment period was 35 (7-69) days. All patients in the PP population had ADAMTS13 activity &lt;10%. During the overall study period, 1 (7%) patient experienced iTTP recurrence. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to platelet count response was 2.79 (1.76-3.59) days. Additional efficacy endpoints are shown in Table 1. The most common TEAEs were constipation and insomnia, reported in 43% and 29% of patients, respectively (Table 2); 2 treatment-emergent TE events were reported, cerebral infarction and deep vein thrombosis, in 1 patient each. One patient had a treatment-related serious bleeding event of pulmonary alveolar hemorrhage. No deaths occurred during the overall study period (treatment and follow-up). Conclusions In Japanese patients with iTTP, caplacizumab in conjunction with TPE and immunosuppression was associated with a low rate of recurrence of iTTP and fast normalization of platelet count and organ damage markers. These findings are comparable to those in the HERCULES study, in which caplacizumab was associated with 12% recurrence rate and median (95% CI) time to platelet count normalization of 2.69 (1.89-2.83) days (Scully M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380 [4]:335-346). Caplacizumab was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were identified in the Japanese population. Funding This research was funded by Sanofi. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Miyakawa: Sanofi: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; argenx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Imada: Celgene Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K.: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Honoraria. Ichikawa: Sanofi: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria. Handa: Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Ono: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; MSD: Research Funding; Shionogi: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Matsushita: Shire/Takeda: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational and investigational support; CSL Behring: Honoraria; JB: Honoraria; KMB: Honoraria; Nichiyaku: Honoraria; Octapharm: Honoraria; Sysmex: Honoraria; Baltaxa/Shire/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational and investigational support; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kirin: Honoraria. Hashimoto: Sanofi KK: Current Employment, Other: May hold shares and/or stock options. Ohshima: Sanofi KK: Current Employment, Other: May hold shares and/or stock options. Tahara: Sanofi KK: Current Employment, Other: May hold shares and/or stock options. Tanaka: Sanofi KK: Current Employment, Other: May hold shares and/or stock options. Matsumoto: Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Alexion Pharma: Consultancy; Asahi Kasei Pharma: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Alfesa Pharma: Patents & Royalties: ELISA for measuring ADAMTS13 activity.

scholarly journals Nurse-based secondary preventive follow-up by telephone reduced recurrence of cardiovascular events: a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Lotta Irewall ◽  
Anders Ulvenstam ◽  
Anna Graipe ◽  
Joachim Ögren ◽  
Thomas Mooe
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractEnhanced follow-up is needed to improve the results of secondary preventive care in patients with established cardiovascular disease. We examined the effect of long-term, nurse-based, secondary preventive follow-up by telephone on the recurrence of cardiovascular events. Open, randomised, controlled trial with two parallel groups. Between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, consecutive patients (n = 1890) admitted to hospital due to stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were included. Participants were randomised (1:1) to nurse-based telephone follow-up (intervention, n = 944) or usual care (control, n = 946) and followed until 31 December 2017. The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac revascularisation, and cardiovascular death. The individual components of the primary endpoint, TIA, and all-cause mortality were analysed as secondary endpoints. The assessment of outcome events was blinded to study group assignment. After a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, 22.7% (n = 214) of patients in the intervention group and 27.1% (n = 256) in the control group reached the primary composite endpoint (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.97; ARR 4.4%, 95% CI 0.5–8.3). Secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between groups. Nurse-based secondary preventive follow-up by telephone reduced the recurrence of cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document